Captain’s Log, Stardate 06

 

More Particles of Space

 

Particle Upsilon-20

 

 

Illogic 'Logic' → and its Consequences

 

Index:

Introduction

 

Joy of Logic (BBC)

- Zip programme

- 3 Logicians & Barman

- Mathematica Principia, Whitehead & Russell

 

Stargazing Live BBC2

 

Irish Meteorological Society – Custom House – Jan 23, 2014

- Weather Climate & Tourism – Nichola Salmon NUIM

- Wave Energy – Prof Frederic Dias UCD

 

Pluto – a planet it its own right

 

Monty Hall: 3 Boxes: 2 Goats & 1 Car

 

BBC4 The Code of Life: DNA development: A&B diffraction patterns, etc.

 

Richard Dawkins 'The Magic of Reality'

 

RIA Discourse - Gender Research in Home & Workplace, Paul Seabright – Jan 13, 2014

 

RIA Seminar – New Horizons in the Humanities – Jan 30, 2014

 

Consequences of Illogic

 

______________________

 

Introduction:

Science which is supposed to be Logic, because Nature functions logically everywhere, there being no place known otherwise, has become largely Illogic.

That we do not know much about Nature and, moreover, that much of what we think we know about Nature is wrong, does not mean that Nature is Illogic.

Illogic is behind global economy chaos that is worsening despite claims of recovery in progress.

The greatest acid-test of the catastrophic failure of western 'democratic' forces bringing stability to an unstable nation was in the 1990s, with SA's transition from Apartheid State to Constitutional State, initially under Nelson Mandela.

Nelson Mandela (according to UK Guardian paper): 'If you want to make peace with your enemy, you have to work with your enemy. Then he becomes your partner.'

Unfortunately the partnership amongst SAfricans, including Nelson, was blighted by a then unknown financial monster, vis: pension/investment/markets frauds, and internationalised over some 50 years from c1960, which flooded counterfeit money globally, and eventually imploded with Tsunami backwash forces c2008, and known as the Global Economy Meltdown. SAfrica was not able to lift the vast majority of its peoples out of poverty – the situation today is increasingly worsening as population numbers dramatically rise – and that population rise is within the impoverished because they have nothing better to do than make more people. Mandela was working with a 'partner' that was entrenched in illogic finance systems. Nobody then knew, other than those who were perpetrating the scams, the extent of its destructive forces during the decades of forward flooding, or the far more disastrous tsunami forces unleashed in its implosive meltdown c2008.

A few years ago CDADD stated, some 8 years after proving the nature of the global fraud scams that brought about the meltdown, that 'we do not know enough'; this was rejigged by Ch Angela Merckel as: 'Do we know enough?' - in context of the Global Economy Meltdown & what measures were needed to reform. Efforts to date by EU & western nations are worsening the situation – because of ignorance & illogic, all stemming from dishonesty, including within Academia which was/is instrumental in giving a veneer of false 'science' credibility to global fraud scams.

The ongoing economic chaos, despite false claims from PM Cameron that his policies are working, is proof positive that we do not know enough.

Moreover, much of what we do know is TOTALLY WRONG – e.g. e does NOT equal m c squared.

(Ed Miliband's countering proposals of restructuring banks is based upon IP stolen from CDADD which proposals were developed some 10 years ago and presented to Tony Blair & Gordon Brown)

It only requires observation through a prism to recognise Newton was wrong and that fundamental science has gone far-off track into science fiction; and which has produced many erroneous theories from Einstein, Hubble, Hawking, Higgs etc. - CERN LHC is a white-elephant.

Defective science has skewed mathematics such that it reinforces & increases defective 'science', producing spiralling confusion. Whether what we see in deep-space is correctly interpreted or not has no direct impact on societies – cows could be jumping over the moon but would not affect, directly, how economies are structured to function. It is as a result of the skewing of science which is then used in economy systems, that the destructive impacts come through, the indirect effects.

Economies boom/crash repeatedly because engineering is entirely absent. Economies are far more complex than physical systems which are far more complex in themselves than defective theories first held; and defective science & mathematics also reinforce & increase defective economic 'science'.

In short there is a break down in science that allows Illogic to become Logic – and this breakdown has been purposeful, it has been masterminded.

Illogic 'Logic' at a micro level is wrongly aggregated/extrapolated to Macro-Economics levels, which gives multiplier distortions and, coupled with Big Data, which is invariably dubious and easily manipulated, creates distorted theories that have no validity. And, invariably, micro-data (including that which has wrongly been aggregated to Big Data) is readily accepted in the face of Macro-Facts that counter & disproves the micro-data → climate change, gender research, ether existence, etc.

The use of computers thus allows Big Data to produce ever increasing spiral-cycles of Illogic to confound people into believing whatever a computer pumps out; 'scientists' readily jump onto any perceived correlation as being 'proof' of some Causal link no matter how much observation or common-sense says otherwise (Hubble's expanding universe at speeds near c is a classic example, and this pre-internet); after all, internet brainwashing has brought about the false belief that 'proof' is determined by 'democratic' choice of those connected to the internet – but this is no democracy because the vast majority have no disposable income, or income at all, by which to vote.

If you were informed of a new fuel that would accelerate & maintain the speed of your car at 25,000kms per hour, would you believe this? Why then believe Hubble's expanding universe at near speed c?

(Wow! Didyaseethatonegoby.....?????????)

It is widespread bogus 'science' maintained by dishonest 'scientists' that has polarised those in the Humanities from the sciences.

(See later: RIA – New Horizons in the Humanities)

Thus:

Garbage IN = Garbage OUT is now wrongly recognised & accepted as being Logic - because people are desensitised to realities – thus societies, economies, are increasingly ruled by Illogic.

AND, a Garbage System can ONLY produce Garbage OUT, regardless of inputs

An illogical 'truth' that confounds:– if it is not on the internet then it's not true.

Corollary: if it's on the internet then it is true.

BUT, the reality is that 99.99999...% of information on the internet is garbage or virtually worthless because of unreliability at best.

Dishonest scientists purposefully present distortions that give false credibility to all this, which undermines, prostitutes Academia & its Institutions; and all aided & abetted by the media; and all of which is controlled by Finance Powers – to which Governments, elected by the people, do not oppose but actively assist.

