Captain’s Log Stardate 02

 

Dark Side of the Moon

 

There is no dark side to the moon, as a matter of fact it is all dark (Gerry Driscoll, Pink Floyd)

 

It is proposed:
Sun emissions -> PMF
TIME is not a space-dimension.

Gravity is a small regional phenomenon within a continuous spectrum; it does not hold universes together.

Universes are simply SUPER-MOTORS

Scientists have become lost within the ToKoG&E

 

_______________________________________

 

(Please Note: This website is primarily about the pioneering of ENGINEERING into the SEBFL environments, it is about seeking truths; it is NOT about journalism, English grammar or prose, or quick-sell – it is down-to-earth engineering & pioneering requiring extensive & intensive THINKING.
SEBFL = social/economy/business/finance/legal environments.

Explaining transmission mechanisms & pre-empting catastrophic failures is NOT doom-prophecy, it is explaining probabilistic reality.)

It is suggested that you read the previous paper in this series:
Captain’s Log Stardate 01 – ‘Blackholes’ are not holes.
_______________________________________

Mathematics is an abstract concept and it can lead people astray unwittingly. For proofs of mathematics being wittingly used to mislead people & perpetrate global frauds see other papers at www.cdadd.com: e.g.
- Infinity, Eternity, Evolution, Creation.
- Economists’ Inexact models Exactly Defective (entire series).
- Annuities in Retirement.
- Mastermind of Organised Crime 1 & 2 (Donald Gordon, Richard Branson, etc.)

_______________________________________

In the dark ages of the 1960s & 70s, and earlier, the sciences were taught by use of a ‘bottom-up’ approach. You either learnt the stuff by rote or it was ‘impressed’ into your mind through physical impact upon the bottom by a thin stick or a wooden bat. This grossly inefficient ‘transfer mechanism’ accounts, it is contended, for much of the difficulty people have in facing the science subjects. It is further compounded by the ‘geekiness’ of scientists and their language which polarises them from society in general. And mathematics gives it a deeper obscurity; and as it became more obscure even the scientists became lost in their increasingly mad world.
And when geeky scientists get into space they then have free rein in creating all sorts of weird ‘theories’ to explain what physical phenomena can (just about) be seen in the far reaches of space.

(Channel 4, 4oD, download free software, free-view of ‘Stephen Hawking-Master of the Universe’, 2 part documentary – 4oD is an excellent webchannel with plenty of quality free-view)

The brilliance of Stephen Hawking’s mathematical work is not doubted within the confines of the abstract nature of mathematics – BUT:-
- one is asked to swallow, in real terms, 9 or 10 or 11 dimensions of ‘string theory’ and especially when no concrete answers are given for the 3 dimensions that we do have around us,
- it is suggested we may reach a point when we need no God,
- there is a ‘belief’ that a ‘theory of everything’ does exist but we only need find it

- Professor Lisa Randall did a simple demonstration of a magnet and a paper clip (1st episode of Hawking documentary) with a statement that the magnet’s force in picking up the clip was far stronger than gravity holding the clip down.
On seeing this demonstration – the immediate response was ‘well Lisa what does that tell you?, … its staring you right in the face.’ Randall was missing the most obvious of what her little demonstration was telling her.

- Another scientist misleads by stating that the gravity forces of bodies distorts space. This is entirely incorrect. Space is space, the fact that magnetic fields are present does not distort the space, it merely affects matter that is within that space, but the space & its dimensions remain the same.

- another tells us that common sense has no place in quantum physics.

- and yet another tells us that space can twist and turn back on itself

?????? … !!!!! …. ?????? ….”ja well no fine”, ek het gese! ……

…. when confronted with all this abstract thinking & mathematics that appears to have no TANGIBLE REALITY to any of it then one has to ask – ‘are these guys missing the plot?’

What is apparent from all of this is that Stephen Hawking, like John-Paul II was, appears to be caught up in the ‘Tree of Knowledge of Good & Evil’ (ToKoG&E) – this is a dicey place to be. (see paper series ‘A Con Undrummed – Good & Evil)

___________________

Gerry Driscoll’s words used by Pink Floyd are, figuratively speaking, quite correct – the moon is all dark. Dark in the sense that we don’t really understand what the moon is all about, what its function is, what its dynamics really are – consequently our understanding of our universe is incomplete. So to think abstractly in terms of many other dimensions beyond what is visible whilst we do not understand what is visible makes no sense.
Also note the irony of Pink Floyd’s warning message (part of) in ‘Dark side of the moon’ of greed and the fact that a key (main?) contributor to the success of this album, Alan Parsons, was cheated out of a just reward.
This is another instance that all is not what it seems – just as mathematical theory is not all that it seems as we are led to believe.

