Organised Crime – Legal & Illegal

Judges are Judged, and found Guilty as Charged

The Difference between Organised Crime (Legal) (OCL) and Organised Crime (Illegal) (OCIL) is simply that with OCL the criminals have bought off judges - who grant orders for payment, or are part of business entities that engage in OCL – thus an unlawful activity (organised crime) becomes lawful (legal).

In this context OCIL is assumed to be activities that create wealth for the criminals as opposed to fundamentalists who have missions to destroy.

 

Societies are misled into believing that the overriding principle for a stable society is “rule of law”. This is entirely wrong.

“Rule of just law within a Constitutional framework” is the necessary focus for a stable environment; and it is what our Constitution provided for before it was emasculated shortly after its birth.

 

Just Law means that Law is filtered through Human Rights.

 

South Africa has a disgraceful history of OCL:-

Under the Apartheid era Broederbonders, factional/mafia elements that masquerade as being of loving-faiths , hanging-judges, backhanders etc. were rife.

 

Under the 1994 Constitutional framework the factional elements have changed, are currently evolving & developing, but the underlying conniving remains.

 

Much of the content of this article summarises key aspects of other articles in this research material so as to bring a clear holistic perspective of the problems that OCL creates.

 

The Constitution provides for the

  • SA Police Service (SAPS) (S205(3)) to “prevent, combat and investigate crime, to maintain public order, to protect and secure the inhabitants …. and their property, and to uphold and enforce the law.”

  • Prosecuting Authority (PA) (S179(2) to “institute criminal proceedings on behalf of the state, and to carry out any necessary functions incidental to instituting criminal proceedings.”

  • Judiciary (Schedule 2 (5) – Oaths) will uphold and protect the Constitution and human rights entrenched in it, and will administer justice to all persons without fear, favour or prejudice, in accordance with the Constitution and the law.”

In real terms the Prosecuting Authority have increased their “necessary functions incidental” to usurp the “investigating of crime” function of the SAPS; in collusion with Judges and Magistrates the PA obtain baseless Warrants of Arrest, Execution, Search and Seizure, and use the SAPS as “hired guns”, Gestapo.

 

Depending on the nature of the issue collusion extends into other government functions such as Pravin Gordhan's SARS.

This is what is behind much of the fraudulent collapses of PSCGG, Tigon, Shawcell.

In turn then, the SAPS simply adopt similar abuse of power “privileges and assume it to be a “perk going with the job”.

 

Without having delved deeply into the comparative impacts of both OCL and OCIL – the writers preliminary view is that OCL is considerably more destructive to economies than is OCIL. The intuitive feel that causes the writer to make this statement is that OCIL is simply economic activities that create employment - where illegal goods (drugs etc.) are manufactured & distributed the activities & impacts essentially are similar to any other goods trading. Certainly counterfeiting of currencies would fall outside of this as it has the effect of increasing money supply temporarily until the notes are identified and taken out of circulation. It is also true that the effects of drugs pushes Have’s to the other side of the dividing line into the Have-Not’s, but so does OCL and more so.

 

OCL on the other hand means that economic units are destroyed or manipulated for selfish personal wealth gain – OCL has the primary effect of sucking huge sums of money from productive economic units into the hands of the conniving criminal elements that make up OCL.

 

The run-on-the-rand was an OCL crime – on both the fall & recovery sides

 

But with OCL the impacts are considerably more destructive & evil – as the real, live, issues dealt with in this research material prove. The key issues are itemised and the key players “named & shamed”.

 

The writer is fully cognisant of the fact that the “legal” authorities will attack him again for telling the truth once this material is globally circulated – so be it!!!

 

As discussed in “Global Financial Services Industry – Rotten Throughout” the professional bodies that are relied upon to ensure governance compliance make up elements of OCL. We know this because the names of Arthur Anderson, Deloittes, Ernst & Young Price Waterhouse, Grant Thornton, etc. that are linked to OCL crime appear frequently in the international media.

“PSCGG, Tigon, Shawcell, – The Perfect Crime” – identifies Simon Hurwitz, Grant Ramsay, Grant Thornton Kessel Feinstein, Mervyn Taback, Judges Joffe & Stegmann, Pravin Gordhan (SARS), Bulelani Ncguka (NDPP) – are all party to the OCL collapse of these entities and fraudulent plundering.

