Captain’s Log, Stardate 06
More Particles of Space
Particle Theta-8
Star Wars - Asteroids, Meteorites, Mercury crashing into earth –> we need to rethink
Why do meteorites crash into planets
(Or, more correctly, why do so many meteors NOT crash into earth?)
What is a meteor; what an asteroid?
Pervading culture of dishonesty within universities & academic institutions is expanding.
Stephen Hawking – Medal of Freedom – Political Puppet?
Richard Dawkins – funding to abuse children
Robert Winston – silent within House of Lords
Whether Mercury crashes into earth is immaterial – man is doing a great job of crashing earth himself – and much sooner
_________________________________________
There is a general but deep culture of dishonesty pervading throughout universities & academic institutions, and western policies are being steered, by high-level intellects, towards expanding that dishonest culture.
Scientists refuse to tell the truth about what is immediately observable on earth – they refuse to acknowledge, they deny, that Twin Towers was IMPLODED, despite clearly observable evidence that ‘transfer of momentum’ is absent, and that free-fall could ONLY be achieved by high impulse, explosive forces & sequential explosive forces, i.e. implosion – yet scientists gaze millions of light years further and argue that stars move away from earth at near-speed-of-light, etc.
For decades the world has been deceived by these kinds of defective theories.
There are scientists sitting in UK’s House-of-Lords & Commons, and in US’s Senate & Congress, and within various European Upper & Lower Houses – yet, not one of these scientists have the courage to protect the integrity of society against a pervasive, cancerous, growth of academic dishonesty.
Even worse, as media reports clearly show, UK children are no longer afforded free meals or full-day care at schools. Their education is limited by the ability of their parents to afford these necessities – which necessities, if absent or diminished, severely curtail the development of a child’s brain, intellect & social abilities. In other words – children from poor homes are condemned to a life of disadvantage before they are even conscious of the realities of the world that are oppressing them.
Yet government, ably assisted by high-powered scientist intellects sitting in HoL and/or Commons, freely permit the subjugation of the nation’s future minds.
There is a new bout of Power suppressions, oppressions, depressions, repressions insidiously creeping its cancerous tentacles throughout society – intent on subjugating future minds into compliant obeisance toward a High-Intellect Global Power Network.
Despite numerous requests to universities such as Oxford, Cambridge, Cape Town, Wits, London, UK Open, etc. for access to facilities & financial support – which request is based upon CDADD’s previous & ongoing researches & developments that significantly disproves decades-old science theories – these universities refuse to assist.
UK government’s Department of Innovation Universities & Skills refuse to respond to requests.
Scientists such as Stephen Hawking, Richard Dawkins, Robert Winston (who sits in the House of Lords) remain silent whilst government maintain the lies of Twin Towers, Economy Meltdown, etc.
The Royal Society & Nobel Foundation also contribute largely to the pervading lies.
- Stephen Hawking received a Medal of Freedom from President Obama – yet Hawking does not have the freedom within himself to acknowledge the truth about TT, or that CDADD has disproved his theories. Hawking effectively condones the lies concerning TT & economy frauds – is Hawking simply a Political Puppet for President Obama to hide the lies of TT & global economy meltdown?
- Richard Dawkins is given media exposure because he gave financial support to camps that deceive children => open child abuse. But, Dawkins & his ‘disciple’ Colin Blakemore are afraid to engage with the writer.
- Robert Winston, sitting in the House of Lords, does not step back from the back-biting, back-stabbing of politics to bring truth into Parliament – he passively, if not actively, supports the jew-mafia & christian-mafia elements (not to be confused with loving-faith Jews & Christians) that massively defraud societies. His position in the HoL was intended to oppose the back stabbing/biting, to bring intellectual truths, but he plays along by remaining silent, dishonestly.
Ironically, Hawking promotes the link between his birth & that of Galileo, who was severely oppressed by the establishment, & their entrenched defective thinkings, for proving that the earth is not flat. Hawking (& universities & institutions in general) are effectively entrenched in their defective thinkings and oppressing CDADD (& no doubt others) for disproving many of their theories.