Egypt is turning almost full circle:- military dictatorship undermined by western 'democracy', collapse of dictatorship, 'free' elections, 'democratic' government which has no democratic systems to install & which ignores minority rights, collapse of 'democratic' government, rioting to install a new military commander → nearly full circle, it just needs a little more time.

We also see Vladimir Putin, who has strong support, also opposing western Economy Terrorism, whether of capitalist or imperialist forms – why should he & followers submit to western Economy Terrorism, when he can be head honcho of his own network?, which explains why he is intent on retaining Ukraine & other states.

Again, western nations have offered no constructive economy models that would instil confidence & economy stability; hence ongoing opposition to western Economy Terrorism & thus increasing violence.

The erosion of previous USSR states to the EU is a real threat to Russia which, under Putin & supporters, want autonomy. And the only way they know how to achieve this in the face of western Economy Terrorism, is to adopt similar strategies & tactics – much as China is now doing with its finance/stock markets functioning as money counterfeiting & laundering operations.

The world is seeing a massive increase in counterfeit currencies – and London's Shard, vacant for a year, is now beginning to see some of that counterfeit currency flowing through as foreigners invade UK further. This is likely to provoke violent reaction as UK citizens are increasingly angry that rising property prices (due to global counterfeit money) are obstructing their right to home ownership, and distorting the economy, and causing jobs losses.

The same is happening in Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, etc. - Western 'democracies' refuse to engage Economy Engineering and thus continue to impose Economy Terrorism (aggregated corporate Organised Crime with government assistance) upon weaker nations, which also undermines those western nations.

The world is heading for Hot Global War.

The Royal Irish Academy(RIA) is to hold a day 'discussion' seminar on Feb 4, 2014 to address reform of Ireland’s upper chamber, The Seanad (Senate), and this as a consequence of the recent defeat of the proposed Constitutional change to abolish the Senate (fortunately defeated, for to throw out the bath along with the baby & bath water is sheer stupidity)

What should cause concern is not the defeat of the proposed change but the huge number that supported such a change, people who without open & constructive debate were willing to give up a structural Sovereign component, hard won by millions before them.

BUT, RIA's interpretation of 'discussion' means one-way communication, i.e. limited questions and ABSOLUTELY NO debate – the seminar event is chock-blocked with one-way presentations from 'specialists' who have not one jot of tangible engineering insights, hence will not have any insights to economy (intangible) engineering – how then RIA hope to develop meaningful reform ideas is beyond comprehension.

The problem with government (lower & upper chambers), and RIA, and Academia, and ….., is quite simple – > dishonesty!

And it will be dishonesty that obstructs meaningful debate on Feb 4 (and no doubt with gestapo present to suppress any attempt at constructive debate) – consequently any proposals forthcoming from RIA will simply make matters worse

There also cannot be open public debate because Ireland's communications infrastructure, like SA's, is thought-policed by USA ISPs - This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. remains destroyed by Eircom.ie; and Eircom.ie, along with UPC.ie, continue to destroy Ireland's sovereign communications on behalf of the USA

------

Engineering undermined:

A person that studies medicine only becomes a doctor if internship is completed - a medical graduate moving into business is NOT a doctor. The medical profession is tightly regulated; nevertheless failings occur within a highly regarded profession. To practice as a surgeon requires further rigorous training.

Graduates in engineering who complete internship become engineers, those that do not graduate or do not complete internship are NOT engineers.

Engineering has been undermined – such that those with lower technical qualifications are permitted to sign-off tasks that should be done by Professional/Chartered Engineers. Even worse, technicians have been granted Professional/Chartered Engineer status purely on a 'grandfather' clause. This is tantamount to granting nurses or old medical technicians status as doctors, or allowing them to perform brain surgery – which would NEVER be allowed in medicine, but such equivalence is allowed in Engineering. (BUT, nevertheless, financial jiggery-pokery & bad management consulting advice has grossly undermined Health Care systems in many countries)

Logicians have become empowered to determine engineering issues in complex systems & these have become incorporated into financial & socio/economy systems; i.e. logic design has largely become devoid of engineering → resulting in increasing chaos, largely from application of (wrongly so) micro logic into Macro systems; and from misinterpretations & mis-applications of logic.

PROOFS: Global Economy Meltdown.

BUT, do not misconstrue the pure evil that lurks behind a seemingly polite term (illogic), the evil is real, it is viewable at the annual World Economic Forum held in Davos, and at which (2014) PM Cameron & other leaders grovel to the WEF's 'Vice-Godfather (Academia)' of global corporate Organised Crime, Klaus Schwab – and while Cameron & other leaders grovel to crooks, other people in Egypt, Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan & elsewheres grovel, dismembered, amongst the bomb destructions. WEF's 'legitimacy' was funded by Dan David through his bogus Prize.

This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.anisedcrime is a highly sophisticated network that has cleverly legitimised itself through funding bogus 'science' so as to give a false veneer of credibility to itself and to corporate organised crime – control of Academia is central to its game-plan, and it has achieved this – especially through the hijacking of the Nobel Foundation and funding of bogus economic 'science', of which John Nash's brilliant mathematical work, but which nevertheless was flawed/impractical/impossible from a real economy perspective, appears as the foundation upon which WEF matured its network of organised crime over some 4 decades.

----------

It is pointed out that the errors by Dave Cliff within 'Joy of Logic' appear as sincere errors, the mere fact that he gave his Zip programme away free supports this. However, Cliff should be aware that giving away something for free does not imply that users making money from it are not obligated to reward.

In contrast, absence of sincerity, vis: dishonesty, is abundantly clear when viewing programmes/books by Brian Cox, Dara O'Briain, Stephen Hawking, Jim Al Khalili, Paul Nurse & other scientists – further proofs hereunder.

Emotive arguments concerning Stephen Hawking's disability are entirely invalid – Hawking's dishonesty contributes to defective science, mathematics & logic such that consequent grossly defective economic science produces massively destructive government policies such that millions/billions are starving or have starved to death – Hawking is happy to continue with his deceptions & dishonesty despite his knowing the destructive consequences of his dishonesty.

However, it appears that Hawking has allowed himself to be misled & deceived by Richard Branson, as did Nelson Mandela, and this offers a plausible explanation as to why Hawking has swayed to Branson’s dishonesty – but this does not justify continuance.

