Captain’s Log, Stardate 06 - Particle 17, Rho-17, Quantum Physics defies common sense

Captain’s Log, Stardate 06

More Particles of Space

Particle Rho-17

Index

- 'Doh' moments, 'Bear-of-Little-Brain' moments- connecting some light phenomena to classical physics.

- Quantum Physics defies common sense - NOW, concrete links from 'quantum' to classical => SENSE!

- Light: not electro-magnetic?!?

- Higgs Boson – invalid claim

- Radio Astronomy - need to rethink

- More on Clouds, and why/how we see them.

- Why is the sky blue?

- What causes the Borealis (Australis) to aurora?

- Certainty that Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle is wrong

- For every action there is an equal & opposite reaction - but, WHY?

- Swiss Coach Crash – compare to Princess Diana crash – light phenomena causing drivers to be misled?

- BBC Stargazing - Brian Cox misleading again!

- Sydney’s Crimson sky – the causes of this

CERN are locked into their billion dollar machine – they have to justify their expense, to the extent of refusing to acknowledge their machine is a white-elephant, to the extent of maintaining bogus science, science-fiction distortions – anything, to avoid admitting they are wrong..........

NOTE: Dublin hosted Europe Science Open Forum 2012 (ESOF2012) in July; CERN director Rolf-Dieter Heuer, Jocelyn Bell Burnell, Marcus du Sautoy & other scientists were billed as key speakers; none had the courage to engage with the Writer, and Royal Irish Academy (RIA) refused admittance to various lectures; thus defective science is maintained by dishonesty.

________________

'Doh' moments, 'Bear-of-Little-Brain' moments - when finally seeing some light.

One sometimes experiences a Homer Simpson 'Doh' moment, or a Winnie-the-Pooh 'Bear-of-Little-Brain' moment when one suddenly recognises something that has long eluded realisation, that something simple has been wrongly complicated. And sometimes one realises that the Doh/Bear-of-Little-Brain moments have actually spanned 350 years.

We have been told for decades that Quantum Physics defies common sense, and this has been accepted mantra amongst quantum scientists. For some years CDADD has progressively demonstrated in this series of papers that this mantra makes no sense, is non sense -> nonsense.

We can now finally see concrete connections between light transmission phenomena and classical physics; between Quantum physics & Classical physics. The facts have always been there but have not previously been understood.

Quantum Physics defies common sense because it is non sense -> NONSENSE.

We see interference-boundary colour patterns through a prism (a light filter) and now understand that the g (green) of the 'rainbow' pattern is the merging of the y&b colours (yellow & blue). The Doh moment came when suddenly realising that the orange is simply the merging of the r&y colours, and the indigo a merging of the v&b (violet & blue) colours. Therefore we have forward light and two sets of side-band colours; red & yellow and violet & blue. This gives us a transmission pattern as we see with radio/radar transmissions, of a main, forward beam lobe and two pairs of side lobes; the side lobes being much smaller than the main lobe.

In other words radar/radio transmission patterns are as a consequence of the ether structure – conversely, the transmission patterns, point specific in their formation, are derived proofs of the existence of an ether.

This is a concrete connection between 'particle' physics, at its most elemental form, and classical physics.

By further deductive reasoning, one can see that to achieve light intensity from deep space (otherwise we would not see stars) that there must exist a switching mechanism by which light information is transmitted without attenuation (loss). Which proves that light cannot travel at speed c but can only be propagated, and requiring a framework, ether, for same; and a frame that is inherently 'powered' so as to propagate light/energy without attenuation losses (Note: intensity dissipation through expansion, distance inverse square law, is not attenuation loss of the total)

It also shows that chain reactions as used to explain atomic/nuclear physics are an impossibility

Hence CERN's LHC, as originally intended, is a white-elephant

Light is NOT electro-magnetic?!?

Classical physics, derived progressively from Isaac Newton's Opticks (which we now know to be wrong), have held that light is in the electro-magnetic spectrum. Is this valid?

Take a compass and a prism, observe position of compass needle; take a prism (light filter) and place in front of compass in line with incoming light. If light were electro-magnetic, then the fact that the prism filters out light, allowing only forward light, then one would expect to see an effect on the compass needle. Similarly, if the intensity of sun rays varied. BUT, this doesn't happen - which suggests that light is not electro-magnetic. The ether across which light/energy is propagated may be/is electromagnetic but light is not (as suggested by this simple observation).

???

Higgs Boson – invalid claim

CERN's claim of finding the Higgs Boson is an invalid claim, just as is the claim of predicting a boson.

