Captain’s Log - Stardate 05

 

Confussion of fission, Confission of fusion

 

There must be some other mechanism that explains nuclear power processes since:

 

e≠mc² & Perpetual Motion is an impossibility

 

PMF (Primary Motive Force) => space SUPER-GLUE

 

Earth’s core => Induction Furnace

 

Richard Dawkins – confussed & confissed over evolution & creation – refuses to debate constructively – purposefully deceiving schoolchildren.

 

_______________________________________

 

(Please Note This website is primarily about the pioneering of ENGINEERING into the SEBFL environments, it is about seeking truths, it is NOT about journalism, English grammar or prose, or quick-sell — it is down-to- earth engineering & pioneering requiring extensive & intensive THINKING.

(SEBFL = social/economy/business/finance/legal environments)

Explaining transmission mechanisms & pre-empting catastrophic failures is NOT doom-prophecy, it is explaining probabilistic reality.)

_______________________________________

 

It is suggested that you read the previous paper in this series:

Captain’s Log, Stardate:-

01 - ‘Blackholes’ are not holes.

02 - Dark side of the Moon

03 - Relative Theory of Relativity

04-Certainty of Error in Uncertainty Principle & Spin

Mathematics is an abstract concept and it can lead people astray unwittingly. For proofs of mathematics being wittingly used to mislead people & perpetrate global frauds see other papers at www cdadd.com: e.g.

- Infinity, Eternity, Evolution, Creation.

- Economists’ Inexact models Exactly Defective (entire series).

- Annuities in Retirement.

- Mastermind of Organised Crime 1 & 2 (Donald Gordon, Richard Branson, etc.)

To understand Richard Dawkins' confussion & confission see series of papers ‘A Con-undrummed’

_______________________________________

 

IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT YOU READ THIS QUICKLY FOR THE FIRST TIME then find space for a quiet re-reading & thinking.

To summarise key propositions from previous papers in this series:

• Universes are simply SUPER-MOTORS, the power source being a star propagating electro-magnetic energy.

• There is a magnetic ether upon which electro-magnetic energy can be propagated, and without which, it is contended, energy cannot be propagated.

• A potential gradient is necessary for energy to flow.

• Energy is able to flow & be regulated by the expansion of matter boundary in space into space without matter and/or to other regions of lesser energy levels = a potential gradient (as in any electric circuit), macro (in general), and micro (localised).

• Energy flows at a drift velocity but propagated at the speed of light (c.f. drift velocity in electric circuits)

• Matter does not travel at the speed of light or anywhere near it (the absence of matter travelling at speed c is the probabilistic proof of same).

• Consequently e≠mc² and Theory of Relativity is physically impossible.

• There are only 3 dimensions in space, Time is not a dimension.

• Space does not become distorted, the ‘ether’ within space simply experiences changes to its potential levels (similar to atmospheric pressure)

• ‘Blackholes’ are not holes, they are more likely SUPER-GENERATORS

• The 9,10 or 11 dimensions propositioned by Quantum Physicists is an impossibility.

• ‘Evolution’ is entirely consistent with ‘Creation’ – there is AMPLE confusion created by both ‘religion’ and ‘evolution’ experts who have their heads stuck-in-sand and refuse to debate constructively.

__________

 

If you were to see a motor car driving down the road belching smoke, with wobbly wheels, crabbing skewly, you would not need to be an engineer to realise that many things were wrong with the car. BUT, it would require engineering insight to predict what kinds of things are causing the observed behaviour & what needed to rectify.

If you were the Big-Guy returning from a galactic billennium space-cruise holiday and saw planet earth from a distance and belching smoke, you would know immediately that there were many things wrong upon the earth.

Both scenarios are consequences of man’s negligence. Both scenarios require engineering insights to rectify. BUT, both scenarios are controlled by non-engineers.

_________

 

Following on from the previous papers in this series:

Our earth is a dynamic environment and a unique one which allows life to flourish – out of all the bodies we can see in space we have yet to find another that has life form on it, assuming that other planets containing life do/did exist.

How our earth functions is not fully understood – the purpose of this series of papers is to throw in some new insights.