Gravity is a term/theory developed by Newton of synthesised views over centuries to describe the observed phenomena of objects falling to the ground, and from this he extrapolated it more ‘universally’ to describing how bodies interact with each other. (F=G.m1.m2/r^2). And looking into space Newton attempted to understand what is without the earth’s environment (i.e. what they saw in the greater universe) by his limited experiences of what he saw within the earth’s environment. Newton wrongly tried to extrapolate micro-theories into the macro-universe.
This has been a fatal flaw which has been passed through the centuries and to today.

Randall’s experiment shows that we need a rethink and the more so when the rest of the Hawking two-part documentary spins crazily into 9,10 or 11 dimensions of mathematical theories taking the viewer far beyond the boundary of TANGIBLE REALITY.

Reflecting on the Hawking documentary whilst cycling Sligo area (Ireland is brilliant cycling country, perfect if no rain) caused a pit-stop at a second hand bookshop to check a basics physics book. Sure enough the diagrams of circa late 1990s wrongly showed that the moon rotated on its own axis, and checking on Wikipedia (BEWARE this site, unreliable information, as Tony Blewitt of SA’s Classicfm is fully aware) explanations on the moon wrongly states that the moon orbits the earth and gravity interacts with it, it then quickly goes into geek language & terminology; and Encyclopaedia Britannica (2006 software version – BEWARE! This is a poorly backed product, endless hassles) argues that the earth’s tidal-changes brakes the moon’s rotation which is the cause for us seeing only one side of the moon???!!!???!!!???

None of this makes sense if we look at things logically.

To give perspective:– the calculations & drawings for a Formula 1 race car are highly complex and one can easily get lost with terminology & technology – BUT, it is easy to understand that an engine explodes fuel, explosion pushes pistons, pistons turn shaft, shaft turns wheels, car goes ….. very, very fast. And if the complex drawings & calculations are wrong then the car does NOT go very, very fast. The observation of the car not going very, very fast is the proof of the error in the drawings & calculations (all other factors being eliminated).

In a similar down-to-earth manner we need to rethink the dynamics of what holds the universe together because the complex mathematics proposed by Hawking & other scientists do not explain how the universe functions.

When we look at the moon it always looks the same (barring the darkening through its phases) which tells us that the moon does NOT rotate on its own axis. Why doesn’t it? And why does the earth spin? It is suggested that the reasons are quite simple; down-to-earth simple ……..and down-to-moon simple!

The fact that we observe a planet in rotational & elliptic motion means that some primary force is causing that to happen – it doesn’t happen just by itself. When we look at our universe we see that there’s a huge ball of fire, the sun, and no other prime energy source for billions & billions of miles around us – consequently it doesn’t require too much deduction to realise that the force that is causing the rotations stems from that primary power source, vis the sun.
Alternatively stated – unless some other invisible force is detected that can be shown to be the primary motive force then on a balance of probabilities, and to the point that there is zero improbability – it means that the sun is the power source - the sun’s emissions are the PRIMARY MOTIVE FORCE for our universe. This is not to say that other universes could not have other forms of PMF, but that the sun is our universes PMF source.

Whilst in Sligo (Ravens Rock Farm cottage, on a working farm, is a great self catering location) - Michael was watching a kid’s movie in which was a scene of a hamster running in its wheel – the thought of the hamster on the outside and with sticky feet came to mind; then thought of the sun’s rays as a whole bunch of sticky feet gives the effect of the sun’s PMF force upon planets.

Light is electro-magnetic radiation/emission – the electrical & magnetic fields are 90 degrees opposed, and as with motors & generators a torquing/rotating action is created by the interaction of electricity & magnetism. It is suggested that since the light rays are themselves providing a torquing action that we have a whole endless bunch of tiny ‘sticky feet’ turning the earth, and other planets. i.e. it is the primary motive force of our earth & universe.
Magnetism plus one of the other forces (either motion or electricity) produces the third (electricity – generator, or rotation - motor)
It is possible that heat flux differential (between the earth exposed to sun & the side not) also aids in the rotation.

In addition in causing this rotation the light emissions (electro-magnetic) induce currents into the earth and magnetises the earth which has the effect of causing the earth to be drawn towards the sun, but the rotating action also causes a centrifugal force which opposes the magnetic forces between earth & sun and holds the earth in a balanced or stable orbital state.

