Captain’s Log, Stardate 06

 

More Particles of Space

 

Particle Psi-16

 

 

Dishonesty has wide-ranging & far-reaching destructive consequences.

 

Cameron’s ‘Dunkirk’ retreat from Euroland;

 

CERN – bizarre claims - ‘faster than light’ & Higgs Boson quest

 

Why & How we see clouds

 

Silver, Warm & Cool Moons, Blue Mornings, Rosy Sunsets

 

_____________

 

INDEX:

Introduction

Faster than light

Higgs Boson quest

How & why we see clouds & why deep-sea is black

Silver, Warm & Cool Moons, Blue Mornings, Rosy Sunsets

Global Warming, Confused Plants

Introduction:

Dishonesty within academic institutions, universities & organisations has wide-ranging and far-reaching destructive consequences:-

But, let’s not be self-righteous about this – everybody is dishonest to some degree. The person to win the prize for being the least dishonest person is likely to be Mahatma Gandhi, and ditto John Paul II in tie position - but nevertheless they both had some dishonesty. There are oceans separating these two persons & Nelson Mandela & others. We are all dishonest to some degree.

But, when dishonesty becomes a virus and infects the structural integrity of an organisation then that is an entirely different matter.

The early astronauts had immense Personal Power which drove the Apollo programmes; and it was this Power that enabled NASA to bring Apollo 13 safely back home. However in the intervening years up to the Columbia disaster financial power had reduced astronauts to celeb passengers because it had virally infected NASA with dishonesty, and the evidence was the disaster. NASA continue to be plagued by dishonesty as they refuse to engage with CDADD on ground breaking R&D that would significantly improve their launch methodologies.

Other evidence of structural dishonesty is detected by events such as Versailles Treaty, Pearl Harbour, Kennedy assassination, Twin Towers implosions, Bhopal, etc., etc. These physical evidences were symptoms of long-standing structural infections.

BBC aired news of doctors/scientists researching eyes and giving injections to correct defects – attempts to contact these persons to discuss benefits from CDADD’s R&D were ignored. This means that doctors are engaging in human experimentation with less than Best Practice because of structural dishonesty; it takes them down the slippery slope of Mengele style experimentation.

Some other symptoms of structural dishonesty that we see today:

- Amongst other nations, Canada & China appear to be bailing out of the Kyoto Protocol regarding reductions of greenhouse gas emissions – this because, as CDADD has shown, the IPCC’s claim of pollution CAUSING global warming is groundless.

- David Cameron’s ‘Dunkirk’ retreat from Euroland is based upon fears of London’s fraudulent ‘Money Machine’ (which is keeping Britannia afloat, just) being exposed – Cameron refuses to see that the money machine is a large causal factor of the meltdown.

- CERN making increasingly bizarre claims of ‘faster than light’ & a bogus search for an indeterminate Higgs ‘Boson’.

Canada (& China, & any other nation) is justified in bailing out of the Kyoto (if that is their intention) as the costs to local & national economies is at grave risk, but without adequate alternative energy sources at present. Nations cannot be expected to destroy national energy resource jobs & forgo consumption whilst alternative energy patents, primarily belonging to Western nations, block reform. This blockage is very much a consequence of inappropriate patent laws & the absence of appropriate Intellectual Property Laws permitting the open usage of IP on a royalties basis (see paper Wolfson Economics Prize, WEP, submission). Development & implementation of new technology is impeded by archaic patent laws, which have the effect of obstructing clean energy – hence old-style fossil energy consumption is continued.

Pollution is a serious problem in itself, but until adequate, readily-available & costs-competitive alternative & clean energy sources come on-line then there will be strong resistance to abandoning readily available fossil fuels, and the jobs that are required for same.

Whilst Cameron’s ‘Dunkirk’ retreat from Euroland is a negative it should be seen as a positive opportunity to address the gross economic disparities within Britannia, but with the view to establishing new principles for establishing wellbeing within nations, and which can be rolled-out globally – and through an Economy Engineering Action Plan that would disempower London’s massive money machine. BUT, PM David Cameron is no Thatcher nor Churchill.

