Captain’s Log, Stardate 06
More Particles of Space
Particle Mu-12
More Corrections to defective science theories.
Engineering application of Sciences (both Tangible & Intangible) – necessity for Economy Stability
Switching model fully rigorous - Wave and/or Particle Theories CONTRADICT/INCONSISTENT
Further proofs that - e does NOT equal mc2
Degodding the ‘gods of science’ (vis: Stephen Hawking, Richard Dawkins, Brian Cox, David Attenborough)
Western Governments/Parliaments CRIMINALLY NEGLIGENT (Economy Terrorism) - purposefully ignoring Engineering application of Science ‘BEST PRACTICE’.
England’s disappointment at FIFA rejection unfounded - since England rejects ‘Best Practice’
BEST PRACTICE: timely implementation of sound Engineering application of incremental Science developments.
Corollary: Purposeful delay in BEST PRACTICE causes Social Injustices – Criminal Negligence – Justice delayed is Justice denied.
_____________________
Index:
1. INTRODUCTION: putting science into global context.
2. SCIENCE Debates:
- Summarising Switching versus Wave & Particle models
- More Light Transmission Dynamics from observing everyday phenomena.
- Sun’s Total Energy
- Saturn’s moons.
- Earth’s Moon – axes, gravity
- Sun’s axis (flipping?????)
- Earth (& Planets) as SYNCHRONOUS SUPER-MOTORS
- Misinterpretations of observations from spacecraft.
- Ether – Doppler effect not applicable to light
- Attribution, incorrect, of Frequencies to Light Spectrum
- Terminal Velocity in Space
- Creation & Evolution
____________________
INTRODUCTION:
[The purpose of the INTRODUCTION sections is to put science into the context of Global/International/National frameworks; to demonstrate how failings in science (both tangible & intangible) do contribute to defective & destructive government & corporate policies, all of which have significant negative impacts upon societies.
You can of course ignore the Introduction & go straight to the science debates below by scrolling down]
---
MAKE NO MISTAKE, if 2010 Nobel Peace Prize Laureate Liu Xiaobo, or (1991) Aung San Suu Kyi, had instead criticised the corrupt Finance Powers that control Israel (Virtual), which controls Israel (Real), then the world would likely not have heard of them; they would have been eliminated or their cell-key thrown away – make no mistake.
MAKE NO MISTAKE, if the reigning WBA Heavyweight Boxing Champion were to refuse a legitimate challenge bout then he would lose his WBA Heavyweight Title - BUT, within the Academic fraternity Titled scientists retain their status despite their refusal to engage legitimate challenges to their defective theories – make no mistake.
MAKE NO MISTAKE, the latest Ireland bailout by the EU has not solved the critical underlying problems, which problems are common throughout the world, many of which have yet still to be identified. There is not one jot of appropriate Economy Engineering expertise amongst the EU Finance Ministers, or EU Council itself – make no mistake.
MAKE NO MISTAKE – UK’s & EU’s oppressive bailout terms to minor EU states are little difference from the disastrous Versailles Treaty – extreme economic hardships generates internal evil; adding to that polarising east/west tensions. By purposefully avoiding BEST PRACTICE Economy Engineering western nations are CRIMINALLY NEGLIGENT, as envisaged within the Rome Statute & Charter of the United Nations (both of which import the Universal Declaration of Human Rights) - World War IV (Hot War) tension is building – MAKE NO MISTAKE!!!!!!
---
Information has exploded exponentially with the development of the web – Information has MASS & VELOCITY and the internet has increased both. Consequently, INTELLECTUAL MOMENTUM (mass x velocity) is massive.
UNFORTUNATELY, 99.9% of the information on the web is defective, rubbish or trivia. BUT, people readily accept what is shovelled in front of them. This means that to change mindsets with correct information that HUGE EFFORT is required.
Matters are compounded when leading scientists become swayed (corrupted) by pop idolatry and continue to promote defective science for purely financial gain. TV documentaries are a large cause of defective science being aired (see later).
A fundamental flaw within Science (Tangible & Intangible) research is that, progressively, greater reliance has been placed upon mathematical modelling to develop our understandings of the sciences, both tangible & intangible. The problem with this is that it is easy, as shown by CDADD’s disproving of Einstein’s energy & relativity theories, & other science & economics theories, that one can easily anticipate observations to ‘prove’ the mathematics models, hence one can too readily accept ‘evidence’ that supports the mathematics model; rather than maintaining caution & patiently testing the observations against the theory. This is the error Albert Einstein made in jumping to the support of Edwin Hubble’s claim that distant stars were moving at near speed c (based upon incorrect frequency attribution to light spectrum & error in application of Doppler effect to light observations)
This fundamental flaw has become increasingly evident by the use of computer graphics (which is mathematical modelling taken to a higher level, and sequential to achieve motion) – ‘scientists’ are now able to ‘research’ ‘real-life’ science in their offices with a laptop; no more the dirty environment of the real world. These flaws have multiplied, and account for the mass of defective deep-space science-fiction theories that are pumped out by scientists.
More worrying is the fact that a number of universities have dispensed with first-principles experiment equipments, and instead have rolled-up misinterpretations of first-principles into higher order principles.
Consequently it is sad to see today’s most ‘Darwinian’ of scientists being drawn into this incorrect method of ‘research’ – David Attenborough should take heed of the inherent dangers that have wrongly led other scientists deep into science-fiction.
Channel 4 recently aired ‘Stephen Hawking’s Universe’ – this was a trashy production which presented science-fiction that relied heavily on computer generated graphics.
BBC 4 had Hans Rosling (Karolingen Institute) in high-speed roll with defective Statistics, and Jim Al-Khalili (Sussex) wrongly putting mathematics as the driving force of Nature. BUT, there was one very interesting experiment with camera & projector that demonstrated the Sideband effect of Light Transmission Dynamics (see later in Science Debates).
.
Rosling created, by the use of manipulative Statistics, an incorrect perception that the world population was advancing – this contradicts the reality of a rapidly widening disparity gaps & rapidly increasing population from un/under developed nations. Rosling wrongly suggested that advancements are improving the lot of man – this is wrong.
We can readily see that wars (Hot Wars or Economy Wars) destabilise nations & lead to population increase – simply because people have nothing better to do than create more people. It is ONLY by constructive, sound Economy Engineering that optimal Economy Stability can be achieved – and ONLY stability will bring about a population decrease (Total Natural Disaster excluded)
Jim Al-Khalili in his BBC4 programme ‘The Secret Life of Chaos’ tried to raise the importance of mathematics above real-life observations & understandings. JAK subtly suggested that nature performs according to mathematical equations – this is totally wrong.
