Twin Towers – Collapse?
No! => IMPLOSIONS!!!
UPDATED March 2021
(Commenced April 2008 + various updates therefrom – uncovering Causal Factors for this criminal event takes a lot of time – FBI refuse to investigate, which is a clear sign of Government/Presidential cover-up)
________________________________________
DEFINITIVE PROOF OF IMPLOSIONS
The ABSENCE of 'transfer of momentum dynamics' (observe a 5-ball Frame) for a NATURAL collapse is the DEFINITIVE PROOF that additional high impulse (explosive) forces were present, that they were numerous & sequential → by DEFINITION an implosion.
Natural Collapse: Impact of material above onto material below imparts momentum into that below but is compensated by loss of momentum in material above; since mass of material above & below is fixed it means that velocity changes → material below gains velocity, material above losses velocity.
BUT, in the Twin Towers there was no loss of velocity in the material above (proof: freefall rate) => additional high impulses (explosive) were present.
It is this definitive proof set-out by CDADD that justified the Toronto Hearings (www.torontohearings.org), which claimed to be transparent but were not – the writer having informed ALL the panel members before-hand of these proofs.
It took many years for the brainwashing, by media & Berkeley University: Center for Catastrophic Risk Management (CCRM) (Prof Bob Bea), to become clear, and for CDADD to disprove the claim of 'natural collapse' and prove implosions. Prof Bea is also behind the false arguments concerning BP Deepwater Horizon, it was a criminal sabotage event.
BUT, there is a far more sinister aspect to the Twin Towers issues.
Since the Towers were imploded (i.e. were NOT caused by consequent plane crashes) it follows that the two events were distinctly separate (plane crashes being one kind, implosions a distinctly kind) – but they were sequential.
On a balance of probabilities it is an ABSOLUTE CERTAINTY that the two independent events could not have occurred sequentially without pre-planning.
The entire events were pre-planned, including the purposeful disabling of USA's ENTIRE Civil & Military Defence mechanisms...................
The writer has repeatedly, over the years, informed Governments/Parliaments, FBI, Met-Police, CIA, Chief Justices, etc., etc., - they all remain silent ….................
Note: (March 2021) – a number (all?) referenced weblinks have been removed – therefore it is necessary to web-search for relevant videos & observe carefully
___________________________________________
[UPDATES: (Scroll to end)
UPDATE 4: Beyond Osama 2 – Obama Talking to the Taliban? – and the Irish
UPDATE 3: Beyond Osama? - as before, the lies continue!
UPDATE 2: More ‘mathematics’ that wrongly try to prove Nature, and missing first-principle insights that disprove the ‘mathematics’.
UPDATE 1- Guantanamo 9/11 Defendants – Lynching (Judicial murder) to cover-up PERFECT CRIME.]
Proof of implosions is very simple
Mathematics & Science without engineering causing confusion
OR is it a case of academic deceptions - being ACCESSORIES to ORGANISED CRIME?
Twin Towers IMPLOSION!!!!
Not conspiracy theory -> ORGANISED CRIME -> another PERFECT CRIME
_______________________________________
UPDATE-> (Scroll to end)
(Please Note: This website is primarily about the pioneering of ENGINEERING into the SEBFL environments, it is about seeking truths; it is NOT about journalism, English grammar or prose, or quick-sell – it is down-to-earth engineering & pioneering requiring extensive & intensive THINKING.
SEBFL = social/economy/business/finance/legal environments.
Explaining transmission mechanisms & pre-empting catastrophic failures is NOT doom-prophecy, it is explaining probabilistic reality.)
_______________________________________
For further proofs of mathematics being used to mislead people & perpetrate global frauds see other papers at www.cdadd.com: e.g.
- Infinity, Eternity, Evolution, Creation.
- Economists’ Inexact models Exactly Defective (entire series).
- Annuities in Retirement.
- Mastermind of Organised Crime 1 & 2 (Donald Gordon, Richard Branson, etc.)
IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT YOU READ THIS THROUGH QUICKLY FOR THE FIRST TIME then come back & read again slowly.
This paper aims to dispel 6+ years of confusion/deception created by erroneous information on the web, TV & from news rags by looking at basics.
_______________________________________
The 9/11 Twin Towers collapse has naturally raised a storm of protest over & above the tragedy itself, mainly because transparency has been entirely absent, & high-powered finance scams, in the form of billions of dollars of unjustifiable insurance award, being present.
The proof of explosions causing the collapse is very simple & the evidence to support it is very clear when one remembers that Nature’s laws are inviolable – but we need to get perspective correct so as to see the truth clearly – it will then emerge that this is another PERFECT CRIME, a high-powered finance scam.
___________________
Google search of the web yields masses of information regarding 9/11 & Twin Towers with much of it being rubbish.
www.debunking911.com contains gross errors, emotive arguments & slurs. This site is non-transparent as it does not declare who is behind it – i.e. the person/s are happy to sling slurs at people, post gross errors, defective mathematics, ignoring clear evidence, and whilst in hiding; - the persons behind this site are afraid of receiving truthful comment back.
Who is behind this site & other similar sites?
(A further caution: many video films of the collapses have been processed to highlight a particular point being explained and news channels have the knack of obscuring videoed evidence by their news banners plastered across TV screens – consequently it is very difficult to focus on an uncluttered video to get clear information – it requires patience in searching for & studying of clips – the links provided will allow fast-tracking.)
Amongst all of the masses of information & mis-information is a paper by Dr Keith Seffen, of Cambridge University’s Engineering faculty, entitled ‘Progressive Collapse of the World Trade Centre: A Simple Analysis’.
A Web search on this paper produced a host of links to other ‘news’ reports about this paper – these reports are factually incorrect but nonetheless as with all media issues the more ‘hits’ that make a particular statement then the more ‘true’ that statement becomes in the minds of the public.
Unfortunately this position is entirely wrong, just as the media reports are wrong, and just as Seffen’s paper is wrong.
It is for each person to decide whether Seffen is sincere – if you believe he is sincere then Seffen must be applauded for the courage in coming out with his views regardless of whether right or wrong, he did it transparently and with reasoned thinking where many others do not.
We need to consider (some of) the surface errors within & surrounding Seffen’s paper, some technical errors within the paper, some basics of Nature’s laws & its implications, and then some relevant issues about legal realities.
It is stressed that the comments herein are by no means exhaustive but sufficient to disprove the validity of Seffen’s paper and show that it is, in the alternative, entirely invalid, and also that from clear evidence & application of Nature’s laws that the towers were imploded.
It is pointed out that requests to the American Society of Civil Engineering (www.asce.org) for a pdf version of Seffen’s paper for pasting onto cdadd.com website has not been successful. A complaint regarding the non-transparency of their website, the more so in light of bridge collapses & plant explosions, has not yielded a positive response – see illogical email from ASCE (below).
It is strange nonetheless that Keith Seffen does not transparently post his paper on the Cambridge University website.
An email to Keith Seffen yielded a hardcopy through the post for which thanx are extended.
In further correspondences Seffen states that he has experienced much abuse/threats as a consequence of his paper being circulated.
The intent herein is to address the paper & issues from an engineering perspective, coldly, clinically, even tersely but not abusively.
However despite repeated requests Seffen refused to release his CV, he having now determined that the intent was to ‘slur’ him. It is hard to understand why he is reluctant to release his CV but it probably does stem from the abuse & threats he has received even though this is not a valid reason for withholding.