Media reports indicate that UK youth is experiencing increasing levels of depression & anxiety due to their futures being destroyed – school soccer is losing significant support, many youths are avoiding due to the increased violence which inevitably follows in the wake of economic turmoil - again, all attributable to dishonesty & corporate organised crime, with scientists & governments assisting.

----------

Whilst science, mathematics, logic are all interlinked, the purpose herein is focus on Logic, or rather the Illogic that is wrongly taken as being Logic. The issue of mathematics skewing science and, in turn, of being grossly skewed by defective science is for a forthcoming paper.

Nevertheless we will need to touch on all areas to understand some of the Illogic 'Logic' which abounds.

----------------------------------------------------

Joy of Logic

Zip Programme

Dave Cliff states that he developed a software programme to replace people on financial trading floors, that this has vastly improved trading conditions and increased the volume of trading. And, that this was possible through the application of some simple logic sequences & some mathematics. And all this was verified by IBM.

Wow. Gosh. Gee-Whiz. Amaaazing! ------------ from outset of the programme we are immediately bamboozled into accepting this statement, and hence softened to receive & accept without question whatever comes next.

BUT, unwittingly, Cliff fails to recognise that gross excessive over-trading, fraudulent over-trading, churning & siphoning, laundering, are causal of the global economy meltdown. Cliff also fails to recognise that Logic is easily rendered Illogic.

Dave Cliff gave clear examples of how logic can easily become illogic; which can then explain why much of the reasoning throughout his BBC programme was filled with errors; and explains why his Zip programme, which 'controls' markets, is causing ongoing global financial chaos.

Some of Cliff's errors …...

The case of the 3 Logicians and the Barman:

Dave Cliff sets out the case:

3 Logicians go into a bar and sit together. The barman asks: 'Would you 3 like a beer?'

The 1^st Logician thinks and says: 'I don't know'; the 2^nd Logician thinks and says: 'I don't know''; the 3^rd Logician thinks and says: 'Yes, we would all like a beer'

Cliff then explains the reasoning by saying that it all hinges on the barman asking whether 'all 3 of you would like a beer'. Cliff goes on: the 1^st one does want a beer but can't yet know whether the other 2 want a beer or not, so he doesn't know, and says: 'I don't know'; the 2^nd knows that the 1^st is in a quandary and that he himself is also in a quandary because he knows he wants a beer but doesn't know whether the 3^rd wants a beer, so he says 'I don't know'; the 3^rd one now realises that the other 2 do want a beer, and since he also wants a beer he says 'yes, we would all like a beer'.

There are HUGE errors with Cliff's reasoning, not solely because he got the scenario wrong.

Cliff erred in first setting the scenario and then with explaining the scenario. In the first instance, as stated by Cliff (carefully watch & listen to replay on BBC iplayer), the barman did NOT first ask: 'would all 3 of you like a beer?'; the barman asked: 'would you 3 like a beer?'

The two questions are TOTALLY DIFFERENT. 'Would you 3' implies independency; whereas 'would all 3 of you' explicitly requires a collective, a dependency.

BUT, besides that, the intended question is also wrongly analysed (i.e. 'would all 3 of you') (Remember: the thrust of Cliff's programme is to justify complex computer logic systems, based upon aggregated logic & mathematics, and to the unwitting & unknowing public/viewers)

Some reasons, but not exhaustive:-

- it is illogical to assume that the 3 all understood the barman's question.

- it is illogical to assume that the barman anticipated only selling beer if only all 3 wanted

- the scenario ignores 'racing' of decisions which occurs in computer software systems (Remember: the thrust of Cliff's programme is to justify his Zip programme & logic)

- the problem ignored the possibility that all 3 answered simultaneously; i.e. Cliff’s analysis wrongly assumed sequential responses.

ASSUMPTIONS are the curse of logic and why logic systems often fail, but not before massive damage has been done. Just as Einstein was wrong with his Energy & Relativity and Hubble with his 'expanding universe' because they ASSUMED Newton's Opticks & Universal Law of Gravity were right. And ASSUMPTIONS are what lesser qualified technical people base their logic on, because they are not trained to think from first-principles, but from established higher level principles, and hence is why they do not understand, No!, cannot detect, the inherent flaws in assumptive logic; and this is, partly but largely, why Engineering has been grossly undermined & Professional/Chartered Engineers wrongly marginalised, with catastrophic results. This kind of undermining would not be allowed to happen in medicine.

(Racing: this occurs in computer base control systems (at least), which operate on a clock system; multiple logic decisions that reach a single junction and from which result in different outcomes, depending on the conditions of those multiple decisions reaching that junction, can trigger wrong results simply because those multiple inputs do not all reach the junction prior to the clock switching, and hence wrongly triggered results can occur → purely by the clock making that decision without all deciding factors having yet reached that junction but having passed the immediate prior decision (an approx 1100km round trip back to a stacker/reclaimer nearby Kuruman was because of such an issue))

Principia Mathematica - Alfred Whitehead & Bertrand Russell

Dave Cliff introduces this work from c1910; and states that 'it took 360 pages to logically prove that '1 + 1 = 2'; and through this 'bucket loads of logical concrete was poured into the foundations of mathematics'

(Can download - https://ia600804.us.archive.org/23/items/PrincipiaMathematicaVolumeI/WhiteheadRussell-PrincipiaMathematicaVolumeI.pdf) (see *54.43 therein for statement in proof that 1 + 1 =2)

This perception of Cliff's is TOTALLY WRONG.

Merely to open the Principia book (thanx to Library, Trinity College Dublin) is sufficient to close it again – it is in a 'language' that very, very few would understand – and if it could be understood would be impossible to prove even one of its contentions therein

BUT, before even opening this book the statements by Cliff are sufficient to cause concern, and a little further thought will reveal that it is pointless to open it.

By definition we call a single item '1', by definition we call two such items '2', and so on. From which we can by definition say that one apple placed with another apple gives us two apples. By convention we simplify this lengthy statement into 1 apple + 1 apple = 2 apples; or simplify further by, apples: 1 + 1 =2, or for general case 1 + 1 =2

The discovery of mathematical operators & operations came about from recognising the reality of placing quantities of like items together in a structured way: another example -

4 rows containing 5 apples in each row gives us ….. er …. 20? apples, yes 20.

And we can simplify this by writing 4 x 5 = 20.

This is by definition, and by convention of writing it so.

One cannot prove definitions. Definitions can only be found, by consensus, as being useful, or not.