Atoms/molecules are NOT sitting there thinking .. ‘Gosh, now I have to square myself ….. Oh, and there’s a Dell operator …. And now I must add a constant & multiply by 2 then integrate myself’ ……
…… Nature performs according to the designs of Nature – man ATTEMPTS to understand that design & uses mathematics (often duplicitously) to try to explain how Nature’s design functions.
IF WE DO NOT CORRECTLY UNDERSTAND OR INTERPRET WHAT WE OBSERVE THEN WE CANNOT CORRECTLY ATTEMPT TO MATHEMATISE THE OBSERVATION
If Darwin were around today then he would likely be rejected by today’s scientists because of the absence of mathematics from his science writings – because today’s scientist have lost touch with reality and are entrenched into deep-space science-fiction – and it is these ‘scientists’ that hold power over the appointment of new members to Academia & Institutions – hence the blind appointing the blind.
Which is why CDADD is rejected – because science is held to ransom by scientists who have become lost in mathematics & computer graphics rather than engaging & developing understandings of the functioning’s of the real world, solar system & universe.
Despite CDADD presenting concrete evidence that disproves long-standing science theories, and other evidence that raises serious doubts about other science theories, in both tangible & intangible sciences, UK’s Royal Society still refuse to engage professionally & scientifically with these proofs presented. Same with Cambridge, Oxford, LSE, etc.
Dishonesty continues within the science professions & academia.
Numerous incidences have occurred in the past 18 months:
- Steven Hawking, Richard Dawkins, Colin Blakemore, Jocelyn Bell Burnell & many Nobel Prize winning scientists refuse to engage on CDADD’s work which disproves their long-standing theories.
- The Royal Society’s poor cousin across the Irish Pond, Royal Dublin Society, also refuse to be honest, despite a panel of nuclear physicists admitting a pressing need for honesty at an RDS science presentation some moths ago. In fact RDS has become more bizarre by awarding a life-time membership of the RDS to the Irish Times Science Editor Dick Ahlstrom; yet Ahlstrom has no science experience, no science training & no science qualification and does not report truthfully about science matters or any matters at all.
The RDS has also blocked the writer’s email address & refuse to engage professionally & scientifically with the writer’s proofs & valid submissions.
- At a recent RDS seminar on Global Warming at Maynooth University, Ireland’s Chief Scientist Patrick Cunningham purposefully obstructed the writer presenting points which disproves the IPCC’s non-fail-safe stance, to which Cunningham holds.
- At a recent Royal Irish Academy lecture by Nobel Prize Laureate (Chemistry) Paul Crutzen – Crutzen was taken aback when the writer raised the serious mistake that IPCC have made re pollution & Global Warming vis: that CORRELATION of data streams does not automatically imply CAUSE/EFFECT, and that IPCC have adopted a NON-FAIL-SAFE policy re Global Warming. Ahlstrom simply shouted down this science fact by use of a microphone, and incompetently stated that cause/effect made sense because of correlation .
- The RIA later hosted Jocelyn Bell Burnell for a lecture at Trinity Burke Hall – Burnell was challenged by the writer on certain of her science theories to which she undertook to engage at a later date – she is now refusing to engage on these science issues that disprove her theories.
- More recently a Member/Thug within the Royal Irish Academy assaulted the writer to prevent open debate on science matters.
Both the RIA & RDS have been hijacked by the Irish Times media rag. For some inexplicable reason the Irish Times editor Geraldine Kennedy has been elected as a Member of the Royal Irish Academy – Kennedy has no academic experience, training or qualifications to justify this, nor does she pursue ‘academic excellence’ as required by the RIA for Membership; vis:-
‘The criterion for election to membership is significant contribution to scholarly research as shown in the candidate’s published academic work.’
It is clear that the RIA & RDS are both severely undermined by the Irish Times – academic debate is regularly obstructed.
UK’s Royal Society is equally undermined.
Dishonesty prevails
Therefore, it is not too difficult to understand why Governments around the world impose grossly defective policies – because, policies are based upon science models that are grossly defective – because academia is dishonest.
Merit is not acknowledged or rewarded/funded.
Cambridge’s Dr Craig Mackay argues in email that Stephen Hawking resigned his chair as he had reached compulsory retirement age of 67 years – yet states he is still a professor at Cambridge. ?????????
Craig Mackay’s contradiction simply adds further confusion on top of Cambridge’s deep-space science-fiction theories. Mackay engages on trivia but refuses to engage on the proofs that Einstein’s energy & relativity theories are incorrect, that Young’s slit experiment has been wrongly interpreted, etc..
Nonetheless Hawking refuses to engage in open debate on legitimate science issues.
Dishonesty has long been rife within Britannia’s parliament & government (past & present) – PM David Cameron’s strings were pulled by President Barrack Obama & grinning House of Representative Leaders when Cameron apologised for the release of the Lockerbie bomber. Obama stated that the truth must come out – but Obama conveniently ignored the absence of truth over the Twin Towers implosions.
David Cameron has accepted not a junior partner relationship but a subservient role for Britannia.
Cameron has not one-tenth the weight of Thatcher, despite his Party claiming they are ‘children of Thatcher’ – Cameron readily surrendered over the BP Gulf Oil Spill cover-up of Ch Tech Williams’ crucial evidence which indicates a sabotage/attack.
Britannia always fields above the USA’s State-average, and invariably leads the USA by many years when standing up to oppressive regimes.
Obama is pulling Cameron’s strings, and Israel(Virtual) pulls Obama’s – why Cameron has not the courage to stand up to Obama is an open question.
Dishonesty is driving the world into polarised positions with the west abusing their powers. Pressures are building, not diminishing, because of the Obama/Cameron puppet show. CDADD’s oft repeated warning has been voiced also by Lebanon PM Hariri.
UK Cabinet Secretary David Willet’s statement that graduates should look towards unpaid jobs is likely to diminish interest toward the sciences, and those that are interested are likely to encounter deepening dishonesty as a consequence of slave labour science.
Dishonesty in science is causal of Willets’ defective policy statement – hence Willets’ policy initiative CANNOT solve the underlying Causal Problems that caused Willets to develop this disastrous policy - Willets does not have the skills to detect the Causal Problems, nor to understand the Causal Problems when they are identified, nor does he have the skills to develop Solutions if he could identify. Consequently his defective policy prevails, spinning UK science & economy ever deeper into chaos.