The position by Seffen is not dissimilar to that of Economics ‘Nobel’ prize winners whose models have, by CDADD, been disproven & shown to be grossly defective & fraudulent. At the time of writing, John Nash, Robert Mundell, Edmund Phelps, Roger Myerson, Eric Maskin, have all continued to remain silent. This, despite the limited admissions by Nash to errors in his models. (see Economist’s inexact models exactly defective 2 (Nash) – but Nash still refuses to make a full admission).
The ASCE have called for comments concerning Seffen’s paper by July 1, 2008 this paper will be sent to them.
___________________
BEWARE
As stated earlier – there is a lot of rubbish on the web.
Beware www.debunking911.com - the arguments at this site seek to ridicule scientists/engineers rather than seeking the truth calmly & clinically. Some errors concerning this site:
- Searching for video shots of WTC7 being ‘pulled’ was not successful. With the entire world intensely watching in awe & shock is it possible that on one side of WTC7 out of sight of any & every camera that a pre-planned action of ‘pulling’ was not minutely recorded. Where are these video records? It is contended that they don’t exist because they were never filmed, and they were never filmed because it never occurred. If this statement is not true then please direct to video that shows this ‘pulling’, and it being the cause of a symmetrical collapse.
- There are ample videos that show that the tower collapses have components falling faster than the building is collapsing – hence (is their argument) that the building is falling at a slower rate (less than freefall) than the components (debunking911.com are implying that these components are freefalling). Careful observation shows that these components have been impulsed far outwards along with masses of debris & dust and hence are exceeding freefall velocity. The impulsive force to accelerate the large components so far horizontally could only have come from explosive charges and not from a pneumatic impulse from a natural collapse, nor from an impacted collision
(http://www.debunking911.com/freefall.htm, scroll halfway-down, video 1 of 15)
Also watch timed video of WTC7 – there is gross error in calculating collapse time.
- at http://www.debunking911.com/jones.htm - the analogy to billiard ball at this site is incorrectly put – transfer of momentum does not cause the lower ball to go faster than the speed of the upper ball. The big ball ‘instantaneously’ accelerates the small ball to the same velocity and they jointly continue accelerating until it reaches terminal velocity or the ground, whichever is sooner.
The graphic showing the no. 2 ball parting from the white and the white remaining stationary on the vertical diagram is wrong, also the horizontal diagram is also wrong as billiard balls roll, which is an entirely different dynamic.)
- Emotive arguments are at the fore of this debunking site – observe the photo which shows ‘the number of people’ required to bring about the implosion conspiracy. It is common knowledge that the world was long unaware of the huge no. of people behind the conspiracy to gas 6 million jews, & kill millions of others.
- the maths calculations are pie-in-the-sky numbers and cannot be accepted as any form of proofs.
- The truth is that www.debunking911.com is full of flaws in its claimed arguments, has insufficient evidence for its claims, and it seeks to ridicule – it becomes tedious pointing them out.
___________________
SURFACE ERRORS:
When viewing a paper, or any publication be it a book or magazine, it is useful to peruse the credits, introduction, conclusion, CV, and other supporting information that proclaims the content of that book/paper to be credible – one needs to determine the credibility of the persons claiming the main-body content to be credible.
The first glaring concern about Seffen’s paper (eventual access of which was preceded by many web links claiming his paper disproves implosion/conspiracy claims) is that a complex building has been addressed in a ‘simple analysis’, as stated in Seffen’s title. In itself this is not serious but alerts one to be cautious.
Turning to the Acknowledgements it states: ‘The writer [Seffen] is extremely grateful to two anonymous referees for insightful and supporting comments.’
On what basis does a Senior University Lecturer in Engineering rely upon referees whose credentials are unstated & unverifiable? This adds to concerns re his reluctance to release his CV.
On what basis does ASCE publish a paper that has not been verified & is not publicly verifiable, and also one that is not transparently accessible on the asce.org website?
A further Google search on Keith Seffen yielded a brief CV at the Cambridge University website (see links below).
Seffen is not an engineer, not even a scientist; he is a mathematician. This is not to knock his mathematical abilities nor his attempt to analysis the Twin Tower collapse, but to give a false impression that he is an engineer is totally wrong (compare this to the deceptions by the 2007 Economics ‘Nobel’ prize-winners Myerson & Maskin.)
Further web searching yielded:-
- a BBC report which stated; untruthfully that Seffen was an engineer, and that (to effect) his paper disproves conspiracy/implosion theories
- debunking911.com: giving similar statements and a list of links to claimed peer reviewed papers explaining the collapse. One can get lost by again wrongly assuming that many voices make a common statement correct.
An important point to remember is that an engineering lecturer, even a professor, is a scientist that lectures science to prospective engineers, the lecturer is not an engineer (and that assumes a scientist, not a mathematician).
Engineers (responsible ones that is) put science into practice, that is holistic science, both exact & inexact, they also observe & take note of the physical world around them and evidence that support or dis-support their analyses into any particular issue.
The key point about the media reports that ‘debunk’ implosion claims is that none of them consider, significantly or at all, the numerous eyewitness statements or visual evidence. And what arguments are raised are not supported by engineering/science that conform to nature’s laws.
From the aforegoing Seffen’s’ paper is non-transparent regarding his claims, it is a mathematical analysis not an engineering assessment, nor a scientific assessment. Therefore his claim that the collapse was ‘quite ordinary and regular’ is inconclusive because it has not been tested against practice or known evidence.
Also of concern is Seffen’s failure to rectify the media errors regarding his abilities.
___________________
TECHNICAL ERRORS
First put perspective on the crash & the claim of a ‘natural’ building collapse:
A 767 aircraft – 360T at 850km/hr (263m/s) – energy = ½ mv^2 = 12450420000 joules
Tower
– top section of 15 floors – 500000T x 15/110 = 68181T at 7.7m/s (i.e. velocity to hit floor below)
Energy = 2021225745 – ABOUT ONE FIFTH OF THAT OF THE PLANE CRASH.
- top section of 28 floors – energy = 3772954724 – ABOUT ONE QUARTER OF THAT OF THE PLANE CRASH.
Clearly the orders of magnitude are far smaller for the top sections of the building relative to that from the plane (transparently open to correction on number crunching and data)
On top of this we saw no bending from heat which is normal for steel structures – instead we saw catastrophic failure & collapse – and it is claimed by Seffen & others as being a ‘natural’ collapse, this is implausible.
OoO
Seffen states that he makes simplifications concerning his model which is a singular floor model multiplied by the no. of floors of the WTC through integration representing a form of dynamic ‘real’ time analysis.
Seffen claims that his model is dynamic. This is incorrect. A dynamic model is one that attempts to replicate the building in toto, floor-by-floor, not merely to develop a simplified equation for one floor and then multiply it by the no. of floors.
His model reaches a conclusion that the collapse of the towers was a natural process (subsequent to plane damage) approximately equal to that of free-fall time for an object released at the same height. In fact his entire effort was to seek to prove this point i.e. it appears he had a prejudged (induced?) position and he sought to prove it. This is not an engineering approach, nor a scientific one. The correct position would be to collate information, develop models, test them & question them against observation, witness reports, & known facts.
If an engineer/scientist designs a model plane and it crashes on its maiden flight then one questions both the design & construction. Clearly the construction passed muster otherwise it would not have been tested, hence the design must be questioned, but also in questioning the construction is double-checked – a reiterative process.
Seffen, a mathematician, not an engineer, not a scientist, wants us to believe that his model is correct and that a building with a host of opposing upwards forces will collapse catastrophically without any natural bending at the rate of a free-fall body. Seffen’s model comes up with a clearly impossible, unrealistic, conclusion - vis that that the laws of gravity & natures forces are violable. Seffen’s position on this alone is impossible.