BUT, a Definition is NOT a fact of Nature – Nature is Nature, and it functions as it does – the fact that scientists have got much understandings of it wrong is besides the point – if a theory does not agree with Nature it is NOT Nature that is wrong but the Definitions & Theories that scientists have developed in their attempt to understand Nature.

It follows, that it is impossible to logically prove that 1 + 1 = 2, because the lowest common form, which is a pre-requisite for a proof, is the very definition that one seeks to prove, which attempts at proof is illogic since it is a definition.

This is not to debase the sincere, intensive & extensive efforts that Whitehead, Russell & many others expended – but to show that Logic has for long been Illogic.

Remember - whilst it is necessary to know what something is – it is equally, if not more, important that we also reveal what-it-is-not, and this latter is far more time consuming. We know an apple is an apple because we know it is not a plum, or a fig, … or an elephant …

Often there are examples of similar looking plants (for e.g.) which turn out to be different.

A further important point:- it can be proved algebraically that 1 = 2 (see below), but this contains at least 3 fundamental errors which renders the 'proof' as a non-proof, or better termed as Nonsense (also see below).

This is essentially the nature of the errors within Andrew Wiles's invalid 'proof' of Fermat's Last Theorem (FLT).

The writer has set a challenge that a classical proof (as was available to Fermat) of FLT exists, CDADD's classical proof is self-evident whereas Wiles's takes one into a chaotic whirl of unbelievable & impossible-to-prove sidetracks. Understanding of the classical proof of FLT derived by CDADD would reveal other Illogic 'Logic' that abounds science & mathematics –> Royal Society, Royal Institute, Royal Irish Academy etc., do not have courage to put up a fair reward (see: Overview of CDADD's Research Papers)

The point here is that in addressing how Mathematics has become skewed & is skewing science it will become clear that government policies are equally skewed and causing massive swathes of destruction globally.

And Illogic is skewing further.

-

On top of the aforegoing – the more complex a system, no matter how simplified the individual logic sequences & mathematics, the easier it is to miss identifying 'logic' as illogic, and the easier it is for systems to be hacked – and impossible to detect.

There is increasing importance on teaching schoolchildren the language & techniques of computer codding – but coding can only code what we know or, rather, what we think we know – the techniques of developing Logic and, more importantly, the skills of identifying Illogic from 'Logic' is far more crucial – but that requires Professional Engineering insights, and from first principles.

The problem comes in when scientists in having been proved wrong, wrongly defend their indefensible positions because of vested financial interests → prostitution, dishonesty, fraud.

BBC4 The Code of Life: DNA development: A&B diffraction patterns, etc.

This programme documented the development of DNA & linked theories.

Despite Paul Nurse being fully aware that CDADD has disproved Newton's opticks, Nurse continued to present dishonest distortions regarding science in general and with x-ray diffraction/scatter from which the helix connection of DNA was made.

As related in the BBC programme: an A form of diffraction was first encountered, later a B form, from which a helix connection was made. What was not covered was the nature of the test rig that produced these A & B diffraction patterns, or explanation of why the differences occur – which means that the helical 'connection' is purely an ASSUMPTION – this assumption does appear hugely beneficial but that does not PROVE it correct – just as light 'spectrum' is now seen to be arc-angle related, not frequency related.

BUT, since we now know that the colour patterns observable through a prism have for 350 years been incorrectly interpreted (hence Einstein & Hubble were wrong) it follows that the A & B diffraction patterns have high probability, if not certainty, of also having been incorrectly interpreted.

We also now know that the light colour patterns correlate with the transmission lobe patterns as measured with radar transmissions (vis: main forward lobe, 'white' light, and 2 sets of twin side band lobes, being red & yellow and violet & blue) – i.e. radar transmission patterns are such because light & energy are transmitted/propagated in this manner.

Intuitive reasoning compels that all light & energy are transmitted via this form; hence light colours are arc-angle related NOT frequency related; and consequently x-ray transmissions are likewise affected.

It follows: that whilst DNA has proved of great benefit to differentiate classes of flora & fauna, even to identify compatibility between differing human organs/tissues, that the claim of differentiating DNA from one person from that of another, hence proving identity & culpability in criminal cases, has a large question mark against it from a pure science reasoning of the questionable logic links behind the DNA claim.

In addition: the fact that mathematics has been grossly skewed by science (to be addressed in a future paper) the statistics & probabilities utilised to firm up DNA as an investigative tool has a further invalidity; such that it cannot be deemed that the scientific probabilities are as being 'beyond a reasonable doubt' as required by law in a criminal prosecution.

The gross Justice abuses in the Stephen Lawrence double-jeopardy murder trial were numerous – not solely because then Chief Justice Judge totally ignored CDADD's proofs that Newton's opticks were wrong, hence also DNA had serious doubts, but also because of the impossibility of the DNA material having gotten onto the accused's clothing at the time of the murder – the appeal by Justice Leveson was also a gross justice abuse because Leveson refused to allow the accused (now wrongly convicted) the right to investigate the nature of DNA; also Ireland Ch Justice & Police Commissioner refuse to allow the writer access to the Forensics Laboratory to further penetrate the errors in DNA testing.

Ireland's Chief Justice Susan Denham, along with Justice Adrian Hardiman, is also a member of the Royal Irish Academy which dishonestly suppresses the clear evidence that Newton was wrong – this compromises, & undermines, & corrupts Academia and also the Justice system

BBC & media are fully aware of all this but allow dishonest scientists to broadcast their lies & deceptions.

Stargazing Live (BBC2, Jan 8,9,10, 2014)

from Jodrell Bank

(Visit Jodrell Bank website and one cannot find data/images from their Lovell Radio telescope, plenty of images from others & NASA, all of which appear to be photoshopped or in which image data has been corrupted → i.e. raw data/images manipulated = of no use for R&D purposes.

What then is the point of spending money on Jodrell Bank if output is unreliable/untrustworthy?

The same applies at BBC’s Stargazing website, which often has erroneous information)

There are more heavenly bodies than there are grains of sand on the earth – 'discovering' new stars is like discovering a 'new' grain of sand. Scientists do not understand how our own solar system, even earth, functions, yet they consume time & money gazing pointlessly into space, conjuring up spurious theories.

Brian Cox & Dara O'Briain continued with dishonesty in the Stargazing programmes.

