Captain’s Log, Stardate 06- More particles of Space

 

##### Particle Omega 24 #####

 

Correcting incorrect understandings of Physics phenomena

 

Apologies: For 'jiggling', under Chromosomes, it should have been recognised as Brownian Motion, after botanist Robert Brown's groundbreaking insights – obviously though, Brown & contemporaries did not have the knowledge, and even Hawking, Higgs & beyond failed to, recognise the multiphase phenomena of the Sun's power supply.

 

INDEX:

- Introduction

- Errors with Photo-Electric effect

- More reasons why Einstein's Relativity Theory is wrong (2020-04-15, Covid-19 lockdown); BUT, more importantly, why defective 'science' aids the spread of diseases (e.g. Covid-19) & Socio-Economic chaos (Economic recovery from CV19 will be retarded because of defective 'science') - Era of Enlightenment? – No! - ENDARKENMENT

- Receding polar ice caps – rethinking the dynamics (2018-07-07)

- Physics: Tensors & Perspective [Update Jan 9, 2018] – further proofs that Einstein, Hubble, are wrong (brilliant thinking, but wrong), which makes Hawking, Higgs, CERN also wrong.

- Economics/Mathematics: John Nash's Prisoner's Dilemma - defective reasoning- Binoculars, Snell's Law & FECKs - How Light Transmission Dynamics (LTD) really work

- Chromosomes → 'some chromos' thoughts => Extra Terrestrials visiting, if existing? Unlikely!

- Maxwell's Colour Wheel – Colours do NOT mix to white - more about Light Transmission Dynamics (LTD) (Updated 2017-05-27)

- Magnetic Fields – some new insights (as distinct from Light)

 

Forthcoming:

 

- Why Einstein's Relativity is wrong - https://ia600205.us.archive.org/19/items/principleofrelat00eins/principleofrelat00eins_bw.pdf - Joint & Several (Dependent & Independent) proofs that Relativity is wrong

 

 

Introduction:

 

As a Professional Engineer with added interest in trying to understand why economies boom/crashed some 23 years of side-line R&D culminated (c2003) to uncovering pensions/investments frauds which had been globalised through demutualisation processes & metamorphosed therefrom – all of which has super-saturated global Money Base & Supply such that money is in the wrong hands, in the wrong places, doing the wrong things – which partly, but largely explains why socio-economies boom/crash – and why there are massive disparities around the world – and consequently why we see reactionary Radicalism/Terrorism.

 

In short: Socio-Economy Engineering is absent.

 

By c2007 it became clear that many/most/all Nobel Prize Economics models are wrong – it became apparent that since Economics/Finances/Socio-Economies are all ETHEREAL domains that any argument is based upon ethereal ideas despite utilisation of science/engineering/mathematics – i.e. endless counter-arguments could be raised to counter CDADD's Professional Engineering developments as to why economies boom/crashed – thus seemingly rendering Professional Engineering inputs as simply more ethereal debate.

 

Something CONCRETE was needed to bring clarity to ethereal subject matters. That was when a eureka (Divine Direction) event occurred early 2007 that directed R&D to Light – what is Light, how does it function – and into other relevant Physics/Engineering issues that appears clearly understood but yet is not.

 

Over the ensuing 10 years CDADD's R&D has realised fundamental errors in Physics/Engineering/Mathematics such as:

Opticks (wrongly attributed to Newton) are wrong → e≠mc²

Also much Mathematics is wrong and is much to blame for defective economics models

Andrew Wiles's 'proof' of Fermat's Last Theorem is NOT a Proof – CDADD has developed a classical proof

 

And to developing insights that an ether MUST & DOES exist and that a Fundamental Ether Component (Kinetic) exists → FECK

 

Consequently Bohr Atomic model is wrong (a non-ether theory cannot exist within ether reality)

 

Chemistry is NOT CDADD's area of expertise, as only 1 year of study - 1^st Year BSc Engineering at UCT, yielded a 2^nd class pass, mainly from expert tuition assistance from GR – but that this is all long past & very sketchy.

 

Remember: historically man has zoomed progressively INWARDS to understand how things work – recognising the existence of FECK as the fundamental component we need to zoom OUTWARDS – and this presents a significant problem because since we are all made up of components that themselves are functioning within & because of the ether, we obviously are unable to see a FECK.

 

So, having developed new insights to Light Transmission Dynamics there is still plenty of work to convert from Bohr Atomic theory to FECK reality, and to develop proper understandings of how the Universe functions.

 

Nevertheless certain phenomena comes to light, from time2time - mainly from bogus science programmes churned out by BBC or Channel 4 or Channel 5 – and by 'scientists' such as Brian Cox, Marcus du Sautoy, Richard Dawkins, Stephen Hawking, Peter Higgs, CERN etc. all of whom, along with Academia in general, are in DENIAL that Opticks are wrong – a case of Theoretical Physicists (in itself a contradiction in terms) being too lazy to look through a prism – and often these presenters make monumental BLUNDERS – so the point within this last Particle in the Captain's Log series is to deal with certain phenomena (as&when they come to light) and to develop correct understandings.

 

And, in conjunction, utilising these new insights to explain errors in present-day Economics/Finances models; and from there to developing further Socio-Economy solutions.

 

But, the reality is that the writer, operating alone, and persona-non-grata, only the surface is presently being scratched – it requires a proper Professional Engineering team (international, ideally) of around 10 Professional Engineers & (say) 5 other specialists – but this requires serious funding, for who would expect a seasoned Professional to take the risk of career change for an uncertain future – one only needs look at the writer having been isolated by governments & forced into exile from home in South Africa to recognise the real risks.

 

BUT, the reality is that this is what is needed to overcome the corporate Organised Crime that prevails and which aggregates to Economy Terrorism, causal of global disparities → driving Radicalism/Terrorism.

 

In this Captain's Log series we are looking PURELY at Physics science errors & new insights (for errors in Nobel Prize Economics models see series: Economists' Inexact Models Exactly Defective)

 

As ALWAYS, CDADD's R&D is open to challenge, which challenges/rs are always welcome (constructive, that is)

 

You are free to visit www.cdadd.com (and, if able, to contribute to CDADD's R&D, ideally regularly/monthly) or to connect via LinkedIn Chris Addington for new updates as&when posted, or contact via This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., or This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

 

Sincerely

 

Chris Addington Pr.Eng.

 

-----------------------------------------------------

 

New Science insights 2020-06-23

 

Einstein:

God does not play dice

Subtle is the Lord … but malicious He is not

Understanding where Einstein went wrong …... and Planck, and …....

…....... and why Science and Socio-Economics have gone wrong

Errors with Photo-Electric effect

 

 

 

'Subtle is the Lord …' The Science and the life of ALBERT EINSTEN - by Abraham Pais

ISBN 0-19-285138-1

 

 

(Reiterate: It is possible to follow the points herein which include a Recap of key LTD points, but an understanding of Optics would give clearer insights - follow fast-track on homepage at www.cdadd.com)

 

 

Abraham Pais, a Dutch, later American physicist was recruited to the Institute for Advance Studies at Princeton where he met & was involved with Einstein. Pais's biography on Einstein gives a good personal & scientific foundation & chronology on Einstein.

 

As with any brilliant works, to determine & understand what is Right it is necessary to also recognise & understand what is Wrong, i.e. what something is not. Often what seems Right turns out to be Wrong, and sometimes something that is Wrong manages to seem Right for a very long time – decades long, even centuries (as with Opticks)

 

There can be many reasons why something that is Wrong seems Right – but all usually emanate as simple errors not recognised, and usually through incorrect assumptions & insufficient checking.

Much sci-fi 'science' which wrongly holds over Science results from failure to apply the ABC principles – Accept Nothing, Believe No-one, Check Everything.

 

An 'incorrect assumption' (or more correctly: assumptions, plural) was what caused Einstein to go off-track, and likewise with others, such as Planck, Schrodinger, Bohr, Heisenberg, Feynman ….. and all were reinforcing each other in these assumptions errors.

 

Einstein wrongly assumed that the Michelson-Morley experiment was correct, that Opticks was correct – and likewise so did many other Theoretical-Physicists. Those that were sceptical did not seek to find out whether Michelson-Morley or Opticks was wrong – thus the Intellectual Momentum of compounded incorrect assumptions became perceived as being Right, wrongly so.

 

The term 'Theoretical-Physicist' is a contradiction in terms itself as those that ascribed to this title were largely theorists, and largely mathematicians – thus ever-deepening theories became accepted without the rigours of experiment. And the more so as theories into deep-space were, obviously, unable to be experimented.

 

Thus: 'Theories' abound that are removed from 'Physics' – hence 'Theories' veer off-track into science-fiction (sci-fi)

 

The purpose herein, at present, is to address the compounded error by Planck in which he addressed the Photo Electric effect and derived the 'Planck Constant'.

 

From Britannica:- ' ….. The significance of Planck’s constant in this context is that radiation, such as light, is emitted, transmitted, and absorbed in discrete energy packets, or quanta, determined by the frequency of the radiation and the value of Planck’s constant. ….'

 

Short videos are available on Youtube to demonstrate the experiment to derive Planck's Constant – e.g.:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MaTXZh6hywQ – photoelectric effect

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dek_Sq1Sulg – deriving Planck Constant

 

The assumptions by Planck is that the light colours in the rainbow pattern are frequency related, in the order given by the rainbow, that light travelled in straight lines, that the colours produce a photoelectric effect, that the potential of each of the colours are different.

 

Nevertheless the experiment to derive Planck Constant shows that:

- 'white' light does not produce a photoelectric effect (note: 'White' is a misnomer, and should be referred to as 'Forward' light)

- that the discrete colours does affect the photoelectric effect and at distinctly different potential levels

- that the INTENSITY of each of the colours does not alter the measured potential of that colour

 

[Recap: (of key points as explained by following the Fast-Track at cdadd.com – Skip this section if familiar with fundamentals set out in fast-track)

 

Orient a (3 x 60 degree) prism in light to obtain rainbow pattern, move prism toward rainbow pattern, notice rainbow splits out to 2 distinct patterns at apex points, roy & vib patterns.

