Economist’s inexact models exactly defective 10 (Nobel Prize Hijacked 3, P Krugman)

Economist’s inexact models exactly defective 10

(Nobel Prize Hijacked 3, P Krugman)

World War III Finance Wars –> Global Economy Meltdown

Nobel Foundation & Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences wave another grossly defective economics paper in the air –> citing it for the 2008 Economics Nobel Prize. (Similarly with Physics).

The economics paper is as ‘worthless’ as that waved by Neville Chamberlain in 1939

The cold, covert, WWIII (Finance Wars) is likely to become overt. And HOT!

The Economy Meltdown is an IMPLOSION, just as it was with Twin Towers with USA’s defensive mechanisms purposefully disabled – what then CERN and their god-bomb?

Despair inevitable in Brown’s ‘Architecture’, Bush’s MDG goals, Sarkozy’s ‘united’ EU – reforms based upon grossly defective models that caused collapse, and seeded in dishonesty c.f. Nineveh, Jerusalem, AsgiSA, etc.

Nothing Changed = Nothing Changes, regardless of Driver.

RSPCA & Pedigree boycott Crufts for inbreeding deformed & disabled dogs

Will King Carl Gustaf XVI of Sweden boycott The Nobel Foundation for inbreeding deformed & defective science models & thinking??

CHANGE WE NEED –> CHANGE IN DEED!

But Barack Obama needs to recognise the defective economic models that prevail

& correctly engage with pioneered engineering

_______________________

It is recommended that you read the previous papers in this series – click on ‘view now’ Historical Archives (lhs panel).

This series highlights the gross defectiveness of Economic Scientist’s models that are causing gross injustices & instabilities throughout the world. The previous papers concern:-

1. Milton Friedman, Lucas, Aumann

2. John Nash (portrayed in Beautiful Mind by Russell Crowe)

3 & 4. Edmund Phelps

5 Robert Mundell

6 Nobel Prize Hijacked

7 R Myerson, E Maskin, L Hurwicz 1

8 R Myerson, E Maskin, L Hurwicz 2

9 Nobel Prize Hijacked 2

(Please Note: This website is about the pioneering of ENGINEERING into the SEBFL environments, it is about seeking truths; it is NOT about journalism, English grammar or prose, or quick-sell – it is down-to-earth engineering & pioneering requiring extensive & intensive THINKING.

SEBFL = social/economy/business/finance/legal environments.

Explaining transmission mechanisms & pre-empting catastrophic failures is NOT doom-prophecy, it is explaining probabilistic reality.)

_______________________

If you are truly wanting to understand the cause of the Global Economy Meltdown and the realities of the covert World War III that has been raging for decades then see the 6^th & 9^th papers in this series concerning ‘Nobel Prize Hijacked’ & also Overview of CDADD’s Research Papers.

INDEX:

Introduction
Alfred Nobel’s Will
Contraventions/Violations of Alfred Nobel’s Terms-of-Will.
1. Administrative violations
2. Procedural violations
3. Substantive violations
  1. General
  2. Technical
Real Dynamics & Consequences (REVISED 2010)
Relevance to Today’s GLOBAL ECONOMY MELTDOWN
Legal Remedies needed, URGENTLY

Addendums:

Open Letter To:
- King Carl Gustaf XVI of Sweden
- Nobel Foundation Directors & Members
- 2008 Nobel Prize Winners.
Alfred Nobel will (relevant text)

_____________________

### INTRODUCTION:

The crisis that the World is facing cannot be defined in any one sound-bite, or even a few, or even a couple of hundred – the issues are so wide spread, so long developed, so deeply entrenched, that it is a case of the World being in total moral collapse stemming from progressive & escalating dishonesty, wide-spread corruption, Organised Crime (Legal).

In fact, Organised Crime (Illegal) is encouraged by the destructive consequences of Organised Crime (Legal) – see paper UNODC Convention on Drugs & Crime.

The grossly defective economic models that the Nobel Foundation & Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences are wrongly awarding Nobel Prizes for are simply a component part of a global strategy by corrupt Finance-Powers

The proofs, from engineering first-principles & developed at this site, concretely show that Twin Towers was IMPLODED. Further, the evidence shows that the entire USA civil & military homeland defensive & security systems were purposefully disabled to enable the planes to crash into the buildings. The entire justice & security systems were disabled to allow forensic evidence to be cleared & destroyed. The disabling of ALL these systems was possible only by High-Powered financial FORCES, alternatively stated: it is impossible that the entire USA defensive systems could have ALL been independently castrated at the same time without careful pre-planning. (see paper Twin Towers Collapse & A Bunch of Open Letters 3)

The trillions of Dollars of defrauded monies (see paper UNODC Convention on Drugs & Crime) that had been accumulating over some 4 decades or more were partly used to finance these attacks. The implosion was NOT by Osama Bin Laden, it was by persons ‘friendly’ to the USA. The plan-seed of flying the planes into the building were also likely from persons ‘friendly’ to the USA.

The pre-planning included the preparation of ‘scientific’ works that could be presented to the public to ‘explain & support’ a natural collapse. Recall how quick these theoretical models were to appear. Recall how we were easily convinced. Then circumstantial evidence & strong pressure claiming implosion (see freedocumentaries.org), but no proofs from engineering first-principles, until Keith Seffen’s paper was successfully challenged by CDADD.

The pre-planning of TT implosion included the ploy of inducing the US Security Services to deceive President Bush & others into believing that Saddam Hussein had WMDs. Prime Minister Tony Blair also bought into this ploy. Such a ploy would be beneficial to an enemy of Saddam that was ‘friendly’ to the USA. The Finance-Powers that achieved this effectively disabled the USA’s Intelligence Service’s internal-protection measures.

Although the mass genocides within Iraq can be argued as being sufficient cause for invasion it does not escape the reality that Finance-Powers TOTALLY disabled the USA’s internal protections; the same with the UK.

It follows then that the buying-off of the Directors of the Nobel Foundation is a small-fry issue – but an issue with immense impact, because the grossly defective Economics (& Physics) models that have been awarded Nobel Prizes in the past were such that the Finance-Powers could entrench their fraud schemes behind ‘credible’ science models.

However the Trillions of defrauded pension/investments & double-accounting offset-frauds were used to buy-off governments & to disable economic/finance defensive/protection measures & to develop the massively destructive Open Global Economy concept which has allowed Finance-Powers to entrench their power base completely, globally.

The financial market spirals, pyramids, siphoning, churning, etc. has been able to develop, unchecked by Justice systems, BECAUSE the defensive protections had been disabled through deregulation & perverting of Justice officers & governments.

Despite the reality of the attacks on the USA & the disabling of the USA’s defensive systems security has not improved. Communications channels to the US Chief Justice, via his clerks, are now blocked. Is it any wonder that the US Government is deaf & Justice entirely absent?

We call this chaotic ‘western’ mess: DEMOCRACY – but it is nowhere near it because those that are elected are elected by high-powered Finance-Powers that are buying-off politicians, hence have bought governments.

Barack Obama, it appears and as he states, developed his finance support DIRECTLY, in the main, from the electorate through his website. Time will tell whether he develops policies based upon electorate & national needs instead of the historical Finance-Power corruptions that have created the chaos.

If Obama attends Bush’s Nov 15 White House G20 he will be the only electorate-funded leader, all the others have been elected by being bought-off. Obama will be in absolute minority. Reports however indicate that he may not be attending which would not be a good thing. Regardless of Barack Obama being in the minority it is important that he initiate interaction even if only to say that new dynamic reform policies are currently in development stage and without going into detail. Kennedy initiated the space programme even though the space vehicles had not been developed, hardly even thought of – in less than a decade man was on the moon. That came about by the majority difficulties being confronted by a person in the absolute minority.

Also note that the Kennedy’s were financially independent –> they paid the ultimate mortal price for pursuing their calling.