The Merkozy hardline stance against defaulting junior states, and against Britannia’s non-alignment, is very much destructive and contradicts the very purpose of unionship, and is propelling Euroland toward a dictate.

(again, see paper WEP submission)

The prior points are essentially consequences of defective intangible Economic ‘sciences’ but consequent to a general aura of viral dishonesty within academia which can be observed through the bizarre claims from CERN.

CERN refuse to engage with CDADD’s groundbreaking R&D which has proved that Newton’s light/prism theories are wrong – and from which Michelson, Morley, Einstein, Hubble, Hawking, CERN & many other scientists have wrongly derived other multiply-tiered defective theories.

Observation through a prism of the roy & vib boundary interference patterns shows that these patterns are everywhere point-specific – and point-specificity can only be achieved within a structured framework, NOT by light ‘particles’ zipping around at speed c like gattling gun bullets. The framework is thus the ether. Point-specificity PROVES the existence of the ether. Whether by design or Design is a free choice belief issue for every person - but what can be categorically stated is that the ‘archbishop of atheism’ (Richard Dawkins) is WRONG in his baseless arguments against Design; and also WRONG about design in his latest book ‘Magic of Reality’ – and the ‘archbishop’ is afraid to engage with CDADD over his (Dawkins’) gross errors & unprofessionalism.

CERN’s refusal to engage transparently & honestly is criminal – CERN violates professional integrity and continues to make bizarre claims for the sole purpose of ‘justifying’ its very existence. Registered Professionals are required by law to abide by Codes of Conduct/Ethics – but CERN can brazenly project bizarre & dishonest claims without compunction.

One needs only visit CERN’s website to see that of both of the latest claims (faster than light & Higgs boson) CERN have no concise information to explain their claims. CERN purposefully hide behind a mass of links, none of which give clear explanation of the claims.

And media simply put across simplistic statements that do not give clarity or real information – hence the public are bamboozled into falsely believing that CERN are making scientific progress – when, in fact, CERN is not; CERN is being dishonest.

(Purposefully vague & confusing explanations can be found at the following links, & links thereon

BUT NOTE: NOWHERE can be found CERN’s countering of CDADD’s proofs re Newton’s errors = CERN avoiding & evading = CERN dishonest.

http://user.web.cern.ch/public/en/Research/CNGS-en.html

http://proj-cngs.web.cern.ch/proj-cngs/ProjetOverview/projetoverview2002.htm

http://proj-cngs.web.cern.ch/proj-cngs/ProjetOverview/MainComponents.htm )

How can we sensibly explain the ‘faster than light’ claims from CERN?

_______________

Faster than Light:

It is important to recognise that CERN’s very existence stems from works/theories initiated by Richard Feynman. Feynman, as can be observed from interviews & lectures (Youtube; Richard Feynman), contrasts markedly from the general aura projected by CERN – whereas CERN project non-transparency & confusion, Feynman projects transparency & constant caution to interpretation errors.

It is contended that were Feynman still alive today that he would take exception at CERN’s dishonesty.

However to understand the errors of CERN’s bizarre claims and to put classical & practical perspective; view a BBC Horizon interview:-

(View: THE PLEASURE OF FINDING THINGS OUT, Richard Feynman Interview (1981)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FXiOg5-l3fk,

especially at minutes 3:45 to 9:00)

During these 5 minutes Feynman gives explanation of his toy wagon & ball on board; which gives a classical understanding of what is really happening at CERN.

Briefly & simply: a ball on a wagon; pull wagon ball rolls to back; stop wagon ball rolls to front. WHY? Feynman’s father explained (as related by Richard Feynman) that the ball only APPEARS to roll backwards/forwards but is in fact moving forwards RELATIVE to the ground due to the inertia of the wagon & its effect on the ball on board; and this is caused by inertia.

It follows, that if one stands on a lightish & stationary wagon with a large block of wood on board & with a sledge hammer and then hit the block with the sledge hammer then the effort from the hammer onto the block transfers to the wagon which will then move slightly, relative to the ground (or try wiggling your body whilst on board & notice the movement of the wagon).