BBC’s ‘It’s Only A Theory’ had, once again, New Scientist ‘cosmologist’ Marcus Chown, putting out defective explanations concerning gravity & time-space. Whilst the programme is a comedy-meets-science programme the fact that a New Scientist journalist, Chown, is given BBC space-time to present defective explanations of disproved science theories is a serious problem.
Students are shying away from science & engineering BECAUSE it makes no sense BECAUSE bogus science theories are held up & valid challenges are suppressed – all of which is reinforced by the media promoting ‘pop’ scientists for purely commercial benefit regardless of the damage to science & societies.
There is a clear need for transparency by the Royal Society to establish a web-based list of science facts and a record of open challenges so that open constructive debate can be engaged – this should be linked to a merit based reward system & a supporting Intellectual Property royalties system for IP that is used.
UK’s Guardian media rag (only worthwhile for its puzzle & light magazine sections) have also promoted Hawking, Dawkins, Attenborough & Cox as ‘Gods of science’ - but they have all refused to engage in debate concerning their defective theories – hence, by default, they are stripped of their titles, they are ‘degodded’.
The media CANNOT be relied upon for honest reporting - dishonesty prevails.
Man has populated earth for millennia and despite the level of today’s technology man still does not understand how the earth functions within itself & within the solar system.
We are induced into accepting, that because a hi-tech complex spacecraft has reached far distant planets, that the scientists behind these craft have greater insights to these distant planets than they do of our earth. This is wrong.
Scientists such a Hawking, Dawkins, Burnell, Cox present theories that make no sense and present arguments based upon non-sequitor reasoning. They all refuse to engage in constructive debate.
The only person to have replied is Brian Cox’s wife who stated she had no interest in these science issues – yet her website actively promotes her husband’s science books & programmes which present defective theories.
The 2010 Physics Nobel Prize has been awarded to two scientists from Manchester University for development of a 2D material of 1 atom thick – a read of the scientific background at NP website indicates that this is more science fiction out of Manchester.
The 2010 Economics ‘Nobel’ Prize is for more defective economic ‘science’ models that were part-causal of the Global Economy Meltdown.
The Nobel Foundation, like the Royal Society, Royal Irish Academy, Royal Dublin Society, has long been hijacked & prostituted – and NP Prizes given for bogus science (especially Economics, which is used as a means of giving false credibility to numerous global fraud scams)
The latest EU bailout agreement (offered to Ireland, November 28, 2010), thrashed out by EU Finance Ministers, was devoid of any Economy Engineering inputs – the bailout will not solve the critical underlying problems, many of which have yet to be identified because EU, UK, USA governments refuse to engage with CDADD’s pioneering economy engineering.
One can also see the gross deficiencies of engineering understandings by reading David Cameron’s article in the Economist’s recently published ‘The World in 2011’ publication, Page 56. The second section ‘Let’s get to the bottom of it all’ does not get even halfway to the bottom (more on the gross inadequacies of Cameron’s article shortly in a separate paper). But, it is important to recognise that David Cameron has no engineering insights, let alone science, & little if any of Margaret Thatcher’s science skills rubbed-off onto Cameron.
And Cameron’s mindset concerning economics & finance science environments is pretty much the same as all within the EU Council which explains why the EU Bailout is grossly defective, fails to address the critical underlying structural, systemic & systematic problems throughout the World.
The bailout is as disastrous as the Versailles Treaty that metamorphosed pure evil into Germany.
There is ample evidence that defective government policies engender evil. Christabel Bielenberg, an English woman, married & changed nationality to a German, early 30s, recorded her & her husband’s experiences of trying to change evil from within Germany – it was not possible because Nazi leadership had closed their minds to reason – evil prevailed. (‘The Past is Myself’ ISBN 0-552-99065-5, Pgs 44, 88).
Western Nation leaders of today have also closed their minds:- Barack Obama, Angela Merckel, David Cameron, Nick Clegg, Nicolas Sarkozy, etc., etc. – evil prevails today BECAUSE of their closed mindsets.
David Cameron is continuing with dishonesty that pervaded the Blair & Brown governments, albeit with different corrupt players; in Cameron’s case, with Rupert Murdoch.
Brown continues to claim he saved the banking system; this whilst moonlighting & writing history books – but ignores the fact that he ignored for years CDADD’s proofs that corrupt Finance Powers were/are manipulating, and which caused the global economy meltdown.
Robert Chote, Director of UK’s Office for Budget Responsibility, made public statements regarding UK’s economy status yet he does not have any appropriate Economy Engineering expertise – his statements are not unlike an accountant giving an opinion on your motor car, vis, unqualified & worthless; hence, the UK are deceived by more confusion.
The fact that EU, UK, USA etc. fail to engage correctly with CDADD means that government leaders are CRIMINALLY NEGLIGENT in failing to adopt ‘best practice’ in the development of National/Union/International policies – they are criminally negligent as envisaged within the Rome statute.
England cannot complain having lost the 2018 FIFA World Cup Hosting – since England rejects best-practice it cannot morally denigrate FIFA for doing likewise.
Governments are effectively pursuing Economy Terrorism against minor EU States and other lesser & under developed nations & purposefully imposing man-made economy disasters upon billions of people globally that is far worse than the Holocaust, and far worse than Stalin’s horrors.
The EU, UK, USA governments/parliaments are CRIMINALLY NEGLIGENT & guilty of Economy Terrorism because they refuse to correctly engage ‘best practice’ by engaging correctly with CDADD’s pioneering R&D into tangible & intangible sciences & engineering, which is the most advanced in the world.
It is not difficult to understand why people are driven to violence to oppose the Holocaust resulting from Economy Terrorism.
7/7 Survivor Gill Hicks’ comment of gratefully witnessing & receiving ‘humanity’ immediately after the London bombings & similar comments by Coroner Lady Justice Hallet ignore the inhumanity of Britannia’s centuries of oppressions which has progressively engendered the evil within the perpetrators of 7/7, and into many others with similar intents who are today actively planning further attacks.
Purposefully ignoring ‘Best Practice’ is a Gross Power Abuse. We see it also with recent legal issues:
- Wikileaks’ Julian Assange – an international warrant of arrest & extradition to Sweden for questioning, which could be done voluntarily via electronic links either from Assange’s office or a police station, or numerous other places. Assange’s delayed bail, due to Sweden’s appeal, is simply a case of guilt until proved innocent.