It is pointless going into all issues simply because it is extremely tedious & time-consuming countering the garbage that Cox, and O'Briain, pump out.

To clarify a few quick points:

Aurora Borealis (AB) – the images from Norway clearly showed 'gaseous' flows upwards, Chris Hadfield (ex Spacestation Commander) related seeing upward streams, others also related upwards streams – YET, Cox argues that CME (Corona Mass Ejections) are streaming from the sun towards earth, hence downwards, and that this is the cause of the AB.

Cox then inserts a video clip of charged spheres producing purple(?) & violet(?) halos to support his theory – YET, on the screen to the right of Cox's head is the GREEN light of the AB. How does Cox explain that?

Aurora Australis (AA) – from New Zealand(?) clearly showed the red, yellow of side-band colours and the mergement with the clipping of the blue & violet side-band colours, thus producing the green.

Clearly then the colours of the AB & AA are caused by the LTD side-band colours from the sun's light, which occur because the main forward transmission lobe is cut-off, from observer, due to the orientation of the earth to the sun.

(LTD = Light Transmission Dynamics; observe side-band colours through prism, compare to radar transmission patterns).

The moving medium upon which the colours appear (in AB & AA) certainly are causing scatterings & effects, including luminescence – but the colours are 'carried' by the side-band lobes that occur naturally everywhere, as they are the natural construct of the ether – thus, two distinct issues: the side-band colours, and the medium upon which the colours move & fluoresce.

Cox & O'Briain cannot correctly interpret how & why we see clouds, how then can BBC allow them to present nonsense, especially when visual evidence (upward streams) clearly contradicts Cox (downward streams)

But, why are we able to see the AB & AA??????

It is important to separate the colours from the motions of matter within the atmosphere upon which the colours interact – i.e. there is a medium by which the colours present are caused to vary & fluoresce, as we observe them to do.

The orientation of sun to earth and in relation to the observers position causes the variations in the colours as are observed. Because main 'white' light is absent due to the orientation of the earth to the sun as observed by the observers; the r&y occur due to clipping of upper atmosphere and b&v due to clipping the earth’s rim, with green produced by the mergement of both, The fact that green predominated the AB (2nd night) (with a faint hint of red) could possibly be explained by the atmosphere/earth space presenting as a very narrow slit (because of earth/sun orientation at that time) and thus allowing only green to appear (this is similar to presenting a slit to the green band resulting from light passing through a prism, with the close proximity prism apexes producing the side-bands & merged green)

This could then raise a valid tool – the fact that the AB & AA were distinctly different from each other (during the 3 nights of Stargazing), then consideration of past & future records could present as information as to very slight changes to the earth's orientation relative to the sun & hence give more insight to climate change (which is unlikely to be caused by pollution – one has to explain synchronicity, and in doing that it becomes abundantly clear that the sun (SUPER-GENERATOR) and planets (SUPER-MOTORS) require massive energy to drive them, hence that Macro dynamic swamps any spurious micro-pollution claims by IPCC climate-change geeks) – see later: Irish Meteorological Society

Gravity lenses?!?!?!? - Cox & O'Briain argue against crystal-clear evidence that Newton's opticks are wrong, they argue 'downwards' against clear evidence of 'upwards' - also they cannot interpret what Hubble incorrectly interpreted.

Gravity lenses???? → Nonsense!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

The AB & AA are proofs positive that gravity does NOT bend light – if it did there would be no AB & AA.

6.5 million images were sent in from some 50,000 viewers, of newly discovered stars/galaxies, i.e. more 'grains of sand' found from an endless 'beach' – it will be impossible to determine which are genuine and which photoshopped/processed (i.e. data distorted). It's been years since Royal Photographic Society caught-out NASA with rigged photos of the 1^st moon landing, and NASA refuse to come clean, hence it will be impossible to verify 6.5 million images from the public = pointless.

Also observe the green fringe in Chris Hadfield's 'Major Tom' video (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q_RB1ENTayU) at minutes 2:47, note also the sudden transformation, as the sun begins to near, of red flaring & separation of colours – this happens very quickly in the video so pause at appropriate points (minutes: 2:54 to 2:56).

On the assumption that this video sequence has not been 'shopped' it would indicate/prove that the green fringe is the result of a singular mergement of r&y with b&v upon the narrow fringe of atmosphere (in orientation from the sun, but as observed from the space station), thus the atmosphere presents as a narrow slit in relation to the sun and as observed on the spacestation. As the space station travels towards the soon-to-be rising sun the red flare predominates with the other colours diminishing before white light takes over & swamps the colours. Note also the flaring of white light that swamps (& assuming this sequence is not 'shopped') – this indicates the form of transmission patterns (as we measure with radar) of the main forward lobe having greater breadth than it source point – this means that light becomes visible BEFORE the point source becomes visible, and due to the widest breadth of transmission lobes that is carrying 'white' light. This also defeats the gravity-bending-light-waves theory. Also, if gravity did bend light waves then we would see much distortion of regular bodies– hence gravity does not bend light waves because everything appears regular, undistorted. (The packing arrangement of the ether & consequent zig-zag transmissions would also account for light appearing before the source from behind bodies in deep space – from which comes the illusion of 'bending' ???)

Note: the singular mergement of sideband colours (of y & b => green) upon the atmosphere is because there are no multiple reflections & refractions as occurs in clouds – which when mixing r&y and v&b creates grey, and the more the mixing the ever darker the grey, which is why clouds appear grey in various tones.

This can also be viewed (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GOAEIMx39-w) – BUT, note the sequence at minutes 1:56 onwards and the blue predominance as the sun rises.

Red in one case blue in another. ???????????????

?

Spectroscopy

This is a powerful tool that has allowed scientists to identify various characteristics of matter and enabled them to differentiate each one from the others, and their elemental characteristics – however our understandings are impeded by Newton's Opticks errors which within a hierarchy of other theories has created an erroneous belief of non-ether – i.e. non-ether is based upon a sequential string of erroneous theories. Consideration of new insights to prismatic observations clearly demonstrates an ether exists. (see Captain's Log - Stardate 06 – Particle: Sigma 18)

Despite spectroscopic analysis we still do not know how these elements are 'constructed'.

Consequently the Bohr atomic model, also non-ether based, is also incorrect. As is the Higgs Boson.