Church leaders also remain silent in their dishonesty.
CERN (Large Hadron Collider) & EU also continue their dishonesty – it is CDADD’s work that brought about the 2009 Memorandum of Understanding between CERN & EU – but no reward/finances have been paid for the significant insight & self-funded effort by CDADD that brought about the necessity for the MoU.
(And, academics that do stand up to the ‘establishment’ are at grave risk – Jo Moila (a psychology lecturer) stood up to abuse from SA’s University of the North, only to encounter even greater abuses from SA’s corrupt Judiciary, including the Constitutional Court that has been hijacked by Jew Justices – Jo died recently under mysterious circumstances, repeated requests to the SA Police Acting Commissioner Tim Williams (who is standing in for his predecessor Jackie Selebi whilst being prosecuted for links to organised crime) has produced no response to requests about Jo’s untimely death. See ‘The Constitutional Court, Boer Commandos & The Cheeky Little Nigger’).
Is it any wonder that the eastern world do not buy into the dishonesty of the western nations.
Is it any wonder that western nations grow relatively weaker as eastern nations grow stronger – both intellectually & numerically.
Whether Mercury does or does not crash into earth is immaterial - Man is doing an excellent job of crashing earth, & much sooner.
Nevertheless it is unlikely that Mercury will crash into earth – at least not based upon the mathematical models that BBC have aired.
We need to understand why this is so.
oOo
As previously discussed, mathematics has often been wrongly used to develop our understandings of nature; and this has created bizarre theories pertaining to deep space, the further we pioneer into deep space the more bizarre the theories (within the economics/business/finance environments mathematics has been used for fraudulent purposes).
Oxford professor, Marcus du Sautoy, in a 4 part BBC/Open University documentary ‘History of Mathematics’ creates a false illusion of the abstract mathematical ‘infinity’ being linked to deep-space infinity – he does this by discussing infinity of numbers in mathematics whilst videos of space are screened – it creates the false impression that mathematics is directly linked to physics/nature, it is not – mathematics, and abstract concept, is an extremely important tool but very quickly breaks away from real space & reality into imaginary space & fantasy.
(Also see paper ‘Infinity, Eternity, Evolution, Creation’ – click on historical archives, lhs panel)
We need to recheck reality. Long, long, long before mathematics was developed, man, even ape, understood that if you let an object go that it would fall to the ground. Man didn’t understand why this was so until many millennia later when mathematics & science came to prominence – nevertheless, in the intervening millennia man/ape continued to function despite not understanding why. Even when understanding came about a number of incorrect theories gained prominence, but what we observed ‘seemed’ to fit into the prevailing theories & models of mathematics & science.
As man’s inquisitive mind reached ever further beyond our planet & beyond our solar system so it became impossible to check the mathematics/science theories against the reality of nature in those far distant regions. Theory began to diverge increasingly away from reality.
Nevertheless the mathematics/science behind those defective theories & within their abstract domain was of immense brilliance – no shadow of doubt – but the reality remains that it is of science-fiction and not science-fact.
This series of papers is aimed at bringing engineering insights (i.e. the practical applications of science into the real world) into those defective theories/models.
oOo
There is a need to give clarity to the dynamics of planets, meteoroids/ites, asteroids, comets, etc. because we are bombarded by much confusing ‘science’; and scientists refuse to engage transparently, or honestly, to bring clarity to these issues.
A major gaffe:- BBC News recently aired an item that predicted that Mercury (& other planets) would possibly crash into earth – but, not too worry, this would be in about 5 Giga-years. It mentioned researchers (J Laskar & M Gastineau) who had developed highly sophisticated mathematical models to demonstrate this.