Barack Obama needs to engage with pioneered engineering for solutions to the economic chaos to successfully confront the majority difficulties within G20 whose leaders & advisors are brainwashed with grossly defective economics models.

BUT, Obama’s economic advisors have also learnt the same defective models & also have not engaged with pioneered engineering.

Barack Obama will only be as good as his team – if the comms channels are blocked, or are not intelligent enough to sift the worthwhile from the worthless, or if his team is contaminated with double-agents, then the effectiveness of his policies will be severely reduced if not entirely turned-about.

It is important to understand that the Economics models that have been awarded past Nobel Prizes are economic ‘god bombs’ – and the 2008 Economics model by Krugman is no different - it is why we are experiencing GLOBAL ECONOMY MELTDOWN –> it was MASTERMINDED – it has been masterminded for decades.

With the US Chief Justice’s ears closed who will tell President Bush about these REAL DANGERS at the G20?

The USA is still disabled.

The EU is so totally engrossed in creating its empire with the Lisbon Treaty that it has lost sight of reality.

Comms & warnings to President-Elect Barack Obama’s election team have resulted in auto-responders but no open replies.

Nevertheless earlier messages & warnings did get through to the US Chief Justice for passing on to President George Bush, and also to Prime Minister Gordon Brown, but …..

Long-standing warnings, complete with engineering proofs, from the writer via this website have been largely ignored by governments globally, and corporates, institutions, etc.; Warnings with sound reasoned explanations have been largely discarded; the widespread corruption that is causal of the Global Economy Meltdown is total in its totality.

The EVIL that is permeating the world is little different to that we read about of ages-old examples e.g.: Nineveh, Jerusalem, Exodus, etc. Their brief reforms were all seeded in dishonesty which ultimately led to collapse, every time, without fail.

President George Bush’s presentation at the White House Summit on International Development showed that the seed of his reform is based upon dishonesty and defective policies, many of which are stemmed from Jeffrey Sachs’ grossly defective ‘Millennium Development Goals’ models.

Prime Minister Gordon Brown continues to disregard the warnings & the reasoned explanations – he too is launching shallow reforms that are based upon dishonesty.

President Sarkozy’s united EU reforms are also defective – these, the newest of reforms, are based upon dishonesty.

Brown’s Reform Architecture will only sow seeds of intense despair – because these reforms will also collapse. The despair will be more intense than currently felt in now-derelict housing estates built only a few decades ago. Masses of money squandered on architectured despair in the real world; Brown now dishonestly engages with virtual architecture to reform the UK economy. The seed of this architectural reform derives from stolen IP from this site & from this writer – as with Nineveh, Jerusalem & others the dishonest seed will result in ultimate crash.

Brown’s incorrect use of the term ‘architecture’ is purposefully to avoid the use of the term ‘engineering’, the use of which would confirm the source of his reform IP, vis this website.

Changing the Drivers from Bush to Obama, and Brown to Cameron will not alleviate the collapse unless the structure & controls of the Economy Vehicle are correctly engineered – and the necessary engineering requirements for this are being pioneered at this site.

Time-cycles with ages-old collapses were in the order of many decades & centuries; in today’s world the cycles are much shorter, a few years to a couple of decades.

There are REAL DYNAMICS & CONSEQUENCES behind dishonesty – there are ages-of-examples:

- South Africa’s collapsed AsgiSA showed us that reform seeded upon dishonesty will not ever work – the IP was stolen from the writer by the SA Government.

- Nineveh is a complete example of dishonesty seeding moral collapse, and the city being totally eradicated from sight – the seed of dishonesty was sown at inception of reform, by Nineveh’s dishonesty to Jonah.

- Pharaoh’s dishonesty against Moses & his people was rewarded with severe hardships for Egypt.

- What we see in Jerusalem today is a living, constant, reminder of the REAL DYNAMICS & CONSEQUENCES of dishonesty.

– see later.

____

Bank of England Governor Mervyn King has ignored the multi-component interest-rate model that would radically improve & stabilise economies – R&D developments at this site are sent directly to him. On what basis does a BofE Governor feel that economies should be unstable, complete with traumatized millions, so that he can satisfy his own selfish needs to not to feel stable & bored.

King’s immorality conjures up images of stuffed-emperors feeding themselves whilst victims are fed to lions.

King has drastically reduced the interest rate again – it clearly shows a desperate person desperately trying to coerce the economy to obey his commands – but it never has done & it never will because there is no rational control behind the unitary-model interest-rate model; it requires rational multi components for discrete & positive control.

How is it that King is employed in such a demanding position?

Mervyn King’s immorality raises the question as to his links with South Africa’s Mervyn King; an ex-High Court Judge that is deeply entrenched in local & global frauds and is global-banker for jew-mafia & christian-mafia elements (not to be confused with respective loving-faiths) out of his Luxembourg based Brait bank. This Mervyn King was the mastermind of the fraudulent sale of the Formula 1 Kyalami Racetrack which belonged to the AA, of which King was Chairman, & many other frauds.

The cover-up of cash-for-honours further shows the depth of corruption – right to the heart & head of Justice systems & governments.

____

If you took your car to the garage for repair of a fault and later picked it up to discover that it now had a dozen other faults you would be livid with anger.

Imagine then the sheer anger that Vlad is justified in having after ‘western’ economists serviced Vlad’s Russia-car and with that car now collapsing. Vlad’s anger is fully justified.

____

The Nobel Prizes are highly influential upon nation-leaders, governments & throughout societies.

Prime Minister John Major stated:- ‘Being insufficiently educated to advise ministers, I decided early on to be a minister myself, and to harness others’ learning to my native good sense.’

It is BECAUSE of the hijacking of the Nobel Foundation by academics that the Nobel Prize has been hijacked and that defective economics models are being wrongly awarded Nobel Prizes and that governments are being misled, they are harnessing incorrect learnings.

The CERN Large Hadron Collider was built upon a false-premise that matter can travel at speeds close to that of light. Vast quantities of money squandered because of erroneous thinking misleading governments.

In light of the realities of the USA’s entire defensive systems being disabled by Finance-Powers what then is really happening at CERN with their god-bomb? Who controls & benefits from the research.

(Images of James Bond vs. enemies such as Blofeld are not unrealistic, but with CERN Bond has been put to sleep, disabled; and with the 9/11 attack on USA Felix Leiter was also napping, disabled)

Governments in UK, USA, Europe, SA, etc. refuse to listen; instead they continue to accept the grossly defective models that are wrongly awarded Nobel Prizes. Their Economic Advisors are not qualified or skilled to determine the engineering defects within these models, they readily accept the defective models from mathematicians with easy-tickets into economic sciences who have wrongly been awarded Nobel Prizes.

Which is why the World is in meltdown!

It was possible for governments to argue that the writer’s work, being pioneered engineering into intangible economics systems, was defective and this argument being supported by Nobel Prize winning models. However the writer’s work into the tangible physics systems supports & gives credibility to the work into intangible systems, which proves that the Nobel Prize winning economics models are grossly defective..

Thus governments have no excuse for ignoring the messages or the content.

The RSPCA & Pedigree have both boycotted Crufts Dog Show because the powers & judging within the Crufts body have corrupted & prostituted their very reason-for-existence which has resulted in progressive inbreeding of deformed & disabled dogs. The BBC is conducting a scientific investigation into the allegations concerning Crufts and has announced that they too will boycott the Crufts Show if the evidence is corroborated.

The evidence is overwhelming that the Directors of Nobel Foundation have corrupted & prostituted the Foundation’s very reason-for-existence and are inbreeding deformed & defective mindsets and science models & thinking.

The arguments herein simply give added confirmation and explain the REAL DYNAMICS & CONSEQUENCES of this corruption and how it seeps into all spheres of society & economies.

Will King Carl Gustaf have similar courage to RSPCA & Pedigree in boycotting the Nobel Awards Ceremony?

Monarchies do have a responsibility for ensuring credibility.