We observe massive geological disturbances, such as volcanoes, but do not understand the origin of the forces that cause these things to happen.

We have seen the development of nuclear energy but the physics that explains its dynamics makes no sense.

We need to think a little further:-

As with electric motor/generator theory movement of a body through magnetic fields cause electricity to be generated which creates magnetic fields, electricity induced into a body causes magnetic fields to be developed, which interact with the primary magnetic field and cause bodies to move or electricity to be generated.

Put the body on a shaft:-

apply electricity -> causes it to turn, i.e. a motor;

turn the shaft -> causes it to generate electricity, i.e. a generator.

The induced/applied current also generates heat – in motors fan blades are fitted to cool the motor down.

If we apply some further thought to that previously developed – vis that universes are simply SUPER-MOTORS - we realise that the movement of the earth through the magnetic ether, that exists throughout space, induces electricity into the earth which creates a magnetic field and heat.

The induced magnetic field interacting with the primary magnetic ether causes us to move, to rotate.

The earth is naturally attracted to the sun by magnetic forces.

The earth’s spin causes centrifugal forces that oppose the sun’s magnetic attraction.

The combined actions result in an elliptical orbit of the earth about the sun.

The induced current produces heat which is keeping the core of the earth in a molten state.

The moon & earth act as a spring/ball regulator which affects its orbit.

The moon’s axis is near perpendicular to the earth’s axis.

Variations in the universes dynamics would cause changes to occur on & within earth.

It should not be overlooked that the earth could have been through more than one molten stage as a consequence of the earth’s orbit being affected by spurious & significant events, or even cyclical events.

If this has happened then any historical/archaeological records would have been entirely erased, or maybe partially erased (look at volcanic eruptions to see how this can happen).

The point to realise with this contention is that the earth being a rotor of a motor that it’s inner core is kept molten by the induced currents => induction furnace. And also:- that our archaeological history is not necessarily limited by what fossils currently exist at present.

______________

Nuclear physicists have over a century developed & refined models that attempt to explain ‘atomic’ matter & behaviour. Mathematics has assisted in quantifying the models, and high correlation between experiments & theoretical models support the correctness of these models.

As models develop over time and begin to fall into an orderly explanation of the world around us then the models become increasingly accepted as being correct. Alternatively stated, fewer & fewer questions are raised that challenge what has gone before. Invariably, when a model eventually does become overturned it is because it is seen to not explain some certain simple reality that had previously been overlooked.

(for example: consider the incorrect mathematical models by scientists that ‘prove’ that the Twin Towers naturally collapsed as a consequence of plane crashes; simple observation of the collapse prove that it had to have been criminally imploded – see A Bunch of Open Letters 3, US Ch Justice JG Roberts Jr.)

Einstein’s statement that ‘Quantum theory is non-intuitive and defies common sense’ has had powerful effects on free thinking with regard physics. Within the statement is powerful authority that deters people from speaking out & challenging - the more people that support the statement the greater the collective power. The power is in the sense of social & academic power, not of violence per se, but it nonetheless has a silencing effect.

The entire basis of Einstein’s theories are that matter travels at or near the speed of light and Relativity Theory explains that there is a change in mass between its rest mast and its mass at speed of light, c; and in the process of moving from rest to speed c that there is an exchange between mass & energy to maintain an energy balance. (vis: e=mc²)

BUT, as argued in this series of papers we do not see matter or light particles travelling at speed c, or anywhere near it; if it did occur then we would have been blasted by the gattling gun effect of zillions of missiles and we would not exist. But we do exist! ……..

…… hence e≠mc²

Nevertheless, Quantum theory has developed over the past century and gives insight & understanding to physics & real world issues because it does give an orderly explanation to real developments that have occurred as a consequence of these theories - e.g. the behaviour of elements is predictable through the periodic table which lists atomic information about each element. Nuclear processes have been developed derived from quantum theory understandings.

Clearly then there is a correlation between quantum theory, the progressive development of physics, and the real world issues of nuclear power plants, bombs, etc.

BUT, the high correlation of all this research to what we experience in the real world does NOT prove that Einstein’s energy & relativity theories are necessarily correct.

Again, we would not exist if light matter/particles were zipping around at speed c.