This news snippet caused the mind to BOGGLE! - and caused an enquiry to J Laskar (who didn’t respond initially) then an enquiry to M Gastineau (who initially responded with link to their paper – overview pasted below) but who later failed to respond to more detailed enquiries – then, later, J Laskar sent the following link.
Scanning through this paper, by Laskar & Gastineau, it is clear that this is high-powered mathematics – but what is entirely absent is any attempt to explain reality - i.e. to put the theory into an understandable real model –> e.g. we observe the effects of gravity on earth and we can understand the theory that explains the dynamics of this gravity – but Laskar & Gastineau give no explanation of the fundamental dynamics of their model that predicts that mercury & other planets will crash into earth.
There has, as yet, been no reply from either Laskar or Gastineau to repeated requests for an explanation.
Whilst scientific research & mathematical modelling must be encouraged – it is clear that there needs to be greater transparency & vetting over what models are given airing – this is self-evident from many defective models that ‘prove’ TT collapsed naturally, or ‘prove’ by defective mathematics that they were imploded (i.e. a correct conclusion but by incorrect deductions). It is clear from the model by Laskar & Gastineau that a defective process was engaged to reach the conclusions they did. Their model merely looked at a snapshot period (a small span of some millions of years) of our solar system & extrapolated the modelling of this snapshot into far-distant time, Giga-years hence; i.e. no discussion of underlying dynamics pertaining to the solar system, or how it functions, were brought into their analysis.
What does this imply?
An example (a silly one, but it gives clarity):- imagine a scientist receiving a signal from Michael Schumacher’s (ok! – he’s had to pull out of a come-back) F1 car as it whizzes round a racetrack, the signal is plotted on a screen as a point light – the light makes a circuit pattern as MS drives the circuit. After a while the pattern changes, a while later the pattern changes again, and so on. The ‘scientists’ now apply mathematical modelling to determine future trends of these plots.
BUT, the scientists overlook the fundamental dynamic of what causes the plot & pattern – which is, MS whizzing round a racetrack, and later another & different racetrack, and later another racetrack – each producing different patterns – none of which can be extrapolated into anything ‘scientific’ – because the layouts of the different racetracks have no scientific connection one to another.
In a similar way – Laskar & Gastineau have taken a snapshot of planetary motions & extrapolated that into far-distant time, and without any insight of the underlying motion dynamics & forces that cause the solar, star/planet, system that we exist within to function – and all of which do have direct interacting links with each other, to varying degrees at varying times.
oOo
We need to rethink the ‘science’ & mathematical models that have gained prominence in astronomy/astro-physics and in light of previous propositions in this series that star/planets systems are simply SUPER-MOTORS – i.e. there are REAL forces that cause planets to turn & systems to function, i.e. they don’t just happen.
There is much confusing terminology within the astronomy/astro-physics worlds that one needs a degree just to recite the confusing terminology – however, all this terminology overlooks the fundamental dynamics.
In short, we can simplify:- A solar system (star/planets) has, by definition, planets orbiting the star (in our case the sun), this occurs (as previously explained in this series) by forces emanating from electro-magnetic radiation from the sun which produces torquing action on each planet, which causes planets to rotate; the magnetic fields between sun & planets draw planets to the sun, but centrifugal forces from planets rotating pushes them apart; the fundamental characteristics of each planet & the energy radiated from the sun determines the ‘stable’ orbit & relative position that each particular planet settles down into, and about the star/sun.
Within the solar system there is other matter besides the star & planets: – this matter ranges in size from tiny dust particles, through to small stones, eventually through to humungous rocks that are mini-planets. If a particle, however big, is in orbit around the sun then it fits into the asteroid class; if it doesn’t orbit it fits into meteoroid class; however confusion comes in with a definition that meteors are smaller than asteroids.
If it has a tail (coma) it is classed as a comet.
That is pretty much what all the confusing scientific mumbo-jumbo is about – there is matter, ranging from tiny size through to humungous size, some orbiting, others not.