 

The writer has spoken to both Porritt & Bennett on some 4 or 5 occasions – it is the writers opinion that neither of them are stupid, completely the opposite. In light of this the writers opinion is that they both have been set up by members of an OCL network. This does not mean that they are not implicated in other ways. It means that there are other factors: Grant Thornton Kessel Feinstein has a long established relationship to Donald Gordon. GTKF are involved in global fraud issues.

 

Update – July 7, 2004. Enver Motala (PSCGG, Shawcell, Siltek liquidator) & other justice officials have been arrested.

 

It is impossible for one liquidator to be appointed to 2 companies with common links unless there is collusion and corruption within the industry. And it is common knowledge that it is a cesspit of corruption right to, and into, the High Court judiciary.

 

Pension funds are a prime target for OCL activities – it is common knowledge that in the era of defined benefit funds that employees were defrauded immensely by institutions as well as the employees company. The change to defined contribution has changed the rules-of-the-game for OCL but massive plundering continues.

 

“JSE Complaint - Corporate Governance Violations” identifies around some 40 companies that have covered up on this massive fraudulent plundering. None of those named have acted honourably, completely the opposite – they have acted unlawfully.

Key names are Mervyn King, Raymond Ackerman, Maria Ramos, Richard Branson, Bill Cooper, Bill Venter, Bobby Godsell, Anton Rupert etc., etc.

 

The article “King of Corporate Governance Dethroned” highlights the collusion between Mervyn King, Feinsteins, Advocate Subel, Judge Goldstein and the unlawful harassment against the writer for bringing a just matter to our courts.

 

Just prior to the writers wife’s PC’s being unlawfully seized by the SAPS, an email was received from the Constitutional Court Justices in which they once again duck the issue and thus protect their fellow corrupt legal persons in their OCL activities.

The sponsors of this SASI Research Excellence awards, Metropolitan, have also covered up on the massive pension losses.

 

Mervyn King – ex High Court Judge, King Commission Cricket Match fixing: Hansie Cronje, King Committee Corporate Governance – is chairman of AASA and Brait. Brait operates out of one of the, if not the, tightest & most secretive of tax havens in the world. Since King has violated his own Corp Gov. principles relating to his staffs pension monies then it is conceivable that he violated exchange controls with the run-on-the-rand. It is the writers contention, having personally experienced King’s deviousness & dishonesty, that he is one of the master-minds of the run.

 

Further proofs of judges being linked to OCL is with PPS (Professional Provident Society) – the writers IP material and proofs of pension frauds were given to the CEO Mike Jackson and to the Deputy Chairman Dr Dave Presbury at their request as I pointed out the benefits to PPS members. In telecon with Dr Presbury it came out that there are links between himself and Mervyn King (an ex High Court judge); also Judges Zuhlman & Goldblatt are board members. PPS have refused to be open regarding the massive losses to members pension funds. Clearly then these judges are not providing security for members; in fact they are party to covering up through OCL. The thin, tatty, veneer of respectability that these “named & shamed” judges brought to PPS has been torn to shreds.

 

The Deputy Chairman Dr Dave Presbury undertook to bring these issues to the board as a matter of urgency, he also undertook, since the writer is a PPS member, to adopt the “we look after our own” slogan and to ensure that rewards flowed from the writers material if proved correct. He has done nothing of substance about this.

 

The demutualisation of Sanlam and Old Mutual was a fraudulent hijacking of these organisations by the executives. The high court (cannot recall judges name) simply granted the order without proper enquiry.

 

The “liquidation” and “divorce” industries are similar – legal parasites destroying for what they can get themselves. The National Productivity Institute (NPI) are currently addressing a proposal put by the writer to them to correct this OCL aspect regarding collapsed companies.

 

Telkom, MTN, Vodacom, Cell-C all collusively act to commit OCL crime. Example:- the voicemail service (cell & landline) will automatically connect a caller through to voicemail and bill for the call, this without giving the caller the option to disconnect without charge. Collectively this OCL crime must run into millions (tens?, hundreds?) of Rands a month.

 

Also Telkom’s landline price increases derive from a “price push” because of the price insensitivity of consumers to being “connected” – and not from legitimate landline cost increases.