Recognise that radar transmission patterns consist of Forward lobe, and 2 distinct sets of twin side-band lobes either side of the Forward lobe – attribute this form of Transmission Dynamic to Light – or more correctly recognise that radar transmission lobes are as a consequence of Light Transmission Dynamics phenomena being forward & 2 sets of twin side-lobes – thus the 2 side-band lobes of colours are r & y, and v & b, the orange being an optical mergement of the r&y, and indigo the optical mergement of v&b.

Thus the CORRECT sequence of forward light transmission is:- y-o-r-F-v-i-b (and NOT roybiv) – where F = Forward. Recognise that the prism apexes are each showing one of the twin side-bands, the other apex the other side-band.

Also recall that reflected light produces a reversal of the colour patterns when observed through a prism.

 

Measurement of the angles of the colour lobes shows approximately 1 degree between each of the colours:-

y-(1 degree)-o-(1 degree)-r-(1 degree)-F-(1 degree)-v-(1 degree)-i-(1degree)-b.

 

Thus colours are arc-angle related NOT frequency related.

 

Take a sheet of paper and move around the prism to detect the 3 bands of light & the prism shadow. Intuit that the forward Light impacting on the prism is therefore obstructed from further forward transmission (thus shadow) and the light onto the prism is split 3 ways:- by being partially reflected & transmitted off each of the 3 faces of the prism. One at the incident face, the other 2 successively off the internal faces of the other 2 sides. Thus the forward light between the 2 colour patterns is attenuated forward light as a result of successive reflections, thus the attenuated light allows us to observe the FULL intensity colour patterns (that accompanies Light) at the apex points (i.e. Forward Light is distinctly separate to the distinctly separate colours & colour patterns.

Intuit that the colour patterns & forward light are all distinctly separate but all are everywhere present, in 'normal' (i.e. sunlight, incandescent, …) light (i.e. 'white light' does NOT split out into colours)

 

Thus intuit that an ether MUST exist – FECKs (Fundamental Ether Components, and Kinetic) packed marble-like, light & energy is PROPAGATED across the Ether through a switching mechanism, thus the Ether has a fundamental & constant potential by which to function.

Thus allowing us to see Perspective

 

If light travelled in straight lines we would not be able to see Perspective, everything would be flat – thus Perspective is a singular proof that an Ether must exist.

 

Light (& Energy) is PROPAGATED across the Ether, light is not a particle or a wave as such, but the consequent effect of propagation-switching of light across the ether does present as similar in certain ways to a wave, but is not a wave, nor is light a particle.

 

End of Recap:]

 

 

Regarding the videos – these are school revision videos well designed to explain the photoelectric phenomena with unnecessary detail removed for the benefit of students revising their work – the videos are sufficient for the explanations herein to demonstrate Planck's (& other theoreticians') error(s) but insufficient to largely extend further understandings

 

From the first video we see the photoelectric effect upon a gold leaf.

In the second video measurements are taken with different colour slides to determine the potential required to stop the photoelectric effect. The potential values measured are shown & graphed, and the resultant slope determined (being Planck Constant)

 

The errors that Planck made were the incorrect attribution of frequency to the colours, and the incorrect sequence & spatial orientation of the colours.

 

Nevertheless the experiments in the videos records the potential values. If we now put these into correct spatial orientation we can detect an important phenomena.

 

Potential measurements (in correct spatial orientation to Forward light):

 

Y 0.42 – O 0.33 - R 0.21 – F (nil effect) – V 1.6 – I (no measurement) – B 0.66

 

From this spatial orientation we can readily see that there is a potential difference between the vib colours to the RHS of Forward light than the yor colours to the LHS of Forward light.

 

Potential Differences are what produces Motive Forces – Motor effects

 

Intuit further:

that INTENSITY of colour light does not alter the stopping potentials – this then indicates that the colour lobes are a characteristics of each FECK component.

Each FECK has inherent potential and are spatially oriented (like marbles in jar) to attain a physical potential difference

The cumulative effect of Light being propagated through space is to create a multiphase Power Supply causing a Right-Hand positive potential difference. Thus Sun's Light & Energy propagating toward planets causes synchronous planetary rotation & orbit.

 

Sun = SUPER GENERATOR/ALTERNATOR

Planets = SUPER MOTORS

 

The polar orientation of any Planet determines its rotation direction (e.g. Earth rotates anti-clockwise for the Sun to rise in East) – from the photoelectric experiment it is clear that RHS potential exceeds LHS potential

 

Chromosomes are essentially dipoles (with offset poles – i.e. not 180 degrees opposed) – in a potential field chromosomes act as an unrestrained 'rotor' of a motor – thus chromosomes 'jiggle' about.

Ditto for all life-forms → Brownian Motion.

 

Note: although we see a potential difference for Light colours – it does not seem plausible that this potential difference alone accounts for planetary rotation & orbit – the light potentials are surely far, far too small to cause motor-effect upon a planet. It follows that additional and FAR, FAR greater multi-phase energy is being transmitted by the sun to cause motor-effect.

 

Also of interest is the fact that Forward light does NOT cause a photoelectric effect – perhaps consider this Forward light as also acting as an insulator between the RHS & LHS potentials – much as the separate core wires of electric cable are insulated.

 

 

 

The aforegoing identifies further historical errors in Science and progresses the search for correct understandings of how the Universe & Solar Systems function.

 

 

 

The experiments in the video should be repeated and fully recorded, giving also the ammeter readings; and ideally using the colours obtained with a prism.

 

 

Defective 'science' → destructive Government policies → chaos.

Much of today's Socio-Economic chaoses derive from incorrect (defective) science & mathematics that have been increasingly purposefully designed for fraudulent purposes – thus science did not bring Enlightenment, but Endarkenment – Endarkenment because of ongoing dishonesty within Academia, Governments, Judiciaries, Parliaments, Corporates ….................

 

What we are witnessing today with mass protests, riots, shootings of police, extremism/radicalism around the world is likely to widen into further attacks on dishonest Parliamentarians and Judges.

We are well into the 21^st century and yet Justice Systems globally remain closed-shop hence, by induction, wholly corrupt – dishonesty, cronyism & corruption – thus can the virus of corpOrgCrime ravage Societies ...

 

…........... thus increasing political tensions –> Russia, N Korea, India/China ….............

 

 

 

Constructive engagement is always welcomed – cdadd5 [at] cdadd.com

 

 

Sincerely

 

Chris Addington Pr.Eng.

 

 

 

 

 

 

-------------------------------------------------

New Science insights (2020-04-15, Covid-19 lockdown):

 

More reasons why Einstein's Relativity Theory is wrong

BUT, more importantly,

why defective 'science' aids the spread of diseases (e.g. Covid-19)

& Socio-Economic chaos

(Economic recovery from CV19 will be retarded because of defective 'science')

 

Era of Enlightenment? – No! - ENDARKENMENT

(PM Boris Johnson is not following Science Evidence & what 'evidence' he follows is not Science)

 

BBC - The Science of Dr Who – Brian Cox

(A segment of this documentary on Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-O8lBIcHre0&list=PLKEzuOOEQvYPEQHJ-nApnOOORvOxEriAf&index=1 )

 

David Cameron (ex UK PM) – autobiography 'For the Record' –>

(Cameron's application of grossly defective 'science' into Socio-Economies - Proof-Positive that 'on-the-job-training' - in Cameron's case, under Margaret Thatcher - has severe limitations)

 

 

 

Despite the writer regularly presenting Governments & Academia (including Cox) with CONCRETE EVIDENCE that Opticks (with a 'k') (wrongly attributed to Newton) are wrong AND presenting new insights to Optics (no 'k')(dynamics of Light transmissions), Cox continues to present defective 'science' – and BBC promotes this dishonesty.

 

A 2013 documentary 'The Science of Dr Who' was re-aired recently on BBC (4?) - certain video segments can be found on the referenced Youtube link.

 

The referenced segment deals with (wrongly) claimed Relativity & Time Travel – Cox sets up a demonstration to prove Einstein's theory on Relativity but Cox, & Jim Al Khalili (JAK) & other Academics, FAIL to recognise the error in Einstein's Thought-Experiment.

This is because Cox, JAK and Academia in general, refuse to look through a prism and recognise that Opticks are wrong.

 

Einstein did not have the technology advantages that Cox has of high-speed cameras - so it is understandable that Einstein could not readily disprove his Thought-Experiment, which Cox has also FAILED to do.

 

The video segment shows JAK sitting on a chair holding a light which he moves up&down, whilst another person moves the chair backwards&forwards (transverse to camera). A camera on JAK's head records the motion of light from his perspective, whilst another camera records JAK&light from audience's perspective. Cox then superimposes the 2 camera images & slows them down to demonstrate the paths of the moving light and asks audience to imagine the light is moving between 2 mirrors and that at each reflection an imaginary clock will 'tick' then on the opposite mirror when reflecting will 'tock', and so on.

 

Cox then explains Einstein's Thought-Experiment by stating that if we accept that light speed is constant then the light as viewed by the audience is on much longer light-path (as viewed by audience) than the light-path viewed by JAK – it therefore follows, states Cox (wrongly so), that since JAK is moving and the light as seen by audience is travelling further between each tick&tock that JAK's clock will run slower – hence JAK is a time traveller because of the Relativity effect on clocks in motion.

 

BUT, despite the MASSIVE ADVANTAGE Cox has over that of Einstein's day, Cox FAILS to understand where Einstein's reasoning falls down. Cox FAILS to understand why Relativity is wrong.