- Concorde Crash - Judgement against Continental Air for a component falling off one of its planes which caused damaged to the Concorde (causing it to crash) – the Airport authority were insured or underwrote its own insurance, freely chose to short-circuit runway checks between take-offs/landings (to increase turnaround & revenue) and the Court blames Continental for the Airport Authority’s negligence in failing to check its own facilities.
The following Science Debates adds further proofs to the veracity of CDADD’s pioneering research & development which disproves numerous long-standing tangible & intangible science models & theories – both of which are causal of defective government policies; BECAUSE governments unlawfully, criminally, refuse to adopt BEST PRACTICE.
Reiterate:
BEST PRACTICE: timely implementation of sound Engineering application of incremental Science developments.
Corollary: Purposeful delay in BEST PRACTICE causes Social Injustices – Criminal Negligence – Justice delayed is Justice denied.
SCIENCE DEBATES:
Summarising Switching versus Wave & Particle models
Switching model proposed by CDADD is fully rigorous whereas Wave and/or Particle Theories CONTRADICT/INCONSISTENT.
Wave model based upon an assumption that Young’s Slit diffraction is explained by frequency attribution.
Wave model is inconsistent
Particle model is inconsistent
Wave & Particle models contradict
Wave model relies on speed c, but higher frequencies then contradict max c
Quantum IMBALANCE: electron drift velocity versus the necessary conversion of gazillions of light particles/waves zipping at c
Wave & Particle are everywhere point chaotic/incoherent
Wave & Particle are electro-magnetic models which clash with everywhere electro-magnetic space & would attenuate
Atmospheric vacuum is NOT Etheric vacuum (which is likely impossible within Universe)
Electro-magnetic space necessarily produces velocity limitation (c.f. terminal velocity in atmosphere)
Stars & matter travelling at near c are nowhere observed, despite claims of exploding stars post (claimed) Big-Bang
Wave & Particle does not explain functionality of Star/Planets systems
Stars & Planets are DEPENDENT upon ether hence Doppler not valid in dependent frames
Switching model explains both Wave & Particle model phenomena
Switching model explains all observable phenomena because everywhere point specific coherency.
Switching model is everywhere point coherent
Switching model explains Star/Planets SUPER-MOTOR functionality
Switching has inherent energy thus no attenuation.
HENCE: Switching model proposed by CDADD is fully rigorous whereas Wave and/or Particle Theories CONTRADICT/INCONSISTENT
Einstein panicked when he rushed to support Edwin Hubble’s claim of stars moving at near speed c – the world has spun off for decades into science-fiction theories.
oOo
More Light Transmission Dynamics from everyday phenomena.
In ‘Particle Llamda-11’ & previous, CDADD’s research showed that Young’s Slit Experiment had been misinterpreted (diffraction patterns were historically, but wrongly, explained by wave theory) & that decades ago Edwin Hubble had mistakenly assumed that the Doppler Effect applied to light transmission dynamics, that a red-shift (incorrectly interpreted) was caused by distant bodies moving at near speed c, that Albert Einstein had simply jumped to a conclusion that he had anticipated simply because he had mathematised that e equals mc squared.
In fact, Young’s Slit Experiment showed, as explained by CDADD, that the diffraction patterns were caused by a switching mechanism through an ether that was constructed of ‘particles’ in marble-like formation; that light zig-zagged to adjacent particles; that the distinct diffraction pattern showing light peaks (maximas) & nulls (minimas) suggested that the ether was structured as clusters of ‘particles’; that the diffraction patterns are as a consequence of a ‘sideband’ effect caused by interference at/nearby the obstructing edge of a slit; the minimas results from a nullifying effect at the point of interference & simply propagated through normal switching outwards; that observed sideband effects happen at the point of observation & at all points between the object observed & the observer, i.e. that it is a phenomena happening everywhere & everywhere observable.
The diffraction/flare around a laser beam point is caused by the zig-zagging sideband effect. In using an obstructing edge one is simply causing the flare/diffraction to occur predominantly in 2D thus making it easier to observe, but it happens all around. Also, the material used to act as the obstructing edge affects the amount of flare/diffraction because of a difference in interference at the obstructing edge/s – white sheet of paper has minimal effect, a glossy black slide negative has increased effect. This is why CDADD has stressed that it is important to recognise that experiments, to ‘prove’ light transmission dynamics, themselves cause interference which has to be correctly separated & explained.
HENCE: Wave theoryisINCONSISTENT; and contradicts Particle model; both of which is nowhere constructive/coherent.
However, Switching is everywhere point specific, constructive & coherent – hence is fully rigorous in explaining Light & Energy Transmission Dynamics.
NOTE: ‘diffraction’/flare patterns also appear by reflecting off other surfaces. Take 2 high-reflective mylar surfaces (i.e. mirrors without the glass) and bounce a laser light sequentially off the two surfaces back onto a white sheet – same/similar diffraction/flare occurs. Beware: much of the increase in flare is due to the distortion resulting from the angle of the mylar surface, and doubled due to 2 reflecting surfaces.
NOTE also: the sideband effect is also observable with two high contrasting shapes in the same plane. Take sheets of e.g. red & of green (complimentary, high contrast) and place together – as one move far away the contrasting edges blur, this is because of the zig-zagging sideband effect alone, i.e. there is no interference flare/diffraction as with a back-light source passing an interposing object – atmospheric effects would also have an additive impact but the sideband effect is still present.
See Eta-7 UPDATE – The Switching phenomena inherently produces a ‘wave’ effect because of the very nature of the fundamental switching function but this is NOT the Wave theory as classically portrayed & used (incorrectly) to explain light transmission. Just because the switching mechanism behaves in certain ways like wave mechanics does not mean that it is wave mechanics; wave mechanics does not explain every-which-way coherent light & energy transmission - wave mechanics functioning in every-which-way at any point in space would cause incoherent chaotic light information transfer. Similarly with particle theory. Only a switching mechanism through an ether made up of marble-like particle structures (& functioning in clusters?) makes sense.
We need to expand our understanding of light transmission/propagation dynamics by considering other everyday observable phenomena by:.
Looking at distant objects
Looking at multiple mirror reflections
If you look at a distant object that you know to have sharp edges and against a light background, then you will notice as the distance between you & the object increases that the edges become increasingly blurred. Why does this happen?