What of the moon? If we consider jonks & jonks ago when the earth was forming, and we suppose that it was an eccentric blob of material in plasticised form (i.e. not fully molten, not fully firm) moving toward the sun, then, as contended previously, the sun’s PMF would cause the earth to rotate. But with the eccentricity it would rotate about an offset axis (its centre of mass) – the plastic nature of the earth would cause the eccentric part to be forced away by centrifugal force away from the rest of the earth. And as the body, in getting closer to the sun and experiencing greater & denser electromagnetic forces, increased in speed the centrifugal force would also increase - over time a sphere-like blob would separate (much like bubbles are blown - see the second of the Hawking documentaries) into a sphere, and the earth through rotational forces would be smoothed out also into a sphere.
Hence over many billions of years we would have the earth/moon orbiting about the sun.

But also the effect of electro-magnetic forces onto the earth/moon would cause electrical currents to be generated into them & for magnetic fields to form.
And, since the earth is rotating then it would surely induce (through magnetic induction) a rotation in the moon. This would seem logical, much as an induction motor causes its rotor to turn - BUT, we can see that the moon does NOT rotate on its own axis. Why?

The fact that the combined mass of earth & moon had become magnetised so too was the moon when it started pulling apart from the earth. The moon’s polarity is hence (nearly) directly in line with the earth’s surface, i.e. perpendicular. The magnetic pull of the earth & moon are opposed by the centrifugal force of the rotation which was increasing as the earth got closer to the sun and was exposed more & more to the sun; it eventually moved towards a stable orbit about the sun.
The tilt of the earth (i.e. that between magnetic north and true north) is caused by the centrifugal action between moon & earth, it is the same kind of balancing effect that one sees with two ice-skaters rotating and holding hands, they lean backwards to balance against the centrifugal forces.

The magnetic perpendicular polarity of the moon is keeping the moon rotationally stationary to the earth – i.e. it is contended that the moons magnetic axis is near perpendicular to the earth and not near parallel as previously thought. And it is for this reason that the moon cannot rotate about its own axis (which if it could rotate it would cause us to see the other side of the moon), because the magnetic polarity of the moon keeps it pointing to the earth.
The librations (small oscillations both longitudinally & latitudinally) of the moon’s face that we do observe would then simply be the jittering effect that we see of a magnet facing an opposite pole and being held apart (see experiments).

What this is saying is that Newton’s observation of Gravity holding the universe together is incorrect, it is everyday magnetic forces that is doing this.

One can test these effects with toy geomag kits -
Using Michael’s geomag set (under huge protest calmed by means of a bar of chocolate) some simple experiments were carried out along with my compass (which had somehow found its way into his possession).
Put a strip of masking tape (500 long) onto a flat surface and the compass at an end position marked 0.0, move 1 magnet (pole pointing to the compass) toward the compass note the position of the magnet when the compass has shifted 10 degrees.
Put a magnet into series (north pole to south pole in a straight line) with the first and repeat & mark position for a 10 degree shift, and so on for 7 or more magnets in series.
Repeat this process but with the magnets in parallel – i.e. north ends all together – you will need to tape them to each other otherwise they squirm apart.
What is indicated from these two experiments is that the magnetic field at the pole ends has the same effect in parallel as for series.
Further, that the distance has an inverse square relationship in relation to the increase in magnetic force.

What this is showing is that there is a proportional but far greater relationship between Newton’s argument that Gravity holds the universe together; the reality is that it is magnetic fields that is interacting between planets and not gravity.

Now, put two magnets together in series and a small ball bearing at the mid point, it will cling but with a small force, slowly shift it to one of either end, it will move easily until near the end when it whizzes to the pole. If, prior to it whizzing to the end it is released it shifts more slowly back to the centre point.
Now hold the ball away from the magnet and let go – it whizzes to one of the poles.

What this suggests is that bodies within the magnetic circuit, but not too close to a pole position, are attracted weakly back to the centre; whereas bodies outside the magnetic circuit are attracted strongly to one of either poles.

What this then indicates is that there is a magnetic ‘cage’ – similar to a Faradays cage – which separates the small ‘gravity’ forces within the cage and keeps them in – hence gravity is NOT the force holding universes together.
Also note that the magnetic cage also keeps external magnetic disturbances out of the earth – this is clear by the fact that compasses are stable, i.e. they point consistently north/south, whereas if regular magnetic disturbances were entering then we would not be seeing stable compass needles they would be oscillating wildly. However, as with meteors occasionally breaking through the earth’s atmosphere becoming meteorites, so too do some magnetic forces break through to the earth. Otherwise they are drawn to the poles and contribute to the auroras (borealis – north pole, australis – south pole)
BUT, the fact that tides are affected by the moons position it is clear that certain regular influences do ‘seep’ through, but would this be a case of the influences breaking through or of the phenomenon of the magnetic cage being weakened by the influences from the moon, which appears to be the most likely circumstance.

