Economist’s inexact models exactly defective 13
(Nobel Prize Hijacked 5, E Olstrom & O Williamson)
Animal selfish-gene smothering Man’s moral-gene
US President for Sale???
More ‘science’ works awarded Nobel Prizes despite violating all terms of Alfred Nobel’s Will
_______________________
It is recommended that you read the previous papers in this series – click on ‘view now’ Historical Archives (lhs panel).
This series highlights the gross defectiveness of Economic Scientists’ models that are causing gross injustices & instabilities throughout the world. The previous papers concern:-
1. Milton Friedman, Lucas, Aumann
2. John Nash (portrayed in Beautiful Mind by Russell Crowe)
3 & 4. Edmund Phelps
5 Robert Mundell
6 Nobel Prize Hijacked
7 R Myerson, E Maskin, L Hurwicz 1
8 R Myerson, E Maskin, L Hurwicz 2
9 Nobel Prize Hijacked 2
10 Nobel Prize Hijacked 3, P Krugman.
11 Nobel Prize Hijacked 4, P Krugman 2.
12 The Unscience of Scientific American’s ‘Science of Bubbles & Bursts’
(Please Note: This website is about the pioneering of ENGINEERING into the SEBFL environments, it is about seeking truths; it is NOT about journalism, English grammar or prose, or quick-sell – it is down-to-earth engineering & pioneering requiring extensive & intensive THINKING.
SEBFL = social/economy/business/finance/legal environments.
Explaining transmission mechanisms & pre-empting catastrophic failures is NOT doom-prophecy, it is explaining probabilistic reality.)
_______________________
IMPORTANT NOTES:
# If you are unable (or simply refuse) to understand the physical dynamics of the Twin Towers implosion, a TANGIBLE, VISIBLE event; i.e. if you incorrectly believe that TTs were natural collapses consequent to plane damage –> then you will have no hope of understanding the INTANGIBLE nature of the sciences pertaining to the social/economy/business/finance/legal (SEBFL) environments. -> in which event, don’t waste your time by going beyond this point – ignorance is bliss, for a while at least, so enjoy it while you can!
# For those who genuinely wish to understand, please continue, but be warned, you need to STOP & THINK carefully ….. engineering is not about cute sales-gloss sound-bytes – engineering is the application of real world sciences (tangible & intangible) to attain optimal systems structures & controls.
(Pointer: Freedocumentaries.org have new batches of excellent docs – including a series on Kennedy’s assassination giving new insights & evidence. Putting all the circumstantial evidence aside and looking SOLELY at physical evidence – it is crystal clear that the Warren Commission covered-up and that multiple gunmen were involved; hence a conspiracy existed, through which National security systems were disabled; exactly as happened with Twin Towers. The USA’s Justice system refuses to act.)
# Mathematics is an abstract concept in which there are an infinite number of dimensions with infinite distance within each – an infinity of infinities – and infinities of equations - deep into virtual space & far from reality. Think of a huge number and imagine it represented by the wall space opposite you – reality is less than a pin-prick of that space. Scientists lose sight of the fact that they have gone way beyond the grey-area bounding reality and deep into virtual space, far from science-fact and deep into science-fiction – because engineering is absent from their untested research.
# We must also be careful of being drawn into sales-gloss sound-bytes that the world has become accustomed to in seeking instant gratification. Half-Empty is a fail-safe perspective relative to the non fail-safe & deceptive sales-gloss Half-Full perspective. We are comfortable in driving our cars & using everyday items BECAUSE precautions are taken in production when items are tested to destruction to ensure cost-effective safety. Engineers ALWAYS look for faults so as to pre-empt failure, to ensure a product is fail-safe as possible. If engineers were to look at products as Half-Full then catastrophic accidents would be more prevalent.
Politicians almost ALWAYS present Half-Full imagery, which is why the world is in such a mess.
Ditto scientists.
________________________
INDEX:
Introduction
Nobel Peace Prize
Nobel Physics Prize
Economics ‘Nobel’ Prize
INTRODUCTION:
Perhaps it is appropriate that we currently celebrate Charles Darwin 200, and the 150 year publication anniversary of ‘The Origin of Species.