The issues we need to understand are what happens (is likely happening) in space; what are the fundamental dynamics (NOT, what are the complex mathematical models that try to project/extrapolate snapshot motions).
Extending the thinking of SUPER-MOTORS:-
Matter (of whatever size) comes hurtling towards & into our solar system, the electro-magnetic forces radiated by the sun cause currents to circulate within that body, which produces a magnetic field about that body & tends to rotate/spin that object – the degree of this effect depends upon the material characteristics of each piece of matter. If it is largely conducive to electro-magnetic influence then it possibly can be drawn into orbit around the sun. If not, it passes on its way through our system.
Sometimes these matter particles can collide with planets – we can see this in certain locations on the earth & also many examples on the moon. What causes these particles to collide with earth?
Clearly, by looking at the moon it appears that it receives far more meteor strikes than the earth does, yet the moon is smaller than earth. It surely tells us that the moon performs an important protective function.
It seems logical, from a SUPER-MOTOR perspective, that the moon is protecting the earth much like a baseball bat hitting balls away. The moon’s orientation (as previously propositioned in this series of papers) is near-perpendicular to the earth; however, regardless of this, the monthly orbit the moon takes around the earth causes magnetic pulses to be radiated into space, these pulses then present a protective magnetic pulse barrier to matter (that now itself radiates a magnetic field because of electro-magnetic induction from the sun’s radiated energy) that travels towards earth – these pulse effects can be likened to ‘pulsing’ a wheel/hoop along the road, it is easier to maintain momentum & direction by pulsing it with your hand.
It is contended, therefore, that the first level of defensive mechanism, against matter crashing into earth, is via a pulsing magnetic field – courtesy of the moon.
The second level protection comes from the moon itself; BECAUSE its axis is near-perpendicular to the earth, it presents a ‘fixed’ magnetic pole outwards, so matter that is not deflected by the pulsing is more likely drawn to the moon than to the earth, which is at an ‘inner’ position relative to the moon & with a vertical polar axis. (Note: this is all happening in effective slo-mo – relative to time-scales of planet life-times, and complex inter-actions are occurring from all directions in space).
The third & fourth levels of defensive mechanism are from the earth’s atmosphere:
– the third is provided by means of a deflection shield, matter bounces off the atmosphere if the angle of impact is too far off perpendicular (note: the moon does not have an atmosphere so once a body is attracted it is unlikely to be deflected)
- the fourth level, is by means of which the atmosphere attempts to burn up that matter (shooting stars) which does enter the atmosphere; and matter that is not fully burnt up hit the earth and are called meteorites
All of this could be likened to random interactions in a pinball machine - but of far greater complexity, because planets are structured components that have designed purposes such that it is impossible, at present, to model the causal forces.
(Not being a meteor/ite expert, but from observing meteorite particles at the temporary display at Collins Barracks (Dublin) or W5 (Belfast) it seems that all these meteorites are metallic. This raises a thought – does the high speed of these particles through space (up to 30 miles per second, 100,000 mph) & over light-years and through the electro-magnetic ether cause (bring about) a ‘mutation’ of matter? Certainly the heating effect through earth’s atmosphere will cause structural changes.
Is a comet undergoing, effectively, a ‘mutating’ process into a meteor or asteroid?)
(A further argument that disproves the claim that the moon is in ‘synchronous’ rotation:- applying electric motor theory – for synchronicity it is necessary that the rotor is in step with the rotating magnetic field, i.e. the ‘poles’ of the rotating field & rotor do not lose synch – for this to happen a synchronous motor requires a stable power supply to both rotor & stator - if we are to accept the moon as functioning synchronously, where then is the constant power supply to the moon? Further, a synchronous motor requires at least 2 pairs of poles, even if one pair is artificially created through pole shading; the earth/moon does not present as multiple poles with constant & separate power sources, as, alternately, earth shades moon & moon shades earth from the sun’s power source => moon cannot be rotating synchronously - or at all, else we would see the other side of the moon).
oOo
Let’s go back to the Laskar & Gastineau mathematics model that predicts that mercury & other planets are likely to crash into earth.