 

To understand the error in Einstein's Thought-Experiment, & regurgitated by Cox, view the video segment at the 0:50mins mark where the motion is slowed & tracing feature effected – it is clear that the audience's view of the light is STRETCHED-OUT, which Cox rightly explains at the 2:17mins mark, but Cox wrongly assumes that the quantity of light at any point on the path is the same, it is NOT, it is diminished.

 

One can readily see at the transition points (when the light direction is reversed from up2down or down2up) that the light intensity is much greater since the light is momentarily at rest (relative to JAK) and that as it accelerates from that momentary rest that the intensity (quantity of light at each point as viewed by audience) diminishes. So, although the light per unit of distance diminishes the TOTAL quantity of light per unit of time is exactly the same for JAK AND for audience.

 

A further error rests in the mirror diagram at 2:17min mark – although the light, as seen by audience, reaching any one mirror is diminished in intensity (distance-squared diminution) the speed at which that diminished light then travels from the one mirror (audience's) to the next is EXACTLY the same as for the the light in a stationary position (or motionary position, it is exactly the same for both) – so JAK's clock 'ticks' & 'tocks' at the mirror interfaces at same rate as for the audience's mirrors.

 

Also, the Thought Experiment is incorrectly constructed, in that it has only one set of mirrors – a correct construct is to have 2-sets of mirrors one for the (relatively) stationary audience and one set for the (relatively) motionary JAK – the light travels between mirrors on both the 2-sets of mirrors at the same speed-of-light, because both relatively stationary Audience & relatively motionary JAK function upon & across the same ether, a common framework. There is consequently a relative but minuscule shift in the time for the information of one clock to reach the other clock but the 'rate-of-clocking' is identical for each of JAK & audience – i.e. both clocks run at same rate.

(NOTE: 'relatively' is NOT Relativity)

 

BUT, also note at 0:34mins on, that the intensity of light as seen by JAK appears constant and the light seen by audience is only marginally diminished – this is because the light intensity reaching the camera's & our eye's receptors are at or near saturation-level and cannot readily differentiate intensity levels – it is only when camera speed is increased hence video-sequencing is slowed down & hence intensity diminished - because light is stretched across more distance & longer video replay - that we can distinguish higher intensity levels at transition points relative to lower-intensity at motionary points. This effect can be seen in the video sequence with the tracing feature.

 

More still – the fact that an ether exists, as is obvious by understanding Optics (no 'k') (Michelson Morley were wrong in their Opticks (with a 'k') experiment and in their Type-1 error, a positive statement (no ether) based upon negative experimental result) it follows that EVERYTHING within the Universe functions on, and as a consequence of, that ether which is a common frame. Consequently Doppler effect (acoustic phenomena requiring 2 relatively independent frames AND a relatively independent medium (air) AND a relatively independent frequency based phenomena (sound) for Doppler effect to function) does NOT apply to light transmission – light is NOT frequency based (other than fundamental & common switching-frequency of ether), and the ether is a common framework

 

Another error in Cox's arguments rests with the fact that the video sequence is TRANSVERSE to audience and through an arc-angle of around 10degrees – this means the radial distance varies marginally (less than 2%) and the vertical distance of light travel (movement by JAK, up&down) is less than 1 metre, so the clocking rate is 1m per second (we are discussing clocking rate)

So, for a person viewing JAK moving directly away, the difference in perceived time (as claimed by Thought Experiment) is 1/300,000,000 → minuscule

 

It is still minuscule for bodies moving directly apart in space because the speeds of motion through space (1000s of km per HOUR; 1000km/h → 30 metres per second) is negligible to the speed of light (300,000,000 m per SECOND) – but, also, since a common framework (ether) with a common switching-frequency it becomes a PURELY THOUGHT EXPERIMENT to prove/disprove, as can be seen with the incorrect & failed Michelson-Morley experiment (not just because of the construct of the experiment but because they did not understand/recognise that Opticks were wrong)

Not that this factor alters that light clocking between mirrors of both mirror sets is identical.

 

A further point – whilst with bodies moving directly apart there could be a 'stretching' of the clocking signals from one set to other set (NOT a change of clocking rate within each set of mirrors), the same would not hold true if bodies are moving directly toward each other, the speed of light being a limiting factor means that the clocking signals could not be compressed – if cannot be compressed does it mean that it cannot be expanded (stretched)? – an unprovable Thought Experiment itself.

 

Consequently clocks run at the same speed whether motionary or stationary & regardless of whether relative to any other observer; there being no proof to the contrary, and any attempt to prove/disprove being impossible because of common ether framework.

 

The fact that 'scientists', Academia & places such as CERN maintain bogus claims is purely because of financial reasons – CERN (for e.g.) is, like London markets, a fraudulent money-laundering machine.

 

Cox & JAK should go back to basics and look through a prism, and follow the FastTrack at CDADD.com website to understand Optics (no 'k') and how light (and the ether) actually does function.

 

Medical research is also impaired because Medical Authorities are wrongly in hostile denial and continue Research based upon defective 'science'.

 

There are indirect, but INEVITABLE, consequences of defective 'science' into ALL spheres of Society & Economics/Finance – massive global fraud scams super-saturate Global Money Base&Supply, drive increased disparities through to impoverishment and, in extreme, to numerous mass Starvation Genocides (see Dynamics of Population/Wealth characteristic at cdadd.com) – and it is often within impoverished unhygienic regions that new strains/types of diseases emanate and which rapidly spread to wealthy (unfairly, unjustly so) areas where obsessions with excessive cleanliness reduce immunity to diseases.

 

Newton's theft of Intellectual Property when Cambridge was closed-down during the Black Plague had & still has far-reaching consequences. This was the age of Science supposedly bringing about the Enlightenment.

 

Not only did Newton's theft distort Science into defective understandings in all spheres, but Newton's BULLYING & ARROGANCE, supported & protected by various cronies, silenced valid oppositional Thought – this impaired both Science & Social progressive Thought, not only within Academia but also within Governments - resulting in grossly destructive policies – this has flowed through the centuries since – and is no different within Academia & Governments today.

 

Newton entrenched dishonesty, cronyism & corruption into Royal Society, which later flowed over into RI, RIA, RDS & elsewheres around the World and is rampant today. Paul Nurse (then President RS) & Luke Drury (then President RIA) both obstructed the writer attending & challenging Nurse at a lecture at RIA in Dublin (c2012), in fact ALL Royal Chartered institutes are corrupted …...

 

….. the so-called Enlightenment was/is a misnomer

we are still in an era of ENDARKENMENT

in an era of grossly defective 'science'

 

Governments purposefully refuse to educate societies that centuries-old science is wrong - a minority few defraud the World, Super-Saturating global Money Base & Supply, causing massive Socio-Economic destruction – consequently electorates cannot make informed decisions in general/local elections - this is why Democracy is non-existent.

 

Simply read the lies/deceptions within David Cameron's autobiography 'For the Record' – Cameron had for over 10 years been regularly informed of CDADD's R&D which clearly set out the errors in fundamental science & finances/economics – including much garbage Economics models at Nobel website by prizewinners who have no Science training or experience.

 

Cameron's book: Chapter 29 (Bloomberg) alone gives clear insight to Cameron's outright dishonesty; the opening pages of Chapter 30 relates one form of the horrific consequences of (largely) London's fraudulent Money-Machine that is destabilising the World with Super-Saturation of Money Base & Supply – BUT, Cameron (then May, now Johnson) & other Western leaders expects the rest of the World to bow down to the tyranny & oppressions (Crimes Against Humanity) resulting from the West's Economic Weapons of Mass Destruction (EWMDs)

 

Slow, lingering starvation-deaths in multitudes on foreign soil is acceptable to Cameron, but not a lone hatchet-job on Western soil – Cameron, May, Johnson refuse/d to fund/reward on Merit pioneering Socio-Economy Engineering & Physics Engineering.

 

Socio-Economy structures & controls are totally inappropriate for constructive reform. Yet people are already beginning to recognise that there needs to be meaningful change. But, because of dishonesty by Governments in failing to educate societies of new science that disproves old, societies have no way of understanding what changes are needed to bring constructive reform.

 

Cameron, as is clear from his 2019 autobiography, has little if any real understandings of necessary reforms. Cameron is locked into wasteful high-cost projects (e.g. HS2) whilst failing to understand the chaos driven by a Super-Saturated Money Base & Supply – a person building inadequate structures but ignoring the raging tsunamis that regularly appear in differing forms.

 

The same can be said for all World leaders – an example is Merkel's failure to understand that EU's difficulties also stem from the consequences of London's fraudulent Money-Machine and the underlying fraud scams 'scientised' with defective mathematics (e.g. see Ch45 Renegotiation)

 

The greater part of his autobiographical book heaps tons of self back-patting over soft-achievements in impoverished countries, tax havens & such like which are not sustainable achievements because of raging global fraud scams protected by bogus 'law' – part evidence being the increasing (at increasing rate?) global population.

 

 

Cameron ignores the TRUTH of Light (Optics) and cowers in the LIES of Darkness (Opticks) from which global fraud scams are 'legitimised' through bogus/defective 'science' & mathematics.

 

A common explanation for failed policies by politicians is the writing-off of the failures by 'unintended consequences' – i.e. a result from a policy was not foreseen.

This is common amongst people who have no Engineering experience, including scientists, because they wrongly accept the fundamental principles wrongly attributed to Newton, because of Newton's theft of Intellectual Property.

 

A classic Physics law (wrongly tagged as 'Newton's Third Law') is:- 'For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction' – for primary & secondary education & even first-stage tertiary education this is a reasonable principle – but it is an incomplete principle which if readily applied into real-world circumstances will invariably lead to failed outcomes.

 

This is because the Physics principle is WRONG! - correctly stated: 'For every action there are equal & opposite reactions' (i.e. PLURAL reactions) because there are additional factors, relatively small or secondary/tertiary, to the main reaction – and it is these INEVITABLE, CONSEQUENTIAL reactions that are wrongly tagged as 'unforeseen' by those unqualified, including politicians such as Cameron, when they consider policies.