Clearly then some other explanation exists for light propagation (information & energy) – this is argued in the previous papers. But also there must exist another explanation for nuclear power processes if Einstein’s theories are not correct, as everyday evidence shows it not to be correct.

Nuclear processes:-

- Nuclear Fission is the process of splitting atoms which brings about the release of immense levels of energy

- Nuclear Fusion is the process of combining atoms and which can release or absorb immense amounts of energy.

These processes actually work – we see nuclear power plants, bombs etc. The understandings of these processes are based upon Einstein’s Relativity & Energy Theories, and upon the claimed belief that matter can travel at the speed of light.

Also these processes are claimed to be self-sustaining processes. Self-sustaining is synonymous with perpetual motion.

BUT, we know, on a balance of probability, that perpetual motion machines are a physical impossibility – this is argued because we do not see any perpetual motion machines, therefore we deduce that they are impossible, on a balance of probability.

So how is it that physicists maintain the view that nuclear processes behave in the way they claim they do which effectively argues an impossible perpetual motion process?

If we accept the earlier proposition that light energy & information is propagated through a switching mechanism it would seem logical that all energy in space is propagated in a similar/identical manner.

It would seem logical that the entire ‘being-ness’ of space & matter rests on a fundamental energy mechanism – a Primary Motive Force (PMF), an energy switching-mechanism.

In other words everything is held together in its various forms by an energy switching-mechanism that propagates at the speed-of-light.

We are familiar with brittle objects such as glass, tough objects such as steel, pliable objects such as rubber, etc.

But, all these different objects clearly affect the amplitude & propagation of energy impulses impacted upon them.

Example: Small impacts on glass would cause cracks to appear, large impacts would cause ‘instantaneous’ shattering – because the energy is propagated with small attenuation of energy levels through the glass material.

In comparison:- with rubbery objects energy levels would be attenuated rapidly; steel would transmit energy without easily shattering, or with little attenuation.

Going back to atomic/nuclear energy.

In simple terms, fission is explained (historically, that is) in the following way:- a nuclear fuel (chemical isotope) is hit with a particle (usually a neutron) which causes the isotope to split with a resultant release of huge energy and its component parts causing a chain reaction to split adjacent isotopic material, and so on. The process happening so quickly & in an uncontrolled destructive chain reaction manner causes a massive explosion (bomb), whereas a controlled chain reaction causes useable energy to be used constructively (power plants).

If we apply some simple knowledge –> by hitting a billiard ball hard with a cue so that it hits another ball, which hits another ball, and so on, we notice that each successive impact results in a ball moving with less velocity than the ball that impacted upon it – i.e. we notice that energy is lost in each impact and also due to the friction of the ball rolling over the table – i.e. we see that perpetual motion is not possible.

With this in mind how is it that physicists claim that a chain reaction started by a particle rupturing an isotope can cause a self-sustaining (perpetual motion) chain reaction?

It doesn’t make sense. There must be some other explanation.

We see that the sun gives of energy and that in giving off energy we assume that it is decaying (very slowly). It is decaying from the outside inwards – what this means is that for decay to occur that there must be a potential gradient over which energy can be propagated. Clearly this must be so otherwise the sun would be decaying on the inside where the potential gradient is zero.

Nuclear materials act in a similar way – the emission of radioactivity energy brings about the decay of the nuclear material and occurs from the outside inwards, because there is potential gradient outside of the material, but no, or limited, potential gradient inside.

If then a neutron is blasted into an isotope and we accept that perpetual motion is not possible then it would not be possible for a chain reaction to come about causing all the particles of the entire material to split through chain reaction in a split second to cause a massive explosion. Nor would the splitting of one atom create sufficient potential gradient for the matter to decay from the inside outwards, and even if decay were possible it would be extremely slowly.

Therefore, there must be another explanation of the nuclear process that causes such immense energy release. There has to be additional potential energy present that would cause an action to occur other than the initial impacting energy of the neutron onto the isotope.

Let’s rethink:- Radioactive matter is simply unstable (‘brittle’) matter that naturally emits certain energy forms off of its surface.