Just as the US President has a right of moral veto on bills passed, so too do Monarchies have a moral right to veto the dishonesty of the Directors of the Nobel Foundation.

And the International Court of Justice has a moral right to protect Alfred Nobel’s name, even in death.

_______________________

### Alfred Nobel’s Will & contraventions/violations thereof

The relevant text from Alfred Nobel’s will is appended at the end of this paper.

The Prize for Economics (correctly: Sveriges Bank Prize in Economic Science in Memory of Alfred Nobel) have regularly contravened the import of Alfred Nobel’s will and, more recently and certainly with the 2008 Awards. The Physics Prize also contravenes the will –> Administratively, Procedurally & Substantively.

There was much controversy concerning AN’s will in the years immediate to his death – his family opposed the will and executors refused to act upon the terms-of-will. The first prizes were awarded only in 1901.

The Nobel Foundation was formed around 1905 and has since then been the regulatory body for the awards, whilst the decisions regarding the prizes are made by the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences (Economics, Chemistry & Physics), Karolinska Institutet (Medicine), Swedish Academy (Literature), Norwegian Nobel Committee (Peace).

_________

Contraventions/Violations of Alfred Nobel’s Terms-of-Will.

Administrative violations:

The Board of Directors are, barring one Deputy Director, DIRECTLY linked with the various academies that decide the Prize Awards – i.e. there is conflict of interest & zero governance.
The only non-academic is Jacob Wallenberg, Chairman of Investor AB; who, presumably, is there to bring corporate governance into play – but corporate governance is non-existent.
The absence of good governance violates AN’s will.
The import of the gross violations is that:
1. Alfred Nobel’s Human Rights, even in death, are being violated.
2. Global frauds are able to be deceptively perpetrated behind defective science models

There is a need for correct governance to be applied within the Nobel Foundation.

Procedural violations:

The secretive nomination & selection process is a violation of fairness to which AN’s will ascribes.
1. It is fact that the Nobel Prizes are highly influential on nations, corporates, academics & leaders – it therefore influences the every-day decisions that affects EVERYBODY in the world.
The Procedural unfairness stems DIRECTLY from the Administrative & Governance contraventions.
There is no appeal process to challenge the defective works that are wrongly awarded Prizes.

There is a need for full transparency with the Nobel Prize nominations & selections.

Substantive violations:

- General:

Alfred Nobel stipulated clearly that the awards are to be made to:
The purpose of Alfred Nobel’s legacy was to encourage new & dynamic thinking towards discoveries/inventions and definitely NOT to support the stuffed-shirt dishonest pomposity to which his legacy has been dragged down.
Admittedly work is progressively developed but the 2008, and many past, Economics & Physics prizes contravene AN’s will in that:
More recent work (by the writer) shows that both the Economics & Physics papers are grossly defective (see Technical violations)
1. The Global Economy Meltdown disproves the 2008 Economics papers
2. That light particles, on a balance of probabilities, do not travel anywhere near speed c disproves the 2008 Physics papers upon which theory they are based
The many works, Economics & Physics, by the writer far exceed all other works for the ‘most worthy’ & ‘greatest benefit on mankind’ criterions set by Alfred Nobel.
The 2008 Economics paper is part-causal of the Global Economy Meltdown (see later).
1. Corollary 1: Krugman’s model cannot ever bring about convergence towards stability within any Economy.
2. Corollary 2: Krugman’s model will bring about instability within a (theoretically) stable model
  1. Because, first & foremost, it is based upon exploitation of majority by minorities.
  2. It encourages finance-wars which in itself is an instability and which induces Hot-Wars.
The 2009 publication by Krugman (see ‘Information for the Public’) is a disingenuous manoeuvre by the NF & RSAS to bring Krugman’s work ‘up-to-date’, so as to create a (false) ‘justification’ for awarding the Prize to him. BUT, the 2009 publication violates Alfred Nobel’s terms-of-will that requires only work of the preceding year to be recognised. Enquiry to Trinity College Dublin Library confirmed that the paper is not yet in circulation, hence is not open to review by peers or others.
1. With any act there comes a defining moment at which that act can become dishonest. With a teller a defining moment can be the instant that the teller instead of putting money into the drawer puts it into his pocket, or across the counter to an accomplice.
2. One of the many acts by both the Nobel Foundation Directors & the Royal Swedish academy of Sciences that defines their activities as being dishonest is the point at which they deceptively called upon an as yet unpublished paper by Krugman so as to ‘qualify’ his work as fulfilling Alfred Nobel’s terms-of-will.
3. Their failure (purposeful refusal) to state that Krugman’s model was/is grossly defective is another defining act of dishonesty – we will see the defects when we discuss the technical violations later.
The 2008 Physics paper relies on the probabilistic unreality that light particles zip around at the speed of light, they don’t – we would not exist if they did, we would be blasted to smithereens.
See other papers in this series for further proofs of defective works wrongly awarded past Prizes
There is no explanation by Nobel Foundation or RSAS as to the determination of ‘greatest benefit’ & ‘most worthy’

There is a need for full transparency regarding the substance of nominations & justification of awards – since these decisions DIRECTLY affect EVERYBODY.

- Technical violations:

Physics - 2008 Nobel Prize.

The prize was awarded for theoretical works into quarks. These are theoretical works and do not conform to discoveries or inventions, hence they do not qualify for a Nobel Prize.

Mathematics, an abstract concept, does not make a discovery or invention – the mathematics can only be used to explain that which is discovered/invented. Mathematics can assist in the search for understandings (transmission mechanisms) but they must nonetheless be explained in first-principle linear terms.

The fact that the Nobel Foundation has become grossly distorted by academics, and who are in conflict positions by holding seats on both Foundation & Academies, is the reason that prizes are wrongly awarded for theoretical mathematics models (which are not discoveries or inventions as required by AN’s terms-of-will).

For a mathematical model to have credibility it is first necessary that the fundamental discovery/invention be explained by first-principles processes (which processes are explained by first-order linear mathematical relationships – i.e. the unit-time step-by-step processes) – it is only when the first principles are accumulated, over time, that higher order and/or non-linearity relationships come into effect.

(Note: Physics laws, such as Newton’s laws, are not first principle laws of science, but second principle. Until gravity and light transmission is fully understood & explained from first principles we cannot explain Newton’s, & others’, laws from first principles. However, Newton’s laws, & others’, are, loosely put, ‘first principle’ laws to engineers, who deal with the real interfacing of systems, both tangible & intangible, within the world ………. and space too ).

(There also appear to be dangers within per-unit mathematics models - i.e. models operating in range between 0 and 1 - when applied to macro-modelling – this is an early thought/idea which requires further development – it has come to mind from delving into Krugman’s model.)

The writer’s work in bringing an engineering approach to light transmission dynamics (vis: light does not travel at speed c, relativity theory is impossible, light propagation transmission is via a switching-process, etc.) is, on a balance of probabilities, correct. But are these observations by the writer theories or facts?

To answer that we need to understand what a ‘fact’ is.

It is a fact that; when we hold an object off the ground and let it go then that object will fall to the ground. BUT, it is important to recognise that we call it a ‘fact’ because on a balance-of probabilities we know that it will not remain suspended in mid-air, or go upwards, but that it will go downwards (i.e. fall) to the ground. We know this ONLY by repeated experiments & repeated experiences by many, many, people – i.e. on a balance-of-probabilities it is deemed that because we do not, have not, observed an instance in which a body did not fall to the ground then on a balance-of-probabilities it is deemed that it will fall to the ground, each & every time, without fail. But, nonetheless it is a case of a balance-of-probabilities, and the probability approaching P(fall to ground)->1 (the probability approaches 1, or unity).

Therefore since a fact, any fact, is in reality a balance-of-probabilities that approaches unity it then follows that the writer’s work in disproving that light particles travel at speed c (i.e. they travel at a nominal drift velocity) is on a balance-of-probabilities a fact, and not simply a theory. Hence this ground-breaking work which corrects previous works does conform to the parameters set by Alfred Nobel for consideration in the 2009 Prizes.