 

The consequence (perhaps 'Inverse Corollary' – whatever …) of this (& criminally so) is that politicians think they can disregard these inevitable reactions (consequences) and deceptively convince themselves they are blameless when policies fail – which is much of what Cameron (& Blair) does in his shabby book. It is not unlike a pilot deliberately failing to carry out pre-flight checks - a criminal dereliction.

CorpOrgCrime criminals such as Branson, Sugar, Gates, Buffet can do likewise but guise themselves in a false aura of philanthropy – chucking back a few peanuts to the millions impoverished by their criminal actions.

 

The inevitable consequences, purposefully ignored by politicians, are what bring about gross disparities globally through to starvation-genocides, they are as inevitable & more destructive than was/is Zyklon-B

 

It is also why the Engineering Profession is severely undermined by people who being half-qualified (and much 'on-the-job-training') are wrongfully given Statutory Authority, with the term 'Engineer' being diminished (e.g.: Engineering Technician, Associate Engineer and, worst of all, a devious route to 'grandfather' promotion to Chartered Engineer without appropriate Academic qualification AND subsequent experience) and with authority to sign-off on Engineering Research/Design work that should be reserved for properly graduated & experienced Chartered Engineers.

 

The INEVITABLE consequence of this defective policy is sub-standard Engineering – readily observed with e.g. Challenger Space shuttle, collapsing bridges …. and even fear of Truth (refusal to acknowledge Twin Towers IMPLOSIONS) …....

 

It isn't simply that Cameron doesn't understand (because he has no appropriate Engineering qualifications & subsequent experience) but because he doesn't want to understand.

Cameron lied to the nation & World during his time as an MP & PM; his focus on winning entrenched his mindset into believing the deceptions he was peddling – this come out clearly in the litter of defective arguments within his book.

 

Perhaps the most telling of these defective arguments can be seen in Ch41 'The Sweetest Victory' (about 4^th page in):

' ….. We could genuinely say we were rebalancing the economy. Investment was now growing faster than consumption. ….. .. the top 1 per cent of earners were paying over a quarter of all Britain's income tax, …....'

These 2 factors, Investment/Consumption and top 1 percenters, shows that Cameron was focussed on maintaining the London fraudulent Money Machine – the very fact that 1 percent were paying such high tax clearly demonstrate the heavily unbalanced economy – a self back-patting instead of addressing the fraud scams that brought about the unbalance

 

Or simply read Ch46 Referendum – endless lies from Cameron about lying to the electorate regarding the Leave or Remain arguments – BUT the real unequivocal evidence …....

 

 

…......... Cameron reneged on his commitment to service-of-country and now works for a private entity, AFINITI, that is focussed on deception (Artificial Intelligence – a contradiction in terms, and 'solutions' that are based on bogus 'science' & mathematics) – he also gets a fat UK Prime Minister's pension package ….....

 

….... a Public Servant that pre-planned jumping ship.

 

Cameron had some Economics education but still does not understand the errors within the theories – PM Johnson, a classicist, has even less experience.

 

Queen Elizabeth's message over Covid-19 (Sunday, April 5) will no doubt stir courage but will not bring constructive reform.

It is also strange that CV19 having initiated in China that China has far fewer infections & far fewer deaths – whilst this could be explained by the effects from China's underlying oppressive regime it should still be a matter for closer investigation

 

The lies by Governments are why the World is unstable & polarising, internationally & intranationally.

 

Despite Johnson assuring of following Science Evidence Johnson dishonestly ignores new Science – he continues to follow defective/inadequate 'science'.

All the hype of clapping & thanking the NHS & other Service providers & volunteers does not address the structural & control deficiencies of UK (& global) Socio-Economies. But the migration of EU labourers to UK farms belies the call for volunteers to sustain UK's own economy → ??????

 

Cameron, Johnson & other leaders, like Academia, refuse to look through a prism to recognise that Opticks (wrongly attributed to Newton) are wrong, consequently that Einstein, Hubble, Hawking, CERN, etc. are also wrong, consequently that Socio-Economy 'sciences' are also wrong – grossly defective 'science' hence massively destructive policies ….................................. the World is still in an era of Endarkenment

 

Newton's dishonesty, arrogance, bullying and copied by Cameron (Blair, Brown, May , Johnson) still wields far-reaching devastations.

 

 

But, the global Covid19 lockdown gives proof that Socio-Economic reforms, especially to eliminate finance frauds on world markets, is entirely feasible – if & only if Socio-Economy Engineering is correctly engaged.

 

 

 

 

 

As ALWAYS constructive engagement is welcomed (but governments & academia are afraid.................)

 

 

Sincerely

 

Chris Addington Pr.Eng.

 

--------------------------------------------------

 

 

---------------------------------------

 

New Science insights: (2017-11-23)

Physics: Tensors & Perspective [Update Jan 9, 2018] – further proofs that Einstein, Hubble, are wrong (brilliant thinking, but wrong), which makes Hawking, Higgs, CERN also wrong.

Economics/Mathematics: John Nash's Prisoner's Dilemma

Physics:

Tensors:

 

Opticks (wrongly attributed to Newton) are wrong → e≠mc²; simply look through a prism and see the errors for yourself: see fast-track at www.cdadd.com

From these fundamental errors we get obscure mathematics (e.g. Tensors that 'explain' Einstein's Relativity -

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ufthvvbwzxm

 

These errors stem from a fundamental error of wrongly accepting Universal Law of Gravity for all inverse-square relationships, and wrongly attributing Time as a dimension.

 

Time is NOT a dimension – hence space-time (S-T) as modelled through Tensors is invalid –> Space-Time cannot explain the fundamental kinetic energy/forces that cause synchronous rotation & orbit of planets.

 

This is NOT to say that Tensor analysis is invalid, only that it is wrongly used to create an incorrect 'explanation' of the universe without recognising the fundamental & distinctly different forces that cause synchronicity (& other dynamics of the Universe)

 

F=ma is a classical time-inherent physics relationship – BUT, it does NOT explain the FECK (Fundamental Ether Component, Kinetic) dynamics that causes it to be so.

 

 

Perspective – further proof that Einstein Energy & relativity theories are wrong (brilliant thinking, but wrong)

 

A read of 'Sister Wendy's Story of Painting' (ISBN 0 7513 0133 7) sets out the history of art from cave paintings through ancient world, Gothic, Renaissance, and so on. It was in the Renaissance period (c1420 – 1600) that art shifted from a flat 2D representation to representation of 3D Perspective onto 2D (i.e. giving depth of field onto a flat image)

 

Prior to Renaissance, artists could see perspective, just as we do today, but did not know how to formally represent this into a 2D painting/drawing.

The change came about through the brilliance of Piero Della Francesca (c1410/20- 92, born Umbria Italy) who formalised the mathematics & geometry that allowed artists to represent 3D perspective 2 dimensionally.

https://www.maa.org/press/periodicals/convergence/mathematical-treasure-della-francescas-archimedes

https://www.dartmouth.edu/~matc/math5.geometry/unit13/unit13.html

 

 

However, it is important to recognise that Mathematics is NOT Science, for Mathematics is an ABSTRACT CONCEPT – nevertheless Mathematics is used extensively in Science & Engineering and would be impossible without it.

BUT, Mathematics has also been used to deceive, for fraud and other wrong reasons, simply because Mathematics can be manipulated to explain whatever argument one wishes to make (e.g. one can prove 1=0 and hence prove any number equals another number) – hence Mathematics is NOT Science (also see Economics/Nash below).

 

Francesca's brilliant Mathematical derivations allows us to represent 3D into 2D but it does not explain why it is that we see Perspective – i.e. why distant objects appear smaller than up close, why a row of terrace houses diminish in size (to a vanishing point), etc.

 

How do we explain the Transmission Dynamic of Light that causes us to see in Perspective all that is in front of our eyes and into far distance?

 

First we need to understand why Einstein was wrong. (For this, ideally, we first need to understand the Fast-track at www.cdadd.com homepage for steps to understand why Opticks (wrongly attributed to Newton) are wrong => e≠mc² – but, one should be able to understand the following, without doing this)

 

On a street with uniform lampposts, stand behind one lamppost & view the next posts in line – it is obvious the the one nearer appears wider than the next one, which appears wider than the one thereafter, and so on.

What causes this apparent 'shrinkage'?

 

Einstein & others argued that light was in form of particles (photons) that zipped at speed c (speed of light) – and somehow, but not explained by any scientist, managing to avoid all other photons zipping in everywhichway direction & also at speed c → ?!?!?!?!?

Well, if that were so then the photons from either side of the first lamppost would be zipping out in parallel lines from that lamppost to the observer – likewise the next lamppost would have photons zipping out from either side of that one, and since we know that the lampposts are the same diameter/width the photons would also be zipping in parallel lines, and would reach us with the same width as the first lamppost – and we would then see in much the way that pre-Renaissance artists depicted their artworks, i.e. flat

 

BUT, the street of lampposts do not appear to have the same width at the observer - the width has 'shrunk' – thus photons do not explain how Light Transmission Dynamics function – and hence it disproves photon/particle theory – hence in recognising this perspective phenomena it provides another singular proof that disproves Energy & Relativity Theories, Expanding Universe as postulated (hence Big-Bang) and hence e≠mc²

 

Disproving Einstein's Energy & relativity by observation of Perspective Realities does not prove how it is that we see Perspective.

 

FECK Reality (Fundamental Ether Components Kinetic, spiky components, packed marble-like as a Universe ether), as derived by CDADD, does allow us to explain the phenomena of Perspective (also see Binoculars, Snell's Law & FECKs below)

 

The marble like structure causes a zig-zagging of light transmission, coupled with attenuation of light (in any one direction of transmission) around each FECK, causes a summation of all directional light flows at each FECK point propagating from one side of lamppost, and to all FECK points along its transmission path from lamppost to observer, and coupled with propagation of light from other side of lamppost (& all points in between) it creates an arc- cone.