Applying high impulse energy onto the material the PMF (switching-mechanism propagating at speed c) simply propagates the impulse energy throughout the material such that it shatters allowing all the tiny shattered atomic components to all give off this decay energy ‘instantaneously’ – i.e. it allows, opens up, a potential gradient, throughout the material which allows all the shattered components to decay ‘instantaneously’. In other words we see a summed decay emission resulting in an explosion of decays (and not an unnatural perpetual motion chain reaction that was previously thought to be the nuclear process).

It is contended that in a similar way to light being propagated through a switching process that the bombarding of an isotope with a neutron causes that initiating energy to be switched through to each adjacent particle of the isotope, which in turn is switched to the next adjacent particles and so on. But, the energy at each switching is of the same order of magnitude as the initiating energy (admittedly, decaying slightly with each successive transmission process - similar to the diminishing of heat energy from a flame in air). The latent energy within the ether (electric & magnetic fields) essentially transmits/propagates the initiating energy in the same way we experience it with light & energy.

Similar to glass, the effect of this impact causes the nuclear fuel to shatter (bomb) or partially disintegrate (power) thus allowing many (bomb) or some (power) shattered components of the nuclear fuel to collectively decay ‘instantaneously’.

Consequently we have an action of energy being propagated at speed c, but of energy levels similar to the initiating energy which is at some speed v which is very, very, much less than speed c. Since the propagation is within a split second we can say that it is ‘instantaneous’ and that the nuclear explosion is simply the ‘instantaneous’ sum of a whole bunch of energy decay discharges (vis: e=∑ particle decay)

Note again: the Hiroshima bomb did not blast the Enola Gay hence matter did not travel at speed c as a result of the explosion, hence the nuclear isotope was not hit by a particle at speed c, nor causing a chain reaction resulting in a host of particles travelling at c.

So how much particle decay would there be? Perhaps looking at it from a full-life or half-life perspective would give a feel that is immediately more understandable.

Plutonium has a half life of 24,000 years, Uranium 235 around 700 million years - reducing even the half-life decay from thousands of years to a split second is going to produce a phenomenal release of energy from a host of shattered particles all immediately decaying instantaneously.

However, there is significant residual nuclear radiation emitted in the area after an explosion so it is clear that the matter is not fully decayed – that is because, it would seem, that the explosion shatters the radioactive material into tiny fragments (much like glass shattering) each having significant residual radioactivity, i.e. it does not shatter down to the last atomic particle, but into miniscule pieces.

The amount of decay energy being instantaneously released in a split second rather than over thousand (or millions) of years is where the massive energy release derives.

It is contended that these arguments, as well as those in this series of papers, keep physics theory within intuitive bounds and within common sense.

It takes away both the Confussion and Confission of Relativity theory & energy theory of quantum physics.

Nevertheless it could be a wrong interpretation!

______________

If we apply a little more thought to this energy propagating switching-mechanism it becomes clear that it is the fundamental process through which all life & matter is able to function, to develop, to evolve (that aspect of God’s Creation in auto-mode), etc.

Everything we see around us is held, ‘glued’, together because of the energy propagation through a switching-mechanism.

The Primary Motive Force is then the Space SUPER-GLUE that holds everything together and provides the medium through which energy is propagated.

Different objects display different characteristics because of the difference in its atomic structure but nonetheless experience the continual switching-mechanism.

Thinking further - it would be possible then to categorise & quantify matter according to these properties, and also characteristics such as brittle, tough, spongy, etc. in terms of this switching-mechanism. Investigations along this line would likely reveal more insight to the Primary Motive Force that allows us & the universes to function.

Flowing from this we could then rethink the way in which we have viewed matter & energy and categorise & quantise common everyday objects & materials in terms of its propagation characteristics.

It would perhaps give further insights as to how life actually functions from a science/engineering perspective – it would also give further insight as to how to solve problems.

Further note: A rethink on the aspect of nuclear particles such as alpha, beta, gamma etc. is needed. It seems that errors in the interpretations of experiments that brought about these terms are misleading research.

______________

Richard Dawkins has made a number of disparaging remarks about Faith & Religion, and also about Astrology. He is wrongly deceiving schoolchildren & the public with unscientific claims.