What is most notable about Darwin’s definitive work is that he did not use one equation – Darwin observed & deduced scientific relationships & propositioned explanations.
Since then scientists have essentially gained fame simply by ‘mathematising’ Darwin’s work, or coining cute catch-phrases such as ‘selfish gene’. Unfortunately these scientists do not appear to recognise that man has progressed far beyond the selfish-gene by ‘internalising’ moral-genes. Moral-genes are what are supposed to separate man from animal - however, all too often some of the man species revert back to the animal selfish-gene mode.
We cannot dispute that the moral-gene exists because we have the Universal Declaration of Human Rights which is proof positive that man does not seek to remain at the animal selfish-gene level.
Whether one ascribes this moral-gene to God or to some other pseudo-science argument is an individual choice – but, beware the unprofessional & unscientific arguments of those that argue against Theism.
Unfortunately, again, the Nobel Foundation that was intended by Alfred Nobel to promote the moral-gene in superiority to the selfish-gene has been hijacked & prostituted by Sweden’s Wallenberg family and consequently grossly defective science (both tangible & intangible) models have been rewarded and other works that disprove these defective models are ignored. Hence, at present, grossly defective & massively destructive science models hold sway.
The result is that the World is in Economic Meltdown turmoil, and despite wishful claims by governments that matters are turning around the downward spiral continues.
The animal selfish-gene prevails in both the tangible & intangible sciences and smothers man’s moral-gene.
- We see CERN Large Hadron Collider continuing with their baseless claim that they (last week) accelerated two beams to near speed c and collided them – there is no doubt that they created highly excited beams, which propagated at speed c, but the claim that particles travelled at anywhere near speed c is bizarre & unproven. CERN refuse to engage in debate on their errors of interpretation of fundamental science that CDADD has shown to have come about. (see ‘A Bunch of Open Letters 3’ & series of papers ‘Captain’s Log Stardate xx’)
- We are brainwashed with unproved links of Pollution (carbon emissions) being linked directly to Global warming – there is certainly high CORRELATION between pollutions & global warming but this does not prove direct CAUSE/EFFECT link. CDADD’s proposition of star/planets systems as SUPER-MOTORS shows an entirely different outcome, a Global Freeze. From a government policy perspective, gearing up for masses of suntan lotion & bikinis presents no defence to an Arctic Freeze requiring arctic-survival gear.
Last night on BBC News Nick Stern (House of Lords & London School of Economics) added his voice again to the unproved pollution/warming link – it cannot be ruled out that it is simply mountains-of-voices maintaining government spend to keep jobs secure in a declining economy. (see Captain’s Log Stardate 6, Kappa-10).
Nick Stern is not qualified or experienced in the area of physics/engineering pertaining to the functioning dynamics of star/planets systems or how global warming has come about, which is still an uncertainty despite the mountains-of-voices unscientifically claiming a pollution causal chain – Nick Stern is in fact another mathematician who has fast-tracked an easy ticket into science (intangible, economics) – yet, his unqualified voice went out around the world last night on BBC transmissions raising higher still the numerous other unqualified mountains-of-voices that are skewing government policy.
(This is not to say that pollution is not a serious issue – it is and must be dealt with appropriately – but, ignoring possible/probable global-freezing is a real danger)
- Economics models are clearly not working (witness ongoing economic meltdown) and clear evidence exists within the recent judgement by UK’s Lord Chief Justice Phillips on Bank Charges that Finance-Powers have carte-blanche to continue their raiding & plundering of economies & societies.
(What is most disconcerting is that LCJ Phillips has been kept regularly informed by CDADD of the damage that unfair bank charges and a unitary-model interest-rate control has upon economies. Yet, whilst he sat hearing the matter on bank charges he chose to play a legal manipulation game and not call for open submissions on the issue, in which greater clarity would have come out. Contrast this to the Iraq Inquiry who have openly called for submissions - the fact that they cover up the Twin Tower implosions is another matter – see papers: ‘Interest Rates & Loans’).
- Professor David Nutt’s termination of his chair position on ACMD advisory council by UK Home Secretary Alan Johnson confirms that government policy becomes locked-in and blocking of further science debate & reasoning – which is a recipe for disaster because no one can now challenge the misinterpreted, the unproved pollution/global warming link, or any other science issue. Economies are crashing because defective models are allowed to prevail because merit is not rewarded, and engineering is oppressively isolated.