The ‘previous works’ referred to are those by such as Einstein, Schrödinger (whose old Dublin house is some 100 metres away), etc. - which are works of mathematical brilliance, but nonetheless are not physics facts but physics fiction, i.e. science fiction, sci-fi.

Since the structure of the Nobel Foundation and the collusion between it & academic institutions have contaminated further an unfair nomination & selection process, the writer hereby submits his work for the 2009 Nobel Prize in Physics.

The writer’s work in explaining star/planet systems, and their power source dynamics, as super-motors, and into the universe in totality, are discoveries.

This collective work, by the writer, which also proves, amongst other things, the invalidity of the CERN Large Hadron Collider, also disproves the basis upon which the 2008 Nobel Prize recipients’ models are based.

(See paper series ‘Captain’s Log, Stardate xx’ at this website).

In the alternative we can say that since we do exist that light particles do NOT travel at anywhere near speed c – because if they did we would be blasted to smithereens, we would not exist.

We can also see that light particles do not travel at speed c by observing that man-made electric light has electrons travelling at drift velocity, therefore there would be a massive quantum imbalance in electrons travelling in electric cables at drift velocity & light-particles emitted travelling at speed c if light particles did travel at speed c – which they don’t.

The mathematical models developed by Cambridge Engineering Lecturer Dr Keith Seffen, that ‘prove’ a natural collapse of Twin Towers, also show how people can erroneously be misled by blind-faith in mathematics, and through TANGIBLE evidence being omitted. Physical evidence clearly shows that Seffen’s models cannot be correct – the absence of transfer-of-momentum dynamics is proof-positive of the incorrectness of Seffen’s mathematics model; the presence of large components reaching ground faster than that possible from gravitational forces is also proof-positive of the incorrectness of Seffen’s mathematics model. Seffen, an engineering lecturer, omitted to apply the physical evidence against the theoretical mathematical models he developed. Nonetheless:- brilliant effort for developing the mathematics but, like Einstein’s energy & relativity equations, they are not fact but fiction.

The Twin Towers were IMPLODED.

The works by the 2008 Nobel Physics Prize fit into the same miasma of errors – they are based upon the same erroneous philosophy that has been mathematised into false ‘fact’ but which can now be clearly seen as fiction.

The 2008 Physics recipients have been wrongly awarded the 2008 Nobel Prize – this is solely because of collusive non-governance & power mergence within the Nobel Foundation, and mergence of the Board of Directors and the respective academies upon which the Board Directors sit.

See also general comments for 2008 Economics Prize

Economics – 2008 Nobel Prize.

This will be dealt with under the 3 separate releases by the Nobel Foundation & Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences – vis: Press Release, Information for the Public, and Scientific Background (viewable at nobelprize.org) – consequently there will be some overlap with the preceding categories.

Press Release:

Para 1: admissions by RSAS that Krugman’s work is theory confirms that it contravenes AN’s will which requires that qualifying work be a discovery/invention.
Para 2: ‘Krugman's approach is based on the premise that many goods and services can be produced more cheaply in long series, a concept generally known as economies of scale.’ This premise is false and immoral – the evidence is overwhelming that cheaper prices come about from the enslavement of poorer ‘sweat shop’ regions/countries.
Para 2: ‘This kind of trade enables specialization and large-scale production, which result in lower prices and a greater diversity of commodities.’ This statement is deceptive – the reality is that the limited specialization within developed countries is swamped by enslavement in poorer regions/countries.
Para 3: reiterates that Krugman’s work is theory – i.e. it is not a discovery/invention = contravenes Alfred Nobel’s will.
Para 4: Reduced transport costs are argued as being part-causal of population concentration. This is an invalid proposition because it is an inconclusive proposition. Krugman has not established CAUSE/EFFECT.
1. In fact a counter argument holds that lower transport costs drive denser populations to seek better & cheaper living conditions further afield – which we partly see in London.
2. Also it is common knowledge that overt transport costs are not reflected in the covert transport costs – c.f. cheap flights, which create societal distortions, which feeds-back to distorted economies, which is part-cause of the meltdown chaos.
Para 4: The driving force for denser populations is that price-wars in rural areas bring about uncompetitive monopolization = job destruction, hence migration to centres, etc.
1. the source of cheaper inputs (to sustain price wars) derives from imported slave-labour which destroys local jobs, reduces safety standards, etc.
2. the imported slave-labour is cheap because it can ignore decades/centuries-developed labour relations policies/laws & regulations which protect the societies that support the manufacturers & which provided the original inputs that slave-labour imports now replace. (e.g. Burberry, Chinese baby milk, lead paint in Chinese toys, etc., etc.)
3. defrauded pension/investment monies create massive distortions to constructive derived-demand forces (see papers UNODC Convention on Drugs & Crime, Mastermind of Organised Crime, Organised Crime Legal & Illegal)
Para 4: Krugman’s ‘observations’ are based upon observation of distorted outputs (garbage out) of economies, and these observations providing distorted feedback inputs (garbage in) into a defective economy system (defective transfer mechanism = garbage system) => garbage throughout.
1. Observations of a corrupted society, which Krugman & other economists have relied upon, cannot be used to verify the validity of a theoretical model – one must first discover first-principle engineered models that can bring about convergence towards stability.
Footnote to Press Release: An outline of Krugman’s academic history is given.
1. A web search reveals that he ceased research around 1999 & began a career in journalism (which as you well know is a polite term for ‘literary prostitution’). It confirms that his work is some 10 years old & does not comply with AN’s terms-of-will.
2. the footnote to ‘Information for the Public’ shows that Krugman ‘suddenly’’ shifted back to research with a 2009 joint-paper with Obstfeld M.:–
  1. BUT, this paper is not referenced in the ‘Scientific Background’ release by the RSAS.
  2. A reference to a 2009 publication contravenes Alfred Nobel’s terms-of-will which requires the Prize be awarded for work in the PRECEEDING year, and to the most worthy person that made a discovery/invention and which conferred the greatest benefit on mankind. All 3 points have been contravened by RSAS & NF (which are essentially one-and-the-same collusive entity).
  3. Trinity College Dublin Library confirms that this 2009 paper is not in general release – i.e. it is not yet formally published, and is not yet in formal circulation for vetting purposes by Krugman’s peers or the writer from an engineering perspective or by others from any perspective.
Footnote: ‘The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, founded in 1739, is an independent organization whose overall objective is to promote the sciences and strengthen their influence in society. The Academy takes special responsibility for the natural sciences and mathematics, but endeavours to promote the exchange of ideas between various disciplines.’
1. these statements by RSAS are entirely disingenuous
2. RSAS is not independent, they are collusive with other bodies as we can plainly see with the Nobel Foundation
3. The RSAS are using the Nobel Foundation to sway public & government thinking for ulterior & dishonest motives.
4. RSAS & NF do NOT endeavour ‘to promote the exchange of ideas’ – they actively engage in the theft of ideas & Intellectual Property.

Information for the Public:

‘How are we affected by globalization? What are the effects of free trade? Why do increasing numbers of people flock to large cities, while rural areas become depopulated?’
1. These are bizarre questions raised by the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences – bizarre, because they are/were raised whilst the World is in dawn of GLOBAL ECONOMY MELTDOWN CHAOS – the effects are plain to see, as plain as the devastation of the atom bomb on Hiroshima.
2. These questions by the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences are entirely disingenuous worthy only of the utmost contempt, derision.
3. The effects of unfettered globalisation & free trade is far more destructive than unprotected sex – this is intuitive because there are far more deaths by starvation than through Sexually Transmitted Diseases, Unfettered globalisation & free trade brings about economic STDs (Systemic Transmission Defects) which brings about HIV (Holistic Investor’s Virus) which develops into full-blown AIDS (All Investors Defrauded Syndrome) which brings about disparity, poverty, starvation, frustration, anger, violence.
4. see section on Press Release for comments on the Footnote
5. see Scientific Background for technical comments.