Now, if someone is steadily pulling the trolley and the block is now hit then the trolley has achieved a slight velocity change, momentarily, hence the anticipated time of arrival at a predetermined point will be slightly different from that expected had the block not been hit.

It is this similar effect that CERN have observed – if CERN’s measurement are indeed correct. (Note: if they are NOT correct then it does not disprove the explanation herein – think about this – don’t make the same mistake as Michelson & Morley)

Recall from past Particles in this series of papers: - there exists an ether, it is contended this is structured like packed marbles, but is clearly having degrees of freedom/flexibility.

CERN has achieved high-energy forces within its accelerators which PROPAGATE (NOT travel) at near speed c – these ‘packets’ of energy are then sent through the ground some 732 kms from CERN to Gran Sasso in Italy; but the ‘particles’ arrive slightly earlier than anticipated.

This ‘slightly earlier arrival’ is explained by the ether ‘flexing’ due to the high energy impact of the packets being released at CERN; the ‘packets’ cause a distortion, a compression on the ether matrix which then shifts RELATIVE to Gran Sasso and hence it APPEARS that the energy ‘packet’ arrives earlier. The energy nevertheless propagates at whatever speed (near to c) but the ether matrix frame flexes closer to Gran Sasso.

This distortion of the ether matrix is also observed in previous experiments of fields affecting light rays – but in which it was wrongly interpreted as light rays being bent; in fact it is the ether matrix that is slightly distorted by the high fields & the light propagated through the ether APPEARING to be bent.

BBC Horizon recently aired a deceptive documentary ‘What Happened Before the Big Bang’ – the programme centred around a loaded question of big-bang, it wrongly presumes that there was a big-bang, which thus causes a baseless search for something that is not proved to have existed. This is similar to Michelson-Morley experiment – a non-result was wrongly interpreted as proof of the non-existence of an ether – which is partly why Einstein, Hubble, Hawking & others went off track.

The LIGO experiment at Louisiana University is also wrong-tracked for similar arguments above.

Newton’s Universal Law of Gravitation is also wrong – because we know that mass has no weight in space, gravity does not exist in space, hence gravity cannot be holding solar systems together – hence it is electro-magnetic forces as the probable cause, and this caused by induction into planets from the sun’s energy flow, which induces electro-magnetic fields & planet rotation, which causes attraction & opposing centrifugal forces, hence balanced orbiting.

Higgs Boson

Scientists have become mindset-locked into believing that things can travel at speed c (light is PROPAGATED at c) and CERN’s massive ‘god machine’ is a huge white-elephant that scientists are locked into defending, whatever the costs. Their very jobs depend upon their maintaining their false claims.

The very existence of CERN has been achieved through financing from a global Money Base & Money Supply that was increasingly inflated through artificial & fraudulent money from defrauded pensions/investments, multiply tiered double accounting scams, & numerous other increasingly toxic fraudulent finance scams that had escalated since the early 1960s. Massive financial dishonesty is the source of CERN’s funding.

The underlying science has derived from multiply tiered & grossly flawed theories and all based upon Newton’s erroneous light/prism experiments. CERN refuse to be honest about these facts – CERN choose to be dishonest.

Whilst some scientists zoom-out into deep space to try to develop understandings of how matter came about, other scientists zoom-in to try to develop understandings of the smallest of matter/particles. Zooming-out leaves an infinity of space, but zooming-in means there is a finite point to which one must reach the smallest particle that exists (whatever that may be). Consequently it is intuitive that such an element must exist – so in stating that a particle exists and calling it the Higgs Boson is much like making a prior determination that sand particles must exist and calling it (prior to it being called sand) sand. And, hey presto! on going to the beach one sees particles and thus claims to have ‘discovered’ sand.

So. CERN have to justify their existence.

So. CERN zaps high energy pulses around its accelerators and cause them to collide creating some ‘fireworks’. CERN scientists now ‘search’ for something that they can tag as the illusive ‘Higgs Boson’.