To claim a 'particle' exists (whether named as a Higgs boson, or scalar boson as Peter Higgs proposes, is immaterial as a name is merely a tag) is an invalid claim if one does not first recognise that Isaac Newton's opticks are wrong and that, consequently, Michelson-Morley, Einstein, Hubble, Feinman, Hawking etc. are also wrong. Ditto also CERN's white-elephant LHC as nothing travels at speed c, light is propagated at c.

What Peter Higgs (Edinburgh University) anticipated as a 'boson' is probably an ether element, or a cluster of ether elements functioning together. But it is invalid to claim prediction without first recognising that an ether exists; the concept of a boson, as originally argued, presupposes that an ether does not exist.

Thus CERN's claim of finding a Boson is an invalid claim.

Radio Astronomy - need to rethink

Now that we see the links between particle & classical physics, it becomes clear that radio astronomy needs to be fully rethought.

BUT, this presents a serious problem as scientists are refusing to be honest.

More on Clouds, and why/how we see them.

BBC's Sky at Night recently discussed 'nocturnal clouds'. From the statements it was difficult to determine whether the presenter was saying that nocturn clouds only appear at night or are only seen at night.

Nocturn clouds are those wispy but darkish clouds that one occasionally sees in the evening, that seem to appear by magic. What is happening is that wispy clouds in the sky are not visible during full daylight because ambient light dazzles observation, but as the sun sets and its rays pass through increasing lengths of its transverse section, it means that there is increasingly more scattering of light in moisture particles, and hence more mixing of the roy & vib colours (now, more correctly, r&y and v&b), so the clouds gradually get darker, hence 'magically' appear.

(This does not mean that similar clouds cannot appear at the same time, they can, but that in general terms observation is made possible by the darkening of the wispy clouds due to the change in direction of sun rays relative to the cloud layer & the greater mixing of increased roy & vib scattered patterns)

Another experience; observing thick clouds over the Wicklow hills from Sutton, and across Dublin Bay, as the sun was setting, early February. It was expected that the clouds would be very dark because of the sun rays passing through the longer cloud transverse section; but the clouds were relatively light in colour. This immediately suggested a contradiction to the colour pattern mixing producing the darkening...... until looking up and above Dublin Bay was a solitary puff of cloud illuminated directly by the sun's rays, and reflecting (torchlight) onto the clouds over the Wicklows, which attenuated the darkening by re-reflecting light reflected from the solitary cloud. This is an important point when observing & interpreting light phenomena, don't believe what is immediately observable – always STOP & THINK.

(A further point. Ben at astronomy.ie shop in Airside, Dublin raised the point of a colour wheel with r, y & b segments, spin the wheel and the colours appear white; Ben made this point to counter explanation of roy & vib mixing causing darkening of clouds. This is an excellent observation and one that needs to be carefully considered. The immediate response is to recognise that direct light & reflected light have different directional properties; and it is possibly this that may be the cause of the difference in observed responses; white (reflected) versus darkening (direct))

Why is the sky blue?

Whilst attending a school play, attention was drawn to a spotlight on the black backdrop stage curtain – one could easily observe a bluish fringe to the light. Later, the operator moved the spotlight and it happened to be partially obstructed by a mosaic mirrored ball (often seen in discos). One could now easily observe the bluish fringe from the spotlight and now also a red to yellow fringe resulting from the ball obstruction.

This brought another eureka moment. Clearly the sun's rays, when observed from any direction, is appearing against an otherwise near dark background of space (much like observing a spotlight at night), and, because of the side-band transmission phenomena there is a vib (bluish) tinge to the extremes of the observable rays (NOTE: DO NOT LOOK DIRECTLY AT SUN); but these only become apparent if there is a medium upon which this blue fringe can appear, or to colour – and that is the outcome of the sun's rays falling onto the earth’s atmosphere – it gives the backdrop on which the bluish tinge can appear – hence a blue planet.

It is because of the sun's rays coming from far distant that it is effectively a point source, and with no other ambient light, that the blue tinge manifests. And it is for this reason that LED lights appear blue, they being intense point sources of light, thus allowing the side-band blue to be more prominent; and why bomber pilots, directly in a spotlight's beam, observed bluish light (it was not, as pilots wrongly thought, that bluish spotlights were radar controlled).

What causes the Borealis (Australis) to aurora?

We can now correctly understand why auroras appear in the northernmost & southernmost parts of earth.