Scientific Background:

The World is in Global Meltdown partly because Krugman’s defective models have been used by governments & nation-leaders. Similarly with previous defective models that were awarded Nobel Prizes.

Krugman’s models may have had a degree of validity some thirty years ago whilst researchers were attempting to understand the intangible systems that economies are - BUT, like Einstein’s models (e.g. e=mc²), they are incorrect, they are defective.

With Krugman having moved into journalism, and hence having abandoned research integrity, the Nobel Foundation & RSAS have been hard-pressed to find some economics work that they could simply hand a Nobel Prize out for – anything to avoid the truth that the writer’s work is the most worthy, of multiple-tsunami proportions. That is the truth, the reality, of the 2008 Nobel Economics Prize.

The most glaring concern regarding Krugman’s model (for which he was awarded – wrongly – the 2008 Nobel Economics Prize) is that he proposes that such complex interactions between regions/communities/nations can be reduced to such a simple equation.

Krugman’s work centres around a simple equation (U=∑_(i=1,n)v(c_i), which was later developed by J Stiglitz & A Dixit to (U=∑_(i=1,n)c_i^y/y, 0<y<1)
1. From this equation Krugman & others claims that all of man’s local & international interactions are described or analysed
2. The RSAS support this view
At page 4, Para 1 – it is ADMITTED that ‘It [Krugman’s model] contains not only a new trade theory that allows us to explain observed patterns of intra-industry trade, but also the seeds of a new economic geography where the location of production factors and economic activity can be stringently analyzed within the framework of a general-equilibrium model.’
1. BUT, we know that the observed data Krugman & others applied is defective (it led to GLOBAL ECONOMY MELTDOWN chaos) -> it follows that Krugman’s model, and as modified by Stiglitz & Dixit, is WRONG!!!
2. QED!!! BUT, let’s not rely on this point alone…..
As with any theoretical model it only has validity, partially or totally, if that model successfully & repeatedly explains the way things actually work, and does not attempt, wrongly, to tell how things should work.
The reason that we see:
1. that Einstein’s e=mc² equation is wrong (i.e. e≠ mc²) is because, on a balance-of-probabilities approaching 1, we do not see or feel any light particle zipping around at speed c.
2. that Seffen’s natural collapse equation is incorrect is because
  1. we don’t see the transfer-of-momentum effects that would be necessary for a natural collapse, these effects are absent.
  2. we do see components reaching the ground sooner than would be the case with a natural, gravity, fall i.e. additional, immense, impulsive, sequential forces had to have been present = multiple explosions = implosion.
Similarly with Krugman’s model, we need to see that it explains everyday occurrences correctly. However, when we do look at these everyday occurrences it becomes plain to see that Krugman’s model does NOT explain these occurrences hence the model is defective because it doesn’t even partially explain the everyday processes.
1. Further, for Krugman’s model to satisfy the ‘confer greatest benefit upon mankind’ criterion it must apply to the majority of people and not just to the capitalist minority AND it must be through CONSTRUCTIVE forces if it is to be considered a ‘benefit’.
2. But Krugman’s model does not even apply to the minority as a benefit as the meltdown proves.
3. Also the forces that draw people to cities are DESTRUCTIVE forces of price-wars.
At Page 2, Para 3 – ‘Today, most trade takes place between countries with similar technologies and similar factor proportions; quite similar goods are often both exported and imported by the same country. At least among the richer countries, intra-industry trade – whereby, for instance, a country both exports and imports textiles – came to dominate relative to inter-industry trade – whereby, for instance, a country exports textiles and imports agricultural products. Under such circumstances, how could intra-industry trade be explained?’
1. Krugman overlooks the massive financial distortions that have grown from the early 60s to today and which are caused by the defrauded pension/investment monies Masterminded by Donald Gordon – these run to multiple Trillions of US Dollars in today’s terms. (see Mastermind of Organised Crime, & UNODC Convention on Drugs & Crime)
2. Also the added distortions from double-accounting of the defrauded pensions/investments.
3. These Trillions have been sloshing around the world funding Israel’s wars, funding high-priced exotic lifestyles, driving supply-driven demand through artificial needs creation, etc.
4. the massive increased demand (driven by supply & artificial needs) has required significant imported inputs, but at same time driving increasing pressure on economies-of-scale.
5. And much of the money has been used to buy-off political leaders, justice officers, public employees, etc. so as to reduce/remove PROTECTIONS that impeded the acceleration of supply & demand. The net result was that DESTRUCTIVE TRADE replaced CONSTRUCTIVE TRADE.
6. Krugman, Stiglitz, Dixit & others have not recognised these REAL WORLD issues – BECAUSE they are academics from mathematics background and have taken a fast-&-easy-ticket into science, but without any formal training or any exposure to interfacing with engineering – hence the reason for their grossly defective models.
Krugman argues that the economies of-scale fits in with general equilibrium (which implies it would yield stability). Again, how can one attain equilibrium when the majority labourers are facing slave-labour ages? There is no equilibrium attainable with Krugman’s model because Krugman entirely overlooks the realities of economics systems and this is because he has no practical or engineering insight to systems & controls.
At Page 2, Para 3 ‘..the new trade theory …. these insights were integrated into a stringent and unified theoretical framework.
1. the net effect of this ‘unified theoretical framework’ is that an ERROR MULTIPLIER has come into play.
2. If you look through the other papers in this series you will realise that all the economics models are grossly flawed – putting all these flawed models into a unified theoretical framework simply multiples the flaws
Central to Krugman’s theory is that people migrate to cities for constructive reasons – this is incorrect because cities were not cities until people were destructively forced to migrate into centralised regions. This was initially for defensive purposes and certainly for collective efforts to accelerate developments.
1. BUT, Krugman argues wrongly that interactions between regions/nations are a good thing because it increases the economies-of-scale despite cross-trading of identical technical products (e.g. cars). Krugman’s argument is totally wrong because it assumes an open-ended increase in economies-of-scale, i.e. an unlimited reduction in factor prices. It is clear this proposition is nonsense because one cannot get something for nothing; for, to achieve unlimited economies-of-scale it means that factor prices must get ever-closer to zero whilst maintaining quality – which is an impossibility.
A central flaw to Krugman’s model lies in his misinterpretation of what drives a particular region to grow unceasingly (albeit in cycles of varying lengths). Krugman implies that the ‘goodness’ of capitalism, free trade, rights freedoms, etc. are the qualities that provide the spirit to bring about a regional growth that eventually emerges as a city.
1. Unfettered competition forces price-wars because there is no protection against these massively destructive wars. (see early paper Price Wars)
2. Observations & the Global Economy Meltdown is proof positive that Krugman’s model cannot be right, that it is wrong. Just as a defective fuel injection system would not allow Lewis Hamilton to have become Formula 1 Champion, so too does Krugman’s model not explain how cities grow, or justify unfettered, unprotected, free-trade which induces STDs.
3. Cities grow because of an insatiable greed factor based upon wrongly perceived, and never-ending, needs. Growth is cited as the central reason-for-existence, without which, it is wrongly argued, societies decay & die. This fundamental flaw is at the root of understanding the gross defectiveness of Krugman’s model.
4. To satisfy that never-ending greed ingenuity drives innovation. New & better products are competitively developed because we are told, brain-washed with, endless reasons why we need this or that new product/service.
Economies-of-scale is simply one of price-war’s terminologies that give credibility to what is essentially a weapon-of-mass-destruction. Instead of saying we need to cut costs, of which wages are the major component, we are told that we need to increase economies-of-scale.
1. i.e. a NEGATIVE statement, vis: wage-cost reduction, is replaced by a wrongly perceived ‘positive’ statement of an increase, a growth, which in truth is a false growth-perception, a deception - a lie!
2. To achieve economies-of-scale, which in truth is predominantly wage-reduction, price-wars are engaged. Price-wars destroy outlying jobs because small-scale rural production can no longer compete. Jobs are lost and people are forced to migrate toward the central regions (which later become cities).
3. But the insatiable greed for new & better widgets & wodgets is never fully satisfied?, only temporarily whilst salivating mouths of ‘emperors’ are consuming the present mouthful whilst anticipating the next which, the ‘emperor’ is told, is better than the past or the present mouthful. And like the flies-in-the-bottle the system is overstuffed, it is poisoned - it dies!
Clearly then Krugman’s model does NOT explain reality BECAUSE it is telling us to do EXACTLY what we should NOT do.
1. It is telling us wrongly to continually reduce wage-costs, and it is inducing price-wars to achieve this, which are weapons-of-mass-destruction = defective policy, grossly so.
2. Krugman’s model does not prove the CAUSE/EFFECT of what we factually see & experience, hence it is not science fact but science-fiction – if indeed it is science at all, which, being purely an untested & unproven mathematics model, it is not.
3. but, unlike the sheer brilliance of theories by Greats such as Einstein, which were based upon significant pioneering of thought, Krugman’s theory is not in this league
4. we therefore cannot even say that Krugman’s model was good philosophy – it was far from it.
5. the dishonesty of the Nobel Foundation Director’s puts it into the domain of evil.
At page 18 Krugman makes the bizarre suggestion that his model can be applied to exchange-rate control, by buying & selling its own money in large amounts – this exacerbates fraudulent churning & siphoning. It is like filling your gas tank with petrol that you’ve drained from it just to refill it. ??????? Totally bizarre.
Is it really necessary to address the remainder of the non-science in this so-called ‘Scientific Background’, or with regard to Krugman’s grossly defective model? – it is untested, unproven and has no engineering insight, and what insight has been applied is a distortion of the real dynamics of what is happening in the real world. If you should feel there are valid points then please feel free to communicate for separate discussion.