Seffen states in his paper: ‘Another important parameter is the time taken by the crush front to reach the bottom of the building, for it defines the collapse period t.’ (the ‘crush front’ is the leading part of the actual collapse)
This is incorrect because the crush front on WTC1 started around the 15th floor from the top, and around the 28th floor from the top of WTC2.
Clearly then, calculating the crush front collapse-time for (110 floors – 28 = 82, or 110-15 = 95) is not comparing to the free-fall time for a body from 110 floors.
In his section entitled ‘Dynamical Model of collapse’, within which section he instead uses a non-dynamic static model, Seffen argues that the towers were symmetrical, natural, collapses – despite the fact that the towers were asymmetrically damaged, and on a floor-by-floor basis the lattice frame was asymmetrical relative to each floor.
Seffen simply dispels asymmetry without any valid reason – he states: ‘Lateral stability is not considered in view of the near vertical collapse of both WTC towers.
This makes no sense. One CRITICAL argument to support the implosion evidence is the very fact that is was near-vertical in both cases from the crush-fronts. A natural and even, floor-by-floor collapse, if it were possible which it was not, would have been asymmetrical because of asymmetrical structure & asymmetrical damage.
The Tower’s frames were not symmetrically constructed in relation to each floor – i.e. the separate frame components were latticed relative to each floor. The latticed framework was asymmetrical (relative to floor) hence an asymmetrical lattice cannot collapse symmetrically floor-by-floor. To achieve a symmetrical collapse of an asymmetrical frame one needs to achieve symmetry – in building demolitions this is done by implosive ‘cutting’ techniques, and in controlled sequence. It cannot be caused by natural collapse sequence consequent upon a plane crashing asymmetrically into just a small section of floors.
Seffen explains that the towers collapsed in a process that he calls ‘impulsive’ – i.e. as the top section fell it then impacted upon the next floor which was an impulse impact, this then caused that floor to collapse causing an impulsive collapse onto the next floor and so on. Seffen also points out that each impulsive collapse causes the velocity profile to be discontinuous. This observation alone means that the total instantaneous velocity of the collapsing building is going to be less than the velocity of a free-falling body at a comparable height position.
It is impossible for a building to collapse at a rate that defies nature’s laws.
If Seffen’s arguments are to be believed (vis: a sequence of impulsive collapses) then each floor is experiencing a successive impulse that is causing it to deform catastrophically and with a discontinuous velocity profile at each floor. But the very first impulse, that from the top section collapsing (as argued in a non-implosion scenario), is simply the mass of that top section of building travelling a short distance (1 floor height) before being arrested, yet this short travel develops such momentum (it is argued) that it causes the floor below to experience an impulse beyond design tolerance that is catastrophic.
Further, Seffen argues that the heat caused metal to become plasticised thus causing it to collapse and cause a natural collapse sequence.
It is contended that this argument by Seffen is not plausible. The statement that the metal plasticised meant that the top section would have slowly begun to bend, tilt, asymmetrically & progressively - this would not have allowed even a full floor height for acceleration to achieve sufficient impulsive force onto the floors below. Such an argument (plasticity) means that this collapse process would have seen the top section tilt asymmetrically gradually and come to a rest position on top of the floor immediately below – this means that impulsive forces would be negligible. It means that the lower floor would simply ‘see’ almost the identical weight it had always experienced before hand.
Simply watch metal structures collapse in a fire, they bend gradually as the temperature approaches the plastic region.
Test for yourself - put a heavy weight on top of a steel 3-rod frame and apply an oxy-acetylene torch to it, make sure the weight is significant relative to the supports – watch the frame begin to begin to bend slowly as the metal approaches plasticity.
So how did the top section accelerate sufficiently to cause an impulsive force sufficient to catastrophically collapse the floor immediately below, and so on symmetrically? How? It couldn’t!!!
If you have ever played tumbling towers then you will notice how IMPOSSIBLE it is for the tower to collapse straight down, it always topples over from the point of instability first before crashing into the lower sections, and sideways. But the collapse doesn’t defy the laws of nature.
Seffen refers to a paper by Bezant & Zhou. Searching the web revealed a paper & email address for Bezant. An email was sent requesting that Bezant explain the collapse from an implosion perspective, and with cognisance of the evidence available and to compare his predictions for this implosion scenario to his ‘natural’ cause model and to highlight differences. There has been no response to date.
What has also been ignored by Seffen & other mathematicians/scientists is the issue concerning WTC7.
Arguments that cranes pulled WTC7, a 40 storey building, and that it resulted in the neat demolition pile it did is unbelievable – those that argue against implosion show still-photos but no video sequence of the ‘pulling’ that caused the collapse.
Is it possible that with the entire world intensely watching in shock & awe that a pre-planned ‘pulling’ of WTC7 was done on one side of the building where not one video camera was observing, and with the ‘planners’ not requesting video observation???????? Of course it is not possible! There are no video sequences because the ‘pulling’ never occurred – it was an implosion.
___________________
NATURE’S LAWS (a couple of)
If we hold a large steel ball 20cm in diameter and a small steel ball of 10cm diameter so that the bottom of the balls are at the same height as the top of Twin Towers and let them go we observe that they both fall at the same rate & both hit the ground at the same time. From this we deduce that the velocity & acceleration are independent of mass.
Now we hold the big ball at the top and the small ball around the halfway mark so that they are exactly in line vertically and let the big ball go. The big ball accelerates by gravitation and eventually impacts onto the small ball. In hitting the small ball it causes the big ball to slow down marginally. The two balls will continue falling TOGETHER and accelerating due to gravity. If we for the moment ignore the singular impact & small loss of velocity then the two balls will hit the ground together and having taken almost the same time to reach the ground as in the first scenario.
i.e. the small ball did not get impulsed away from the big ball it remained ‘stuck’ with it all the way to the ground. (this collision with bodies ‘sticking’ together is called an elastic collision)
Further, if the small ball is hit off-square, tangentially, i.e. the impact causes it to travels sideways as well as down, then the transferred tangential velocity cannot exceed the imparted tangential velocity from the big ball. This means that any tangential forces would yield transferred velocities LESS than the vertical free-fall velocity for the relative height (hence velocity) travelled by the big ball. (this kind of collision is called inelastic collision – they do not stick together)
THESE TWO POINTS CAN BE CONFIRMED ON A 5-BALL NEWTON FRAME.
If you are in disagreement with these two points then go back to physics books and check up & test with the Newton frame.
However the impact upon the stationary small ball does cause a slight loss in velocity, and when we consider that Seffen argues a sequence of impulses floor-by-floor then it is clear, as he admits, that the velocity profile is discontinuous. It follows that the Towers could not have collapsed at free-fall rate due to natural collapse consequent to the crash damage. It means that the each impulse event would have a distinct time delaying factor which would be mass dependent because distortion of any particular floor is dependent upon the mass & time span it experiences that mass. However there comes a point when the mass is above a critical-mass and each floor would experience instantaneous shear, BUT - it cannot exceed free-fall rate.
www.debunking911.com argue that because components did fall faster than the building (which point is true) it is proof that the building did not collapse at free-fall (it being implied that the components were falling at free-fall). This deduction is incorrect BECAUSE we know that the buildings DID fall at near free-fall rate (around 10 seconds). Therefore the components must have fallen at a rate far faster than for free-fall.
The ONLY way that a body can be caused to fall faster than free-fall is if an additional impulsive force caused it to exceed gravitational acceleration. And the only way a large component can be caused to exceed gravitational acceleration is by an additional force acting upon it. Since there was no singular point source acting solely on each of all the falling components it means that for the components that there were general localised high impulse forces, i.e. explosions. Since the floors collapsed symmetrically & sequentially it follows that these impulses were sequenced & symmetrical and that they had high explosive force. It follows that the Towers were imploded.