When the sun is below the horizon we can get both a vib blue tinge from the direct sun's rays and a red to yellow roy tinge resulting from the interference upon the earth, both mixing in the sky. Molecules in the earth';s atmosphere act as a screen upon which these lights colours fall & merge; and the movement of these particles create the spectacular display that is observed.

The explanations given in text books & Wikipedia are incorrect. Certainly the earth's magnetic field has an impact indirectly on the movement of atmospheric particles but it is not the principle cause of the auroras.

(e.g. Wikipedia: aurora borealis: explanation given:- '......caused by the collision of energetic charged particles with atoms in the high altitude atmosphere (thermosphere). The charged particles originate in the magnetosphere and solar wind and, on Earth, are directed by the Earth's magnetic field into the atmosphere .....'

This explanation is incorrect)

The relative position of the sun to earth, and relative to the relative position of an observer on the earth will cause differences to the observed colours patterns produced by the mixing of the roy & vib fringes.

Certainty that Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle is wrong.

'The more precisely the position is determined, the less precisely the momentum is known in this instant, and vice versa' - Heisenberg, uncertainty paper, 1927

Like Einstein's & every-other scientists' theories, Heisenberg's were also affected by the consequent errors flowing from Isaac Newton's dishonesty in plagiarising/stealing another person's work on optics.

The universe, everywhere at its most least point, functions precisely - we can confirm this by looking through a prism and seeing the precise patterns that form, and repeatedly, no matter how many times we look at them - the ether functions precisely according to a precise functioning (this may seem a tautologous/convoluted statement - but stop & think; its particles are precise in position AND precise in functioning).

Every switching of the ether occurs for a precise reason & produces a precise effect & a precise outcome; and the next switch occurs precisely & producing another precise effect and another precise outcome - there is absolutely no uncertainty about this - everything functions precisely. FULL STOP.

We, as yet, do not know what that precise functionality is, but that is ignorance NOT uncertainty.

The fact that an ether exists and everything functions in an orderly & precise manner means there is absolute certainty in everything that happens. (Obscure philosophical arguments about butterfly wings causing chaos & other such arguments are not entered into)

(An aside: Werner Heisenberg was much maligned for remaining in Germany during WWII - his allegiance being to his country not its leaders & system. He was further maligned for failing (fortunately) in progressing Germany's nuclear programme. BUT, since nuclear theory is not correctly understood it was only by chance that Allied scientists came up with a functional bomb. Hence it was wrong to demean another scientist’s failure for also not taking the same wrong turns that despite being wrong achieved success.

Niels Bohr was for long of the opinion that atomic energy was not attainable; it was only after reaching the United States and induction into the Manhattan Project that he began to see the possibilities; but nevertheless the theory was & still is wrong as to why nuclear energy is as it is. It is the incorrect understanding of particle physics that is making nuclear power more dangerous.

See: Heisenberg's War by Tomas Powers)

For every action there is an equal & opposite reaction - but, WHY?

Forthcoming..... but give this some thought in the meantime. What observable classical physics can be used to explain the fundamental 'particle' functionality which, in the 'aggregate', causes physical things to occur?

i.e. how do we close the gap between classical & 'particle' physics (as we now observe with light transmission dynamics)

(Note: blue sky is proof that white light not made up of 'rainbow' colours; because of differing responses roy & vib caused by interference of, but not components of, white light

What is 'white' light?)

-------------------------

Swiss Coach Crash Why is the sky blue?, What causes the Borealis (Australis) to aurora? Stargazing episode 3 Re: BBC2 Stargazing - Re: More on Light Transmission Dynamics -Sydney’s Crimson morning sky Re: Rethinking CERN's bizarre claims: 'faster than light', Higgs Boson; Cameron's 'Dunkirk' retreat. Thu, 15 Mar 2012 11:02:47 +0000Chris Addington <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.;This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., desmond swayne <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.;, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., Paul Farrelly <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.;, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., Richard Dawkins <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.;, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., Charles DeJongh <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.;, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., Naomi Van Loo <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.;, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., Norman Lamb MP <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.;, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., Sanjay Patel <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.;, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., Michael Fitzpatrick <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.;, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., eric avebury <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.;, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., Brian Cox <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.;, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., Policy Exchange <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.;, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

the tragic coach crash in switzerland should also be considered from a light phenomena perspective.

the driver was not speeding, was rested, the vehicle is modern (unlikely to be component failure)
viewing video at skynews (link below) the video shows a similar layby with green (fluorescent) light strips; below the video is a photo of the crashed bus square-on to the layby oncoming facing wall.

