New Science insights (2020-04-15, Covid-19 lockdown):

 

More reasons why Einstein's Relativity Theory is wrong

BUT, more importantly,

why defective 'science' aids the spread of diseases (e.g. Covid-19)

& Socio-Economic chaos

(Economic recovery from CV19 will be retarded because of defective 'science')

 

Era of Enlightenment? – No! - ENDARKENMENT

(PM Boris Johnson is not following Science Evidence & what 'evidence' he follows is not Science)

 

BBC - The Science of Dr Who – Brian Cox

(A segment of this documentary on Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-O8lBIcHre0&list=PLKEzuOOEQvYPEQHJ-nApnOOORvOxEriAf&index=1 )

 

David Cameron (ex UK PM) – autobiography 'For the Record' –>

(Cameron's application of grossly defective 'science' into Socio-Economies - Proof-Positive that 'on-the-job-training' - in Cameron's case, under Margaret Thatcher - has severe limitations)

 

 

 

Despite the writer regularly presenting Governments & Academia (including Cox) with CONCRETE EVIDENCE that Opticks (with a 'k') (wrongly attributed to Newton) are wrong AND presenting new insights to Optics (no 'k')(dynamics of Light transmissions), Cox continues to present defective 'science' – and BBC promotes this dishonesty.

 

A 2013 documentary 'The Science of Dr Who' was re-aired recently on BBC (4?) - certain video segments can be found on the referenced Youtube link.

 

The referenced segment deals with (wrongly) claimed Relativity & Time Travel – Cox sets up a demonstration to prove Einstein's theory on Relativity but Cox, & Jim Al Khalili (JAK) & other Academics, FAIL to recognise the error in Einstein's Thought-Experiment.

This is because Cox, JAK and Academia in general, refuse to look through a prism and recognise that Opticks are wrong.

 

Einstein did not have the technology advantages that Cox has of high-speed cameras - so it is understandable that Einstein could not readily disprove his Thought-Experiment, which Cox has also FAILED to do.

 

The video segment shows JAK sitting on a chair holding a light which he moves up&down, whilst another person moves the chair backwards&forwards (transverse to camera). A camera on JAK's head records the motion of light from his perspective, whilst another camera records JAK&light from audience's perspective. Cox then superimposes the 2 camera images & slows them down to demonstrate the paths of the moving light and asks audience to imagine the light is moving between 2 mirrors and that at each reflection an imaginary clock will 'tick' then on the opposite mirror when reflecting will 'tock', and so on.

 

Cox then explains Einstein's Thought-Experiment by stating that if we accept that light speed is constant then the light as viewed by the audience is on much longer light-path (as viewed by audience) than the light-path viewed by JAK – it therefore follows, states Cox (wrongly so), that since JAK is moving and the light as seen by audience is travelling further between each tick&tock that JAK's clock will run slower – hence JAK is a time traveller because of the Relativity effect on clocks in motion.

 

BUT, despite the MASSIVE ADVANTAGE Cox has over that of Einstein's day, Cox FAILS to understand where Einstein's reasoning falls down. Cox FAILS to understand why Relativity is wrong.

 

To understand the error in Einstein's Thought-Experiment, & regurgitated by Cox, view the video segment at the 0:50mins mark where the motion is slowed & tracing feature effected – it is clear that the audience's view of the light is STRETCHED-OUT, which Cox rightly explains at the 2:17mins mark, but Cox wrongly assumes that the quantity of light at any point on the path is the same, it is NOT, it is diminished.

 

One can readily see at the transition points (when the light direction is reversed from up2down or down2up) that the light intensity is much greater since the light is momentarily at rest (relative to JAK) and that as it accelerates from that momentary rest that the intensity (quantity of light at each point as viewed by audience) diminishes. So, although the light per unit of distance diminishes the TOTAL quantity of light per unit of time is exactly the same for JAK AND for audience.

 

A further error rests in the mirror diagram at 2:17min mark – although the light, as seen by audience, reaching any one mirror is diminished in intensity (distance-squared diminution) the speed at which that diminished light then travels from the one mirror (audience's) to the next is EXACTLY the same as for the the light in a stationary position (or motionary position, it is exactly the same for both) – so JAK's clock 'ticks' & 'tocks' at the mirror interfaces at same rate as for the audience's mirrors.