What is also suggested is that this magnetic cage has discreet levels of magnetic iso-lines which would account for quantum levels.

It also appears that this magnetic cage is presenting an outer barrier, a cap, to our atmosphere

Now play around with two of these magnets with one suspended by a cotton line; observe how the magnets squirm when the axes are parallel and moved slowly toward each other; and how the suspended magnet is stabilised if its axis is near-perpendicular to the other magnet that is moved slowly toward it. Also note that if the axis is NOT fully perpendicular it appears to be easier to maintain a stable position, but at full perpendicular it appears to be less stable.
(Also remember that if the moon’s axis was parallel to the earth then we would expect to see an induced rotation of the moon around its own axis, but the fact that it is not rotating means that the axis is not parallel to the earth.)

Some more observations:-
– point two north poles together then there is repulsion, but interface a steel ball then both north poles attract to the same steel ball. Check with the compass and observe that both ends are south poles
- play around with different geometric constructions and see how the magnetic fields, strengths & direction vary according to its construction (testing of relative strengths can be done by measuring distance to cause a 10 degree shift of the compass).
- note the polarities and change 1 magnet at a time & note effects (e.g. 4 N poles on a ball bearing, note distance. Turn 1 round = 2 N poles, as 1 S pole cancels 1 N, turn 2nd around = neutral, as 2 N cancels 2 S)

These simple experiments indicate:-
- that magnets are a composite of a whole host of tiny magnets all held together in a matrix.
- if we cut/break a magnet exactly at the halfway point we do not end up with a north pole and separately a south pole, we end up with two magnets of half magnetic flux. (there would likely be a ‘normalising’ process to achieve full magnetic balance)
- ‘Gravity’ as Newton described is an ‘internal’ phenomenon of a magnetic environment
- Newton’s gravity law insofar as he wrongly extrapolated to the universe is simply a misinterpretation of a greater proportional magnetic relationship.
- there is a magnetic cage around a body radiating magnetic fields

ORBITS

But, what about the effects of the moon & earth rotating around it own centre-of-mass, and in turn about the sun?

If we accept the earlier proposition that the moon separated itself from the earth and its axis is near perpendicular to the earth’s axis, then we have:
- the earth rotating on its own axis
- the earth & moon rotating about its centre-of-mass
- the earth & moon rotating about the sun

In addition to the sun’s emission inducing a torquing/rotating action on bodies, the fact that the earth is rotating is causing an induced rotation into the moon; BUT, because the moon’s axis is perpendicular to that of the earth’s axis the rotation is not about the moon’s axis but about the combined centre-of-mass of the earth & moon; and the earth’s rotation causes the moon to rotate through an additional ‘slip’ process.
To explain: - an induction motor has a rotating field on the stator which causes the rotor to turn, but the rotor does not run at the same speed as the rotating field, there is a ‘slip’ between the two speeds, which varies according to the load on the rotor. With induction motors the slip is a matter of a few percent because of the small airgap between stator & rotor, but with the moon & earth there is a huge gap so the slip is very high which is why the earth rotates approximately 27 times for every rotation of the moon about the centre-of-mass. But, again, the magnetic orientation of the moon’s axis keeps the moon pointing in the same direction to the earth – which is why we see only one side of the moon.

Perhaps the moon & earth can be viewed similar to a spring & ball governor on a steam engine but with the magnetic field being the spring. As the engine speeds up the centrifugal force pushes the balls further apart and opposing the action of the spring so as to close the steam valve causing the engine to slow, on slowing the spring pushes the balls back toward each other so as to open the steam valve and speed the engine up. So the balls & spring continually oscillate and jitter about a stable position, and hence a stable speed for the engine.

The magnetic fields between moon & earth are acting simply as a governor, a speed regulator, with the moon & earth shifting relative positions slightly thus causing its orbit about the sun also to vary as it moves through varying & various cycles. These variable conditions account for short, medium & long term oscillations that impact upon earth’s orbit around the sun. The long term oscillations run easily into the billions of years.

As the earth/moon cycle brings it into a phase that is closest to the sun, the effect is that the earth covers a greater angular cone of sunlight, i.e. more ‘sticky feet’ fall more densely onto the earth, this causes the earth to spin faster, centrifugal force increases and the earth is repelled away from the sun. The increase in earth’s rotation also forces the moon further away from the earth which shifts the centre of mass and also affects the rotational speed of the earth/moon combined. The nett result is that there are complex interactions which cause oscillations toward & away from the sun, which increase/decrease its elliptic orbit, and so on.