Is this a realistic proposition? Unlikely!
Simply consider the SUPER-MOTOR explanation – some energy source is causing the planets to rotate & orbit the sun – obviously it must be the sun itself as being that power/energy source.
Each planet is in its own particular orbit because of each planet’s own characteristics (its own particular & unique make-up of matter) if the sun’s radiated energy flow were to diminish (increase) then ALL planets would slow down (speed up) & be drawn closer to (forced away from) the sun – i.e. their relative positions would remain unchanged – hence they are unlikely to crash into each other.
Also, should the planets draw closer to each other then their magnetic fields would repulse them from each other
What this means is that for the planets to have any chance of colliding then the very make-up of one (or more) planet would by necessity have to change so as to bring their relative orbits closer & closer together.
This is unlikely to happen of its own accord.
If a massive piece of material were to enter our solar system & collide with a planet/s then there is a possibility, however remote the probability, that the characteristics of a planet will significantly change.
But, a collision as proposed by J Laskar & M Gastineau, based upon extrapolation of historical data? – definitely not!
Nevertheless, their efforts at mathematical modelling is sheer brilliance – and all credit due for same. Science can only progress if serious effort is made - but, unfortunately, a general pervading culture of dishonesty is retarding science.
The cause of their error, which makes their modelling science-fiction & not science-fact, is the distance that scientists place between themselves and engineers – scientists hold themselves in isolation. This isolation is part-causal of the general culture of dishonesty that pervades ALL universities & academic institutions
The BBC was wrong to have aired this news item – the more so since they are kept regularly informed of the developments at CDADD website.
There is a more urgent need for measures that can compel the media to publish/air the truth & not half-truths.
Chris Addington Pr.Eng.
(Under enforced exile from South Africa due to ANC government’s oppressive XDR-nazi system and oppressive economic isolation by corporate & academic world’s.)
XDR = Extreme Democracy Resistant.
________________________________________
AND Abstract below
Nature 459, 817-819 (11 June 2009) | doi:10.1038/nature08096; Received 17 February 2009; Accepted 22 April 2009
Existence of collisional trajectories of Mercury, Mars and Venus with the Earth
Astronomie et Systèmes Dynamiques, IMCCE-CNRS UMR8028, Observatoire de Paris, UPMC, 77 Avenue Denfert-Rochereau, 75014 Paris, France
Correspondence to: J. Laskar1 Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to J.L. (Email: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.).
Abstract
It has been established that, owing to the proximity of a resonance with Jupiter, Mercury's eccentricity can be pumped to values large enough to allow collision with Venus within 5 Gyr (refs 1–3). This conclusion, however, was established either with averaged equations1, 2 that are not appropriate near the collisions or with non-relativistic models in which the resonance effect is greatly enhanced by a decrease of the perihelion velocity of Mercury2, 3. In these previous studies, the Earth's orbit was essentially unaffected. Here we report numerical simulations of the evolution of the Solar System over 5 Gyr, including contributions from the Moon and general relativity. In a set of 2,501 orbits with initial conditions that are in agreement with our present knowledge of the parameters of the Solar System, we found, as in previous studies2, that one per cent of the solutions lead to a large increase in Mercury's eccentricity—an increase large enough to allow collisions with Venus or the Sun. More surprisingly, in one of these high-eccentricity solutions, a subsequent decrease in Mercury's eccentricity induces a transfer of angular momentum from the giant planets that destabilizes all the terrestrial planets 3.34 Gyr from now, with possible collisions of Mercury, Mars or Venus with the Earth.
Astronomie et Systèmes Dynamiques, IMCCE-CNRS UMR8028, Observatoire de Paris, UPMC, 77 Avenue Denfert-Rochereau, 75014 Paris, France
Correspondence to: J. Laskar1 Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to J.L. (Email: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.).
##### End of Particle Theta-8 #####