The answer lies in recognising that whilst the size of the object diminishes that the sideband effect is CONSTANT, but also that the interference at/nearby the edge causes light coming past that object’s edge & to you, the observer, to flare (diffract) out into a cone. Therefore the receding object DIMINISHES in size RELATIVE to the INCREASING flare caused by interference & sideband effect – hence the overall image appears more fuzzy, ‘out-of-focus’; & lighter in hue, and this is because the light from the sideband effect encroaches across the observed (& diminishing) space of the object. This effect is more pronounced by looking at leafless trees in winter where the small twigs appear sharp when close-up but quickly become hazy as the distance increases – it’s why painters make impressionistic smudges of paint to represent trees – because the increasing flare/diffraction swamps the receding image size as distance increases, hence object becomes more blurred, dimmer, smudgy.
This effect also explains why far-distant objects appear more blue – the blue of the sky coming from behind the distant horizon becomes more prevalent & ‘washes out’ the actual colour of the object; similarly at sunset with the redness flaring out, it gives a rosy wash to everything.
So, there are 2 effects - the zig-zag sideband effect along the direct line of sight, and then the consequent interference (howsoever that interference actually functions) at the point of object interposition causing light to flare/diffract and be transmitted along other lines of sight, also zig-zagging, and in a cone shape.
The sideband/flaring/diffraction effect is more noticeable in multiple mirror reflections.
You may have experienced being in a lift that has mirrors on opposite walls of the lift carriage, and you observe numerous multiple images of yourself diminishing into the ‘distance’, so it appears). The images you observe are the first reflection, then third, fifth, ….. seventeenth, nineteenth ……. twenty-first, etc. because the opposite mirror is reflecting the second, fourth, sixth, etc. images.
NOW, if you observe carefully the outline of your first reflection you will notice that it is sharp, then look to the nineteenth (or greater) reflection then you can see that that further reflection is much more blurred. This blurring comes from two factors: from the same effect as distance shift of an object (i.e. its appearance reduces in size) but it predominantly comes from an AMPLIFICATION/MULTIPLICATION of the sideband effect & flare/diffraction. It cannot be solely because of size reduction (equivalent distance-shift) because the mirrors are fixed and the nineteenth reflection is still only barely a metre away; but it is the images that are multiplicated. Hence, successive reflections AMPLIFY/MULTIPLY the sideband effect & flare/diffraction such that the more reflections the greater the greater ‘halo’ on the successive reflections of the sideband of light – hence blurring increases. The mirror & glass would also have impacts.
Jim Al-Khalili’s experiment (BBC4 ‘The Secret Life of Chaos) with a video camera & projector producing feedback of his image projected onto a screen & videoed back successively – this is similar to the mirror effect except that the successive images are enlarged, and in so doing the ‘halo’ from the sideband/flare/diffraction is multiplied. The general blurring across the increasing images is due to multiplication/amplification of everywhere point specific sideband effect.
oOo
Sun’s Total Energy
Briefly:- Brian Cox, of Manchester University, in his BBC ‘Wonders of the Solar System’, visited Death Valley with a can of water, an umbrella & a thermometer. Can of water shaded by umbrella to establish & record ambient temperature, remove umbrella & record time to raise water by 1 degree centigrade, calculate energy required, calculate total energy at the sun.
Cox estimated that the sun’s total energy at its surface was/is 400 million, million, million, million watts radiated every second, or radiating 1 million times USA’s total annual electricity energy consumption every second.
And, …….. wow ……… gosh …… mind-blowing …………. jeepers ………… what an IMMENSE amount of energy …… pheeeewwww!!! ………..
…………… and, with our brains in turmoil over such an immense figure, so-simply scientifically derived, Cox moved our bamboozled minds to another aspect of physics over which we would be bamboozled even further. And by the end of the first episode we were hooked – all 6 million viewers.
We need to stop & rethink! - BECAUSE Brian Cox is WRONG!!!!!!!!!!!
Something is causing solar systems to function. Planets, including earth, are not spinning & orbiting for no reason at all – energy is being consumed to cause these planetary motions – to function as SUPER-MOTORS. As CDADD previously presented, the only logical source for this energy is the sun. It follows then that the amount of energy that heated the water in Cox’s can is NOT the total amount of energy falling on the part of earth on which Cox’s can was sitting. There has to be an additional amount of energy, far greater than the energy that caused the water to heat up, that causes the earth to spin & orbit, and similarly for other planets in our Solar System.
Consider: if we were to sit on an electrical cable, switch power on and measure the temperature rise & calculate the energy consumed to raise the temperature of the cable as a result of electrical energy flowing through it, we would be incorrect to argue that that heating energy is the sum total of the energy flowing through the cable – which energy we do not see or feel.
There is a simple explanation for this heating - energy flowing through the cable causes a secondary effect of the cable heating (square of current times the resistance) which in itself is essentially a frictional energy (of electrons vibrating & heating through the friction from vibrating – but this friction should not be confused with the classical Newton friction which at the time that Newton developed physics relationships electrical theory was almost non-existent)
In a similar way, the mere fact that the earth functions, by rotating & orbiting, as a SUPER-MOTOR means that the heating energy is NOT the total energy influencing the earth; it means that other & far greater energy is being induced into the earth to cause it to function as a motor. There is a PMF (Primary Motive Force) that causes solar systems to function as SUPER-MOTORS. And the ONLY logical source of that PMF energy is the Sun.
It would seem logical to conclude that the heat we feel is as a consequence of vibration energy resulting from the energy flow that causes the earth to function as a SUPER-MOTOR (similar to electrical flow through a cable)
Consequently the Sun’s Total energy must be many, many times greater than Cox’s estimated 400 MMMM Watts/second.
Just because we have not yet identified the nature & functioning of this radiated energy does not mean that it does not exist - that the earth rotates & orbits IS the proof that it does exist. Man was not aware of air for many millennia yet it existed then, & now.
Consequently Brian Cox cannot be right with his theories & calculations.
(His website also continues to promote Einstein’s now-proved incorrect theory - vis: e equals mc squared.
CDADD has shown that e does NOT equal mc squared because nothing travels at anywhere near speed c or even 1000th of c; which term c, in any event is a misnomer. There is a refusal by scientists to engage scientifically & professionally but some will waste time on trivia to deflect attention)
Taking the aforegoing proposals further - it then follows that the structure of the earth (similarly for all planets) affects how the planet functions – consequently it cannot be ruled out that the drilling & mining for minerals from the earth’s subterranean could be causal of changes to the earth’s characteristics. And such that, as previously proposed by CDADD, these changes cause the core to become hotter, hence:- more & greater volcanic actions, earthquakes, & resultant tsunamis.