Observation of a video from ground level looking up at the towers shows material being thrown tangentially into a parabolic flight, of which the vertical velocity is far in excess of the building that is at near free-fall, therefore its vertical velocity is in excess of free-fall (& probably far higher than for the height of max free-fall velocity, vis just before hitting ground) this means its tangential velocity is far higher still.
(http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IX9gdRST6zM - at seconds 10-12; or ¼ speed at seconds 20; at seconds 28 note dark shadow on tower to right of building in front, the shadow is still visible at seconds 56 and debris far ahead of tower which is visible by the shadow. Do not use ¼ speed times for calcs, even normal speed cannot be relied upon for timing. Simply observe the relative positions of debris (large) and the tower.
Note that large debris is flung far distant from the towers & beyond the building in foreground, which means its tangential velocity had to be far higher than its vertical velocity)
It only needs to be observed as an instantaneous event – one does not need to time the entire collapse and compare – only the instantaneous fact of a component falling faster than the building with the building falling at near free-fall, or proof of absolute velocity in excess of free-fall velocity, or a tangential velocity greater than free-fall. This also applies to Seffen’s model, a catastrophic sequential natural collapse cannot cause a body to exceed the relative free-fall rate by a transfer of momentum, nor a greater tangential velocity.
Note also that for demolition of the lower sections it would probably require more powerful explosives – but you would need to discuss the finer points with an expert in this field.
If there is a piece of evidence of one, just one, component that can be measured, in even a short term, of having a velocity of greater than that of the relative free-fall rate at the height from which the component was ejected, OR above the maximum free-fall rate for the max height of the building – then it proves conclusively that an additional impulsive, explosive, force was used.
One can clearly see that there are a host of components far exceeding the collapse rate of the building which rate is at near free-fall.
A small discontinuous velocity profile would result in a small differential velocity initially between the building & any freely falling components – but we saw impulsive, explosive, velocities of components relative to the building.
IMPORTANT NOTE: The reverse argument does not hold true – if one cannot find one component falling in excess of free-fall then it is inconclusive; vis one cannot say it is proof that explosives were not used.
Also note that the ‘squibs’ are ejected at high velocity horizontally – and that there is plenty of dust debris and that the squibs are BELOW the floors that are at the same moment collapsing as are the squibs impulsing out. It is argued that compressed air created by floors collapsing is causing this.
This is not possible as the air pressure is dissipated in all directions including inside the building. Hence the localised pressure would be insufficient to produce the required impulsive force. Dust debris is pushed to the outer edges of stream flow and follows in the wake of pressure, simply observe a car on a dirt road.
The dust could not be accelerated beyond the front wave of the collapse which is required for it to magically travel to the next floor and emerge out of a yet-to-be-destroyed lower section.
The impulse of the squib achieves a higher velocity than the debris above it at the floors which are collapsing.
It follows; that debris was created locally to the squibs, that the velocity was far, far in excess of free-fall, and that the only possible cause was a localised impulsive, explosive, source.
One can also measure the relative distances in 9/11 Mysteries: Demolitions at www.freedocumentaries.org, see links below.
- At minutes 35:32 to 35:57 – especially at minutes 35:52.
- Using an HP Pavilion dv6000 Laptop and Michael’s transparent plastic school ruler taped to top of screen frame – (NOTE: BEWARE HP laptops – huge hassles – HP Customer Service do not service customers)
Stop/start the video and measure the vertical travel from just before the huge rightwards impulse, then start/stop when the impulse is at peak horizontal travel and measure vertical. Then measure the horizontal travel.
This yielded a horizontal measurement of 32 and a vertical of 2, i.e. horizontal travel was 16 times the vertical, which means that the average velocity is 16 times greater than average vertical. The vertical is at near free-fall for its height.
Recall one cannot impart a collision velocity greater than the velocity of the propagating body. The fact that the horizontal travel of debris was at 90 degrees to the vertical propagating force it means that the causal force for the horizontal (& vertical) force was an explosive source – a MASSIVE source.
(Is there someone suggesting that the pneumatic pressure from a ‘natural’ collapse caused this???? Surely not!)
Why is it that universities are not addressing this national/international tragedy more seriously. With all their resources the prominent works look at creating confusion/deception with simplifications, assumptions etc. and not making serious studies.
It is possible with suitable technology to triangulate key components & the towers, and from this to determine the trajectories of each component – it would accurately measure what is roughly confirmed by crude measurement with a child’s plastic ruler.
There is a large frame section falling to the left of the building which is very distinct – obtaining videos from different angles would allow triangulation of a large section of its flight path and hence allow velocities to de determined.
BUT, Universities are not doing this – instead their actions/inactions support the impression that their research is influenced strongly by finance – which is what Twin Towers collapse is all about.
Nature’s laws CANNOT be violated.
NOTES:
- Implosions are not exact science events, whilst there is control over the event there is nonetheless a margin of error in timing sequences that can cause a large multiple of sequences to accumulate errors of 1 to 2 seconds. The effect of a delay in a subsequent implosion charge going off is that the section above can become merged with a pre-imploded floor below. There can be a host of micro-effects flowing from this but nevertheless as long as the timing between successive charges is not too far out the building will collapse freely. One can observe the effects of charges mis-timing by buildings that become lopsided. Implosions are not of the exact science realm – it is very much agricultural, admittedly with hi-tech controls added to the equation but which still makes it agricultural.)
- Observations are based upon video sequences available on the web which are assumed to be genuine – but reliance is not upon absolute times on these videos but upon visual relative positions of building & components.
Claimed collapse times range between 10-12 seconds.
_________________________
The paper by Seffen does NOT explain a reasonable sequence of events that is consistent with laws of nature & evidence.
The admission by Seffen that a natural velocity profile is discontinuous means that the building could not have collapsed naturally at free-fall rate or anywhere near it – but since it did collapse at near free-fall it means an unnatural event occurred, the only logical that is consistent with the evidence is demolition/implosion.
Seffen’s paper does not explain the symmetrical collapse from asymmetrical damage.
Seffen’s explanation of impulsive forces insofar as they are claimed to have occurred naturally in both twin towers are inconsistent with the gradual & slow plasticising of the top sections that must have occurred (if indeed it did).
Seffen’s paper does not explain the large debris far distant from the towers.
Seffen’s paper does not explain components reaching ground well above free-fall rate.
Seffen’s paper does not explain the collapse of WTC7, which claim of implosion supports claims of Towers implosions.
Seffen’s paper ignored the reports of eyewitnesses or of video recordings or other evidence.
Seffen’s simple, static, non-dynamic, mathematical model does not determine accurate measurements of known evidence – instead it creates more confusion (deception?) – it is not science nor engineering.
The only explanation that satisfies all the observations & evidence of 9/11 is that explosive/demolition charges were laid prior to the planes crashing into the towers.
The only explanation for the presence of demolition charges was wilful, premeditated, murder – an Organised Crime.
The probability of the terrorists having laid the charges into the 3 buildings (some 260 floors in toto) to which they had limited, if any, access is ABSOLUTELY ZERO.
___________________
MOTIVE, MEANS, OPPORTUNITY
The 9/11 implosion claim is not ‘conspiracy theory’ but fact, it is Organised Crime.
See papers:
- ‘Organised Crime (Legal & Illegal)’
- ‘PSCGG, Tigon Shawcell – The Perfect Crime’
As stated & proven:- financial power-players, jew-mafia & christian-mafia elements, those who masquerade as members of loving-faiths, are active & globally perpetrating massive frauds & crimes. They are protected by Justice systems including UK’s Lord Chief Justice, Met Police Commissioner, SA’s first Chief Justice, & Police Commissioner (who is to be charged for links to organised crime), and so on.