_______________________

### REAL DYNAMICS & CONSEQUENCES: (Revised 2010)

[IMPORTANT NOTE: If you are a follower of Richard Dawkins’ non-faith in God - which non-faith is in itself a faith, albeit a negatively stated one - then your immediate response would possibly be to discount the following arguments – BUT, the references are matters of historical record, hence they have relevance even from an evolutionary perspective, which evolutionary perspective is simply God’s Creation in auto-pilot

It is also important to recognise the difference between Faith & Religion. Faith is the vertical relationship with God. Religion is the horizontal relationship amongst people who claim to have Faith in God, complete with masses of political scheming. For those in Faith the issue of buildings, artefacts & traditions have no significance; for those wrongly locked into Religion buildings, artefacts & traditions are hugely important.

Evolutionists cannot ignore the reality that conscious conscience has, and is having, a major impact upon evolution. Therefore, since most of mankind have a belief in God or gods, it follows then that God indirectly impacts evolution through man as well as directly through Creation

Richard Dawkins cannot escape the delusion of his claim of faith in non-Faith ………

………. ‘what was that Pontius?’ …… ‘Yeah, a fruit-cake. This one reckons he’s the King of Evolution’ ………‘Rome will have something to say about this, mark my words’…… ‘He certainly is a very naughty little boy’…... ‘Nails’?..... ‘Under your throne your pilateness ….. Salvaged ‘em from the last King we nailed up’ ….. ‘Best place?’ …… ‘Perhaps just there, right where he accidentally shot himself in the foot.’]

AN AGES-OLD EXAMPLE:

(see Jonah, Mathew 12:39-45, Luke 11:29-36)

Briefly:- Nineveh was rotten throughout and God told Jonah to go to Nineveh with a message (in short & simple terms:– ‘turn or burn’), Jonah was poop-scared because Nineveh was a really bad place, scary; Jonah disobeyed, and went 180 degrees the other way on a ship, huge storm, discovered by crew, thrown overboard, gobbled by fish (?), spat out(?), finally arrived in Nineveh, delivered message –> Nineveh listened, repented and reformed.

BUT, Jonah was angry, and God was not pleased with Jonah over this anger.

Important Note: God did not state that He would destroy Nineveh, and it would be wrong to interpret as such – it is contended that the correct interpretation is that God forewarned of impending doom from external forces (to Nineveh, but no doubt kept informed from within) that God could clearly see was looming.

The Gospels of Matthew (12:39-45) & Luke (11:29-36) refer to the repentance of Nineveh with a message that there is no necessity for any message of any greater warning to future generations.

Corollary: Such a warning, ignored, is at man’s own peril. (Nation-leaders take note!)

BUT, there is a further message, unstated, within these verses from Mathew & Luke, because ….

….. Nineveh nonetheless was later, around 612 BC, totally & utterly destroyed. Despite the reforms (as a consequence of Jonah’s message from God) Nineveh was eventually destroyed, eradicated from all sight, totally, utterly, completely.

It was only in the past centuries that archaeologists have been uncovering its existence.

There had to have been REAL DYNAMICS & CONSEQUENCES that brought about its eventual collapse.

The key-point is – what was the seed of its destruction & when was it planted?

The truth is that the seed was dishonesty, and it was planted when Nineveh immediately began its reform – it began with the dishonesty of Nineveh to Jonah.

How do we see this?

It is important to recognise that man has been given free-choice by God. Man can freely choose to be honest or dishonest. Whilst God was pleased that Nineveh had repented & begun to reform – it was only later that the consequences of Nineveh’s free-choice decision to be dishonest to Jonah worked its way through a REAL DYNAMIC process to Nineveh’s complete destruction & eradication from the face of the earth.

Recall: Jonah, after delivering the message, saw that Nineveh repented and he was angry because he knew that God would have been merciful to Nineveh regardless, and hence there had been no need for him (Jonah) to have endured the ordeal God put him through.

BUT, is that all there was to Jonah’s anger? Hardly! –> despite the ordeal he was angry that Nineveh had taken the message that Jonah had ordealed to deliver and without any compensation, without any reward.

Jonah’s failing was not his anger at being rejected by Nineveh but in his failing to forgive Nineveh their wrong-doing toward him. Forgiveness is a dynamic process (see paper ‘A Con-undrummed VII – Forgiveness’).

In short, there are two-parts to Forgiveness – the giving & the receiving.

When one forgives another it simply clears the giving person’s conscience/spirit so that he/she is not continually embittered towards the wrongdoer.

However the wrongdoer, having been extended forgiveness, cannot receive it until he/she has rectified the wrongs done to the best of his/her abilities.

So, whilst a wrongdoer fails to rectify their wrongdoing, and hence fails to receive forgiveness, the wronged-person, although having eased his own conscience/spirit in extending forgiveness, is unable to avoid the consequences of the hardships that he/she experiences because the wrongdoer has failed to rectify the wrongs done - i.e. a person who forgives can still be in total physical turmoil despite at spiritual peace (also see Job).

Corollary: Do not pay heed to the pious rubbish of ‘you haven’t forgiven if you’ve not forgotten’ – it is IMPOSSIBLE to forget ongoing traumas that others bestow upon you even though you forgive them, repeatedly, and continuously.

Nineveh took the message (note: Intellectual Property) from Jonah but did not give him any reward/compensation for his ordeal, Nineveh stole the message.

From fear, of the impending consequences of not heeding the message that Jonah delivered, Nineveh nonetheless repented & began its reform. God was pleased that Nineveh did, but God was also angry at Jonah’s anger (and rightly so because Jonah had not forgiven Nineveh), but God was SILENT on Nineveh’s future doings BECAUSE God gives free-choice.

And, by free-choice, Nineveh did reform, but based upon a dishonest act (the theft of the message from Jonah) – Nineveh’s seed of destruction was sown at that very point of rejecting Jonah.

Had Nineveh not rejected Jonah history would have been much different.