 

The essayists in “Manuel, Markets & Money” have also remained silent on the pension frauds – on what basis can they be relied upon to provide sincere input to developing solutions to SA’s acute problems? None! They can’t be relied upon or trusted.

They cannot claim that they don’t know about it – they are all employed by or closely linked to major financial institutions such as Investec, Standard Bank, Nedbank.

 

Foremost business media personalities have also been dishonest, lied, to the public – Alec Hogg, Bruce Cameron, Bryan Hirsch, etc. Similarly with all business news & magazine publications.

 

In fact it appears that Classic fm were concerned about the embarrassment Hogg’s dishonesty brought to the radio station as he has now been taken of air. Will the new “Classic Business Day” be transparent in contrast to Hogg’s dishonesty? A telecon to Rob Rose to discuss this and the Motala issue was interrupted - so a policy statement was not made – time will tell.

 

Disinterest is seen amongst new judges in our High Courts in addressing OCL crime. Example – example: Judge Satchwell who has plenty of time to pursue her own Constitutional matter, but cannot find the time to address the most important constitutional issue – vis: a Bill of Rights violation, Section 38 – for a private person.

 

SO HOW IS ALL OF THIS POSSIBLE? It is possible because the new leaders (yesterday’s freedom fighters) have become today’s despots, blending into the then existing, and developing their own, factional elements for self interests. And with total disregard for the Have-Not’s – which is why Diepsloot is possibly on the verge of rioting.

 

Cyril Ramaphosa has just been appointed Chairman of Bidvest, his 6th (5th?, 7th???) chairmanship. It is impossible for anyone to effectively perform the duties of more than 2 (or 3) chairmanships – so why is he chair of so many?

He is also Chairman of Alexander Forbes – the writer has exposed Alexander Forbes for dangerous & bad financial advice, and for their poaching of the writers IP research material – Ramaphosa has not insisted that Corporate Governance principles of economic empowerment, honesty, transparency, etc. be enforced - and for the writer to be rewarded/compensated for Alexander Forbes’ poaching of the writer’s property.

So then what value does Ramaphosa bring to these companies? - because Corporate Governance is clearly not one of the qualities.

It can only be the “network” that he referred to in last nights radio interview – but the “network” must be clearly & correctly translated into “Organised Crime (Legal)”

 

Direct Approaches to the Constitutional Court has resulted in angry arguments in court between the writer and Chief Justice Chaskalson who refuses to address the Constitutional and OCL crime violations by people such as Mervyn King. The reality is that the Chief Justice is aiding & abetting OCL crime – as with SA’s foremost business persons & thinkers, so too:- the Judges are Judged, and found Guilty as Charged

 

Chris Addington Pr.Eng.,083 962 7098

 

UPDATE July 8, 2004

 

Telecon with NDPP, Adv. Alta Eksteen (012 845 6970)

This update must be read in light of Dave Gleason’s comment in Business Day July 5, 2004 – Pg. 8 – “I am left with the horrible feeling that there is no one around to police the police. It is becoming clearer by the day that the national prosecuting authority is a den of iniquity, an Augean stable in urgent need of cleansing.”

I am being harassed by NPA for making similar statements but not so with Dave Gleason, despite his having repeatedly “banged on this (Business Day) column” with similar statements. What especial protections does Gleason get from the Representations division of NPA headed by Ms’s Matzke & Eksteen? What else is he banging on for especial treatment?

It would be correct to correct Dave Gleason – the NPA is a cesspit of corruption, power abuse, gross negligence, gross incompetence, immorality. And they are this because our judiciary are no different.

BUT – to the mornings telecon with the NDPP. Note: some three quarters through our telecon Eksteen advises that we were being recorded – so she can transcribe and circulate. This update is a brief précis.

Adv. Alta Eksteen replaced Adv. Matzke in Representations (see S 179(5)(d) of Constitution).

 

The issue refers to a baseless Summons issued out of Jhb Mag Court last year. Divorce Attorney Gundlefinger had colluded with Prosecutor Adv. Davidowitz to bring a criminal summons against the writer. As related by Inspector Dave Hudson of Norwood he had been instructed to issue the summons, he stated he objected to being “used” by the prosecutor for a baseless issue – i.e. the Prosecutor had ordered a prosecution without the SAPS first investigating = abuse of power by prosecutor & SAPS. SAPS allowed themselves to be used as “hired guns”, Gestapo – for Gundlefinger & Davidowitz to exact revenge against the writer for exposing the factional/mafia elements (nothing to do with loving-faiths)

 

Meetings & negotiations with Matzke led to the matter being unconditionally withdrawn – as a lay person the writer understood this to mean the matter was closed – and Matzke knew that this was the writers interpretation.