the fact that the bus hit the wall directly square-on is possibly revealing

there is much about light transmission dynamics & phenomena that we have/do not properly understood/understand

the green light strips (as seen in the video) certainly give a confusing message in that it creates a 'frame' which one could be drawn toward.

but, my suspicions are that there are certain, as yet not understood characteristics, with regard the nature of vehicle lights, interference boundary effects, colour mixing phenomena, frequency of electric power, bends/dips in tunnel, etc. all of which multiple phenomena probably created a circumstance which caused the coach driver to see incorrectly, to be misled

http://news.sky.com/home/world-news/article/16189078

the circumstances concerning princess diana's death may have similar characteristics -- it having also occurred in a tunnel with artificial lighting

sincerely

Chris Addington Pr.Eng.

-------- Original Message --------

Subject:	Stargazing episode 3 Re: BBC2 Stargazing - Re: More on Light Transmission Dynamics -Sydney’s Crimson morning sky Re: Rethinking CERN's bizarre claims: 'faster than light', Higgs Boson; Cameron's 'Dunkirk' retreat.
Date:	Thu, 19 Jan 2012 08:03:39 +0000
From:	Chris Addington
To:	This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., desmond swayne <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.;, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., Paul Farrelly <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.;, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., Colin Blakemore <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.;, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., Richard Dawkins <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.;, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., Charles DeJongh <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.;, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., Naomi Van Loo <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.;, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., Norman Lamb MP <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.;, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., Sanjay Patel <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.;, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., Michael Fitzpatrick <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.;, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., eric avebury <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.;, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., Brian Cox <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.;, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., Policy Exchange <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.;, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

bbc2 stargazing episode 3 - weds jan 18

brian cox makes more gross errors

he explained that with planets orbiting distant stars these can be observed by changes in the observed light frequency, via doppler shift. whilst planet moves away from observer (planet on its orbit) a red shift is observed, moving toward observer a blue shift is observed.

this is wrong - the phenomena is simply an observation of alternating roy & vib interference boundary patterns as the planet obstructs the star's light on one sided of its sphere and then the other.

there is no evidence of frequency attribution to light, the rainbow pattern is not a continuous pattern but two merged patterns of roy & vib. since patterns are everywhere point-specific it follows that a structured framework, ether, must exist. hence nothing can travel at c but is propagated through a switching mechanism. which is why, if life exists elsewhere, it would likely not be able to reach us (alive) or at all, nor could we reach them.

life elsewhere is a moot point & a pointless point - there are far more compelling problems on earth, including the need for scientists to be professional & honest.

unfortunately people who focus on maintaining celeb status find that they have to maintain a constant oral stream of verbiage, these people quickly run out of constructive things to say hence garbage becomes the norm & professionalism is entirely lost.

bbc should stop promoting cult status & get back to what it was famous for, vis: maintaining global links, and for free. bbc should open up bbcplayer & other transmission channels & give fair exposure to other professionals

sincerely

Chris Addington Pr.Eng.

eircom have now abusively blocked my address This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
google continue to abusively restrict my communications which contradicts wiki's standpoint against internet abuse

On 18/01/2012 10:15, Chris Addington wrote:

to macclesfield astronomical
re bbc2 stargazing

brian cox is not being honest with you

cox is refusing to acknowledge that newton was wrong (hence also michelson, morley, einstein, hubble, feynman, hawking)
nor is cox acknowledging the light transmission dynamics that cause us to see clouds.
the existence of an ether precludes matter from travelling at speed c; light & energy is propagated at c.

episode 1 - cox's explanation for tides makes no sense. the tidal 'bulge' moving around the earth following the moon is effectively a symmetrical bulge (on both sides of earth); whereas the moon presents as an asymmetric force. clearly then, the asymmetric 'gravity pull' from the moon does not explain a symmetrical phenomena.
earth as a 'synchronous induction motor' does explain a symmetrical phenomena

episode 2: blackholes - if brian cox is not prepared to admit error re seeing clouds then he, like hawking & others, will not admit error with blackhole theory. if, historically, we have misunderstood how we see clouds then it is highly probable that their blackhole theory is wrong.
to develop a massive theory based upon a far distant & bright spot is ludicrous.

also, too many assumptions are being made re radio astronomy when we have still to uncover much more re light transmission dynamics

professionalism is absent from physics research

i would encourage that honesty is adopted as prime policy by macclesfield & not be misled by the celeb cult by bbc & other media, to which brian cox has succumbed

sincerely

Chris Addington Pr.Eng.