- The Nobel Foundation (controlled/hijacked by Sweden’s Wallenberg family) wrongly support & reward this defective science base – the NF remains locked into their selfish-gene dishonesty – the 2009 Nobel Prizes for Peace, Physics & Economics have been awarded for works that do not confirm to Alfred Nobel’s ‘Terms of Will’ and the NF do not challenge these results = proof of contamination.
We can see concrete evidence of the Nobel Foundation/Wallenberg dishonesty by viewing the NF website. Based on CDADD’s research, John Nash made a retraction (admittedly only partial) of his Nobel Prize winning model (which was awarded a Nobel Prize because it had been purposefully used to give false credibility to otherwise global finance fraud scams) – instead of promoting Nash’s honest (partial) admission, which would have brought discredit to numerous finance/economics models, the Nobel Foundation promote his image & his models on their website – thus maintaining the deceptions & dishonesty.
- Whilst East/West governments may bring temporary solutions (that satisfy the immediate needs of those individuals in power) to various current conflicts, the masses remain disparitised – so ‘solutions’ fail – just a we see in Northern Ireland.
The East/West conflict can only escalate – the only way to avoid this is by engineering sound economy structures & controls – but merit is not rewarded, hence defective economics models prevail, hence disparities continue to increase, followed by frustration, anger & violence.
- A Channel 4 programme on Monday night highlighted the fact that certain UK Lords are linked to Russian oligarchs who are deemed to be linked to massive crimes. One Lord argued that if a relationship yielded more British jobs then that was the most important consideration. It does not require too much brain-power to recognise that such an argument is pure rubbish.
There is NO reason why Britain, or any nation, should not be fully employed – the reason nations are not fully employed rests with the grossly defective & massively destructive SEBFL models upon which policies are based.
Britain achieved over 150% employment (housewives taking up jobs vacated by men) when fighting World War I & II. If a nation can be fully employed fighting a war by destructively throwing bombs & bullets around the world then there is no reason why engineering cannot achieve similar employment constructively fighting World War III (Finance Wars) – the ONLY reason that this is not happening is BECAUSE of defective government/parliament policies based upon grossly defective & massively destructive SEBFL models.
The world is heading for World War IV (Hot War) which is being triggered by a cold war, WWIII (Finance Wars), which is manipulated by Global Finance-Powers who are also manipulating governments and now buying-off a sitting US President.
Nobel Peace Prize 2009 – President Barack Obama:
The Nobel Peace Prize is decided by a committee of 5 persons, Norwegian Nobel Committee, elected by the Norwegian Storting/Parliament.
It is abundantly clear to all throughout the world that President Barack Obama has done NOTHING to warrant the award of the 2009 Nobel Peace Prize. It therefore raises the real & only issue - that a sitting USA President has been bought-off buy Wallenberg (& his associates within a network of Finance-Powers).
We have seen how Tony Blair was bought of with his honours4cash $1M Dan David Prize pay-off, and this was belated because the original cash4honours was thwarted by Parliamentary & Police enquiry (all of which was later covered up).
We have seen similar dishonesty with Ireland’s ex-PM (Taoiseach) Bertie Ahern
Fortunately neither made it to the EU Presidency.
Norway is also easily open to corruption from the Nobel Foundation/Wallenberg, and far more easily is the five man Norwegian Nobel Committee selected by Norway’s Storting.
If President Barack Obama persists and accepts this unwarranted award then he will simply be presenting himself to his African relatives & countrymen, and to the rest of the world, as another coconut (black on the outside, white on the inside).
Cassius Clay (Muhammad Ali) vocalised the stark differences between the ‘white’ African-Americans and those of Africa when he visited Zaire for his 1974 ‘Rumble in the Jungle’ fight with George Foreman.
The 2009 Peace prize violates ALL THREE foundation points required of Alfred Nobel’s ‘Terms of Will’:
President Obama is committed to INCREASING a standing army in Afghanistan – which contravenes Alfred Nobel’s express Terms of Will pertaining to the Peace Prize which states:
‘ ….. and one part to the person who shall have done the most or the best work for fraternity between nations, for the abolition or reduction of standing armies and for the holding and promotion of peace congresses.’