BUT, CERN still refuse to engage with the CONCRETE proofs that Newton was wrong, that light patterns at interference boundaries are everywhere point-specific & must be caused by a structured framework, an ether, all of which contradicts CERN’s claim of particles zipping at c. And since there is a framework, an ether, it follows that nothing can travel at c, but must be propagated at c.

CERN scientists claim that these ‘higgs boson’ particles are inconsistent in where they appear. This is not surprising.

Try zipping a snooker ball at another – notice how the direction that the second ball (& first) travels depends on exactly where the first ball strikes the second - and on round surfaces the directions are varied & random; and this is in 2 dimensions, in 3 dimensions the directions are more varied.

How & where two high energy particles, PROPAGATED around CERN’s collider, impact upon each other will determine in which directions each will travel, and they will be random & varied.

CERN do not engage professionally, or at all. Yet, CERN continue to make bizarre claims = CERN choose to be dishonest.

So. CERN remain mindset-locked

---

Notes:

- Everywhere-point-specificity of the roy & vib interference patterns proves the existence of the ether; ‘bending’ of light rays indicates the ether to have flex; which thus indicates that high-energy impact experiments such as those by CERN would/should produce an APPARENT ‘faster than light’ phenomena. But note: this does NOT prove the results that CERN have achieved.

- The fact that particles pass through the earth at near speed c supports CDADD’s contention that ALL matter passes/moves across the ether as a consequence of the ether switching mechanism, because the ether is the fundamental framework upon which ALL matter is structured.

- CERN are extremely vague & unclear in their website; purposefully so. Their intent is to bamboozle & deceive; to justify, by any means, their existence.

Reiterate: Michelson-Morley adopted a non fail-safe approach in their experimenting to ‘prove’ that the ether does not exist. Michelson & Morley were just two people that created just one of many false links into the erroneous Big Bang theory (as presently postulated)

Don’t allow yourself to be bamboozled by CERN’s free-choice of dishonesty.

How & why we see clouds & why deep-sea is black

(copy & paste from previous paper)

We need to differentiate between: Passive Black Dark and Active Black Light & Active Transparent Light.

Why is the deep-sea black? It is because the light in deep sea is Active Black Light (not Active Transparent Light)

To understand why this is so we need to rethink what clouds are & why we see clouds as we do. Historically it has been believed that clouds obstruct light therefore they are dark – but this does not make sense, because the shadow on a white ceiling is lighter than the dark base of cumulonimbus clouds – yet both have light obstructed. There is an ACTIVE aspect to dark clouds that has not been previously recognised.

Cycling back along a country road between Jamestown Bridge to Cadamstown, from Aglio’s Restaurant in Enfield to Kilmore House (brilliant overnight stop), on the last night of our Carrick tour, the clouds were a rosy red from the setting sun, but under the rosy-ness the clouds were also grey-black. Why are clouds ranging white, white-grey, grey-white, grey, grey-black, black-grey?

It is because Active Transparent Light is transformed into Active Black Light, and a range of greys in between.

The bright white of clouds are due to reflected light, and amongst these we also see passive white-grey shadow (passive black dark, of low intensity)

Passive Black Dark is the total darkness that we experience in a closed space with no light source – as light is progressively introduced we experience greying, until full light is permitted - the greying is the passive ‘shadowing’ (less intense Passive Black Dark) relative to full light (Active Transparent Light).

Active Transparent Light is that light we see all around us.

Active Black Light:

Contrast the shadow of a white ceiling to a dark cloud – the cloud is far more intensely black-grey than the ceiling shadow – hence it cannot be argued that the clouds blocking the sun’s light is the cause of the dark clouds. Clouds have a dark base because it is Active Black Light that is causing the dark greying, which predominates over the passive grey (‘shadow’)

As I presented in the latest papers in the Captain’s Log series – a prism is a light filter; it filters out every-other-which-way ambient light & permits forward light only (can a prism be considered a Convolution Integrator?). In filtering out ambient light and thus transmitting only forward light, it allows us to see the two distinct interference patterns that occur at interference boundaries – namely: the rhs roy (red/orange/yellow) & lhs vib (violet/indigo/blue) patterns; and that it is the merging of the virtual boundary roy pattern with the real apex boundary vib pattern that creates the merged rainbow pattern roy(g)biv – yellow (y) & blue (b) mixing to create green (g).