It was recorded as withdrawn in the Mag Court records.

 

Superintendent Mbasa obtained a Search Warrant and seized my wife’s computers two weeks ago. On the Monday the writer showed Mbasa in Jhb Mag Court that the matter had been withdrawn. We went back to John Vorster Police station where the computers were returned & the writer signed for them. We returned to Norwood PS where the monitor was returned – Mbasa asked the writer to wait whilst he conferred with the Station commander. There was no obligation to do so, so the writer left.

Late that afternoon Mbasa & 2 others arrived at the writers home threatening him with defeating the ends of justice. They demanded the computers back – the box had been opened. They asked the whereabouts of a box of stiffies. The writer informed them they were acting unlawfully. The search warrant was invalid – they had exercised it and then cancelled it by returning the seized (unlawfully) computers. They had to get another warrant. Calls to Satchwell's clerk (Urgent Application cell no.) were fruitless (she’s only interested in using her powers for her own ends). Eventually Mbasa took the computers without giving an inventory, despite numerous requests.

 

The aforegoing was related to Eksteen this morning. Also the fact that the SAPS have not investigated Gundlefinger's unlawful activities, or the fact that he is aiding & abetting his client (writers ex wife) to defy a High Court order. Neither the SAPS or the NPA investigate corruption in the judiciary.

 

The writer stated to Eksteen that she was abusing he powers and selectively targeting the writer and assisting Gundlefinger & Davidowitz who are using their mafia network to exact a cowardly revenge attack upon the writer.

 

The writer is anticipating further unlawful power-abuses by Eksteen & other NPA’s and the SAPS.

 

As mentioned, Eksteen only advised some three quarters through the telecon that it was being recorded – so the full version of the writer’s truthful statements can be verified.

 

Needless to say they refuse to return my wife’s computers despite the fact that they have no grounds for any prosecution. They are simply concocting issues against the writer, whilst protecting Gundlefinger and refusing to investigate him – whose criminal activities are the root cause of the matter.

 

Eksteen’s reply to the fact that the SAPS are acting unlawfully via the Prosecutors instructions – “the SAPS do not fall under our control, you must contact the Minister of Safety & Security”. The writer pointed out that her response was as duplicitous as to have told Biko to contact the Minister of Police, when he was having the **** kicked out of him. Eksteen replied - “You are not Biko”. TRUE – but the writer is just another victim - a victim of Eksteen’s, Matzke’s, Sampson’s, Davidowitz’s, Gundlefinger’s, Ncguka’s power abuses.

 

Eksteen’s interpretation of “power to institute criminal proceedings” includes crossing the power divide into the SAPS “investigate crime” function. Crass stupidity! Which is why the Skorpions are Gestapo agents.

 

With Prosecuting Director Davidowitz colluding with Gundlefinger they were the initiating, mafia, masterminds – but other factional issues have now jumped on board.

 

Eksteen feels that the NPA are not responsible for the actions of the SAPS – despite the NPA masterminding the unlawful activities, and refusing to investigate Gundlefinger for his criminal activities.

 

Again: what hope for someone who is not educated and living in places such as Diepsloot against corrupt power persons?

No!, Dave Gleason – you are wrong – the NPA (and justice systems, civil & criminal) is a cesspit.

 

But- Dave Gleason then closes by saying “One day, a man of integrity and courage will step out of the (NPA) office and tell us what has really been going on.”

Business Day has been on the writers email list re Organised Crime issues for years – but they do not support those people who do have integrity & courage to come forward.

Clearly then, those within NPA who might be thinking in terms of spilling the beans simply see a media that will pump them for information and then leave them to the wolves.

 

The fact that the Chief Justice has trashed our Constitution means that they (the bean-spillers) will not have protection under the freedom of expression rights etc., which is exactly the problem the writer currently faces with Gundlefinger, Davidowitz, Matzke, Sampson, Eksteen, Mbasa – abuse of power, mafia & other factional elements, hired guns, Gestapo, to silence someone who is standing up to Organised Crime (Legal),