Mere talk about nuclear arms limitations cannot be construed as an ‘abolition or reduction’ of weapons
It is true that Obama’s Cairo Speech could be loosely construed as a ‘congress’ as termed by Alfred Nobel – but, Obama failed to tell the truth about the Twin Towers implosion – Obama deliberately lied, hence it cannot be construed that he is a ‘person who shall have done the most or the best work for fraternity between nations’.
Whilst it is also true that Obama has visited a number of nations those visits are nowhere near as groundbreaking as, for example, President Nixon’s Feb 1972 China visit. In that year (1972) no Nobel Prize was awarded.
It follows that on ALL THREE foundation points of Alfred Nobel’s ‘Terms of Will’ that President Barack Obama has not qualified.
It follows from these CONCRETE proof that that the Nobel Prize has been hijacked and a US President bought-off.
Whether Barack Obama sees the light and withdraws/returns his acceptance of the Nobel Peace Prize remains to be seen.
(It should become a principle within the United Nations charter and/or within Universal Declaration of Human Rights that a sitting Head of State, and for some reasonable period thereafter, should be precluded from receiving any awards, especially of a monetary nature. In addition, there perhaps should be a standardizing of salary & pension scales for heads of states.)
2009 Nobel Physics Prize.
Whilst the scientific/technological advances made by this year’s Nobel recipients are significant they do not conform to, they violate, Alfred Nobel’s ‘Terms of Will’.
It is abundantly clear & admitted to by the Nobel Foundation & Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences that the development of fibre-optics and CCD devices are many decades old – in other words they do not comply with Alfred Nobel’s requirement ‘…. those who, during the preceding year, shall have conferred the greatest benefit on mankind’.
The developments by Kao, Boyle & Smith are hard to be construed as having ‘conferred the greatest benefit on mankind’ because even more people have become impoverished since the Global Economy Meltdown has come about.
In fact the advances & massive increase in communications has had totally the opposite effect – it has reduced benefit to mankind in toto, and only benefitted (this assuming ‘benefit’ is an appropriate term) a small minority. Communication advances have created a greater awareness of disparity simply by constant images of luxury being beamed into the vast regions of poverty – hence it has raised frustration & anger. BUT, more importantly hi-tech sucks money out of marginal economies: mobile phones, lotteries, pay-tv, etc., etc..
Hi-tech is inappropriate technology for over 90% of the world’s population.
The consequences of the Nobel Foundation & Prize having been hijacked & prostituted are immense. As stated before, academic institutions have become prostituted such that a general culture of dishonesty pervades. Scientists refuse to engage in open scientific debate when theories are validly challenged. None of the 2009 Nobel Prize winners have taken up CDADD’s Open Global Challenge, yet they are awarded prizes for works which do not conform to Nobel’s Terms.
There is an excellent reason why Alfred Nobel stated that Prizes must be awarded ‘.. to those who, during the preceding year, shall have conferred the greatest benefit on mankind’ – and that is to stimulate competitive research that will bring real benefits to mankind from which the greatest can be chosen. It was to specifically stimulate new thinking, and to minimise the stifling old thinking – to restore man’s moral-gene.
But, the Nobel Foundation/Wallenberg has totally corrupted & prostituted this dynamic – and the proof of this is the culture of dishonesty that pervades academic institutions globally – hence, new scientists & science discoveries are held ransom to an ‘old-boys club’ which suppress/deter open debate on new research. This can also be seen with Scientific American – the editor, Bruce Brandfon, in response to CDADD’s paper opposing SciAm’s ‘Bubbles & Bursts’ article sent a reply:- ‘Get a grip mate’ – Brandfon refuses to publish CDADD’s opposing paper, hence science debate is squashed.
Hence the Nobel Foundation/Wallenberg selfish-gene smothers man’s moral-gene.
On a scientific basis:
- Whilst man-made pulsing light has been used to transmit information it has not been shown that light has frequencies attributed – it has been erroneously interpreted from Young’s Slit Experiment (see Captain’s Log Stardate 06, Particles Iota-9 & Kappa-10).