 

Also, the Thought Experiment is incorrectly constructed, in that it has only one set of mirrors – a correct construct is to have 2-sets of mirrors one for the (relatively) stationary audience and one set for the (relatively) motionary JAK – the light travels between mirrors on both the 2-sets of mirrors at the same speed-of-light, because both relatively stationary Audience & relatively motionary JAK function upon & across the same ether, a common framework. There is consequently a relative but minuscule shift in the time for the information of one clock to reach the other clock but the 'rate-of-clocking' is identical for each of JAK & audience – i.e. both clocks run at same rate.

(NOTE: 'relatively' is NOT Relativity)

 

BUT, also note at 0:34mins on, that the intensity of light as seen by JAK appears constant and the light seen by audience is only marginally diminished – this is because the light intensity reaching the camera's & our eye's receptors are at or near saturation-level and cannot readily differentiate intensity levels – it is only when camera speed is increased hence video-sequencing is slowed down & hence intensity diminished - because light is stretched across more distance & longer video replay - that we can distinguish higher intensity levels at transition points relative to lower-intensity at motionary points. This effect can be seen in the video sequence with the tracing feature.

 

More still – the fact that an ether exists, as is obvious by understanding Optics (no 'k') (Michelson Morley were wrong in their Opticks (with a 'k') experiment and in their Type-1 error, a positive statement (no ether) based upon negative experimental result) it follows that EVERYTHING within the Universe functions on, and as a consequence of, that ether which is a common frame. Consequently Doppler effect (acoustic phenomena requiring 2 relatively independent frames AND a relatively independent medium (air) AND a relatively independent frequency based phenomena (sound) for Doppler effect to function) does NOT apply to light transmission – light is NOT frequency based (other than fundamental & common switching-frequency of ether), and the ether is a common framework

 

Another error in Cox's arguments rests with the fact that the video sequence is TRANSVERSE to audience and through an arc-angle of around 10degrees – this means the radial distance varies marginally (less than 2%) and the vertical distance of light travel (movement by JAK, up&down) is less than 1 metre, so the clocking rate is 1m per second (we are discussing clocking rate)

So, for a person viewing JAK moving directly away, the difference in perceived time (as claimed by Thought Experiment) is 1/300,000,000 → minuscule

 

It is still minuscule for bodies moving directly apart in space because the speeds of motion through space (1000s of km per HOUR; 1000km/h → 30 metres per second) is negligible to the speed of light (300,000,000 m per SECOND) – but, also, since a common framework (ether) with a common switching-frequency it becomes a PURELY THOUGHT EXPERIMENT to prove/disprove, as can be seen with the incorrect & failed Michelson-Morley experiment (not just because of the construct of the experiment but because they did not understand/recognise that Opticks were wrong)

Not that this factor alters that light clocking between mirrors of both mirror sets is identical.

 

A further point – whilst with bodies moving directly apart there could be a 'stretching' of the clocking signals from one set to other set (NOT a change of clocking rate within each set of mirrors), the same would not hold true if bodies are moving directly toward each other, the speed of light being a limiting factor means that the clocking signals could not be compressed – if cannot be compressed does it mean that it cannot be expanded (stretched)? – an unprovable Thought Experiment itself.

 

Consequently clocks run at the same speed whether motionary or stationary & regardless of whether relative to any other observer; there being no proof to the contrary, and any attempt to prove/disprove being impossible because of common ether framework.

 

The fact that 'scientists', Academia & places such as CERN maintain bogus claims is purely because of financial reasons – CERN (for e.g.) is, like London markets, a fraudulent money-laundering machine.

 

Cox & JAK should go back to basics and look through a prism, and follow the FastTrack at CDADD.com website to understand Optics (no 'k') and how light (and the ether) actually does function.

 

Medical research is also impaired because Medical Authorities are wrongly in hostile denial and continue Research based upon defective 'science'.

 

There are indirect, but INEVITABLE, consequences of defective 'science' into ALL spheres of Society & Economics/Finance – massive global fraud scams super-saturate Global Money Base&Supply, drive increased disparities through to impoverishment and, in extreme, to numerous mass Starvation Genocides (see Dynamics of Population/Wealth characteristic at cdadd.com) – and it is often within impoverished unhygienic regions that new strains/types of diseases emanate and which rapidly spread to wealthy (unfairly, unjustly so) areas where obsessions with excessive cleanliness reduce immunity to diseases.

 

Newton's theft of Intellectual Property when Cambridge was closed-down during the Black Plague had & still has far-reaching consequences. This was the age of Science supposedly bringing about the Enlightenment.