It follows that a rethink is needed as to how spectral observations are interpreted – whilst the Bohr model has been useful & will demonstrate correlation to the true dynamics of the ether, for man to progress his understandings of Nature & its functionality it is necessary that a rethink is embarked upon.

-

It is disgraceful that BBC continue to abuse children, and the public, with bogus science, corrupted data/images, half-truth news & other garbage – BBC's dishonesty & immorality explains why Jimmy Saville & others got away with abusing children on the scale they did - BBC allow Cox , O'Briain, Hawking, Dawkins, Al Khalili, Clarkson, May, Hammond & others to abuse children mentally, which is just as bad as sexually.

--------

Irish Meteorological Society – Custom House – Jan 23, 2014

- Weather Climate & Tourism – Nichola Salmon NUIM

Ireland's Weather, perceived as Tourism unfriendly, needs boosting – Salmon proposed a Tourism Climate Index – but this is based upon the same data & theories as that of claiming Climate Change being caused by Pollution.

Clearly the micro-activities of some 6.5 billion people scurrying around the world CANNOT possibly swamp the Macro-Solar forces that drive the planets.

Hence a TCI is merely a differently packaged indicator of standard met reports.

(The writer, having cycled over 25,000kms in the past 7.5 years, has seen more of Ireland than most Irish people – whilst tourism service is excellent at grass-roots (accommodation, etc.) the same cannot be said at national level – accommodation information is user unfriendly, road signage is appalling, national transport is cyclist unfriendly (including trains refusing to take bikes after having booked, and being left stranded) – but these issues stem from executive incompetence, those employees & providers at grass roots always provide the best within the constraints. Tourism would be better served by improving Executive competency)

- Wave Energy – Prof Frederic Dias UCD

A very interesting lecture that gave insights to wave dynamics and some of the dangers with rogue waves.

BUT, Dias' excellent research is also held back because he, it appears, has not been informed that Newton's Opticks & Universal Law of Gravity theories are wrong.

Science is off-track because of Newton's errors – Gravity is an internal force to planets – hence it is not the moon's gravitational force that causes sea level to rise & fall, thus tides, but the moon's electro-magnetic interaction with the earth's such that the earth's gravity is affected, weakening & strengthening, which causes these tidal effects – i.e. the moon has a 'shading' effect on the earth's function as a SUPER-MOTOR. This might seem superfluous but in fact has massive significance – because incorrect interpretations obstruct research into other insights of Nature's dynamics.

Gravitational changes causes seas to rise & fall thus creating a pumping action, since this is caused by the Sun and with interaction from the moon, it follows that observation of Light dynamics as observed on earth could provide correlatory insights to natural phenomena, including catastrophic ones, and provide warning long in advance of sensors that are presently relied upon.

e.g. A volcanic eruption occurs BECAUSE of increased internal heating (by induction from sun's energy), therefore the heating occurs BEFORE the eruption – therefore identifying an increase in heating gives earlier warning than an impending eruption given via sensors.

The AB & AA are significant phenomena that likely conceal indicators of the earth's dynamics as a SUPER-MOTOR.

As pointed out to Dias, thought should be given to careful observation & recording of AB & AA dynamics – changes in these observable dynamics indicate changes to the sun's orientation to the earth, and these would correlate to changes in energy transmission (which is via the same ether as is light), and hence to changes in weather & tidal patterns, and give earlier warnings of other phenomena such as eruptions & quakes & possibly even rogue waves.

The Universal Law of Gravity is wrong, it is Illogic.

--------

Pluto – a planet it its own right

That astro-physics has gone far off-track into science fiction is perfectly clear, and for some 350 years stemming from Newton's errors.

One subsequent error was the declassification of Pluto as a Planet to that of dwarf-planet.

There are 3 criteria established by the IAU (International Astronomical Union) - that, in the Solar System, a planet is a celestial body which:

1. is in orbit around the Sun,

2. has sufficient mass to assume hydrostatic equilibrium (a nearly round shape), and

3. has "cleared the neighbourhood" around its orbit.

(from Wiki)

Pluto, according to IAU, fails on point 3, in that with Pluto being in the Kuiper belt it hence had not cleared its neighbourhood of other objects (asteroids etc.).

This 3^rd criterion is far too narrow a criterion and has no validity in position 3 when other Macro evidence exists concerning functionality of solar systems. The fact that we now know that massive multiphase power is generated by the sun to drive planets is proof positive that all regularly orbiting bodies (planets) are integral components of that (our) solar system. The dynamics of our solar system CANNOT be explained by Newton's Universal Law of Gravity because it fails to explain synchronicity of planets or its means to rotate & orbit them about the sun – and until we have fuller knowledge of the nature of the solar systems functionality we cannot argue further about Pluto’s specific function (or indeed of any planet)

Consider a steam locomotive – it has numerous critical components that are integral to its full functionality – the springs & balls of its centrifugal steam governor/regulator are minuscule compared to the entire locomotive, or even its largest singular component, but the spring & balls regulate its speed & operation – they are critical components without which the locomotive would not function correctly or at all.

Similarly, Pluto is a small planet but its importance cannot be ruled out until such time as we know its full purpose – nevertheless criterion 3 is invalid because it fails to recognise the true nature of solar system dynamics and of each component's purpose, and Criterion 3 is positionally invalid.

Illogic is behind Criterion 3 & its position.

-------

Monty Hall, 2 Goats 1 Car Problem

This is set out : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monty_Hall_problem

Also see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monty_Hall

In brief:

3 doors, 2 doors hide goats, 1 door hides car.

You win what you choose.

You choose a door, but before this is opened the Host opens a door behind which is a goat.

The host now offers you a second choice.

The problem is: is it in your best interest to stick with the original door chosen or switch to the other door.

This is a logic problem that cannot be solved either way.

The standard logic options, which sets out the probabilities (see Wiki) indicates that it is better to switch. But this ignores the human interactive factors, as Monty Hall rightly stated (remember: we are addressing the issue of logic, as interpreted by Logicians, making decisions supposedly in the best interests of the problem at hand, and, therefrom, supposedly for societies)

The logic options set out also ignore pre & post cognitive understanding – i.e. being aware of a second choice before playing (precognitive) and not being aware (post-cognitive). Intuition & logic options says that pre or post is immaterial – but intuition & logic options are NOT proofs – and to prove there are pre & post differences, or not, is something that cannot be proven. Try it, you will soon be caught up in endless contradictions & confusions.