But so does everything else around us have light transmitted in effective arc-cones – but, it is by the dynamics of our eyes (lens etc.) that we can select the specific arc-cones according to the direction we are observing.

 

So the effective arc-cone is the result of FECK realities and by which objects appear to shrink with increased distance.

 

Astronomers/Astrophysicists are refusing to acknowledge that much of their interpretations of deep-space phenomena are in need of rethinking, and are possibly/probably wrong, hence their inter/extrapolations into radio-astronomy are also distorted – and all of which is further distorted by photoshopping of images.

 

 

Manythanx to Sister Wendy for bringing this observation to attention, which observation had been left within the domain of Mathematics, and not previously considered as being a fundamental aspect of the functioning of the Universe.

 

[UPDATE: January 9, 2018 – The Youtube video link below (by 'lemma') gives an excellent & quick overview of history of Maths/Geometry that eventually led to Einstein & Tensors. The other videos that follow, also by the same lecturer, give a good background to Tensors.

 

BUT, the lecturer has erred in WRONGLY assuming that Einstein was right and consequently WRONGLY assumes that light travels as photons in straight lines.

 

Light does NOT 'travel' it PROPAGATES; Light does NOT propagate in straight lines, Light zig-zags (3 dimensionally) through space (via 'switching' mechanism) - which is why we are able to see Perspective.

 

The aforegoing is NOT to say that Tensors are WRONG – Tensors are RIGHT as long as one keeps within 'straight-line' bounds of classical mathematics & geometry – Tensors are WRONG when trying to explain Light Transmission Dynamics (LTD), which is why Einstein, Hubble, Hawking, CERN etc., are WRONG!!!!

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e0eJXttPRZI

 

END of Update Jan 9, 2018]

 

 

 

 

 

Economics/Mathematics

 

Similarly with John Nash's mathematical models of establishing a 'Nash Equilibrium' for the Prisoner's Dilemma.

 

Nash failed to take into account the 0 (zero) outcome – i.e. the Prisoner is acquitted, gets 0 years imprisonment (there are a number of game-plans to achieve this) – this oversight is why the Nash model & 'Nash Equilibria' are false propositions/outcomes.

 

It is this defective model that has been used within finance/business/economics to create fraudulent scams. Simply by claiming a Nash Equilibria a mass of complex & deceptive mathematics becomes 'respectable', but behind which resides purposeful fraud scams.

 

https://www.khanacademy.org/economics-finance-domain/microeconomics/nash-equilibrium-tutorial/nash-eq-tutorial/v/prisoners-dilemma-and-nash-equilibrium

 

This is not to diminish the brilliance of Nash's R&D, only to recognise that it is incorrect mathematics that has been fraudulently utilised.

Also John Nash should have been awarded a Mathematics Prize in memory of Nobel NOT an Economics Prize.

 

---

 

As always, constructive challenges to any R&D by CDADD are welcomed.

 

 

Sincerely

 

 

Chris Addington Pr.Eng.

 

-----------------------------------------------------------

 

Binoculars, Snell's Law & FECKs

How Light Transmission Dynamics (LTD) really work

NOTES:

1. This paper requires some quiet thinking – seated comfortably
2. It is necessary to first understand the Optics set out in Particle Sigma-18 (see fast-track at www.cdadd.com) which explains why Opticks (wrongly attributed to Newton) are wrong → e≠mc²
3. FECKs (Fundamental Ether Component, Kinetic) - think of the ether FECKs as packed like marbles (as we see in a jar, but covered in spikes)
4. It is important to think these issues through in your mind – diagrams can be misleading, which is why in the main they are avoided – one cannot ever see a FECK so there is no point in drawing one.
5. For this you ideally should have at least 1 magnifying glass (preferably 2), a pair binoculars (or telescope); a prism.
6. There are a number of designs of binoculars – the purpose is not to discuss design types but to understand how light transmission dynamics are 'captured' by an optical instrument. A telescope is simply a single optical magnifying instrument.
7. There is no need to buy expensive binoculars – the ones used for this paper & occasional birdwatching are cheapish Argos compact 10x-30x zoom binoculars at around E40.00 (& a Lidl zoom telescope around E25.00)
8. There is not one physics textbook or website that correctly explains how optical instruments work – because ALL are wrongly based on Opticks & incorrect attribution of Frequency to the colour 'spectrum' – we can immediately see that frequency is not the attribute to the colours – for, if varying frequencies were bent at different angles going through a prism then we would see distorted images, but we see regular images, therefore light is not bent according to frequency, nor are colours attributed to frequency, light&colours are arc-angle related.
9. Binoculars have been chosen to explain the functionality of FECKs & optical instruments – mainly because Birdwatch Ireland had an article on binoculars in their Wings magazine & subsequent comms with Swarovski Optics caused further investigations – to which this paper.

 

 

[This has been compiled over a number of sessions & whilst under severe stress because Governments of developed nations are oppressively isolating & Ireland's abusive (in)Justice system is attacking (c.f. Galileo) – so some repetition may occur, apols.

 

Being isolated by dishonest Governments, Academia, Media etc. renders the writer Persona-Non-Grata – and for some 20+ years –> it takes its toll on personal life – it's time to call quits.

 

It was intended to write a paper outlining the errors in Einstein's Energy & Relativity theory – this can be seen by largely recognising that Einstein erroneously assumed 'no ether' in his Relativity publication as did other scientists in their experiments upon which Einstein relied – it all falls like a pack of cards.

Brilliant thinking – but wrong. As is CERN.

https://ia600205.us.archive.org/19/items/principleofrelat00eins/principleofrelat00eins_bw.pdf ]

 

-----------------------------------------

 

 Binoculars, Snell's Law & FECKs

How Light Transmission Dynamics (LTD) really work

 

Look at an object directly in front of you – (the study bookcase in front has Tony Blair's 'A Journey' – NOTE: don't waste money buying a copy – this hardback came from a charity shop in a 5-books-for-1-Euro buy, and had difficulty choosing the fifth – at least it makes a cheap firelighter)

 

The light-information that is transmitted from the object to the viewer is along a direct 'path' – now look at a specific point midway between yourself & object – there exists at that specific point a specific FECK (think of a marble with spikes all around it, and the spikes being approximately 1 degree apart) - and this FECK is, as are all FECKs throughout the Universe, constantly switching at some phenomenal switching rate that achieves propagation (speed of light) of around 300,000 km/second – BUT, it is also switching information in ALL directions around that FECK – through transmission bands (c.f. Radar transmission patterns) – the one band transmitting directly towards the observer being the forward transmission band, all others being side-bands (relative to viewer) – whereas if viewer shifted position the viewer would now see the forward transmission of what was previously side-band transmission – think about this!

 

Also bear in mind that everything moves through space by switching across the ether framework – so, when it is said 'specific FECK' it is meant in relative terms to where we are relative to the object – whilst observing: you, the object & everything are switching through space and are changing FECKs all the time, but the relative position of you to object remains the same even though it is an entirely different FECK as we (on earth) move through space.

 

So, with light coming from the right, the left, the bottom, the top, the everywhere around it – that FECK is switching light & energy to ALL its adjacent neighbouring FECKs (packed marble-like, and spiky), and in turn those FECKs switch light & energy to their adjacent FECKs – and it does ALL this in an orderly switching manner (& throughout the Universe) such that we can see the object before us and objects in deep-space; and across the road, everywhere we look.

 

BUT, we need to understand what effect that the specific line-of-light coming from the object before us has on ALL the FECKs around that specific mid-point FECK.

 

Consider: a torch on a pitch-black night – the light beam not only projects the full forward intensity of light forwards in a direct line but also at each point light shines all around each & every FECK but with increasing attenuation of that light from 0 degrees (maximum intensity) to 180 degrees (almost zero intensity) around that FECK, i.e. a very, very small amount of attenuated light shines backwards & sidewards – this may be due to the atmosphere rather than the FECK itself, one would need to test in space – but nevertheless we are on earth and it is earth-bound physics we are dealing with regarding Optics.

 

Imagine a planar bird's-eye view of a point on a paper – and drawing in intensity scale around that point – at 0 degrees plot 100% (or per unit scale) – then at 1 degree intervals plot attenuated levels until you reach 180 at near-zero – note: side-band colours are full intensity so would be in order of near 100%, and being r&y or v&b the arc-angle of these bands are around 3 degrees – hence, this 2-D planar view gives an idea of the 3-D picture of relative light intensity around any FECK – the difference being only the absolute intensity; relative intensity around the FECK would (seemingly) be the same.

 

(Note: this is a simplified explanation – FECKs being packed marble-like would not be in cube formation but offset in all 3 dimensions, thus creating a 3D zig-zag path. This would also explain why light appears to 'bend' round objects, creating halo effect; and also why we have small amount of light shining backwards. It would also seem reasonable that FECKs act in clusters, so as to produce the broad transmission bands/side-bands)

 

This phenomenon applies equally to the light information coming from the object towards the observer – BUT, not being dark, that the ambient light transmitting from other directions is greatly attenuated relative to that object light, which is why we see the object without interference from other light-paths – intense ambient light may cause some glare, but essentially it is only forward light and its r&y and v&b side-bands (for that is where colour is transmitted to the cones/rods of our eyes that are off-centre within the eye) towards the observer that are seen – and they are seen because the eye is curved (lens) & each point on the curve is a specific prism point which selects the appropriate light rays, hence arc-cone, by which we are able to see the object.

 

 

Binoculars

 

Binoculars are a multi-optic device by which, through selection/design of optical glass, one can select specific arc-cones of light – and thereby magnify distant objects which have under normal observation narrow arc-cones – the further away the object the narrower the arc-cone, through normal eye vision.