Thus, there is a further, unstated, message within the verses of Mathew & Luke (referred to earlier).

At the time of the statements (by Jesus, as recorded in Matthew 12:39-45 & Luke 11:29-36) it was common knowledge that Nineveh had been totally eradicated some 612 years before. It is inconceivable that Jesus would have simply referred to the people of Nineveh as having turned from evil and becoming upright; it would have made no sense to the audience to which Jesus was delivering this example because they would have known full-well that Nineveh was eventually destroyed because it later became, once again, totally evil because of its dishonesty seeded with the theft (of Intellectual Property) from Jonah.

It follows then that the full meaning of the Mathew & Luke verses is that: in making the turn away from evil & towards righteousness that the turn itself had to be itself righteous in totality & from outset. Reiterate: the reform, by the people of Nineveh, was not righteous because they stole from, failed to reward/compensate, Jonah for his ordeal in delivering the message and for the value (if any) of the message (Intellectual Property) itself. (Note also: the value of the Intellectual Property was not to Jonah’s credit since the IP was that of God’s; the value owed to Jonah by Nineveh was the cost of the ordeal Jonah endured).

Nineveh’s reform was seeded in dishonesty – God was pleased that it was reforming but He also gave free-choice as to how it would reform – Nineveh freely chose a route seeded in dishonesty – REAL DYNAMICS & CONSEQUENCES flowed from that dishonesty and in the fullness-of-time Nineveh was totally eradicated – nothing to be seen.

From a humanitarian perspective the total destruction, and total erasure of all visible aspects, of Nineveh was probably a kind act – because it put finality to a cess-pit of evil. It allowed future generations to have it out-of-sight, hence out-of-mind, in the main.

In contrast:- the enduring humiliation of God handing over the site, in Jerusalem, of Solomon’s temple to others is a constant reminder to both Jews & Christians that God is displeased with his Chosen people & those that chose/choose to follow Him. Instead God gave it freely to the other great nation he promised to make (Gen 17:20) – and it is rightfully theirs unless & until God decides otherwise.

BUT, to reiterate: For those in Faith the issue of buildings, artefacts & traditions have no significance; for those wrongly locked into Religion buildings, artefacts & traditions are hugely important.

NOTE also: some people are confused over the term ‘Apocalypse’ – Nineveh was not an apocalyptic event, it was a man induced & performed disaster event – ‘event’ being used in a long-term (years/decades/centuries) sense of numerous small destructive events culminating in final collapse & total eradication from sight; i.e. a perfect man-made disaster. Apocalypse, when it occurs, will be a singular Divine event, not against man but against the forces of evil, and final.

____

### Relevance to today’s GLOBAL ECONOMY MELTDOWN

A message, correction: numerous messages, have been given to the World’s nation-leaders, governments & parliaments via CDADD/website that the ‘western’ nations are utterly corrupted; that economy, inexact science, models are grossly defective.

More importantly –> the messages have been given with sound reasoned explanations & arguments; extensively & intensively.

Nation-leaders, & nations, have free-choice as to whether they will listen, whether they will heed, whether they will reform, whether they will be honest or dishonest should they choose to reform.

Whether they believe that the messages from this website are God-directed or not is immaterial; they have been given the messages; the messages alone are sufficient.

But, further, the messages have been accompanied by sound reasoned explanations & arguments in the form of progressive research & development of particular defects that prevail within the World’s intangible environments (SEBFL). This is ground-breaking work that has been presented to governments & nation-leaders.

Further still, proofs of developments into physics, exact science, models have also been presented so as to give additional credibility to the developments in the inexact sciences.

So, even if a nation-leader/government was to have doubts about the source of the messages there are no grounds to ignoring the explanations & arguments, BECAUSE they are based upon facts. Nation-leaders can question academics & the writer in open debate if there is doubt. But they refuse!

The writer has forgiven the various & numerous nation-leaders BUT the nation-leaders, and nations, have not received forgiveness because they have failed to reward/compensate the writer for the ordeals of developing & delivering the messages extensively & intensively. The extending of forgiveness by the writer does not alleviate the stress & consequences of him & family being forced into exile, and being economically isolated.

The respective & token reform initiatives by President George Bush, Prime Minister Gordon Brown, President Nicolas Sarkozy are based upon seeds of dishonesty. Their reforms cannot work, they will not work – until honesty & transparency prevails.

Reiterate: South Africa’s AsgiSA reform initiative collapsed because it was based upon dishonesty, in that the reform initiative & Intellectual Property was stolen from the writer by the SA government.

Reiterate: Nineveh.

Reiterate: Jerusalem, etc.

Changing of Drivers to Barack Obama (and David Cameron) will not change the outcome unless honesty & transparency are engaged.

CHANGE WE NEED –> CHANGE IN DEED!

But Barack Obama needs to recognise the defective economic models that prevail

& correctly engage with pioneered engineering

_________

### Legal Remedies:

Emerging nations are calling for the ‘Rule Book’ of international relations & interactions to be rewritten – i.e. the grossly Unfair Rules need to be scrapped & replaced with new Fair Rules.

There is clearly a need for the World’s Justice intellect to actively engage & transparently rectify the wrongs that the dishonesty by the Nobel Foundation Directors & Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, & others, have brought about.

The International Criminal Court must become pro-active and prosecute the Directors for their dishonesty which can only be construed as an integral part of an Organised Crime culture.

The import of Alfred Nobel’s will is that the Prize was not intended to be hijacked by academics for self-lauding, but for awards to the most worthy persons, including lay persons, who have done the most appropriate of recent work, and which confers the greatest benefit upon mankind.

Corollary 1: dishonesty was intended to be expressly excluded.

Corollary 2: the spirit of research/development excellence was intended to be kept alive & relevant and not stifled by decades-old & grossly-defective thinking.

Most major nations are signatory to the Rome Statute which is founded upon the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.

People have the right to be dealt with honestly & transparently – issues such as the Nobel Foundation being prostituted by collusively dishonest Directors has a DIRECT and, obviously, indirect bearing on these rights being diminished – which diminished rights are causal of greater & increasing disparities.

Alfred Nobel, even in death, is entitled to reasonable protection of good-name – it is a Constitutional Right and a UDHR right to good-name. This in turn implies that terms-of-will are subject to lawful protections; this can only be achieved through reasonable pro-active responses from Justice offices & officers.

NOTE: South Africa is collapsing, and Zimbabwe has collapsed, because of lack of pro-activeness from Justice offices & officers; as well as through direct corruption by justice officers, local & elsewhere: e.g. SA Police Commissioner, UK Met Police Commissioner, SA ex-Chief Justice & Justices, UK Lord Chief Justice, Prosecuting Authorities, and so on, and so on, ….

At worst the International Criminal Court & its Prosecutor should make public announcements concerning the violations of Alfred Nobel’s will with the wrongful awards of the 2008 ‘Nobel’ Economics & Nobel Physics Prize awards.

At best the International Criminal Court Prosecutor should initiate formal prosecuting action against the Directors and to ensure a speedy process to appoint new independent NF Directors that will undertake with integrity to oversee fairly the nomination & selection processes for the Nobel Prize Awards.

Whilst academics must have reasonable security-of-tenure in their positions it obviously is not an absolute right, nor a right to engage in any form of dishonesty or duplicity. Their security can obviously be terminated where substantial grounds exist. The Nobel Foundation Directors have long-passed the grey-area-of-immorality with regard the violation of trust within their security-of-tenure, and are deep across the Clear-Line-of-Criminality into Organised Crime (Legal & Illegal).

The handing-over of Nobel Prizes by King Carl Gustaf XVI of Sweden adds credibility to these dishonest proceedings – this simply reinforces the incorrect belief that the science models of the scientists that are being honoured are correct and can be used to formulate policies.