(Note: rhs & lhs are relative to the interference boundary, with prism held such that viewing face is to rhs of apex closest to eye, and with forward light not reflected light -> orientation convention; if held to lhs or reflected light then pattern orientations reverse – observe this with reflected light off cloud boundaries)

Hence there is no basis for frequency attribution to light colours & thus Doppler effect is invalid – there is cone-arc relationship, & light directional attributes.

We also know from observation that rain drops & sunlight cause rainbow patterns. It follows that water droplets each have a myriad of virtual prisms contained within each of them; and the orientation of the droplets to the orientation of the sun’s rays will determine the orientation of the virtual prism that causes any particular rainbow (note: depending upon each observer’s position to a rainbow, the orientation of the virtual prism within a droplet will also change).

The intensity of the sun’s direct rays producing the rainbow pattern swamps the ambient greying of the light through the rain – thus we see a bright rainbow pattern.

A cloud is a mass of water droplets of varying sizes – from gas molecule through to golf ball sized & bigger drops, and through to solid ice. So, with light entering a droplet, certain rays will transmit forward to produce a rainbow effect (merging of roy & vib), all other light will be scattered, but the scattered light will impact other droplets and they too will create rainbow patterns due to their virtual prism effect & also scatter all other light, which impacts upon other droplets, and so on …….

So, in a cloud, we have a myriad of roy & vib patterns scattering in every-which-way directions.

We know that by mixing colours red, yellow & blue that we achieve greys of increasing intensity (take some school poster paints, but best with transparent watercolours) and mix red & yellow to achieve orange, note the approximate quantities of each, now slowly add small amounts of blue – the change to grey is rapid – i.e. it requires small amounts of blue relative to red & yellow to create the greying effect – hence blue predominates the red & yellow. (The addition of violet & indigo causes more rapid greying)

We know from rainbow patterns that green is produced by the merging of yellow & blue, so with further mixing of roy & vib patterns greys emerge.

Consequently the taller the cloud, the more the mixing of the myriad of roy & vib patterns, and with vib predominating the cloud becomes increasingly grey-black, black-grey. It does not become completely black because there is always ambient light surrounding the cloud.

In addition, ice droplets will also obstruct light, but also partially reflect light.

But, in the deep sea, ambient transparent light is not surrounding the depths. Also the water molecules are much smaller so there are far more prismatic effects & pattern mixings per metre (i.e. water is denser than clouds), so the darkening in the sea happens within a shorter depth.

Consequently marine life exists in the sea depths because light reaches it in ample quantities, excepting that it is Active Black Light NOT Active Transparent Light.

This deduction gives further weight to my R&D, that a star/planets solar system consists of a SUPER-GENERATOR (star) powering SUPER-MOTORS (planets).

(Len Deighton, in his novel, Bomber, mid-chapter 23, explains that bomber pilots, both RAF & Luftwaffe, believed that searchlights with a bluish tinge were radar controlled lights. Deighton stated that there we no such things as bluish searchlights. It would appear that Deighton is wrong & that the pilots are partly right. The light from a search light would cause a high intensity of vib blue around the inner rhs edge (relative to pilot) of the searchlight frame (because reflected light from reflector), past which the light shines, and when shining directly at a bomber – i.e. when the searchlight has ‘caught’ a bomber. The pilots were in error in assuming that the searchlights that ‘caught’ them, being bluish, were associated with radar control, and hence they were caught because of radar, hence they were blue – in fact all searchlights would give a bluish tinge when a pilot was ‘caught’ in its beam)

The aforegoing is groundbreaking research that would have become apparent centuries ago had Newton not been dishonest, or had the Royal Society adopted professionalism – BUT, the RS was manipulated by Newton as its President.