 

Achieving, through binoculars, a wider arc-cone of far distant (hence narrow arc-cone) object magnifies that distant object – so, by lens design, one can achieve low or high magnification simply by increasing the arc-cone - a narrower arc-cone gives lower magnification. It is simply a case of designing the instrument to select a pre-determined arc-cone, hence magnification.

Zoom binoculars allow one to magnify the fixed arc-cone through the object lens - thereby achieving a range of magnifications.

 

It is important to note that the light arriving at the object lens is IDENTICAL regardless of the design specification of the binoculars – the binoculars simply choose (by its design) which arc-cone to let through (filter)

 

To explain the difference between narrow & wide arc-cones:

We are looking at this from perspective of the object lens of the binoculars. Distant objects have narrow arc-cones, closer objects have wider arc-cones, as observed by the observer.

 

If we want to enlarge the image, through the binoculars, we need to increase the narrow arc-cone of distant objects to a wide arc-cone by means of the lenses in the binoculars – by selection of light from that object, which in normal circumstances, with our eyes, is yielding a narrow arc-cone. Remember any&every object, and any&every point on any object, is transmitting information on ALL side-bands – the observer is simply in a position to pick up certain of those side-bands, which for the observer are the forward & side-bands facing toward the observer, but the object is nonetheless transmitting on ALL points from that object – the purpose of the binoculars is to select the specific side-bands so as to achieve the right arc-cone for a predetermined magnification, or range of magnification for zoom binoculars – it does this by increasing a narrow arc-cone from that object to a wider arc-cone of that object at the eye lens, hence magnifying.

 

This will be easier to understand if you take a page of text, hold it behind a magnifying glass (single lens) then move it away until the print is in focus – the print is enlarged (by lens design) to a wider side-band arc-cone of a narrow arc-cone of the print on the paper. Now hold e.g. a pencil so it is viewed both within the lens & without – you will see the lens is creating (by lens design) a wider side-band arc-cone of the pencil which appears larger (magnified) through the lens than appears outside which is regular size.

 

Now hold the magnifying glass close to the object you first observed (here Tony Blair, and above his head 'A Journey' …... also note how this magnifies his deceptions!!!!!!!!!!!!!!) - hold at arms length and move yourself backwards slowly, see how the image magnifies (& the deceptions!), keep moving slowly backwards, the image begins to blur.

This blurring we call out-of-focus but which is simply a case of circles-of-confusion → i.e. each point in front of the glass is mapped to a circular area on the observer side of the magnifying glass, and all points collectively mapping to circles-of-confusion causes overlapping of the confusion circles, hence blurring.

 

Keep moving slowly backwards, the confusion circles decrease in size until image become sharp again and we see that the image is large – keep moving back, the image begins to shrink – stop at this point - and think about the arc-cones under normal vision and the arc-cone of the object through the magnifying glass – the image through the glass is inverted & reversed, and SHRUNK – i.e. we now achieve DEMAGNIFYING of the object through the first lens.

So, clearly, in designing binoculars distance between lenses is an important factor.

 

Through the use of other lenses & by design of the binoculars we select the specific arc-cone width & hence the magnification of that shrunken image through the object lens – and 2 Porro prisms (prisms with internal faces at 90 degrees, so as to act as mirrors) reverse & invert the image the 'right' way round.

 

Since the OBJECT lens of binoculars are large compared to the eye lens – the binoculars are able to pick up wider arc-cone of distant objects, and since each point on a lens is a specific prism point we are able to achieve selection of certain side-bands to transmit through the lens, the forward band (relative to each prism point of the object lens) being reflected, and other side-bands transmitted through the external face of the object lens being reflected on the opposite inner surface of the object lens or transmitted through at angles which are not picked-up by the inner optical glasses. So, effectively, a side-band coming through the lens is now the forward transmission and being originally a side-band of the object itself is now also attenuated.

(It might help to draw a sketch with radial forward & side-band lines from a couple of points of an object to the lens of the binoculars – but you need to work this out for yourself so it sticks in the mind)

 

Note also, that by selecting a specific arc-cone through the binoculars (by lens design) we are EXCLUDING from going into the binoculars all other arc-cones that are available at the object lens – which we can observe by looking at the object lens of the binoculars (with eye piece covered) – the reflections we see are some of those that are being EXCLUDED from going into binoculars because of lens design - holding binoculars steady, move your view point slightly and you will see some other reflections which are also EXCLUDED.

 

Let's make a quick digression to Snell's Law and recognise some new insights:

 

-----

 

Snell's Law - One can websearch under 'Snell's Law' for a concise explanation.

Willebrod Snellius (Snell) brought brilliant insights into light transmission dynamics (LTD) – and derived the refraction indices for various materials which are used extensively today in optics – BUT, BUT, BUT – unwittingly, the use of Refraction Indices deflects attention from what is happening at the FECKs interfacing the mediums (air/glass etc.)

 

The reflected angle is equal to the incident angle of the light – but the 'refracted' (an incorrect description, see particle Psi-23) varies according to the material through which light passes and is given by the Snell refraction equation n₂sinx₂ = n₁siny₁ where x is refraction angle, y is incident angle and n are dimensionless medium constants, the ratio of which was termed the refractive index.

 

But, this unwittingly detracts attention from the fact that what is really happening is that the medium is neither reflecting, nor transmitting through, certain of the side-bands between the reflected angle and the refracted angle – i.e. the medium STOPS the transmission of certain side-bands according to the material itself and/or the type of light source – certain side-bands are stopped - or we could say that the medium 'absorbs' those 'missing' side-bands.

 

What then happens is that other side-bands are now transmitting the light information – and being at a different angle is why we see a shift in the angle of light through the medium (wrongly termed refraction, because it is SUBTRACTION of a side-band by 'absorption' – we also need to clarify what happens with this 'absorption' process)

The shift in the angle of light being relative to that through other mediums such as a glass prism.

 

Now, this gives a clue as to the side-band transmission characteristics of the light type AND to the mediums – this is for diligent scientists to experiment, record & analyse – it could begin to bring new insights, including how to utilise dangerous nuclear waste so as to neutralise.

 

-----

 

Back to binoculars & FECKs

 

With standard binoculars there is also pay-off for achieving greater magnification – and that is: since we are having to widen a narrow arc-cone within the binoculars we are effectively choosing side-bands that contain attenuated light relative to the forward transmission band AND spreading that arc-cone over a larger arc-cone area (thus magnifying) hence the light per unit area diminishes – it is because of selecting attenuated side-bands for any specific magnification that light intensity diminishes & colour intensities diminish – the greater the magnification the wider the arc-cone selected the greater the attenuation (i.e. the less the light).

Green colours diminish the fastest because they are on the 'outside' side-bands of the colours – recall: the colours at a specific FECK are NOT the rainbow orientation, but [yellow (orange) red (forward light) violet (indigo) blue; orange & indigo being optical mergements of r&y and v&b respectively]; so, green, achieved by our eyes optically merging the outer side-bands of y and b of adjacent FECKs, are reflected off the object lens before the 'inner' side-band colours r and v; which is why distant views become purplish (optical mergement or r and v)

 

With zoom binoculars it is a case of using other optical glasses (convex, concave by design) to select and enlarge (magnify) specific narrow arc-cones depending on zoom position. Again, by enlarging a narrow arc-cone we are reducing the light/square-area of the object viewed so the image loses brightness, light is attenuated.

 

Compact binoculars can also have a pair of Porro prisms, these are used to achieve a longer light path, hence greater magnification, for shorter binoculars ( a trade-off) – the prisms also invert & reverse the image so that it appears the right way round.

(see images: https://www.google.ie/search?q=zoom+binoculars,+how+they+work&client=firefox-b&tbm=isch&tbo=u&source=univ&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiOx7aIsP7UAhXlIcAKHe-SCeUQsAQIbA&biw=1268&bih=687 )

 

Coatings are usually applied to lenses – but it is argued that this simply creates a smoother surface than is achieved by polishing processes alone which polishing can have imperfections hence cause image distortions (aberration – which is simply caused by 'jumps' in consecutive 'prism' points on a lens due to imperfect polishing, which then allows side-band colours through hence unclear image)

Tinting is sometimes applied – but this, it is argued, simply achieves a 'WOW!' factor rather than achieves any real optical advantage.

 

 -------------------------

 

 With Optics it is important to shift our thinking from Quantum particle science-fiction to fundamentals of FECK reality.

But, remember, it is important to understand what is happening not to pick at the poor explanations herein – the explanations although maybe confusing does set out how to go about understanding Optics

 

…....... well, the end of the road …........... having started (c April 2007) with the Captain's Log series we have reached (Aug 2017) a clearer understanding of how the Universe functions, corrected some erroneous but nonetheless brilliant ideas, shown CERN to be a white-elephant (mainly due to dishonesty) –> but now plenty of experimentation needed by HONEST & DILIGENT scientists so as to progress understandings further.

 

The 'Economists' inexact models exactly defective' series concerns Socio-Economic 'universe' & 'ether' – which is far, far, far more complex than the real Universe – but, again, Governments are funding dishonest socio-economic & physics science – which is why the world is in increasing chaos.

The Socio-Economy Engineering developed here merely scratches the surface but Governments refuse to fund/reward.

 

Cheerio

 

Sincerely

 

 

Chris Addington Pr.Eng.

+353 (0)86 168 4318

www.cdadd.com, LinkedIn Chris Addington

 

 

 

--------------------------------------------------------

 

Chromosomes:–> 'some chromos' Thoughts

=> Extra Terrestrials visiting, if existing? -> Unlikely!

 

 

The following is an intuitive argument derived from recognising that Opticks (wrongly attributed to Newton) are wrong; hence, that e≠mc²; & also that solar systems must function through multiphase power transmission to achieve planetary synchronicity.

 

To understand the following it is necessary to understand the Optics as set out in Captain's Log Stardate 06: Particle Sigma-18 (link on homepage at www.cdadd.com) – it is imperative that it is recognised that Opticks (with a 'k') are wrong – and that we need to understand Optics (no 'k').