(Note: see paper at www.cdadd.com, “UNODC Convention on Drugs & Crime” for proof of the United Nations covering up on the writer’s warnings about Organised Crime (Legal))
A crime scene was cleared before transparent forensic investigations could be carried out – not one USA judge or law enforcement officer, or any nation’s leader called for transparency on the investigation. Everything was covered-up.
NOT ONE USA, OR INTERNATIONAL, JUDGE CALLED FOR A PROPER INVESTIGATION & EXAMINATION OF EVIDENCE. This is concrete proof that justice systems & courts are corrupted, absolutely.
How is it that the insurance company (SR INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS INSURANCE CO. LTD) did not vigorously defend this (effective $14 Billion) insurance claim? Microsoft have wrangled for YEARS, yet this insurance company threw in the towel in under 1 year, WHY?
The answer is simple to understand:- insurance & investment companies are owned/controlled by jew-mafia & christian-mafia elements. The scam justice process was staged to simply shift ownership of a huge mass of money into their hands legally.
Still not believing? – then read ‘PSCGG Tigon Shawcell – The Perfect Crime’ to understand how the jew-mafia justices have corrupted & prostituted SA’s High Court & Constitutional Court & Constitution.
On top of that USA judges ignored public outcry that claimed a second crime (implosion, mass murder) and ordered, as reported, a $7 Billion insurance payout.
The evidence, as reported, is that the owner of the building, Larry Silverstein, had increased the insurance amount & the risk cover shortly prior to 9/11.
The reality is that the owner of the Twin Towers, Larry Silverstein, had motive, opportunity & means to perpetrate the deed, and the motive (part of – vis: insurance claim) has been fulfilled. The reality is that he has access to the jew-mafia network which has full access to intelligence information & to planning the implosion or conveniently allowing access to those that did the installation of the implosion charges.
The global jew-mafia & christian-mafia financial power-network has perpetrated & is perpetrating ongoing massive frauds & crime. Richard Branson, Donald Gordon, Lord Levy, & others are part of the same criminal power-network. So too are major international auditing/accounting firms – Price Waterhouse Coopers, Deloittes, Ernst & Young, Grant Thornton, KPMG.
Israel & the global jew-mafia are essentially one & the same – the creation of the state of Israel simply gave a focal point to the diaspora that had lost its state some 2000 years ago.
These frauds are hidden behind defective & fraudulent academic models, predominantly in the economics/business/finance areas (see Economists’ inexact models exactly defective 9 (Nobel Prize Hijacked)) – these fraudulent models, and the people financing them, are protected by corrupt justice systems & judges throughout the developed world.
It does not require too much thinking to see that Seffen’s paper assists in covering up the truth about the Twin Towers implosion by casting incomplete & inadequate ‘scientific’ research into the mass of confusion.
ASCE’s non-transparency is adding to this.
The frauds have been perfected by the fact that academic institutions have become prostituted through financial inducements. ‘Scientific’ research cannot be trusted and institutions such as Nobel Foundation & Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences have been hijacked by academics that have been bought-off and who are honouring defective & fraudulent models.
It is proven fact that the jew-mafia financial power-network is siphoning hundreds of billions of defrauded investment & other monies - and, in part, it is used to fund Israel’s never-ending wars. It follows that Israel’s intelligence & operative networks are at the disposal off or an integral part of the power-network
If a person is convicted of organised crime & his accounts cannot normally explain his assets it is deemed that the assets result from that organised crime.
Israel wages never-ending, extremely expensive, wars & has a sophisticated military infrastructure for same; Israel cannot afford this military expense from its own accounts, nor is the USA providing support for free, it is therefore deemed that Israel’s funding for its wars & military infrastructure is funded from the proceeds of Organised Crime which includes global finance frauds, mass murder as, for example, in Twin Towers.
It follows that jew-mafia/Israel had foreknowledge of the planes into the towers – this means they had advanced intelligence information regarding the crashes. It follows that either they had a source within the terrorist’s cell accessing their plans or a mole putting forward the plan.
The reason that there is such mass confusion over 9/11, and other issues, is because:-
- defective ‘scientific research’ can be used to support whatever position one wishes to sway public thinking toward by simply distorting the research to support a particular slant.
- mathematics is deceptively used and models are wrongly claimed to be scientific findings
- there is a mass of money that can pay for masses of rubbish information on the web and to pay dishonest media rags to add masses of confusion.
- engineering insight is predominantly absent from many (most) mathematical & scientific models.
There is a dearth of analyses on 9/11 to the point of splitting hairs over the meaning of statements by Silverstein & others. Put all this aside and concentrate only on fact and nature & its laws and test theoretical models against those laws and the factual evidence. Laws of nature cannot be defied!
Theoretical mathematics & science ‘research’ models that have no professional engineering insight are being funded by leading universities - but CDADD which has disproved a whole bunch of these defective & fraudulent models is not funded/rewarded.
It raises the question – are these Universities simply Accessories to Organised Crime? Answer:- Yes, Yes, Yes!!!
The determinations herein are at least sufficient to warrant the arrest of Silverstein on suspicion of a crime (mass murder) having been committed, either individually or corporately.
As regular visitors to this site will be aware - all of the statements concerning power-network frauds, collusion & corruption have been categorically proven & concrete proofs are available on this website – see Mastermind of Organised Crime, Annuities, etc. etc.
______________
It is up to readers to decide whether they believe Seffen’s intentions were entirely sincere in his attempt to model the collapse of the twin towers.
Whilst people must be encouraged to pursue research, only work that has integrity should be rewarded.
Engineering Societies should adopt full transparency, the more so in light of installation collapses/failures.
There is ample overwhelming evidence that the Twin Towers were imploded and that Silverstein had motive, means and opportunity – the video & other evidence is sufficient for a prosecution to achieve, ‘beyond a reasonable doubt’, a conviction of mass murder, or at least of culpable homicide.
BUT, a $7 Billion insurance payout can buy a whole bunch of prostituted ‘scientists’ ‘mathematicians’, ‘engineers’, to develop more obscure models as a means of defence. And there would be plenty loose change to buy a couple of judges or more.
After all, if a USA judge can award $7 Billion on a claim that stinks of Organised Crime (implosion) then it should not prove too difficult to buy an acquittal.
The USA and the rest of the developed world need to rethink & end their relationships & activities with Israel, and the jew-mafia and christian-mafia power-networks which includes Donald Gordon, Richard Branson, Lord Levy & many others.
The USA & UK are not adverse to pre-emptive strikes – what prevents them arresting these perpetrators?
The world also needs to rethink what really caused Germany to internalise evil – the Organised Crimes of Twin Towers, of financial & economy frauds, give clear insight to the kinds of causes of intensive & extensive despair within Germany that allowed Nazism to breed changing babes-in-arms to monsters. Similarly, with Russia & Communism. The jew-mafia of the time brought the anger upon loving-faith jewish people.
These global frauds & grossly defective economic models by Nash, Mundell, Phelps, Myerson, Maskin & others are part causal of what is causing the genocides & collapses of under-developed countries today
The mathematical ‘proof’ of a natural collapse of Twin Towers has been disproven! It contravenes both nature’s laws and overwhelming conclusive evidence.
The implosion of Twin Towers is proved, and that it was Organised Crime by jew-mafia & christian mafia elements, with jew-mafia & Israel being synonymous entities. It was another Perfect Crime.