Most people who support monarchies do so because they need to feel secure, they assume, by faith or trust, that their respective Monarchs will act honourably. On the other hand those that are opposed to monarchies generally do so because their respective monarchs are not seen, or not believed, to be honest or worthy. That monarchs should actively & freely engage in dishonest acts is a malignment against their supporters and a further weapon for their detractors. All of this increases polarisation, and fuels anger which can be the spark of civil wars & international wars (c.f. excuse for WWI, Archduke Ferdinand assassinated)

The International Criminal Court is duty bound to speak out when persons or bodies of high-influence act or say things that can increase polarisation (and hence increase instability)

The consequences are that nation-leaders can simply argue that they are on the correct course with the ‘reforms’ they are proposing (i.e. Bush, Brown, Sarkozy, etc.) BECAUSE they see the Nobel Prize models as being the leading economics models upon which they can ‘harness others’ learning to [their] native good sense’.

However, it is important for these nation-leaders to understand that they have no excuse for ignoring the proofs herein of the duplicity & dishonesty of the Directors of Nobel Foundation & Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences that are perpetrating these deceptions. Nation-leaders have been, and are being, warned on an ongoing basis of the developments at this website – there are REAL DYNAMICS & CONSEQUENCES for ignoring these warnings, which ample warnings are supported by solid proofs.

Chris Addington Pr.Eng.

www.cdadd.com

(Under enforced exile from South Africa due to ANC government’s oppressive XDR-nazi system and oppressive economic isolation by corporate & academic world’s.)

XDR = Extreme Democracy Resistant.

____________________________________

Open Letters To:

His Majesty King Carl Gustaf XVI of Sweden

AND

Nobel Foundation Directors & Members:

Chairman Dr Marcus Storch - Member of the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences

Deputy Chairman, Gunnar Öquist, Professor, Secretary General of the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences

Members
Sohlman, Michael, Executive Director

Engdahl, Horace, Professor, Permanent Secretary of the Swedish Academy

Jörnvall, Hans, Professor, Secretary of the Nobel Assembly and of the Nobel Committee for Physiology or Medicine at Karolinska Institutet

Wallenberg, Jacob, Chairman of the Board of Investor AB

Mjøs, Ole D., Professor Dr. Med, University of Tromsø

Deputy Members

Gräslund, Astrid, Professor in Biophysics, Secretary of the Nobel Committee for Chemistry

Sundqvist, Bo, Professor and President, Uppsala University, Member of the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences

AND

2008 Nobel Prize winners

Physics: Yoichiro Nambu, Makoto Kobayashi, Toshihide Maskawa,

Economics: Paul Krugman,

CC:

2008 Nobel Prize Winners:

Chemistry: Roger Y. Tsien, Martin Chalfie, Osamu Shimomura,

Medicine: Françoise Barré-Sinoussi, Harald zur Hausen, Luc Montagnier,

Literature: Jean-Marie Gustave Le Clézio,

Peace: Martti Ahtisaari,

His Majesty King Carl Gustaf XVI of Sweden

Your Majesty

I refer to the attached document ‘Economist’s Inexact Models Exactly Defective 10 (Nobel Prize Hijacked 3, Paul Krugman)

This document & other papers at my website (www.cdadd.com) sets out concrete proofs concerning the gross errors of both the 2008 Economics & Physics Prizes being awarded to the addressed recipients.

Last year I communicated to Your Majesty the gross defectiveness of past Nobel Prize wining papers but to date nothing has been done by the Directors of the Nobel Foundation.

The Nobel Foundation & Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences are in collusion & Governance is non-existent. It is creating an inbreeding of deformed & defective science models which models are wrongly used by governments & corporates. These grossly defective models are the front behind which massive global frauds are perpetrated which are causal of the GLOBAL ECONOMY MELTDOWN.

In light of the evidence in the attached and at my website I respectfully request that Your Majesty fully-distances from the Nobel Foundation & Prize Ceremonies until such time as the Nobel Foundation has been appointed with new Directors & Members having integrity & independence.

Yours Sincerely

Chris Addington Pr.Eng.

Nobel Foundation Directors & Members:

The evidence in the attached document & at my website conclusively show that you have purposefully & totally eroded, for fraudulent purposes, the integrity & honour that should be attributed to the Nobel Foundation.

I demand that you all resign your posts and hand temporary Executive Powers to the President/Chief Justice & Justices of the International Courts for purposes of appointment of new directors having independence & integrity.

Chris Addington Pr.Eng.

2008 Nobel Prize winners

Physics: Yoichiro Nambu, Makoto Kobayashi, Toshihide Maskawa,

The evidence in the attached document & at my website shows conclusively that:

The foundation of your research for the Physics Nobel Prize is based upon theories, and not on discoveries/inventions as required by Alfred Nobel’s will. Further that your works, individually or collectively, do not meet the ‘most worthy’, or confer the greatest benefit on mankind’ criteria as required in the Terms-of-Will.

Nor do they fulfil the necessary technical correctness - the foundation of your work, that light particles travel at speed c, is invalid; and high-order & non-linear mathematical models alone do not prove the existence of that which you seek to prove.

I respectfully request that you all decline your Nobel awards to avoid further embarrassment to the good name of Alfred Nobel & to His Majesty King Carl Gustaf XVI of Sweden.

Economics: Paul Krugman,

The evidence in the attached document & at my website conclusively prove that your paper does not comply with Alfred Nobel’s Terms-of-Will in that it is not work of the PRECEEDING YEAR, but nearly 30 years old. The 2009 paper cited is invalid as it has not yet been published for review. Your model does not comply with the ‘most worthy’, or ‘confer the greatest benefit on mankind’ criteria as is required.

Your paper is grossly defective from a technical perspective – of which only a few, but critical, issues have been addressed in the attached document.

I respectfully request that you decline your Nobel award to avoid further embarrassment to the good name of Alfred Nobel & to His Majesty King Carl Gustaf XVI of Sweden.

Yours Sincerely

Chris Addington Pr.Eng.

www.cdadd.com,

(Under enforced exile from South Africa due to ANC government’s oppressive XDR-nazi system and oppressive economic isolation by corporate & academic worlds.

Also under severe economic oppression due to Ireland & UK government dishonesty.

XDR = Extreme Democracy Resistant.)

________________________________________

Alfred Nobel’s Will (relevant parts – full text from nobelprize.org)

The whole of my remaining realizable estate shall be dealt with in the following way: the capital, invested in safe securities by my executors, shall constitute a fund, the interest on which shall be annually distributed in the form of prizes to those who, during the preceding year, shall have conferred the greatest benefit on mankind. The said interest shall be divided into five equal parts, which shall be apportioned as follows: one part to the person who shall have made the most important discovery or invention within the field of physics; one part to the person who shall have made the most important chemical discovery or improvement; one part to the person who shall have made the most important discovery within the domain of physiology or medicine; one part to the person who shall have produced in the field of literature the most outstanding work in an ideal direction; and one part to the person who shall have done the most or the best work for fraternity between nations, for the abolition or reduction of standing armies and for the holding and promotion of peace congresses. The prizes for physics and chemistry shall be awarded by the Swedish Academy of Sciences; that for physiological or medical work by the Caroline Institute in Stockholm; that for literature by the Academy in Stockholm, and that for champions of peace by a committee of five persons to be elected by the Norwegian Storting. It is my express wish that in awarding the prizes no consideration whatever shall be given to the nationality of the candidates, but that the most worthy shall receive the prize, whether he be a Scandinavian or not.

As Executors of my testamentary dispositions, I hereby appoint Mr Ragnar Sohlman, resident at Bofors, Värmland, and Mr Rudolf Lilljequist, 31 Malmskillnadsgatan, Stockholm, and at Bengtsfors near Uddevalla. To compensate for their pains and attention, I grant to Mr Ragnar Sohlman, who will presumably have to devote most time to this matter, One Hundred Thousand Crowns, and to Mr Rudolf Lilljequist, Fifty Thousand Crowns;

Recent Papers