As can be seen from open letters to Dawkins he has refused to engage in honest debate. (see ‘A bunch of Open Letters 3’)

This gives further weight to Dawkins’ unscientific approaches – he is not prepared to accept that he could be (& is) wrong. This is not to denigrate the immense value of his other works.

Dawkins’ unscientific claim is that evolution disproves Creation.

Evolution is entirely consistent with Creation – evolution is simply that part of God’s Creation in Auto Pilot

Somewhere, somehow, Dawkins has lost sight of reality & became focussed purely on science, to the exclusion of God, without realising that life-experiences contain data that are explained by historical natural & super-natural happenings. By adopting a scientific approach to collating & analysing data one can begin to assemble understandings about these historical events.

Astrology is one of those areas denigrated by Dawkins, and in so doing he overlooks a mass of data that could bring insight to how we function.

It is unscientific to dispel that which we don’t know simply because we have a biased viewpoint – it obscures/obstructs possible underlying truths.

However it is stressed that we need to separate horoscopes & interpretations from the planetary observations etc. that may hold valid insights.

On a balance of probability leading astrologers hold insight to revealing the nature of God’s Creation.

If we now accept that there exists a Primary Motive Force (PMF) = electro-magnetic switching-mechanism propagating at speed c, and that everything that exists functions as we see them because of this PMF then it becomes intuitive that since interacting planetary bodies affect the ether then in turn planetary interactions must have some impact upon us humans & earth. There is enough suggestive & recorded evidence to show that electricity grid lines & cell/mobile telephone transmissions have an effect on people/animals.

It is also known that our brains & bodies function as a result of electro-chemical interactions.

It logically follows then that interplanetary motion is likely to affect our ‘moods’ – and this is essentially what astrologers attempt to identify –> mood swings induced by terrestrial influences.

If we accept the developments within this series of papers then it is clear that everything is affected by energy flows – it is what ‘drives’ universes & life within the universe that we know. Clearly then influences from planetary interactions are going to affect energy potentials all around us, this in turn would no doubt have some generalising effects upon people.

If the observations of astrologists were collated & scientifically analysed it could realistically indicate further understandings as to how we function in microscopic & macroscopic terms.

As similarly discussed earlier regarding volcanoes, the correlation of astrology data and other data pertaining to natural events (& super-natural) could reveal further insights as to how we function & in predictions of future natural events (super-natural is at God’s discretion).

Again, it is not suggested that one should be misled by the horoscopes published in media rags – BUT, astrologists (serious ones) do consider/study planetary motions & interactions; they have observed & recorded events and noticed correlations between various kinds of events and human behaviour.

The fact that observational correlations have been identified is proof of their existence.

It is for scientists to qualify & quantify those observations into meaning.

That it why it is strange that Dawkins unscientifically dismisses, with contempt it appears, astrologists.

Richard Dawkins is also confused between ‘natural selection’ of evolution (i.e. the auto-mode of Creation) and the ‘conscience’ aspect of human-kind.

By all means watch Dawkins’ ‘The Genius of Darwin’ (which is being screened on Channel 4, Monday evenings, or off the internet on 4oD) but be careful of the deceptions by Dawkins regarding distinctions between evolution developments of animals, and especially the evolution of man, and that of the ‘conscience’ development of man as determined by the Creator.

These are distinctly separate developments.

This will be dealt with in a later paper.

______________

Confissed or Confussed - the point is that is that we need to rethink issues logically & practically, from an engineering perspective – the aforegoing arguments certainly make more sense than the 9, 10 or 11 dimensions, or that matter travels at the speed-of-light, or other sci-fi issues that physicists expect us to believe.

It is way beyond a reasonable doubt and towards absolute certainty that a Primary Motive Force (PMF) exists within the evolutionary, auto-mode, bounds of Creation that causes everything to function – it is the SUPER-GLUE of space.

And always remember - God is THE Engineer! Man’s knowledge is a drop in the ocean.

Chris Addington Pr. Eng.

www.cdadd.com

(Under enforced exile from South Africa due to ANC government’s oppressive XDR-nazi system and oppressive economic isolation by corporate & academic worlds.

Also under severe economic oppression due to Ireland & UK government dishonesty.

XDR = Extreme Democracy Resistant.)