If you have any concrete arguments against this paper then please contact via a link on lhs panel, thankyou.
Chris Addington Pr.Eng.
www.cdadd.com
(Under enforced exile from South Africa due to ANC government’s oppressive XDR-nazi system and oppressive economic isolation by corporate & academic worlds.
XDR = Extreme Democracy Resistant.)
http://www.debunking911.com/freefall.htm
http://www-math.mit.edu/~bazant/WTC
http://www.debunking911.com/pull.htm
http://www.debunking911.com/paper.htm
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/6987965.stm
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y9w4Wg1mYZ0&feature=related
www.freedocumentaries.org
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fEukLepgUPM&feature=related minutes 1:39, also notice the squibs.
http://www.freedocumentaries.org/film.php?id=147 9/11 Mysteries: Demolitions –
minutes 19 – 22, 34 – 37, especially 35:32 to 35:57 (measure horizontal versus vertical changes)
EMAILS TO/FROM ASCE:
dear William
thankyou sincerely for your mail
i am unable to understand the logic of asce's position
such a position effectively says that if a person/entity obstructs transparency so as to cover-up issues then it will achieve a cut-off date in which non-transparency is aided further ???????????????????????????????????
???????????????????????????????????????
with absolute sincerity i am unable to understand asce's logic.
i respectfully reiterate my request for a pdf copy
sincerelychris
Chris Addington Pr.Eng.
Nara, William wrote:
Dear Mr. Addington,
In response to infrastructure disasters, ASCE does make relevant information openly available during and after a crisis. This was done after the WTC collapse, Hurricane Katrina, and the I-35 Bridge collapse
In some cases, technical information is still available, World Trade Center Building Performance Study
http://www.fema.gov/rebuild/mat/wtcstudy.shtm
Papers related to response to and mitigation of hurricane events,
http://www.asce.org/static/hurricane/journal.cfm
ERP Report on The New Orleans Hurricane Protections System: What Went Wrong and Why
http://www.asce.org/static/hurricane/whitehouse.cfm
But for papers published years after an event, we follow our business model which is to charge for articles.
Regards,
Bill Nara
Marketing Manager, ASCE Publications
American Society of Civil Engineers
1801 Alexander Bell Drive
Reston, VA 20191
USA
Ph: 1-703-295-6163 | Fax: 1-703-295-6278
E-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Internet: http://www.pubs.asce.org | http://www.ascelibrary.org
-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Addington - Sent: Friday, March 07, 2008
12:53 AM
To: MARKETING; PERMISSIONS; MARKETING; MEMAPP
Cc: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Subject: Re: request
good morning
re keith seffen - twin tower collapse
this is an important issue as are all engineering issues - it seems strange that an official mouthpiece of the engineering profession does not post these articles openly on the website. the more so in light of bridge collapses etc. the public need to be kept informed of research
i reiterate my request for a free pdf copy of keith seffens' paper as it needs to be challenged.
sincerely
Chris Addington Pr.Eng.
Dear Sirs/Madam
I would appreciate if you would forward a pdf version of Keith Seffen's paper (details below), thankyou
sincerely
Chris Addington Pr.Eng.
EMAILS TO/FROM KEITH SEFFEN
K.A. Seffen wrote:
Now you see why I have to be guarded. Sorry, but to ask me for my CV, to then use it, potentially, to construct a slur on my capabilities (for I now see there is nothing in what you say that sits outside of the usual chanting from conspiracy theorists), is pretty poor form; and I will be keeping track of any libelous remarks. Sorry, but if you want a proper copy of the paper, please ask the journal for it. I look forward to reading your comments in due course.
On Mar 7 2008, Chris Addington wrote:
i am wanting to see background/experience versus analysis
______________________
#### UPDATE 1 ####
To: US President-Elect Barack Obama
CC: www.cdadd.com,
From Chris Addington Pr.Eng
Re:- GROSS ABUSE of USA JUSTICE PROCESS – 9/11 Guantanamo Bay inmates guilty plea
Torture, misinformation, indoctrination => LYNCHING (Judicial Murder) to cover-up a PERFECT CRIME
Why would Guantanamo 9/11 suspects plead guilty?
WHY????????
What benefit to the accused would a guilty plea bring to them? Answer: None!!!!!
See proofs regarding the defective game theory model ‘Prisoner’s Dilemma’ developed by mathematicians & by Nobel Prize (economics) winner John Nash (portrayed in the movie ‘A beautiful Mind’ by Russell Crowe) in paper ‘Economist’s Inexact Models Exactly Defective 2 (John Nash)’ at www.cdadd.com.
There are NO benefits to the defendants pleading guilty ………
So why did they?????????
The 9/11 suspects have been incarcerated for years and under oppressive & abusive circumstances
The Twin Towers did NOT collapse as a result of the planes crashing
The Twin Towers were IMPLODED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
The first-principle engineering proofs of implosion include:
- the absence of any transfer-of-momentum dynamics
- the fact that many large components reached the ground earlier than that possible through free-fall.
Hence the Towers were IMPLODED & a whole host of circumstantial evidence supports this
(see freedocumentaries.org).
(see paper www.cdadd.com, ‘Twin Towers collapse -> IMPLOSION!!!’)
The IMPLOSIONS had to have been pre-planned.
The IMPLOSIONS had to have been pre-planned with the knowledge that the planes were going to crash into them.
The new owner of TT, Larry Silverstein, obtained a grossly unjust 7+ Billion US Dollar insurance claim on buildings which he bought for a few million – this was a PERFECT CRIME ably assisted by corrupt Justice officers & judges.
Silverstein had foreknowledge of IMPLOSIONS but called it ‘pulling’.
USA Justice is performing a sham Guantanamo 9/11 trial to cover-up the truth through intent of committing a Judicial Murder (Lynching)
The US Justice system & Chief Justice Roberts are blocking communications which blocking shows their complicity in the cover-up of the 9/11 attack.
New York City Hall is also blocking communications – they too are hiding their complicity.
New York State Police are blocking communications.
The White House also are blocking communications.
As shown many, many, times before, there is a global jew-mafia & christian-mafia network (not to be confused with loving-faith Jews & Christians) behind the Twin Tower IMPLOSIONS.
The only logical explanation is that the defendants are being indoctrinated with lies so as to submit a guilty plea so as to wrongly claim credit for the ‘collapses’ (and thus wrongly imply it was caused by the plane damage)
(see A bunch of Open Letters 3, and Twin Towers collapse)
The jew-mafia & christian-mafia elements clearly want the trial to be restricted so as to avoid full evidence from being aired in open-court. If these mafia forces can implode the TT then it is likely they planted the seed of the plane crashes – it follows then, that the indoctrination of the defendants is a relatively simple task.
The Guantanamo Court is fully able to proceed with presenting evidence & proofs of IMPLOSION to the World without the defendants being present – the defendants can be afforded opportunity at a late date to see this evidence & to challenge it in open court, not in the restricted court that currently prevails.
The evidence is overwhelming that evil forces are manipulating the USA justice system so as to commit a PERFECT CRIME.
These forces are the same network of evil mafia forces that are behind: the UK’s Cash-for-Honours & Silence-for-Honours and corruption of Justice systems & officers; SA’s Pension frauds, ABSA/Barclays fraud, Arms Deal with BAe & other entities and corruption of Justice systems & officers, emasculation of Constitution; and so on.
If President-Elect Obama remains silent on this Justice Abuse issue & silent on the TRUTH regarding the IMPLOSION of the Twin Towers then the USA will NOT reform.
God will NOT reward dishonesty (active or passive)
Change We Need – Change In Deed
Chris Addington Pr. Eng.
www.cdadd.com
(Under enforced exile from South Africa due to ANC government’s oppressive XDR-nazi system and oppressive economic isolation by corporate & academic worlds.