It is suggested that the ice-age was simply a ‘normal’ phase of these complex oscillatory patterns and that the indications are that we are now simply moving towards a heat-age before cycling back to another ice-age – these cycles taking billions of years - global warming issues aside, which nonetheless would have destructive effects upon our environment, as we too clearly see.

To dispel another theory – it is clear that the earth is not going to crash into the sun, it cannot possibly do so under these propositions. If we accept that in the absence of any other power source that the sun’s emissions creates the torquing action that creates the centrifugal force that separates the earth/moon from the sun then as the sun diminishes the earth will move further away because if the sun were to go out then there would be nothing drawing the earth to the sun and since there is no real friction in space then there is nothing to diminish the inertia of the earth/moon rotation so, if anything, it is contended that as (if it indeed should) the sun diminishes so the earth would separate from the sun, and hence not crash into it. Pheww!!!

So, to put into simple terms - we have an electro-magnetic PMF power source (sun) driving mechanical bodies (rotors), hence we have SUPER-MOTORS. This is simple 3D stuff - no geek language, no un-understandable mathematics, no sci-fi.

So what is Gravity?
It is contended that this is simply a regional phenomena of a magnetic field interacting with electrostatic forces as one approaches the limit of the centre of a magnetic field – i.e. as one approaches the zero or middle point of a magnetic field and in conjunction with static electricity.
How this functions is not contended but suffice it to say that it is very weak.

What is clear is that gravity, as defined by Newton, insofar as it pertains to the earth, is NOT the force that holds planets together, it is proportional but greater magnetic fields around interacting planets stemming from their magnetisation, be it an inherent magnetisation or an induced magnetisation or both.
The ‘gravity’ force, that we are accustomed to, is a very weak force that is observed within the magnetic environment. It is not known exactly what causes non-magnetic material to be affected to the same extent as magnetic material by this gravity, except that we do observe that static electricity is the only other known source, and in the absence of any other evidence then for the present we must deduce that it is both electric & magnetic effects that bring about this phenomenon known as gravity.

TIME:
Time is NOT a space dimension – the space we see right now is the space of now, what it was 1 second ago, or 1000 years ago is not a dimension shift, it is simply space as it was then; and space right now is as it is right now, nothing more. And the space in the future will be whatever it brings, but it will be the same space with the same matter – admittedly having changed, whether slightly or greatly. Time is not some other dimension of space.

__________________

The problem with ‘string theory’ is that every strand needs to tied together from the very first to the very last. The fact that gravity, that force that is, or near, the very first strand, is unclear it logically follows that the remainder of the string simply flops down.
Intuitive, common sense, thinking – i.e. that which is based upon incremental knowledge tested & proven – says that untested, unproven, 9,or 10, or 11 dimensions is way beyond tangible reality and well into abstract imagination.

Whilst the brilliance of this abstract thinking is not being knocked – is it right that academic institutions are spending huge amounts of money on abstract research whilst ground-breaking engineering research into the SEFL environments, and which is finding engineered solutions to avoid economy instability & genocides, are not funded/rewarded?

___________________

As stated before, CDADD’s work is focussed on the SEBFL environments – if one considers that if just 1% of the amount of money being spent on the construction of the 6 mile long hadron collider (particle accelerator) in Switzerland were spent on engineering into the SEBFL environments then huge inroads could be made in solving real down-to-earth problems that are causal of intense anger & violence leading to genocides throughout the world. BUT, George Bush, Gordon Brown, Bertie Ahern, & other nation leaders refuse to fund new, or reward proven, engineering research into the SEBFL environments.
Whether Morgan Tsvangirai wins the Zimbabwe election & actually takes office is immaterial to Zimbabwe’s future simply because he will not be able to counter the destructive effects of the external 1st World economy models that are inducing destructive forces within Zimbabwe. The ONLY way that any nation can reverse the downward spiral into poverty is by implementing sound engineered economy systems & controls (see paper Poverty, Disparity, Unfair Rules). And we also see from the dishonesty of SA’s President & Deputy-President that non-engineers are unable to develop nor implement engineering solutions, which is why SA is crashing.

Perhaps a blast on the hadron collider might shift mindsets.

Chris Addington Pr.Eng.
www.cdadd.com
(Under enforced exile from South Africa due to ANC government’s oppressive XDR-nazi system and oppressive economic isolation by corporate & academic worlds.