At best you can, if you have the opportunity to play for a real car or goat (and it must be real or else it would not be a valid trial), is to choose whether on the second choice to switch, or not – which is a 50/50 probability!?!?!?!?

A further assumption is that the host is honest –> it is an assumption that there is indeed a car behind one of the doors & that it remains behind that assigned door – Remember: we are addressing justification for Logic in the real world, and one in which we know that Honesty plays no part; Dishonesty rules, as the GEM meltdown proves.

Richard Dawkins 'The Magic of Reality – How we know what's really true'

The dishonesty by Richard Dawkins continues. CDADD's proofs of Newton's opticks being wrong rendered Dawkins's original book as pure fiction.

The numerous pieces of artwork by Dave McKean were nevertheless very attractive.

Random House have now, it appears, ceased publishing the book that contained the illustrations and replaced it with a book containing purely text.

Random House have not announced a 'product recall', so many copies of the original are still mis-educating/abusing children.

BUT, the new book (text only), by the removal of the paintings, now renders the book as complete rubbish.

'A picture paints a thousand words', and the accompanying text words enhance the meaning of that painting – so, by removing the painting the words become meaningless – to see this: go to an art gallery in which explanatory text remains after a painting has been removed.

BUT, Richard Dawkins is not concerned about science integrity – money is his sole interest, and fraud is fair play to Dawkins. And Random House.

RIA Discourse - Gender Research in Home & Workplace, Paul Seabright.

Royal Irish Academy, Monday January 13, 2014 – Can modern biology help in understanding gender in the 21^st century Home & Workplace. Prof Paul Seabright, Toulouse.

This was an interesting discourse in which many approaches were taken to understand gender 'discrimination'. It transpired that whilst differences in salary levels between male & female has virtually disappeared at levels up to senior management, that significant differences still occur at executive level, and of around a 20% variance between male & female.

Paul Seabright called for ideas – BUT, the hostility from RIA President Luke Drury remains despite the writer offering a polite 'hello' on entering Academy House – hence Drury refused to acknowledge the writer's raised hand.

Much of Seabright's (and his staff's) research had relied on Big Data from corporations and on micro-games designed to elicit general behaviour, which is all well & good.

However because of general academic dishonesty it is likely that Paul Seabright is not aware of the writer’s R&D that gives clear insights to the main causes of the Global Economy Meltdown, and the ever-increasing economy distortions that prevailed for some 50 years and all whilst gender equality was being driven.

In short, Seabright has focussed on micro-data, aggregated to Big Data, and to micro-games, whilst not being aware of Macro-factors/impacts – this is similar to the Climate Change 'scientists' who argue micro-pollution in the face of Macro/Universal functionality of star/planets systems.

In a similar way, Seabright has not considered the Macro impacts of some 50 years of ever-increasing frauds of pensions/investments, of finance markets frauds, etc. - all of which was causal of progressive saturation, over-saturation, super-saturation of global money base & supply, such that in c2008 it all imploded.

These events occurred simultaneously with the drive for gender equality. It also was initiated roughly concurrent with the dropping of the gold standard, which stifled economies, whereas saturation of money base & supply grossly flooded economies.

NOTE: Both stifling & flooding of economies causes skewings & crashes – it requires careful examination to differentiate one kind of crash from another kind – just as a mangled car caused by brake failure is difficult to differentiate from one that spun out of control.

In short, corporate executives were induced to take up particular pensions schemes by financial institutions, rewards were extended. Of some 50 major corporates, including international, that the writer contacted, all closed-up regarding their pensions schemes – because they knew that they had accepted kick-backs, pay-offs.

This dishonesty has powerful repercussions, and was the motivating factor for females to be kept from executive advancement, for fear of being rumbled.

(Various mutations of these pension frauds came about due to the escalation of defective mathematics – see Nobel Foundation, Economics Prize winning models, most recipients are mathematicians fast-tracked into economic 'science', but with no science training)

RIA/IRC Seminar – New Horizons in the Humanities – Jan 30, 2014

Chair: Prof John Thompson QUB

The polarisation of Humanities from the Sciences has caused the Royal Irish Academy to hold a seminar in attempt to bridge that gap (or so it is claimed by those in the RIA Sciences)

In listening to the various & numerous presentations it became clear that much of the ideas & initiative for the seminar derived from CDADD's IP – i.e. RIA stole CDADD's Intellectual Property (Ditto RIA's new Customer Charter)

The Irish Research Council have long been aware of RIA's dishonesty.

The European Research Council is headed up by ex-RIA President Nicholas Canny, who is complicit with RIA's dishonesty & who made his contempt for lesser educated & less advantaged people well known at last year's Funding Seminar.

The RIA is essentially an incestuous organisation that runs on cronyism, hence suppresses Merit.

Yet, RIA hopes to draw in the Humanities under the RIA's control.

It became clear that the Humanities are being drawn into a deceptive 'partnership' by those in the Sciences – with the intent of dis-empowering the Humanities from independency – and this will be achieved by the use of money – by awarding research grants to those that toe-the-line set by the Sciences.

This is not to suggest that the Humanities are not fraught with their own internal ivory-tower problems – but to highlight the stated fact that Humanities are at the bottom of the food-chain in terms of fundings.

Whilst there was a limited amount of open debate prior to close, the debating time was cut short by half the allotted time, and the remainder of the 5 hours was one-way communication.

Much of the 'science' principles adopted by those presenters were flawed.

One classic case was a circular diagram showing clockwise Causal flow from micro to macro to meso(?). In using micro & macro in relation to each other infers a relative relationship not an absolute one; e.g. a business is a micro entity to a country (macro), but a country is a micro entity to the world (macro).

Causal flow is UNI-DIRECTIONAL, macro to micro; micro actions do NOT affect macro environments.

Whilst John Thompson pointed out that no harm can have been done by the seminar; it nevertheless requires those Humanities leaders to be constantly alert to being undermined & marginalised, & even corrupted. Nelson Mandela is a classic example of progress being destroyed by deceptions from corporates & finance powers, with Richard Branson playing a crucial part, and leading societies into deeper chaos.

Money talks & corrupts, and there is much counterfeit money circulating to achieve this.