Also under severe economic oppression due to Ireland & UK government dishonesty.
XDR = Extreme Democracy Resistant.)
#### END of UPDATE 1 ####
______________________________________________
#### UPDATE 2 ####
Two recent papers have been published regarding ‘mathematical’ proofs concerning the Twin Towers:
- Descent curves and the phases of collapse of WTC 7;
Charles M. BECK, (Dated: July 26, 2009)
(http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/0806/0806.4792v4.pdf)
- HOW DID THE WTC TOWERS COLLAPSE: A NEW THEORY;
A.S. Usmani, Y.C.Chung and J.L.Torero
School of Engineering and Electronics, University of Edinburgh,
(www.era.lib.ed.ac.uk/bitstream/1842/1216/1/WTCpaper.pdf)
Charles Beck concludes correctly that TT were destroyed in a controlled manner despite major errors in analysis; whilst A Usmani Y Chung & J Torero conclude incorrectly whilst also analysing incorrectly.
Both make the same mistakes of failing to understand that mathematics does not prove Nature; Nature PROVES whether the mathematics correctly interprets/explains Nature.
Whilst research must be encouraged there is a distinct lack of credibility within academic institutions due to the FAILURE to correctly apply first-principles in determining the veracity of ‘research’ papers.
The paper by Usmani, Chung & Torero is not worth commenting upon.
Charles Beck’s research argues that the lower section of the Twin Towers between ground & around the 28 metre level was annihilated first, thus allowing the top sections to fall (in stages) at free-fall rate.
Observation of videos (see freedocumentaries.org) show clearly that this was not the case – the lower sections were the last to be destroyed.
However both papers fail to explain how large components can be ejected with IMMENSE force outwards & sequentially (from top downwards). Both papers FAIL to explain how these immense forces came about in the manner they are viewed as occurring.
To reiterate:
The Twin Towers were IMPLODED and this is PROVED by observing the fist-principles of engineering that:
1. ‘Transfer-of- Momentum’ was absent – this means that additional high impulse forces ejected large components forcibly – this was sequential. High impulse = EXPLOSION; sequential = IMPLOSION
2. Free-fall rate – this means that the numerous impedances (that held the buildings up) had to have been removed for free-fall to be achieved. These impedances could only be removed by immense impulse forces & sequentially = IMPLOSION.
QED!!!
No mathematics are required beyond these observations & applications of engineering first-principles – i.e. the applications of first-principles PROVES the IMPLOSIONS!!!!
(An aside: It is interesting to note that the US Justice system, headed up by Ch Justice John Roberts, is more concerned about harassing a nerd hacker (Gary McKinnon) suffering from Asperger's syndrome rather than prosecuting Larry Silverstein for complicit in the Twin Towers implosions.
The US Justice system is as corrupted & prostituted as others elsewhere throughout the world)
Chris Addington Pr.Eng.
(Under enforced exile from South Africa due to ANC government’s oppressive XDR-nazi system and oppressive economic isolation by corporate & academic world’s.)
XDR = Extreme Democracy Resistant.
#### END OF UPDATE 2 ####
_____________________________________________________
#### UPDATE 3 ####
Beyond Osama? (& Beyond Will & Kate's pomp & ceremony)
As before, the lies continue!
We are informed by USA President Barack Obama, and later by UK Prime Minister David Cameron, that Osama bin Laden was killed in a covert US special forces operation; and was later buried at sea after a religious funeral - but no evidence to prove all of this, the official line from Obama being that the photos are too gruesome & would incite others to violence.!?.!?.!?.!?
How can we possibly believe President Obama (or PM Cameron) when he refuses to tell the truth about the Twin Towers implosions, or about the BP/Deepwater Horizon sabotage?
There is nothing preventing President Obama permitting limited viewing of the photos & other evidence by appropriately qualified people, including the writer, to give greater certainty.
The old photos & videos that have been released are unconvincing - these could easily be staged 'lookalikes', or graphically altered sequences.
Whether you believe Obama or not, about the killing of Osama (or about TT, or BP/Deepwater), is immaterial to the reality that the East is polarising from the West due to the West's continued economy aggressions & oppressions, and backed-up by military gunslingers.
Osama bin Laden was simply one of billions angered by the West’s aggressions & oppressions.
Today’s communications permits ease of live-access to world events.
Two days prior to Osama’s killing, Prince William & Catherine (Kate) Middleton's wedding was transmitted globally and including into the vast impoverished nations throughout the world. Instant pomp & ceremony images (despite the slumming-down with PUV minibuses replacing historical ornate carriages) reinforced in the minds of billions of people the fact that their position is vastly poorer than those in the West.
Those billions feel the difference and have their feelings confirmed by visual images of the West's pomp & ceremony & wealth. There is little likelihood that they understand that the historical causes stem from the West's centuries of overt enslavements & plunderings, and now covert plunderings in the form of aggressive & oppressive economy enslavements. The 'little likelihood' is due to their uneducated status which leaves them susceptible to popular leadership & angry retaliations, which is tagged by the West as 'terrorism'.
It is unlikely that the West is going to change as Barack Obama still refuses to tell the truth that the Twin Towers were imploded. Nor will Cameron. Muslims must continue to bear the lies that Obama & Cameron continue to support. The victims of Twin Towers implosions also remain buried under these lies.
(Nature’s Laws cannot ever be defied. The absence of 'transfer of momentum' dynamics - observe this real dynamic with a 5-ball Newton frame - from the Twin Towers destruction sequences, amply viewable on youtube & elsewhere, confirms that additional high-impulse (explosive), and many explosives, and sequential had to have occurred - which, by definition, is an implosion. Implosions had to have occurred BECAUSE 'transfer of momentum' dynamics are absent - and the viewable evidence confirms this CONCRETE fact)
The CONCRETE fact that the TT Towers were imploded means that there were 2 distinctly separate but sequential (as occurred) events for each of the towers - 1. the plane crashes, 2. the implosions. It follows that the 2 events were co-ordinated; it is so-far-beyond-a-reasonable-doubt (i.e. a certainty) that Osama could not have planned the implosions; BUT the two events were sequential, it follows that some other person/s planned the implosions AND the plane crashes; AND defeated the ENTIRE security/intelligence/defence capabilities & protections of the USA. Osama could NOT have done this. It was an inside job & the owner of TT Towers, Larry Silverstein, is prime suspect as being one of those complicit.
Jim Garrison’s investigation into John F Kennedy's assassination brought out the truths of complex intertwined involvement by numerous members of the USA's defence, security & intelligence organisations - involvement was long, deep & wide. And the cover-up by the then US Chief Justice Earl Warren, under his chairmanship of the Warren Commission, confirmed complicity within the Justice function.
(Jim Garrison, ex US District Attorney, later Louisianan Appeal Judge - On the Trail of the Assassins)
Garrison rightly identifies Kennedy's assassination as a coup d'etat - for which there are 5 crucial components necessary for success (these apply to any power-play, government, corporate, social etc., not solely to assassinations)
1. extensive planning & preparation by the sponsors; 2. the collaboration of the 'Praetorian Guard' (the President's security providers); 3. a diversionary cover-up afterwards; 4. the ratification of the assassination by the new government(authority) inheriting power; 5. the dissemination of disinformation by major elements of the media.
All components were & still are present regarding Twin Towers & BP/Deepwater crimes. The altering or staging of photos/videos of Osama is very easy compared to the elaborate & lengthy 'sheepdipping' set-up that was constructed around Oswald by USA State Security/Intelligence members
The fact that Al Qaeda, as reported by the media, have acknowledged the killing of Osama does not mean that this is not simply another deception, disinformation, by the original sponsors of, and/or the successive governmental powers subsequent to, the TT implosions.