Silver, Warm & Cool Moons, Blue Mornings, Rosy Sunsets

These varying effects are from the same causal roy & vib colour patterns that occur at interference boundaries.

The interference boundary is the earth’s edge, and interfering with the sun’s rays.

In the mornings the sun rises from the east, which produces a vib pattern, hence morning light is bluish; in the evening, after the sun has set, we experience a roy pattern, causing a rosy sunset (and dust particles in air will also cause a rosy effect about the particles).

NOTE: red-sky in morning is caused by clouds causing a roy pattern, which is why it is a warning to shepherds of possible rain, as the earth surface rotates towards the clouds & sun.

Red sky at night is a delight to shepherds because the earth surface rotates away from the clouds & sun, which clouds are broken to allow roy colour patterns. (But these are not hard&fast rules)

Depending on the moon’s position relative to the earth and to the sun’s rays, we can observe direct sunlight on the moon causing a silver/bright moon; or a vib pattern or a roy pattern & shades in between, and these caused by the earth’s edge interfering with the sun’s rays & producing the roy & vib patterns and the moon being in the specific position to be so affected.

____________

Global Warming, Confused Plants

IPCC have been wrong regarding their claim of pollution causing global warming – correlation does NOT prove Cause/Effect - as CDADD has stated before the dynamics of solar systems (star/planets systems) are such that they function as SUPER-GENERATOR driving SUPER-MOTORS.

However, we also are accustomed to seasonal changes in the climates to trigger plants. But, we presently see spring flowering pants flowering in late summer, and trees budding & flowering in December winter instead of spring.

It is proposed that there are other dynamics, as yet not identified, that trigger plant activity, and possibly also are causal of the climate change – hence there is co-correlation but not cause/effect between the two co-correlated events.

We need to rethink how plants are triggered as it may provide a clue to other dynamics.

Reiterate: one should not be quick to disregard the knowledge that certain ‘professional’ astrologers may have concerning planetary motion & observed phenomena.

Dishonesty from IPCC is primary cause of nations disregarding the Kyoto Protocol – had IPCC been honest & open and corrected their false cause/effect claim, and presented a correct model as presented by CDADD, then correct focus on the dangers of pollution would have been possible.

IPCC have made a monumental hurdle which is now blocking constructive change – despite some nations being politically correct & going through the motions of pretentious compliance.

____________

Apologies: This Particle has been quickly compiled whilst taking a short break in R&D on the more urgent Wolfson Economics Prize MMXII – whilst pumping out speedy papers is unprofessional there was urgency due to CERN’s increasing & false claims. This paper has been proof-read, does need closer attention, but nonetheless sets out sufficiently clear counter explanations to CERN’s false claims.

Responses & challenges, professional/sincere, are always warmly welcomed.

Chris Addington Pr.Eng.

www.cdadd.com, (currently unlawfully & abusively gagged/censored by SA ISP Diamatrix.co.za & USA ISP Softlayer.com)

Ireland ISPs UPC.ie & Eircom.net both controlled by USA entities are both unlawfully ‘Thought Policing’ and blocking/destroying CDADD’s emails

(Under enforced exile from South Africa due to ANC government’s oppressive XDR-nazi system and oppressive economic isolation by corporate & academic world’s.)

XDR = Extreme Democracy Resistant.

[Points for future discussion:

Michelson-Morley experiment wrong

Einstein thought experiment - wrong

Simon Singh – big bang book – ignores Newton prism = fatal flaw

Big bang (as founded) = incorrect

Pensias & Wilson, CMB effect, COBE

Light – no basis for frequency attribution, but roy & vib cone-arc relationship, frequency proportionality to RMS amplitude

Russell foster – blue light – body clock

Doctors - Eye injections – Mengele style experimentation when purposefully ignoring new r&d

Richard Feynman – eye, sorting out conflicting light waves, horizon, 1993 programme

Science theory process – guess, compute consequences, compare with experiment, if disagrees with experiment then theory is wrong; BUT, interpretation errors?????????]

##### End of Particle Pi-16 #####