However, prisms are very scarce – London Science Museum only stocks 45 degree prisms (2x45, & 90 degree), the museum does not stock (3x60) prisms – but a (2x45, 90) will yield most results & careful thinking will uncover those factors determinable with (3x60)

(Also: the Science Museum, like Academia in general & RI, RS, RIA, RDS, are totally hostile to CDADD & refusing to acknowledge that Opticks are wrong)

 

Also remember:- we are looking from the perspective of the most fundamental ether component (kinetic) (FECK) & zooming outwards – whereas, historically, scientists have zoomed inwards to postulate various theories such as Bohr atomic model; which Bohr model is clearly wrong even though it is extremely useful.

 

We know that planets rotate & orbit synchronously, and logic tells us that synchronicity requires a multiphase power-supply (from sun) – in the alternative we can say with certainty that Universal Gravity does NOT explain synchronicity therefore UG as being force holding universe together is not valid. Gravity is an 'internal' force to planets.

 

DNA Testing has been with us for a couple of decades but scientists refuse to acknowledge that Opticks (wrongly attributed to Newton) are wrong, hence that chroma-spectrography/spectral-analysis is also wrong (insofar as its foundation) because the colour spectrum is not valid (follow observable proofs in Particle Sigma 18 paper). We can deduce that an ether exists (in the alternative:- Michelson Morley were clearly wrong) AND that the sun transmits multiphase power & light, we deduce that planets are SUPER-MOTORS (Sun is a SUPER-GENERATOR/ALTERNATOR).

 

Nevertheless R&D has developed a modular understanding of cell structure & its variances, and have established DNA. None of which explains how it is that cells primarily function, i.e. what & how is it that matter is caused to function and with a primary motive force (PMF) & multiphase?

 

Recognising that chromosomes come in X & Y it caused thinking as to how things are 'created' – how does an egg & sperm cell develop into people, animals etc.?

 

We know that compasses are very useful in that they point north/south and allow us to navigate – and compass needles are reasonably static when compass is stationary, especially if compass is immersed in a fluid (damps needle activity) – and we call such a compass needle a dipole (i.e. having a north and a south pole diametrically opposed by 180 degrees)

 

BUT, cells are not static – they move, jiggle about – what causes this?

 

Looking at magnets:- Take a pin, tie cotton strand midsection, magnetise pin – let it suspend and confirm that it points north/south

Now bend the pin to form an obtuse angle (>90 and < 180 degree) and hold a magnet distant and slowly move it closer to suspended pin, the pin increasingly jiggles (until the magnet comes so close that it attracts a polar end onto the magnet.

 

Now bend pin carefully (they can easily break) to an acute angle (<90) and repeat – note jiggling more pronounced. It appears more pronounced when the magnet approaches towards the bent junction rather than when approaching the poles.

 

We know that X chromosomes are basically two conjoined U sections –

 

What is proposed herein is that these U sections are in fact bent 'pins' (acute angle) conjoined at the midsection (centromere) and that these form not dipoles (poles 180 apart, which is what a compass needle is) but an acute polar component (an acu-pole, distinct from obtuse pole, obtu-pole) – and it is proposed that it is this unstable formation that causes the jiggling within the earth's magnetic field and complexed much further by the fact that the sun transmits multiphase power.

 

However, magnetism per se does not appear to affect cells, nor does Gravity explain the way cells can function – both certainly have an effect but does not explain how (e.g.) people are made. We do know that high powered magnets (MRI) can affect cells so as to image the body but magnetism & gravity per se do not explain how & why cells function.

 

That we observe much jiggling of cells, it follows that there must be some prime motive power source – and, again, we see that by understanding light transmission dynamics (LTD) that the sun's radiations are multiphase → hence it is reasonable to deduce that this is the PMF (primary motive force/power supply) that causes cells to function/jiggle.

 

Although images of chromosomes show neat X & Y shapes they are found in clusters/balls – nevertheless the underlying shapes within a radiated multiphase power supply would explain the necessary primary motive force required to cause cells to jiggle, to interact and to produce life.

 

Y chromosomes would seem more unstable simply because of their shape

 

Boys have XY chromosomes, girls have XX (nothing to do with girls being 'stable' …...... Or is it?)

 

The apparent chaotic jiggling of unstable cells nevertheless produces regular forms (humans, cats, dogs, etc.) - so, although seemingly chaotic, the results are 'orderly' & usually uniform (within norms/variances) & consistently repeatable – which means that far from 'jiggling' cells are being switched from one step to another step, to another, ….., in a pre-formatted (programmed) sequence – for how else could we get repeatable consistency? – all of which, as an aside, perhaps confirms that 'chaos theories' are generally phenomena claims that are not properly understood.

 

We also know that magnets that are stored freely eventually lose their magnetism – so poles that are forced into obtuse or, more detrimentally, into acute orientations, their magnetism would diminish more rapidly – a similar phenomena could explain life-cycles of cells and the need for animals to produce new cells.

 

Planet-Earth is 'just-so' for lie to exist, yet nearby planets have no comparable or any life-forms – is this because they do not receive the right levels energy radiation to achieve the 'just so'ness' by which life-forms can exist? - either too-much or too-little?

 

So, with the need, it appears, for a multiphase power supply to attain & maintain life forms it would follow that thoughts of inter-galactic travel, even travel to extremes of solar system, may prove to be impossible as life form would likely not be sustainable – and reproductive abilities would likely cease before the life itself, necessary to reproduce, ceased - unless one had a multiphase portable 'sun' (Hmmmm!?!?!?)

 

BUT, hypothetical ETs (Klingons, Vulcanian Spocks, & suchlikes) are unlikely to ever reach us, or us reach them, if indeed they exist at all.

 

 

Sincerely

 

Chris Addington Pr.Eng.

+353 (0)86 168 4318

www.cdadd.com, LinkedIn Chris Addington

 

-----------------------------------------------------

 

 

Maxwell's colour wheel

Colours do NOT mix to white

understanding more about Light Transmission Dynamics (LTD)

(Updated May 27, 2017)

 

BBC4 'Scotland's Einstein: James Clerk Maxwell', the man who changed the world

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZGF-jHUAPDQ (colour wheel at minutes: 21:00)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Color_triangle (colour triangle)

 

An interesting documentary but factually incorrect

 

Light/spectrum is not frequency related - it is arc angle related

 

-> see:-

www.cdadd.com (homepage, fast track link) - or LinkedIn Chris Addington – or:-

http://www.cdadd.com/physics-engineering/28-captain-s-log-stardate-06-particle-18-sigma-18-new-science-that-counters-disproves-newton-s-opticks

 

 

In BBC4 documentary (around minutes: 21:00), Malcolm Longair presents:- rotating disc with r,g,b segments – when rotation speed increases we eventually see 'white' light.

 

This was interpreted as proving that colours mix to produce white light

 

BUT

this is wrongly interpreted.

 

We KNOW that if we mix colour paints r,g,b we get shades of grey to black depending on mix & respective tones.

 

We also know from observation of sunlight through clouds that the side-band colours (r&y, b&v) when passing through zillions of rain/moisture droplets, which each contain zillions of virtual prisms, that the multiplicity of colour mixing produces shades of grey through to near black. Observe when sun is near-setting, when light passes transversally through long lengths of clouds, they appear near-black – i.e. the deeper & denser a cloud the greater the colour mixing & the darker the clouds (which is also why tall thunder clouds have black bottoms)

 

BUT, we also know that on days of heavy dark clouds that 'white' light comes through the clouds – so the side-band colours & 'white' light ALL also transmit through clouds

 

- so all this tells us that something else is happening (or not happening) when we observe 'white' light with rotating disc of rgb segments.

 

Opticks (with a 'k')(wrongly attributed to Newton) are wrong → hence e≠mc2 → because an ether exists => Einstein's Energy & Relativity theories are NON-ETHER based, hence are wrong.

 

Need to understand Optics (no 'k') & Light Transmission Dynamics (LTD) → observations & reasoned deductions confirm that an ether exists hence Bohr atomic (non-ether) model also wrong, also Relativity wrong. Ditto: Hubble, Hawking, Higgs, CERN, etc. (click on cdadd link above)

 

We need to RETHINK!!!!!

 

Observe Longair's rotating red/blue disc & notice that the merged purple is of much lower tonal intensity than either of the 2 colours when stationary - this supports CDADD's contention that there is also a transmission dynamic at work, not solely a perceived colour mixing per se

 

We are dealing with LTD ether switching through/across Fundamental Ether Component Kinetic (FECK) (a FECK does not 'recognise' future energy, i.e. Potential energy, it 'sees' ONLY its present Kinetic energy) - which FECKs are the basic components of the Universe ether – and hence understandings can only be achieved by thought experiments combined with observations through prisms & other observable dynamics.

(NOTE: FECKs must NOT be considered as 'particles' as expounded in Quantum Physics)

 

We also now know side-band transmission dynamics is what accounts for the halo effects of light around edges (i.e. light rays are NOT bent by gravity -> hence Einstein wrong on energy & relativity; Eddington wrong on his solar eclipse interpretations – see Particle Psi-23 on Glare etc.); and accounts for the colour side-bands (r&y, b&v)

 

We also know that the 3 colours (r,g,b) on the rotating disc are 'solid' colours but each colour fills only 1/3rd the disc

 

It is contended that our eyes are 'deceived' and/or transmission dynamics are affected by rotating disc - i.e. the distinctly separate colour receptors are not seeing their respective colour hence see 'white' ambient light - i.e. it is a transmission function issue (of our eyes) not a colour mixing issue – and/or – the disc rotation disrupts transmission.