 

Not only did Newton's theft distort Science into defective understandings in all spheres, but Newton's BULLYING & ARROGANCE, supported & protected by various cronies, silenced valid oppositional Thought – this impaired both Science & Social progressive Thought, not only within Academia but also within Governments - resulting in grossly destructive policies – this has flowed through the centuries since – and is no different within Academia & Governments today.

 

Newton entrenched dishonesty, cronyism & corruption into Royal Society, which later flowed over into RI, RIA, RDS & elsewheres around the World and is rampant today. Paul Nurse (then President RS) & Luke Drury (then President RIA) both obstructed the writer attending & challenging Nurse at a lecture at RIA in Dublin (c2012), in fact ALL Royal Chartered institutes are corrupted …...

 

….. the so-called Enlightenment was/is a misnomer

we are still in an era of ENDARKENMENT

in an era of grossly defective 'science'

 

Governments purposefully refuse to educate societies that centuries-old science is wrong - a minority few defraud the World, Super-Saturating global Money Base & Supply, causing massive Socio-Economic destruction – consequently electorates cannot make informed decisions in general/local elections - this is why Democracy is non-existent.

 

Simply read the lies/deceptions within David Cameron's autobiography 'For the Record' – Cameron had for over 10 years been regularly informed of CDADD's R&D which clearly set out the errors in fundamental science & finances/economics – including much garbage Economics models at Nobel website by prizewinners who have no Science training or experience.

 

Cameron's book: Chapter 29 (Bloomberg) alone gives clear insight to Cameron's outright dishonesty; the opening pages of Chapter 30 relates one form of the horrific consequences of (largely) London's fraudulent Money-Machine that is destabilising the World with Super-Saturation of Money Base & Supply – BUT, Cameron (then May, now Johnson) & other Western leaders expects the rest of the World to bow down to the tyranny & oppressions (Crimes Against Humanity) resulting from the West's Economic Weapons of Mass Destruction (EWMDs)

 

Slow, lingering starvation-deaths in multitudes on foreign soil is acceptable to Cameron, but not a lone hatchet-job on Western soil – Cameron, May, Johnson refuse/d to fund/reward on Merit pioneering Socio-Economy Engineering & Physics Engineering.

 

Socio-Economy structures & controls are totally inappropriate for constructive reform. Yet people are already beginning to recognise that there needs to be meaningful change. But, because of dishonesty by Governments in failing to educate societies of new science that disproves old, societies have no way of understanding what changes are needed to bring constructive reform.

 

Cameron, as is clear from his 2019 autobiography, has little if any real understandings of necessary reforms. Cameron is locked into wasteful high-cost projects (e.g. HS2) whilst failing to understand the chaos driven by a Super-Saturated Money Base & Supply – a person building inadequate structures but ignoring the raging tsunamis that regularly appear in differing forms.

 

The same can be said for all World leaders – an example is Merkel's failure to understand that EU's difficulties also stem from the consequences of London's fraudulent Money-Machine and the underlying fraud scams 'scientised' with defective mathematics (e.g. see Ch45 Renegotiation)

 

The greater part of his autobiographical book heaps tons of self back-patting over soft-achievements in impoverished countries, tax havens & such like which are not sustainable achievements because of raging global fraud scams protected by bogus 'law' – part evidence being the increasing (at increasing rate?) global population.

 

 

Cameron ignores the TRUTH of Light (Optics) and cowers in the LIES of Darkness (Opticks) from which global fraud scams are 'legitimised' through bogus/defective 'science' & mathematics.

 

A common explanation for failed policies by politicians is the writing-off of the failures by 'unintended consequences' – i.e. a result from a policy was not foreseen.

This is common amongst people who have no Engineering experience, including scientists, because they wrongly accept the fundamental principles wrongly attributed to Newton, because of Newton's theft of Intellectual Property.

 

A classic Physics law (wrongly tagged as 'Newton's Third Law') is:- 'For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction' – for primary & secondary education & even first-stage tertiary education this is a reasonable principle – but it is an incomplete principle which if readily applied into real-world circumstances will invariably lead to failed outcomes.

 

This is because the Physics principle is WRONG! - correctly stated: 'For every action there are equal & opposite reactions' (i.e. PLURAL reactions) because there are additional factors, relatively small or secondary/tertiary, to the main reaction – and it is these INEVITABLE, CONSEQUENTIAL reactions that are wrongly tagged as 'unforeseen' by those unqualified, including politicians such as Cameron, when they consider policies.