We need to develop greater understanding of what form is the sun’s energy & how solar systems actually function – i.e. we need to be focussed closer to earth, rather than looking into deep space & incorrectly applying misinterpreted earth-bound observed phenomena & distortedly extrapolating into deep-space, and into science-fiction.
oOo
Saturn’s moons.
Cox introduced various scientists in his series, however their details were not presented on screen & their credits were absent during the end-of-programme credit roll.
One lady scientist stated in an early programme (part 2?) that Saturn’s moon Enceladus expanded & contracted due to gravity effects, which caused immense frictional forces, and this explains the molten interior of Enceladus.
In a later programme Cox discussed Jupiter’s moon Io and argued the same dynamic process (vis: friction from gravity effects) being the cause of intense energy & heating of Io’s core.
Does this make sense?
We first need to recognise that friction is a secondary effect of a primary action/force – a primary force acting on a body causes a body to move, the fact that the body is moving creates a frictional (secondary) force that is experienced as heat.
Cox & the lady scientist argued that strong interplanetary gravity effects of Jupiter on Io, Saturn on Enceladus causes the moons to expand & contract, thus causing the friction. BUT, if this were so then the initiating force would be irregular, because the position of, & influencing forces emanating from, the respective planets & relative to the moons are irregular. Therefore if, as they argue, the moons are expanding/contracting it means they are pliable, and if pliable & experiencing irregular forces the moons would be plied into irregular shapes.
BUT, the moons are NOT irregular, they are very much regular, spherical – consequently the forces heating the core of the moons cannot be secondary frictional forces consequent to irregular parental planetary gravity forces.
It makes far more sense that the radiated energy (not merely the heat energy) from the Sun is inducing energy into the planets & moons, causing circulating currents which would cause regular shaping – that their moons (& planets) are essentially induction furnaces creating forces that cause them to function as motors, to spin & orbit.
As proposed – the characteristics, the susceptibility, of the matter/materials that make up the planets & moons are very much what determines the motion, orbit & positioning of the planets in the solar system.
oOo
Earth’s Moon – axes, gravity
As proposed by CDADD previously, the reason for the moon’s non-rotation lies in the fact that the moon most likely has a prominent static polar magnetic axis near-perpendicular to the earth. (the moon does not spin synchronously, nor at all – so some force must be acting to cause it to not spin, i.e. a static magnetic axis)
However, further thought shows that the moon must have two axes.
The moon rotates about the earth and the earth orbits the sun, consequently the moon also passes through the sun’s radiated energy, as well as the sun’s radiated energy flowing past the moon (& every other body in the universe, eventually). As the moon rotates around the earth and passes between the earth & the sun the moon is travelling in one direction relative to that radiated energy; as it orbits the earth, so that the earth is now between the moon & sun, the moon has now reversed its direction of travel relative to the sun’s radiated energy.
This alternating of orbital direction (relative to sun) means that induced circulating currents within the moon are also continually reversing, and consequently the moon must have a vertical magnetic axis that is also continually reversing. In addition the earth’s magnetic fields would have an influence on the induction of energy into the moon. Essentially the moon is experiencing an induction of the sun’s energy which is continually changing between one direction & another, and with the strength of induction greatest when the moon is between earth & sun.
Consequently the moon experiences an alternating magnetic axes (near-vertical to the earth) but with a marginally prominent axis because of the continually reversing induction being prominent when moon is between earth & sun.
(It is most likely that the moon’s axis prominency is in the same direction as the earth’s magnetic axis, because the moon’s orbit when nearest the sun would be rotating in the same direction as the earth’s rotation – but, these rotation directions need to be checked)
Also, because the induced circulating currents are continually reversing, with corresponding increase & decrease in magnitudes as the moon orbits it means that the static-electric (gravity) effect is also experiencing an effective nett reduction.
Note: rubbing of ruler on clothes induces a static charge regardless of direction the ruler is rubbed, but the magnitude is affected by the speed of motion, which motion increases & decreases as direction changes; and also by the earth’s shading of the moon.
Similarly, the moon’s gravitational force (static electric force) is greatly reduced relative to that of earth which orbits the sun uni-directionally even though spinning on its axis.
oOo
Sun’s axis (flipping?????)
Images of the Sun & its sunspots were projected by Prof Jocelyn Bell Burnell (JBB) at Trinity’s Burke Hall during Ireland’s Science Week – the sunspots had a blurred edge; and later thoughts caused realisation that the gap between two sunspots was effectively Young’s Slit – so what was being observed was the classical ‘diffraction’ on the side of the sunspots, but which is in fact simply the sideband effect + flare/diffraction, and which effect was observable around the entire perimeter of each & every sunspot.
But, JBB also stated that the Sun’s magnetic axis flips every 11 years or so. In question time the writer asked JBB to explain how this was determined; her response was that spectral analysis showed this to be the case. The writer explained that it made no engineering sense & after short counter-argument, re: nothing travels at speed c, e does not equal mc2, etc., JBB asked me to contact her later.
A number of emails has not resulted in explanation, merely referral to a mountain of possible websites. ESA & NASA all make assertions that the sun’s axis flips but give no experimental procedures to justify the assertions.
The fact that JBB stated that spectral analysis was behind her assertion is an immediate warning bell, because the attribution of frequency to light wrongly came about by the misinterpretation of Young’s Slit Experiment. As yet the writer has not found any proofs that light has frequency attributes, other than from the natural propagation switching frequency, but that is the mechanism through which, it is contended, that everything functions, and is a constant – hence not varying as required for a claim that light spectrum is attributable to a frequency range.
The claim of ‘flipping’ should also have been a warning bell of a misinterpretation.
It appears then that much, most, all deep-space observations need to be carefully rethought, including JBB’s claim of Pulsars.
JBB also raised ‘blackholes’ – in light of her misinterpretation of Young’s Slit Experiment it is pointless debating this beyond that covered in the first paper in this series.
oOo
Earth (& Planets) as SYNCHRONOUS SUPER-MOTORS
Following on from previous Particles in this series – since the earth (& other planets) spin at a near constant speed it suggests that perhaps the rotation is synchronous; this thought is given more credence when we consider that the other planets in the solar system are orbiting such that the planets are changing relative positions constantly. Thus inter-planetary magnetic influences (NOT gravity – because gravity is an ‘internal’ force to each planet) are forever changing – hence if planets were asynchronous (similar to induction motors) then it would be reasonable to expect that the earth’s rate of rotation & orbital path would become erratic.
BUT, the Earth is not rotating erratically – it is rotating, to all intents & purposes, constantly – hence, it is contended, that the earth (& planets) functions as a SYNCHRONOUS SUPER-MOTOR.
