To: European Court of Human Rights – attention President Guido Raimondi & Justices

CC: as per addressees & general

From Chris Addington Pr.Eng.

November 17, 2016

Re: Objections to unfair & obstructive 'Rules of ECHR Court' such that the Rules purposefully defeat/obstruct attainment of Human Rights Justice out of the ECHR Court → ECHR Court Rules are themselves gross Human Rights violations.

I assert that I am in process of drawing up an application to the ECHR Court concerning various & numerous Human Rights abuses/violations by Ireland Government, Dail (Parliament), President, Taoiseach (PM), Chief Justice & Justices, and Ireland Garda Commissioner & Garda (Police), & others – these Human Rights abuses within Ireland stem from general gross governance violations that emanate from a toxic mix of dishonesty, cronyism & corruption throughout, between & amongst government components, statutory authorities, academia, & corporates – which is also producing systemic & systematic frauds over both Ireland & EU funds/assets/sovereignty etc. → These fraud mechanisms have been globalised, Ireland is simply a minor nation that is afflicted.

(It is because of these globalised fraud mechanisms, entrenched through collusive Judicial sanctions, that people worldwide are largely disparitised – and explains the recent Brexit & Trump election – disparitised peoples dissatisfied with governments, which includes Judiciaries – and largely because defective science & mathematics are distorting economies – and governments pander to academic dishonesty which is fuelled by corporate Organised Crime – and it is my addressing of these valid issues to which Ireland Government are hostilely opposed)

I have previously requested ECHR Court Information office to address the unjust issue of Fax requirement (see below) but nil response.

In reference to the Rules of the ECHR Court there are a number of requirements which in themselves render the EHCR Court inaccessible or distanced such that access to relief from the ECHR Court is effectively thwarted – i.e. the Rules of ECHR Court are themselves gross Human Rights violations.

The following issues are NOT exhaustive:

1. The requirement of Applications being sent Snail-Mail (postal service) is an HR abuse; as opposed to electronic email communications which are now readily accepted by most (if not all) Justice systems, and is accepted by the Information office of the ECHR Court.

2. The requirement of exhaustion of all Local remedies ignores the fact that by insisting on utilising abusive Local remedies that an applicant to ECHR Court becomes oppressed by the Local Courts abusively issuing extortionate, unjust & inhumane court orders & cost-orders. Furthermore, the demand for charges to initiate an action in a Local Court also contravenes the principle of ECHR Court of NIL charge for an application. In other words, long, long, LONG before one can apply to the ECHR Court (as interpreted by the Rules of ECHR Court) one must first open oneself up to extensive abuse by Local Justices → GROSS HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS.

   1. The historical closed-shop nature of Justice Systems has, by an inductive process, created corrupt Justice Systems within EU Member States & in States globally in general.

3. Interim/Urgent Matters to ECHR Court are required to be FAXED to a specific Telephone/Fax number – this is another abusive requirement which in itself is a Human Rights violation – Who has a fax machine today? Can one buy one? - electronic email communications are readily available and must be allowed.

4. The shorting process of reviewing applications to ECHR Court is another gross Human Rights violation with roots in failure of Justices to self-regulate its own Independency.

5. Independency of Justices is a foundation stone to civilised/humane societies – but Justices have become dishonest & corrupt (as will be detailed in my application, and as can be seen by recent Brexit Judgement from UK's Chief Justice Thomas); and this because Justices do not self-regulate, nor do ECHR Justices regulate EU Member State Justices - this failure to self-regulate accounts for much injustice, including an inordinate number of rejected applications to ECHR Court.

   1. The Justices of the ECHR Court come from the various Member States, of which many Justices have learnt their 'law' under draconian, unjust circumstances – their mindsets are heavily biased away from Justice or fair determinations pertaining to Human Rights. UK is considered to be one of, if not the, most advanced Justice system – BUT, it is founded upon a non-transparent Constitution which no one can see, let alone understand. Consequently, as we have seen with the Brexit judgement by CJ Thomas & 2 other Justices, the Constitution is effectively an infinitely-elastic elastic-band; such that Justices can fit it to suit their personal circumstances, and to support corporates maintain their Organised Crime networks.

   2. The inordinate number of rejected applications by the ECHR Court can only be explained by closed-mindsets of ECHR Justices who have learnt draconian law under oppressive circumstances.

Consequently I request that the ECHR Justices immediately remedy the unjust aspects of the ECHR Rules of Court, direct ECHR Court Staff to set-up email addresses for applications via email & similarly for Interim/Urgent Matters.

Please direct ECHR Court Staff to reply promptly to this mail

Thankyou

Sincerely

Chris Addington Pr.Eng.

-------- Forwarded Message --------

hi
thanx4reply - now working

your mail (below)
Re: 'The Court has established a dedicated Fax number for sending requests for interim measures: +33 (0)3 88 41 39 00 '

BUT, one cannot buy fax machines - who has one these days? - this unreasonable demand (of using fax) is a Rights violation itself

surely there is an email address - if not one can be quickly set up - please pass this complaint on to relevant authority

sincerely

Chris Addington Pr.Eng.