 

The consequence (perhaps 'Inverse Corollary' – whatever …) of this (& criminally so) is that politicians think they can disregard these inevitable reactions (consequences) and deceptively convince themselves they are blameless when policies fail – which is much of what Cameron (& Blair) does in his shabby book. It is not unlike a pilot deliberately failing to carry out pre-flight checks - a criminal dereliction.

CorpOrgCrime criminals such as Branson, Sugar, Gates, Buffet can do likewise but guise themselves in a false aura of philanthropy – chucking back a few peanuts to the millions impoverished by their criminal actions.

 

The inevitable consequences, purposefully ignored by politicians, are what bring about gross disparities globally through to starvation-genocides, they are as inevitable & more destructive than was/is Zyklon-B

 

It is also why the Engineering Profession is severely undermined by people who being half-qualified (and much 'on-the-job-training') are wrongfully given Statutory Authority, with the term 'Engineer' being diminished (e.g.: Engineering Technician, Associate Engineer and, worst of all, a devious route to 'grandfather' promotion to Chartered Engineer without appropriate Academic qualification AND subsequent experience) and with authority to sign-off on Engineering Research/Design work that should be reserved for properly graduated & experienced Chartered Engineers.

 

The INEVITABLE consequence of this defective policy is sub-standard Engineering – readily observed with e.g. Challenger Space shuttle, collapsing bridges …. and even fear of Truth (refusal to acknowledge Twin Towers IMPLOSIONS) …....

 

It isn't simply that Cameron doesn't understand (because he has no appropriate Engineering qualifications & subsequent experience) but because he doesn't want to understand.

Cameron lied to the nation & World during his time as an MP & PM; his focus on winning entrenched his mindset into believing the deceptions he was peddling – this come out clearly in the litter of defective arguments within his book.

 

Perhaps the most telling of these defective arguments can be seen in Ch41 'The Sweetest Victory' (about 4^th page in):

' ….. We could genuinely say we were rebalancing the economy. Investment was now growing faster than consumption. ….. .. the top 1 per cent of earners were paying over a quarter of all Britain's income tax, …....'

These 2 factors, Investment/Consumption and top 1 percenters, shows that Cameron was focussed on maintaining the London fraudulent Money Machine – the very fact that 1 percent were paying such high tax clearly demonstrate the heavily unbalanced economy – a self back-patting instead of addressing the fraud scams that brought about the unbalance

 

Or simply read Ch46 Referendum – endless lies from Cameron about lying to the electorate regarding the Leave or Remain arguments – BUT the real unequivocal evidence …....

 

 

…......... Cameron reneged on his commitment to service-of-country and now works for a private entity, AFINITI, that is focussed on deception (Artificial Intelligence – a contradiction in terms, and 'solutions' that are based on bogus 'science' & mathematics) – he also gets a fat UK Prime Minister's pension package ….....

 

….... a Public Servant that pre-planned jumping ship.

 

Cameron had some Economics education but still does not understand the errors within the theories – PM Johnson, a classicist, has even less experience.

 

Queen Elizabeth's message over Covid-19 (Sunday, April 5) will no doubt stir courage but will not bring constructive reform.

It is also strange that CV19 having initiated in China that China has far fewer infections & far fewer deaths – whilst this could be explained by the effects from China's underlying oppressive regime it should still be a matter for closer investigation

 

The lies by Governments are why the World is unstable & polarising, internationally & intranationally.

 

Despite Johnson assuring of following Science Evidence Johnson dishonestly ignores new Science – he continues to follow defective/inadequate 'science'.

All the hype of clapping & thanking the NHS & other Service providers & volunteers does not address the structural & control deficiencies of UK (& global) Socio-Economies. But the migration of EU labourers to UK farms belies the call for volunteers to sustain UK's own economy → ??????

 

Cameron, Johnson & other leaders, like Academia, refuse to look through a prism to recognise that Opticks (wrongly attributed to Newton) are wrong, consequently that Einstein, Hubble, Hawking, CERN, etc. are also wrong, consequently that Socio-Economy 'sciences' are also wrong – grossly defective 'science' hence massively destructive policies ….................................. the World is still in an era of Endarkenment

 

Newton's dishonesty, arrogance, bullying and copied by Cameron (Blair, Brown, May , Johnson) still wields far-reaching devastations.

 

 

But, the global Covid19 lockdown gives proof that Socio-Economic reforms, especially to eliminate finance frauds on world markets, is entirely feasible – if & only if Socio-Economy Engineering is correctly engaged.

 

 

 

 

 

As ALWAYS constructive engagement is welcomed (but governments & academia are afraid.................)

 

 

Sincerely

 

Chris Addington Pr.Eng.