Sydney’s Crimson morning sky

BBC2 recently aired a documentary ‘Nature’s Weirdest Events’ produced & presented by Chris Packham – Episode 1 included the event of Sydney’s crimson morning in September 2009 (BBC iPlayer for UK residents, or http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/8270104.stm, )

Briefly:- red/brown, orange dust from Lake Eyre region was blown over wide parts of eastern Australia in September 2009 which, coupled with a morning sun, produced a crimson colour all around Sydney & elsewhere around. Later the atmospheric colour shifted to more earthy orange, then later to greyish.

Meteorologist accounted for the crimson colour in the air to the colour of the dust itself, this is largely incorrect

Going back to prism basics developed by CDADD (and correcting Newton’s errors); a prism is effectively a light filter, it filters out everyotherwhichway light & transmits forward viewing light only. Interference boundaries around objects cause two distinct colour patterns roy & vib (red, orange, yellow & violet, indigo, blue, the green in a rainbow is the yellow & blue merged, i.e. the rainbow is not one contiguous colour pattern but two patterns merged). We view these interference boundary colour patterns when general ambient light is removed, and this is the effect of a prism filter, i.e. the prism removes everyotherwhichway ambient light & transmits only forward viewing light, which thus allows us to see the interference boundary colour patterns.

The earth’s horizons present as interference boundaries to the sun’s light. Evening sunsets produce a roy pattern hence rosy sunsets, whereas morning sunrises are vib, bluish. But these general phenomena are altered by atmospheric conditions. So, as the earth rotates eastwards towards the sun each morning we initially experience a bluish tinge in the increasing light, however if clouds or pollution are present then the boundary/paarticle edges produce an opposite side roy pattern, hence expression red sky in morning.

However the Lake Eyre dust was everywhere present in Sydney and each particle caused a rosy roy colour pattern below each particle & relative to a viewers position relative to the rising sun, which predominated the orange colour of the dust and collectively created the crimson effect in the sky. Since the particles of dust are densely packed the orange & yellow colours of the roy patterns are obstructed by the immediately adjacent dust particle thus allowing the deeper red (crimson) to predominate, this is repeated about every other dust particle, hence a general red/crimson colour. We can also see this effect with smog which produces a sickly crimson colour in the mornings.

As the sun rises higher above the horizon light rays now increasingly bounce off objects and create everyotherwhichway ambient light which then diminishes/swamps the roy & vib colour patterns. But nevertheless the particles of dust create both roy & vib patterns which progressively merge and create a greying of the atmosphere, a similar dynamic to that which creates the greying of clouds.

Viewing of the various newsclips at the BBC link above one can see a lessening crimson effect as the sun has moved higher into the sky, the ambient light would have diminished the deeper crimson effect that occurred early morning when ambient light was minimal. Some images clearly show a late morning greying effect.

An important point to note: since we now know that mornings are bluish (vib) & sunsets reddish (roy) and taking east as right hand (rhs) & west (lhs) (when facing north) we can establish a ‘normal’ orientation convention for prisms. The vib pattern appears to rhs of interference boundaries when prism apex is pointing to the lhs; adopting this convention would avoid confusion (in previous discussions a ‘norm’ had been established with the apex to rhs causing a roy pattern to appear on rhs of interference boundaries).

Also recall: the fact that there are two distinct patterns (roy & vib) indicates directional properties of light; which indicates directional transmission of light at each & every point in space, the point-specificity of the patterns can only be achieved through a framework (i.e. light particles zipping everywhichway would not explain the point-specific characteristic of the colour patterns); this confirms the existence of an ether; which proves that Michelson-Morley were wrong; & hence that Einstein, Hubble, Feynman, Hawking, Dawkins, Cox, Al-Khalili & others were/are wrong, and that CERN’s Large Hadron Collider is a white-elephant. Nothing travels at speed c, light (& all matter) is PROPAGATED via a switching mechanism throughout the ether.

Also observe sunsets with thin cloud layer in sky; notice that the cloud layer gets darker as the sun sets lower – this is because as the sun’s rays progressively shine through lengthening section of the cloud layer the light rays experience ever increasing numbers of water droplets, each with their own interference boundaries & each producing roy & vib patterns, these patterns are increasingly mixed with roy & vib patterns from adjacent water droplets, because of increasing length of cloud through which rays travel, & into greys which increasingly darkens as the rays travel through increasing cloud length.

The fact that we have not previously understood why we see clouds confirms that we need to rethink what we see in deep-space & rethink what we call ‘black-holes’

Chris Addington Pr.Eng.

##### End of Particle Rho-17 #####

Recent Papers