Captain’s Log, Stardate 06
More Particles of Space
Particle Phi-21
INDEX
- BBC2 Sky at Night – more defective/misleading 'science'
- Missing Plane- MH370 – alternative explanation?
- Crimea – legitimate self-determination
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.,
________________
BBC4 Sky at Night – more defective/misleading 'science'
Presenters Maggie Aderin-Pocock & Chris Lintott (Sky at Night, March 2014), along with guests: Lucie Green (Mullard), Bill Chaplain (Birmingham), Sarah Bridle (Manchester), Tim O'Brien (Jodrell) presented argument that the 'sounds' of space could be heard.
They pointed out that sound cannot travel through space but explained (to effect) that one could convert the activities within solar bodies into sounds – and one could hear the noise of the sun (for example).
This is entirely misleading – and suggests that Pocock, Lintott & guests were simply trying to 'justify' alternative ways of falsely maintaining that light is frequency based, and of other erroneous theories flowing therefrom, such as Big Bang – there is NO valid science foundation of light to frequency attribution*.
Nevertheless they claim to have converted various radiations into 'sound'.
There is a very simple test that one can do to disprove this claim, and that is to visit an arc furnace in operation – one can get an idea (the sound is not great quality) from an arc furnace in New Zealand (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G6Uxh-xtU-g)
One can also listen to a nuclear bomb exploding – the sun is a massive nuclear bomb – the converted 'sounds' (which, as we know from pop songs, can be distorted to achieve whatever sounds we desire) of the sun do not sound remotely like a nuclear bomb.
Viewing BBC http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p01th5y9 – Lucie Green demonstrates salt vibrating on a metal plate vibrated with a violin/'cello bow & sounds from the plate – this demonstration ignores that the shape of the plate & its material characteristics largely determines the vibrations, hence the sounds – so the salt patterns do not directly correlate to the sounds that one hears despite the plate & the bow both causing the two distinctly separate phenomena, there is an indirect correlation – i.e. the patterns are INDEPENDENT of the sounds (the salt does not largely cause the sound, and vice versa – i.e. they are not themselves the cause/effect relationships)
It follows that it is entirely misleading to argue that one can 'hear' the 'sounds' coming from space – because although we see patterns and/or observe particles in motion on planets/stars we do not know the characteristics of the star/planet hence cannot know what sounds would occur (were an atmosphere present)
It is as misleading/erroneous as Einstein’s Relativity & Energy theories, as erroneous as Hubble’s expanding universe, as erroneous as Higgs boson.
Pocock, Lintott & other scientists still have not openly acknowledged that Newton's Opticks are wrong – consequently they maintain dishonesty.
Scientists have not yet explained how to interpret that which Hubble wrongly interpreted as 'red shift' and from which he claimed 'expanding universe' – once this misinterpretation is properly understood it will become clear that the claim of 'expanding universe' has no foundation (at least insofar as it exceeding even 1/000th of speed c)
It is up for grabs, as new science, the explaining of what Hubble misinterpreted as 'red shift' – even schoolchildren can reason this.
These erroneous theories have arisen because of Newton’s errors – and which wrongly gained massive Momentum when Michelson-Morley wrongly argued 'no ether' on the basis of a failed experiment that was grossly flawed in concept, because they had not recognised Newton's Opticks were wrong.
Sound is a (unique) phenomenon that we experience within earth's atmosphere because of particles vibrating within a body/region causing air particles to vibrate, and thus propagate, and impact upon our ears – this is sound! Sound is NOT electro-magnetic radiation in itself (as such, although since an ether exists sound must be of electro-magnetic foundation, as all & everything in the Universe is held together by & functions because of the ether)
It is perfectly acceptable to use analogies to assist in explaining certain phenomena – but it is totally wrong to use analogies to distort & mislead – and that is what Pocock, Lintott, Green, O'Brien, Bridle, Chaplain are doing – purposefully misleading/deceiving people. By not informing viewers that Newton, Einstein etc. are wrong; by wrongly maintaining Big Bang; etc.
And that is what BBC (& media in general) is all about – lies & deceptions.
*Newton's opticks are wrong, white light is not split out into the rainbow pattern, the patterns are 2 distinct sets of side-band patterns (r&y, v&b) that occur at the apexes of prisms, and is observed because every-other-which-way light is filtered out thus enabling us to see the patterns, the colours are arc-angle related not frequency related, there is no evidence of frequency attribution, it was merely assumed
See Captain’s Log Stardate 06 – Particle Sigma-18 Formal Application to Royal Society, Royal Irish Academy etc. - Academia is in hostile denial.
---
Missing Plane- MH370 -
It should not be overlooked, the possibility (probability?) that MH370 was remotely hijacked.
Retrofitting of devices/software with pre-programmed flight, disconnection of comms, etc. is a real possibility, with perhaps facilities for hijackers to downstream information/data/instructions via satellite as & when was necessary – such an approach would require minimal connection time, even for programming routes.
If this possibility is correct it ups the stakes of hacking & hijacking
---
Crimea
Foreign Secretaries John Kerry (USA) & William Hague (UK) have made much noise over Crimea's Referendum (March 16) and of Russia's acceptance of Crimea's annexation into Russia – Kerry & Hague argue violation of International Law but do not categorically state which law/s.
Whilst International Law is there to provide protections is is NOT there to impose imprisonment on peoples who wish to self-determine their reasonable futures.
At best it is correct to say that the Referendum was illegitimate insofar as a final determination – but that would simply require UN oversight of a full & fair Referendum, as the past Referendum justifies this – the outcome of the past Referendum suggests that a UN controlled Referendum would produce the same result.
USA & UK are simply upping the aggression by maintaining an unreasonable position (of wrongfully claiming unlawful land-grab); and those in Ukraine are failing to respect the rights of those in Crimea.
(This must be contrasted with USA & UK refusal to object to Gauteng's unconstitutional/unlawful land-grab, without any due lawful process of any sort, of the Broederstroom area of North West Province in South Africa – a matter still with SA Constitutional Court & Public Protector)
As stressed before – Russia does not want to become another concentration camp to western Economy Terrorism – many African/Asian/SAmerican nations are grossly impoverished such that they are essentially Auschwitz style concentration camps – but far more efficient in starving people to death.
Russia was devastated by USA 'economics experts' post wall-collapse – USA/UK/Euroland refuse to put a stop to corporate Organised Crime that aggregates globally into Economy Terrorism – consequently Russia must protect itself as best it can.
Nevertheless the extent of aggression from Russia, and the tragic killing of a Ukrainian(?) soldier was totally unwarranted.
The rise of Russian oligarchs (for example) was directly attributable to USA policies imposed post wall-collapse. A similar kind of fate awaits UK pensioners when PM Cameron plays to corporate Organised Crime by allowing pensioners to unwittingly commit financial suicide, by means of accessing al their pension savings at retirement. We can see how Richard Branson is squandering defrauded employee pensions on his space missions – Branson is unlawfully protected from prosecution by Met Police & CPS – but Branson is nonetheless small-fry in the scale of global corporate Organised Crime.
It is corporate Organised Crime (Economy Terrorism) which invaded Russia, and against which Putin is standing (this is no to to suggest that Putin is an aggrieved innocent)
It requires Economy Engineering to solve the underlying problems that brought about the collapse of Ukraine (Libya, Egypt, Syria, etc.) - which are identical to the collapse of western economies - politics is simply the incompetent mismanagement (often purposeful) of economies by elected people who have no economy engineering insights.
Chris Addington Pr.Eng.
##### End of Particle Phi-21 #####