Assuming this to be the case – how then is synchronicity achieved?
If the sun’s energy is considered to be a ‘single phase’ supply then the moon would need to function such that it provides a shaded-pole effect.
This is a plausible explanation.
HOWEVER, from observations of the sideband effect it could also be argued that the sun’s radiated energy, through the ether’s switching mechanism, presents as a POLYPHASE power supply. The observation of coarse maximas within the sideband effect (young’s slit – diffraction) indicates that the ether functions as a clusters of ‘particles’ and phase shifts of (as yet unidentified) energy flows could be a consequence.
This is also a plausible explanation.
A reason for further R&D
oOo
Misinterpretations of observations from spacecraft.
The Voyager & Cassini vehicles have barely scanned/orbited the surfaces of distant planets, yet scientists make bold predictions without concrete facts.
Ulysses’ scanning of the Sun’s surface is another instance of unproved interpretations.
Scientists do not yet fully understand the earth’s dynamics, or our moon’s – they rely on minds of the masses being bamboozled by the complexity of the space vehicles creating a false sense that these scientist must know what they’re talking about. Unfortunately that it a wrong perception.
Reiterate Jocelyn Bell Burnell’s argument that ‘flipping’ interpretations stem from ‘spectral analysis’ which assumes, wrongly so, from misinterpretations of Young’s Slit Experiment, that frequency is attributed to the light spectrum.
Again, there is pressing need for careful rethinking.
oOo
Ether – Doppler effect not applicable to light
.. A further reason why …
.. As mentioned earlier, millennia ago man did not know what air was, or that our earth had an atmosphere. But they knew by observation & experience that our bodies functioned for a reason, that the wind we created in breathing had something to do with a necessity of life; and that staying under water for a long period of time was not good for longevity.
We do not know what the ether in space is, what is its form or exactly how it functions – but as CDADD has shown in an earlier paper it does exist because it must exist, otherwise star/planets systems would not function – nothing would function, we would not exist.
We also know that we see things coherently and because of that it means that light information is transmitted coherently (corollary: light cannot behave as particles zipping at speed c, or oscillating through space as frequencies because intersecting light transmissions would act incoherently).
And, because we see things coherently it means that the objects that emitted or reflected the light that we see must also be functioning coherently.
Therefore, since everything functions in an orderly coherent manner we can then propose that everything within the Universe is DEPENDENT upon this ether, and all at the same time, and every successive moment in time.
Consequently previous theories that the universe is expanding at a speed near to that of light, or that observed stars are moving at speeds up to c (based upon Doppler interpretations, etc.) – CANNOT be correct theories – because EVERYTHING is functioning DEPENDENTLY upon the same ether.
Hubble’s observations of stars & deductions based upon Doppler effect (red-band shifting) cannot hold true with DEPENDENT functions. It requires RELATIVE INDEPENDENCY for Doppler effect to hold true. Doppler frequency shift does not hold true for persons inside a moving vehicle (the movement of the vehicle & the emission of the sound are dependent upon the same framework) as it does for persons standing outside that vehicle (relatively independent of each other). Since everything is INSIDE the Universe ‘vehicle’, a star body & its emissions are not RELATIVELY INDEPENDENT they are DEPENDENT upon the same ether for its existence & functions.
Hence: a moving body emitting light is DEPENDENT upon the ether for both its movement & its emission & all at the same time, and therefore cannot be producing a Doppler shift. Hence, again, Hubble misinterpreted his observations of deep-space stars. And Einstein, in panicking when he agreed with Hubble, was simply matching an eagerly anticipated result with an observational misinterpretation; an error which led to decades of increasingly obscure science-fiction theories (as can be seen in numerous sci-fi books & movies and Hawking’s & Cox’s documentaries). Nonetheless, Einstein, Hubble, Hawking, etc, engaged sheer brilliance in terms of philosophy & mathematics – but, not science-fact, science-fiction.
Hence, once again, CERN Large Hadron Collider is a white-elephant insofar as its original purpose.
oOo
Attribution, incorrect, of Frequencies to Light Spectrum
Intellectual Momentum maintaining incorrect theories.
Frequencies have long been attributed to light as a consequence of misinterpretation of Young’s slit experiment. Now that CDADD has disproved the misinterpretation it nonetheless leaves massive Intellectual Momentum throughout the World, i.e. most people still believe Young’s slit experiment justifies attribution of frequency to light. It takes time & HUGE effort to change mindsets – witness refusal of scientists (‘gods’) in engaging with those that disprove their theories.
It is IMPORTANT to recognise that the fact that CDADD has disproved Young’s interpretation does not mean that frequencies are not attributable to light; it does mean that the classical interpretation, that stemming from Young’s experiment, no longer holds true.
It also means that it is wrong to continue claiming the attribution unless & until alternative evidence of frequency attribution should come to light.
BUT, Intellectual Momentum has long held frequencies to explain phenomena - whilst it appears to hold true it does not mean that it is correct.
However, it is necessary to test other possibilities.
We know that from heating iron in a fire that it begins to glow & the colour of the glow changes as it gets hotter. Whilst the light that is emitted is of low energy the heat required to cause the iron to glow is immense.
We also are shown thermal-imaging pictures – we are not told they are frequency-imaging pictures. Nonetheless, common usage has historically caused us to attribute frequency to light spectrum – but the term thermal imaging indicates that temperature amplitude is the link to colour variations.
However, for a frequency range with a constant maximum peak, a change in frequency does bring about a change in RMS value (RMS = Root Mean Square, the equivalent/effective constant value of a frequency based variable)
So in arguing that light is attributable to temperature is also not proved.
The reality is that we do not know enough about light & energy transmission dynamics through the ether and how it properly functions. But, in understanding that Young’s Slit Experiment has been misinterpreted takes us a step forward – and that is what science is all about – the incremental revelations of understandings about science – but which is retarded due to academia dishonesty.
oOo
Terminal Velocity in Space, Comets, Asteroids etc.
A further point (previously discussed?) – the fact that the ether exists means that there is a terminal velocity for matter travelling through space. This is intuitive since in moving through space the body cuts through magnetic fields, thus inducing energy, which produces back-emfs, which produce opposing magnetic fields which oppose the ‘natural’ attraction forces between magnetic sources. Hence there is a limiting action, hence there is a terminal velocity for matter travelling through space. This also shows that Einstein’s Energy & Relativity theories cannot be correct.