 

To explain:- there is ample ambient light around the disc - and all transmitting on all side-bands

 

Consider - full sunlight crossing transversally across line-of-sight to colour wheel. The ambient light will be at 'full' intensity and we will see what we term as 'glare' – i.e. the ambient light intensity is so great that it interferes with the forward light transmission towards us of the colour wheel (or whatever is being observed) , even when wheel not spinning.

 

This glare occurs because of side band transmission dynamics which is what creates ambient light – if we did not have ambient light we would have darkness (passive dark) wherever direct sunlight was not (assuming no artificial lights)

 

With lesser intense ambient light glare progressively becomes indiscernible – which is the case with Longair's rotating disc experiment.

 

When the r,g,b disc rotation increases, the amplitude of each colour's tone diminishes & also optically merges with the other colours; the resultant effect appears to become greyish & lighter in tone - and when to a sufficient speed it exceeds our eye refresh-rate (20/sec?) - and when that point is reached the ambient light, which is constant, becomes increasingly dominant (as colour tones diminish) until such time as zero light from the colours & we see ambient light only -> 'white' light

 

BUT, also, we must consider the dynamic occurring at the disc face. The disc is rotating transversally to our line-of-sight. We cannot simply argue the 'white' effect being solely due to the dynamics of our eye construction & function.

 

Does the disc rotation cause an attenuation of the light reflected from the disc surface?

Does the alternating of colours also cause an attenuation? And mergement.

 

Let's consider some other observations:

 

Observe propeller powered aircraft - when rotating the propeller is 'invisible' and one can see objects behind the propeller planar area – e.g. Spitfire 4-blade propeller occupies 20% of planar area – and with it running in powered flight it is invisible & objects behind are not attenuated (at low frames/second objects behind appear attenuated, or 'greyed' because of the propeller 'blur') (see sequence in links below)

 

With 20% area occupied by blades one would expect an attenuation of only to around 20% - but it is in fact virtually TOTAL attenuation (mainly because all blades are uniform colour) – so it appears that there is also an LTD dynamic at work as well.

It should be experimented: with propellers being painted with r,b&g and effects observed

 

BUT, we can deduce, because the propeller becomes 'invisible', that light information from behind the propeller plane does transmit through – we see that this is so - consequently with a solid rgb coloured disc we know that no light comes from behind, that since the colours become invisible (i.e. that the eye cannot distinguish any one or more colour) and since we can now see 'white' ambient light → it follows that somehow (not yet known) that light is NOT transmitted from the coloured disc.

 

Consequently we see the ambient 'white' light!!!

 

These are real LTD dynamic issues that can only be fully solved through thought-experiments coupled with experimental observations – and these require careful consideration of various & numerous light experiments – we must be careful not to jump to conclusions about why this phenomena occurs.

Longair's wheel does not have circumferential edge (as does Maxwell's) - what effects?

Also, does colour sequence have an effect -> i.e. rgb versus rbg?? (in order of rotation)

Also try with lamp shining transversally across line of sight -> side-band transmission maximum, direct light onto wheel minimum (relative to viewers line-of-sight to colour wheel).

 

But, now consider ether-rupture dynamics:

We can see slow motion rupturing of the ether (see link below) with explosions – we can interpret this by recognising that forward light coming towards us from hills in background is disrupted by the ether-rupture ripple – such that it distributes light-from-behind around the ripple-sphere (see hill distortion) – this is because in disrupting/rupturing the ether, each feck so affected transmits that information it held, immediately prior to ripple-front passing through to that specific feck, that feck is now switching its light information into now a different direction – which causes the seeming distortion of the hills behind & also attenuation - because we see NOT the direct light that we would have prior to rupture, but now the side-band light which is attenuated.

 

The homogeneity of the area around the explosion, vis: space occupied by atmosphere – explains the symmetry of the ether rupture & the symmetry of the distorted light-information transmissions.

 

But we also now see (from links below) that explosion rupture-front travelled at 2 x speed of sound.

What does it mean by breaking the sound barrier (in air)? – doesn't this simply mean we are rupturing the ether when air occupies that space. Different materials/substances would result in different threshold ether-rupturing velocities, surely.

 

What outcome in space?

???

 

We can now propose that a rotating disc (propeller, wheel, etc.) is partially or fully rupturing the ether thus causing light-information to be disrupted, the rgb colours adding to the confusion of transmission, and since no background light can come through solid disc it leaves ambient side-band light between observer & disc => thus we see 'white' light.

 

This obviously requires considerably more detailed experimentation – but the principles are reasonably clear.

 

[BUT, thinking further:- since the ether ruptures it must have a degree of flex – so, whilst side-band transmissions accounts for halo effects (etc.) - it must surely also be the case that the ether does deflect around large objects (planets, etc.); so whilst it is true to say that planets do not bend light, it would seem reasonable that planets deflect ether framework thus causing light to appear bent.

 

However, counter-argument:– once deflected, (ether framework, that is) then surely the light transmission would shift to other FECKs that are now in direct line-of-sight – i.e. a perceived shift in position would only be transitory not permanent.

???????????????????]

 

Links:

Wagonwheel:

[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QKdmOpXJHR4

Wagonwheel: This is a digital copy of a film but the effects are nonetheless clear – a rotating wheel with spokes, the spokes themselves become largely indistinct, thus allowing light information behind the plane to come through.

(minutes 0:57 secs) Notice that one can clearly view what is behind the wheel plane – parts of film sequence does have frequency strobing effects, (low wheel speed + low film frames/second) whereby the spokes appear to rotate slowly, or appear stationary.

 

Brilliant film sequence nonetheless

(Q: which of the billed stars makes the first appearance? Look carefully.)

 

Also:

Propellers:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4iOoiEbtf2w

at minutes: 0:34 secs – the propeller is virtually invisible; which indicates that if blades had alternating colours, as with Maxwell's rotating disc, that it would be entirely invisible]

 

And more clearly we can see ether rupture with an explosion:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Aq5TSs-yX0g at minutes 0:13 & 0:20 seconds

 

AND

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HFsAbkkAV-Q

here, it appears that rupture occurs at speed of nearly 2x speed of sound (2 x 340m/s) – what minimum speed for rupture?

 

 

Nevertheless, and again, the colours do not mix to 'white' light - it is light transmission dynamics that are occurring in which ambient 'white' light predominates because disc colours become invisible (because not transmitted and/or our eyes cannot decipher)

 

Sincerely

 

Chris Addington Pr.Eng.

 

No, it wasn't Gregory Peck but Charlton Heston (on his hoss just before stage coach stops, and in preceding aerial shot)

 

 

 

 

---------------------------------------------------

 

Magnetic Fields – some new insights

 

(as distinct from Light)

(2017-05-15)

 

 

(NOTE: To fully understand contents herein, ideally you need first understand the new insights of Optics as set out in Particle Sigma-18)

 

Michael Faraday made numerous advances in science and especially into Magnetic Fields & Electricity – there is little that we use today that does not have some derivation from his amazing works.

 

However, Faraday, like ALL scientists, then & now, has been limited in works because of defective Opticks (with a 'k')(wrongly attributed to Newton).

In light of Opticks errors – we need to rethink fundamentals of Magnetism

 

Magnetic fields: can readily be seen with a bar magnet behind a board with iron filings on top of board – the radial field lines are clearly visible. (websearch: magnetic fields, images; but observe actual photos not sketch diagrams) – this is all standard high school stuff which most of us are comfortable with (as an observation, at least) - we can count the radial field lines – these are in the order of 20 to 25 radials per 90 degrees (counting from corner of bar magnet 000-090 degrees) – which yields an arc of between 4.5 degrees to 3.6 degrees per radial.

 

Recall from Particle Sigma 18 that light is propagated from one FECK to another by forward transmission lobe (white light) and 2-sets of twin side-band lobes (red&yellow and violet&blue, with merged colours of orange & indigo respectively) and measurement of the roy or vib band yields arc-angle of around 2.5 degrees.

 

This means that 2.5 degrees spans half the forward transmission lobe and the 2 side-band lobes, i.e. 2 & ½ lobes; therefore each lobe has an arc-angle (assume even distribution) of 1 degree – whereas magnetic field lobes have 3 or 4 times magnitude over light lobes

NOTE; measurements given herein are rough and need to be accurately measured with laboratory instruments. Nevertheless eye-ball observation clearly show that magnetic radials have far larger arc-angle than do light radials – we conclude (as a reasonable hypothesis) that light & magnetic radials are DISTINCTLY different – and by experiment we recognise the differences (some of) – BUT, we still don't know how a FECK functions.

 

Also, magnetic fields should be obtained with very fine iron filings so as to identify possible side-bands – coarse filings will produce inaccuracies.

 

The question is – how are they different? (within the FECK that is) – for we know there is a difference and man has made use of the properties of these differences (motors, generators etc. - thanks to Faraday) – BUT, that does not explain how a FECK functions in regard light, magnetics, or any other matter.

 

We also know that Magnetic fields propagate at a slower rate (?) than light, and also that magnetic fields attenuate rapidly (a matter of centimetres to metres) whereas light does not attenuate in propagation - light attenuates in toto per unit area over any increased surface area as it propagates outwards, but any light point going outwards is of the same intensity from here to that at infinity & all points in between, because if light did attenuate in propagation then we would not see stars (think about this, this is a CRUCIAL point that must be understood)

 

Whilst Michael Faraday was correct in his insights, & applications thereto, of Magnetic fields & Electricity (& in many other areas of sciences), his understanding of why it happens was restrained because of incorrect Opticks.

 

So, herein we have recognised a new insight but we still need to understand how a FECK fully functions – we need to convert Bohr theory to FECK reality.

 

Sincerely

 

Chris Addington Pr.Eng.

 

 

-----------------------------------------------------

 

 

Forthcoming:

Chromosomes → 'some chromos' thoughts

Why Einstein's Relativity is wrong.

https://ia600205.us.archive.org/19/items/principleofrelat00eins/principleofrelat00eins_bw.pdf

Joint & Several (Dependent & Independent) proofs that Relativity is wrong