The writer pointed out to the Seminar Chair that much science is wrong and that this can easily be observed by looking through a prism and noting the change of side-band colours about an edge when observing directly and when at its mirror reflection - this singular piece of evidence is brand new science – it does not requires a science degree to recognise this or its consequences – this singular piece of evidence alone is as near-powerful as Moses's staff in clearing a path amongst obstructions, it empowers those in the Humanities to stand up to those in the Sciences by demonstrating that much of the Sciences 'authority', which kept those in the Humanities suppressed, is baseless - but the Humanities must adopt a constructive standing.

(It was announced that Taoiseach (PM) Enda Kenny is to award the RIA's Gold Medals – but T Kenny is fully aware that the writer's R&D is far more advanced than any of those Gold Medal winners, Kenny is fully aware of the proofs over RIA's entrenched dishonesty – all this proves that RIA continues to skew awards & funding, it also proves that governments assist in dishonestly skewing/distorting Academia)

--------

In short: the aggregation of micro-research into Macro principles/theories is the key stumbling block within genuine Academia research – the ever present race for recognition causes people to take short cuts – hence bogus theories abound – from expanding universe, climate change, gender differences, Twin Towers, BP Deepwater Horizon etc.

The errors are amplified by skewed mathematics, skewed logic, skewed science – dishonesty obstructs genuine research.

* a PROOF must be self-evident – if a 'proof' is confusing or unclear then it is not self-evident, hence not a proof *

---------

Consequences

Dishonesty is skewing science, mathematics, logic, economies – it is deeply entrenched from the top of governments/parliaments through public offices, through corporate entities – predominantly at executive level.

What we see in Syria & eleswheres is the result of western Economy Terrorism which is the aggregation of global corporate Organised Crime.

The numerous gross Justice abuses in the Stephen Lawrence murder trials & appeal confirms that the 'Golden Thread' of Justice (the presumption of innocence until guilt proved; corollary: that it is better that 10 guilty go free than 1 innocent be convicted) has been extinguished by the Judiciary, and this is the case in many western countries – UK Ch Justice Judge purposefully corrupted Justice by ignoring CDADD's proofs regarding DNA and that it was impossible (let alone beyond reasonable doubt) for transference of blood onto accused's clothing at the crime scene. Ireland Ch Justice Denham promotes dishonesty. USA Ch Justice Roberts continues lies over Twin Towers, BP Deepwater etc.

Democracy is non-existent, democracy is not simply one-man-one-vote, it is the holistic integration of honesty throughout all levels & spheres of government, civil service & commerce. The breakdown can be witnessed at grass roots in any residential area with the undermining of residents' associations – through which government leaders, local & national, can manipulate because the association leaderships are largely illegitimate.

A typical example, which is common throughout 'democracies', can be viewed with Dublin's Clontarf Residents' Association (CRA) which has never held a legitimate Annual General Meeting (AGM) – the CRA & its website is controlled by business & manipulates local decisions without formal consultation, or at all, to its Residents, it is done with the full knowledge of Local & National Government – grass-roots democratic institutions are corrupted at source by those that are empowered into government, with collusive assistance from business – MPs (Dail Members) & Councillors happily engage with this dishonesty.

A current issue – MKN Construction's plans for a multi-storey development on Clontarf coast front were passed by the Planning Board without the proper procedures & consultations – and purposefully without opposition from the CRA - an initial planning rejection was later granted - MKN executive purposefully failed to fulfil legal requirements & Planing Board executives purposefully colluded in granting permission – > both criminal actions. Government, Council, Police, Justice all ignored and allow this illegal construction to continue.

A Cabinet Minister, Richard Bruton, was instrumental in allowing this criminal action – he has long been aware of the CRA's illegitimacy & fraudulent deceptions. But, this kind of fraud happens throughout all residential/electoral areas (witness London's Shard) – proofs positive that 'democracy' is an illusion, that Justice & Police are corrupted. And Academia assist as we see with the corruption of the Royal Irish Academy with the able, criminal, assistance of Chief Justice Denham & Justice Hardiman.

(c.f. SA's Chief Justice (late) Arthur Chaskalson's aiding of Barclays Bank’s fraudulent raid on ABSA bank)

In UK a PC is to be charged over lying re Plebgate - but PM Cameron, Met Commissioner Hogan-Howe are allowed to lie & cheat.

Richard Branson can defraud, and Hogan-Howe, as with his predecessors, affords Branson unlawful protection; ditto Prosecution Authority (Branson is currently being 'rehabilitated' - his image now appears in BBC's countdown to hourly news).

Cut the PM's hair, defraud pensions, scam markets – these are all OK if you have the money to buy off PMs, Commissioners, Judges, etc. - BUT apply engineering to solve these problems and you will find yourself persona non grata – which is why Economy Engineering is absent barring the pioneering work by CDADD

Public transportation is another area of Illogic – roads are congested because of high public transport charges – it is cheaper to drive & park in Dublin than for even 2 to take the bus or Dart train in town – this widespread distortion occurs because social-costing is ignored, or wrongly assessed, similarly with all goods & services – which is why (for e.g.) slave-labour imports have destroyed/reduced western self-sufficiency.

Illogic rules in place of Logic. BUT do not misconstrue the pure evil that lies beneath this seemingly polite term which veneers the sophisticated corporate Organised Crime network academically centred (so it appears) at Davos headed up by its Vice-Godfather Klaus Schwab.

Sincerely

Chris Addington Pr.Eng.

-------------------

Algebraic Proof that 1 = 2

(note: a^2 → a squared)

Let a = b

a^2 = ab

a^2 + a^2 = a^2 + ab

2a^2 = a^2 +ab

2a^2 – 2ab = a^2 + ab – 2ab

2a^2 – 2ab = a^2 – ab

2(a^2 – ab) = 1(a^2 – ab)

divide both sdides by (a^2 – ab) results in

2 =1, or 1 = 2

the first error is in illogically separating a like item with another descriptor, vis: calling an item known as 'a' as 'b' – e.g. an apple being illogically called a bapple.

the second error is in illogically expanding a lowest common form, vis: a = b into a more complex form, which thus renders the proof as a non-proof, which becomes effectively tautologous in itself but raises numerous irrelevant steps that in themselves can contain numerous other errors.

the third error is in illogically dividing by 0 (zero) –> (a^2 – ab) = (1^2 – 1x1) = 0

##### End of Particle Upsilon-20 #####