The ‘Information for the Public’ states:- ‘Infrared light with a wavelength of 1.55 micrometers, is nowadays used for all long distance communication where the losses are lowest.’
- Research into light transmission via optics has been misinterpreted – the losses are lowest (with infrared) not because it has a wavelength of 1.55 micrometers (which frequency attribution is disputed by the writer) but simply because light which is towards the red band of refracted light is least bent than those toward or beyond the blue band. It follows that light that is refracted (bent) the greater obviously has many more bounces per meter to make along a fibre-optic than those less bent, hence the more bounces the greater the amplitude diminishes, in totality of the number of bounces (as well as from increased acuteness of the bent light?) Infrared is least bent, hence fewer bounces along a fibre-optic, and since it is the lowest light band that can be adequately photo-optically detected it is why it affords best results.
- Further, RSAS stated of the recipients works, that whilst electric cables and electrical data transmissions are affected by lightning strikes, light is not affected by strikes, hence light is a more reliable form of data transmission. The point to note here is - that since lightning does not affect light it must follow that light is NOT electro-magnetic radiation as previously thought – and this is one of CDADD’s propositions that counters long-standing theory that light is electro-magnetic frequency radiation
The aforegoing is not intended to denigrate the significant works by Kao, Boyle & Smith which has brought new technology to the world – but simply to point out that their works do not conform to Alfred Nobel’s Terms of Will – hence they are not entitled to the Prize.
Whether the recipients will withdraw/return their acceptance remains to be seen.
2009 Nobel ‘Economics’ Prize: Elinor Olstrom & Oliver E Williamson.
The World of 2009 is in its worst ever Economic Meltdown and despite ‘assurances’ from western governments that economies are turning around the spiralling downturn continues unabated.
Despite the Global Economy Meltdown crisis the Nobel Foundation (through its Prize selection processes) has somehow managed to award the Nobel ‘Economics’ Prize for obscure works that have no relevance to the present crisis, for obscure work from Prize recipients that have no formal science experience but instead have solely academic experience, for work that has been untested by engineers. In contrast, the Nobel Foundation & RSAS ignore significant groundbreaking work that has extensive engineering insights and that does address the economy crisis and also far exceeds the works of those cited for the Economics Prize.
Once again, as with past Nobel Economics Prize models, the works by Olson & Williamson are old works – their works are not from the previous/preceding year, but from decades past – on this point they fail Nobel’s Terms of Will.
The Olson & Williamson works also fail on the grounds that they do not bring benefit to mankind, not at all, let alone the ‘greatest’, because the Olson & Williamson works are founded upon the animal selfish-gene and not upon man’s moral-gene.
If we look at the ‘science’ summary as presented by the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences (RSAS).
- The first important point to note are the reams of References appended to the ‘Scientific Background’. Contrast this to the absence of References for the Physics Prize.
What this confirms is that Olson & Williamson have not made a new discovery or invention – if this were the case then their work would stand on its own accord, and un-referenced.
Instead, RSAS have simply amassed a mountain-of-voices (the references) to give false weight to an incremental development of defective science within the intangible economic sciences.
Contrast this to genuine original works – such as Darwin’s – there is no reference index to Darwin’s work because he pioneered science, he did not seek to manipulate & accumulate works by others with the intent of extracting their ideas – Darwin developed original thinking, he initiated an incremental process.
- Whilst there are certain positive aspects to Olson & Williamson works their incremental developments do not benefit mankind – far from it – it benefits a small minority of Finance-Powers who have long been manipulating to attain significant, if not total, control over economies/societies.
It is because the Olson & Williamson works are not moral-gene but selfish-gene oriented.
It is another incremental slithering of an evil creeping cancer that is spreading throughout the world – and through a form of ‘legalised’ Organised Crime that achieves its aims by rewarding defective, untested, economics models that give false credibility to fraudulent schemes & scams globally.