It is also contended that comets, asteroids, etc. are caused to rotate by the MOTOR effect that comes about by either direct influence from the sun (or other star/s) or from impulsed velocity from a bodily explosion (which matter is also then acted on by star/s). The MOTOR effect also has a ‘metamorphosing’ influence on bodies, i.e. it constantly changes the dynamics/characteristics of body (we see this with the changes to our Earth) and this reality could explain (partly) how the earth was eventually formed, a metamorphosing process.
(The BIG BANG, as proposed by Hawking & others, is an unlikely event).
oOo
Creation & Evolution
People such as ‘Archbishop of Atheism’ Richard Dawkins & his disciple Colin Blakemore give weak unprofessional arguments to dispel the existence of God & Creation (their unprofessionalism raises serious doubts about the veracity of their mainstream science works). Yet they both, like Hawking, Cox & others, refuse to engage in science debate over new research that disprove their theories.
Bearing in mind that CDADD’s R&D has brought new insights into how the universe functions, we nonetheless are merely scratching the surface of understanding that functionality – even if we were to have better understandings we would still not be within reach of ‘scientising’ Conscience, and assuming it can be ‘scientised’.
It leaves only one inescapable conclusion – the existence of God.
oOo
The aforegoing, as with all of CDADD’s Engineering R&D is open to challenge & challenge is welcomed
REITERATE AGAIN:
BEST PRACTICE: timely implementation of sound Engineering application of incremental Science developments.
Corollary: Purposeful delay in BEST PRACTICE causes Social Injustices – Criminal Negligence – Justice delayed is Justice denied.
Chris Addington Pr.Eng.
www.cdadd.com, (currently unlawfully & abusively gagged/censored by SA ISP Diamatrix.co.za & USA ISP Softlayer.com)
(Under enforced exile from South Africa due to ANC government’s oppressive XDR-nazi system and oppressive economic isolation by corporate & academic world’s.)
XDR = Extreme Democracy Resistant.
________________________
Open Letter to: Stephen Hawking, Brian Cox & Sir Patrick Moore
October 7, 2010
Dear Sirs,
Good Morning
Your respective programmes: Channel 4 ‘Stephen Hawking’s Universe’, BBC ‘Wonders of the Solar System’ (Brian Cox) & BBC ‘The Sky at Night’ (Patrick Moore)
You all claim, in your programmes, that the Doppler effect, as experienced for e.g. with sound waves through air or water, are transmutable into light transmission dynamics as propagated through space. BUT, none of you in your programmes give the science facts that support such a claim – you make unfounded, unscientific, unprofessional leaps in reasoning from air dynamics to space, ether, dynamics.
Last night’s ‘Sky at Night’ programme presented contradictions:- in the first half, explaining that ‘exploding’ stars we observe in space are the effects of explosion light on space matter & NOT the matter itself being ‘exploded’ outwards (Note: Patrick Moore & his presenters did not present the source of the IP, vis: myself, that brought about the change to these new thinkings).
BUT then, in the second half, discussion by scientists at a LOFAR site to detect radio band waves from space, that LOFAR is (partly) to detect the red-shift (Doppler effect) of galaxies etc. in an expanding universe.
Patrick Moore did not question this contradiction:- if exploding stars are NOT the source of matter supposedly zipping at near to speed c; then what is the source of matter that scientists claim cause the red-shift, Doppler, effect deep into the radio spectrum, and through which scientists argue that the universe is expanding at near speed c?
Answer: There are contradictions because the fundamental science is wrong – Doppler effect in air/water does not transmute into light transmission dynamics; matter does not travel at anywhere near even one tenth of speed c, not even one hundredth of speed c, not even one thousandth; and the universe is unlikely to be expanding at speed c, it is more likely to be expanding at a small drift velocity, possibly less than a metre/sec.
I have presented ample plausible argument that disproves the bases upon which you all claim that the Doppler effect holds with light transmission/propagation dynamics. Yet, you all continue to mislead the public.
We do not properly understand the dynamics of light transmission or even how rainbows are formed, yet scientists gaze into space and make wild deductions.
Nevertheless you all maintain your positions that Doppler effect transmutes from air/water dynamics into light transmission dynamics - therefore professional integrity requires that you all set out the bases of your claims of red-shift, Doppler, effect in light transmissions & the fundamental science principles upon which you base these claims.
It is ironic that Patrick Moore expounded on the work of Tycho Brahe & the oppressions from prejudice, dishonesty & danger that prevailed in Brahe’s time, which caused scientists to extreme caution & silence in their research; ditto:- Galileo & many others – the dishonesty by scientists of today, towards my work that disproves theirs, is similarly oppressive.
If exploding stars did shoot out matter at speed c then we would have seen and, by now, felt the effects of zipping matter from the exploding star that Brahe observed – but we have not seen/felt zipping matter because matter is not exploded out at speed c, or even one thousandth.
Further, immense amounts of money are expended by governments and finance institutions, such as Hiscox, whose wealth derives from defrauded pensions/investments monies & which are causal of the Global Economy Meltdown, in constructing white-elephants such as CERN LHC & funding bogus science TV programmes. Financial Powers are skewing research, and you have all succumbed to this and are misleading societies/parliaments/governments.
Professional integrity is such that the onus is upon you to PROVE your claims of the science foundations for you to justify enormous leaps in reasoning such that it does not broach into hocus-pocus science-fiction as is presently the case. It is not for others to disprove the bases of your science foundations. And, if challenged, the onus is upon you all to address those challenges, professionally.
Please set out the clear bases upon which you make these transmutable Doppler Effect/red-shift claims – bullet points, then brief explanations (as a first pass).
You also claim that TIME is a dimension – please set out briefly the bases of this claim.
(Our thinking of time as a dimension is purely abstract & has not real substance - the past is past, the present is right now, but having read ‘now’ is now past never to be repeated again, and the future is forthcoming and when briefly present is forever gone.
A dimension in Physics is continuous, unbroken, measurable & real.
Time is not real, hence it is not a dimension)
The bases for your claims are clearly readily available, you would not have made claims of science ‘facts’ supported by them were they not, hence 48 hours would be sufficient time to respond to this reasonable request
Thankyou
Sincerely
Chris Addington Pr.Eng.
www.cdadd.com, (currently unlawfully & abusively gagged/censored by SA ISP Diamatrix.co.za & USA ISP Softlayer.com)
(Under enforced exile from South Africa due to ANC government’s oppressive XDR-nazi system and oppressive economic isolation by corporate & academic world’s.)
XDR = Extreme Democracy Resistant.
##### End of Particle Mu-12 #####