(The recent bank-charges judgement by UK’s LCJ Philips confirms the puppet status of justice systems within this Finance-Powers global-empire)
- The central thrust of the works by Olson & Williamson is their argument that ‘Economic Governance’, achieved through firms, provide a better form of conflict resolution over common interests (with Olstrom addressing common property issues)
In short, what Olstrom & Williamson are promoting is a new form of political/societal authority control – but deceptively guised as a constructive incremental step in the development of free societies, and through the application of ‘science’. BUT, what the Olson & Williamson works really do is take us another step further away from elected governments (which are already extensively corrupted & manipulated by Global Finance-Powers) and towards ever more-powerful firms of autocratic bosses who are chosen & controlled by the global Finance-Powers who decide how best to distribute limited resources for narrow self-benefit.
Effectively, because justice systems are closed-shops and justices are controlled by Finance-Powers, the very forums that are meant to resolve conflict-of-interest disputes are disabled, thus creating the falsely ‘credible’ notion by Olstrom & Williamson that an alternative form of decision making rests within firms (of autocratic bosses).
- The selfish-gene ‘science’ upon which Olson & Williamson derive their grossly flawed conclusions is itself flawed, because it is based upon mountains-of-voices (see the RSAS’s Scientific Background reference index) and not upon moral-gene science, or testing of science (engineering).
It is simply preconceived notions held together by prejudged ‘results’ from ‘experiments’ that are more flimsily constructed than a test rig for an early space rocket (of which many made spectacular crashes - and rockets would crash for the most basic of reasons – and they still can – witness Challenger exploding because of a faulty seal, Columbia on re-entry).
The Olson & Williamson works are based largely upon the animal selfish-gene and not upon man’s moral-gene.
Economies are controlled by a defective interest-rate control-device, money supply is destabilised by global double-accounting frauds. These massive shock mechanisms to economies prevent any & all rational analysis of economy data streams – consequently the works by Olstrom & Williamson are equally flawed, and their conclusions are thus baseless.
There is no doubt that scarce resources do need to be managed & conflicts resolved – but the research & deductions by Olson & Williamson are far removed from being considered as ‘solutions’. These ‘solutions’ could be a tipping point of causing societies to spin into civil war because the majority will be unfairly disparitised more than present; and the USA & Britain & parts of Europe are setting cauldrons of anger which are not requiring too much more to boil/explode.
A central flaw with works by economists is that there is a reliance upon old research as a foundation for their own works – it has been concretely shown in this series of papers that the foundation is essentially shifting-sand – and the only reason the old defective models have any weight is purely because a mass of people who have fast-tracked an easy ticket into economic ‘science’ have built up a mountain-of-voices – all of which is self-reinforcing of defective science-fiction theories upon which governments base their policies, with calamitous results.
It is essentially no different to the science-fiction of Einstein’s energy & relativity theories, or Stephen Hawking’s big-bang theories, which are all based upon fundamental mis-interpretations of long-standing tangible science phenomena. The intangible economic sciences are far more easily misinterpreted, and this is a central cause of the amassed flaws – a sea of shifting sands.
The Nobel Foundation/Wallenberg are eager to keep it as such because it is easier to manipulate for their own gain.
If you do not accept what is stated herein then go and read the summaries at the Nobel Prize website.
Also read Olstrom’s ‘Why do we need Laboratory Experiments in Political Science? (http://dlc.dlib.indiana.edu/dlc/bitstream/handle/10535/1570/W07-14.pdf?sequence=1,) – this gives ample insight to the masses of assumptions & over-simplifications that can & does lead to incremental errors built upon multi-layered errors of analyses.
Whether the recipients will withdraw/return their acceptance remains to be seen.
______________
It requires sound engineering to rectify these gross defects – to develop sound structures & controls that are incrementally proved in practice – this is not as difficult as it may appear, but governments & corporates are obstructing reform because both are controlled by Finance-Powers, and courts are closed because they are corrupted – hence merit is not rewarded, dishonesty is rewarded …..
…. hence grossly defective & massively destructive economics models hold sway .. and the world spirals deeper into chaos – because the animal selfish-gene, which has cancerously taken control of those minority global Finance-Powers and the Nobel Foundation, is allowed by elected governments to smother man’s moral-gene.
Chris Addington Pr.Eng.
(Under enforced exile from South Africa due to ANC government’s oppressive XDR-nazi system and oppressive economic isolation by corporate & academic world’s.)
XDR = Extreme Democracy Resistant.