The CONCRETE evidence of the absence of 'transfer of momentum' dynamics is the proof of implosions AND the proofs of subsequent lies.
Today’s USA Chief Justice John G Roberts' complicity in the cover-up of the Twin Towers implosions confirms that long/wide/deep-standing corruption within USA's government still exists. The, supposed, independency between the Executive, Legislative & Judicative components of a government is fragile - corruption, or dishonesty, unchecked, in one component quickly seeps into all - without fail.
President Richard Nixon's ignominious departure from office for lying appears not to present as a deterrent for successors.
It cannot be ruled out, but is more likely a high probability, that Obama's claim of the killing of Osama is simply an elaborate deception to justify a face-saving bail-out of a costly decade-long manhunt - and for a man that was set-up just as was the extremely elaborate, lengthy & complex set-up of Lee Harvey Oswald over Kennedy's assassination.
It cannot be ruled out that previous video sequences of Osama are in fact staged-performances coupled with sophisticated computer-graphic manipulations, to 'justify' the decades-long hunt for bin Laden - i.e. to justify war; just as Lyndon Johnson, in reversing Kennedy's policies, mere hours after Kennedy's death, quickly put the USA into the Vietnam war.
Deception, as a strategic & tactical method of warfare, hot & cold, and for crime, has become highly sophisticated since pioneered by Dudley Clarke early in WWII - yuppie Presidents & PMs are no match for the skilled operators/manipulators that engage Deception. Consequently Obama's, & Cameron's, views regarding the killing of Osama are unqualified.
Regardless - the latest claim, of killing Osama, will cause cloning of new leaders because the real, underlying economy aggressions & oppressions imposed by the West are what is constantly fuelling intense anger - which provides the followers.
As the writer has warned Obama & Cameron & others before - Nineveh was destroyed not because God 'smote' it, but because Nineveh was dishonest - Nineveh stole Jonah's Intellectual Property (message from God), Nineveh did not pay fair reward for Jonah's efforts, regardless of the message-delivery being God directed.
Even atheists cannot dispute that at least a virtual god exists, simply because billions believe that He does - and the destruction of Nineveh is historical record, fact; hence there must have been reasons why Nineveh was destroyed - the reasons were simple; dishonesty, dishonesty, dishonesty & more dishonesty -> imposing economy aggressions & oppressions.....
The East is polarising from the West for simple reasons ..........
........... dishonesty imposing economy aggressions & oppressions - imposed by the West’s catastrophically destructive economy models which are based upon massively destructive government policies, which are based upon grossly defective science, which are developed by dishonest scientists that avoid engaging with engineering - and dishonest scientists are funded by global Finance Powers which also manipulate Parliaments/Houses.
The electorate are equally manipulated by Finance Powers through media channels under their control.
(e.g.: The media Deception strategy of misinforming the electorate about the (premature) AV referendum caused much confusion to the extent that the electorate did not recognise that the AV simply gave each & every voter a democratic FPTP (first past the post) system by merely selecting only one choice in any election, if a voter wanted a democratic AV then they simply choose other preference alternatives. The Deception confusion was so great that those that stood to gain the most, such as BNP, called for a NO)
Cameron’s move to appease Muslim's by appointing Muslim clerics to the House of Lords simply puts puppets on display as a wedge to further splintering amongst societal groups.
Obama & Cameron refuse to change to constructive Economy Engineering, which would bring about greater economy stability - instead they prefer to chuck missiles, bombs & bullets into compounds, killing children amongst others.
Obama & Cameron are criminals BECAUSE they do not fund/reward Economy Engineering, pioneered by CDADD, but instead happily fund the chucking of explosives which are killing children & other civilians.
Some twelve weeks ago NA & ME were peaceful tourist-filled places, now Obama & Cameron get their kicks dumping explosives - one can almost sense the intense tingle in their nerve-ends as they reach orgasmic climax ejaculating phallic missiles at children.
Not telling the truth is at least as, if not more, destructive as telling lies.
Not telling the truth about the TT Towers created an icon (Osama) that will continue to spawn other clones whilst the real Masterminds behind the TT plane crashes & implosions get off scot-free.
The Lone Ranger (GeorgeW) & his side-kick Tonto (Tony) really stuffed-up - BIG TIME! - and now Laurel (BarackO) & Hardy (DavidC), in not telling the truth, continue the clowning (& cloning)
The World is moving closer to crashing into World War IV (Hot) - only sound Economy Engineering can avert.
Chris Addington Pr.Eng.
www.cdadd.com, (currently unlawfully, criminally & abusively gagged/censored by SA ISP Diamatrix.co.za & USA ISP Softlayer.com)
Ireland ISP UPC.ie are also unlawfully, criminally interfering & blocking communications
(Under enforced exile from South Africa due to ANC government’s oppressive XDR-nazi system and oppressive economic isolation by corporate & academic world’s.)
XDR = Extreme Democracy Resistant.
To President Barack Obama & Prime Minister David Cameron
CC: as per addressees
May 13 (Friday), 2011
Dear Sirs
Re: Taliban revenge attack on Pakistan paramilitary academy (May 12/13, 2011) – only Economy Engineering will solve the increasing East/West tensions
This morning BBC interviewed former Pakistan army Lt Gen Talat Masood who stated (to effect) that a military solution was not the solution & that the USA (& West) need to look at Pakistan's problems from a (com)passionate perspective.
As I have repeatedly pointed out to you both, & your predecessors, Pakistan is not the problem, nor are any of the other marginalised un/under-developed nations. The problem is the West's gang-banging attitude towards the rest-of-the-world in both destroying economic upliftment & preventing upliftment. And, when anger explodes (understandably! justifiably?) into violence then the West dump missiles/bombs/bullets onto people, killing children & others.
The truth is that you are both refusing to engage with the constructive Economy Engineering that I have pioneered & still am pioneering - you refuse to accept the CONCRETE EVIDENCE that I have researched which disproves various & numerous economics & physics models to which you both and your advisors have wrongly long-held – instead of rightfully funding me & my ongoing R&D you both instead wrongfully spend billions of dollars/sterling on dumping missiles/bombs/bullets onto people & children - I am a lone voice against the mountains-of-voices that are presenting grossly defective advice to you both and you are both afraid to accept that they are wrong because you both take comfort in numbers & not in the substance of concrete proofs that I, as a lone-voice, submit.
I am a lone-voice because you both refuse to fund/reward the concrete proofs & Intellectual Property that I have presented. Consequently you both only listen to defective theories, which is a recipe for disaster, which is what is unfolding around the World.
Please have your advisors put their theories to me (if they have the courage to do so) & I will single-handedly take ALL of them on AND prove them wrong.
Lt Gen Talat Masood recognises that the West is (principally) at fault (that is the true import of his message) even though he does not know the technical reasons why this is so. Failure by the West to respond to Masood’s call will simply show the West to be disinterested & which will polarise the East further.
I respectfully point out that Economy Engineering is the ONLY constructive way forward to solving the increasing East/West tensions, and that requires honesty & transparency.
I respectfully urge you both once again to correctly engage with the Economy Engineering that I am pioneering.
Sincerely
Chris Addington Pr.Eng.
www.cdadd.com, (currently unlawfully, criminally & abusively gagged/censored by SA ISP Diamatrix.co.za & USA ISP Softlayer.com)
Ireland ISP UPC.ie are also unlawfully, criminally interfering & blocking communications
(Under enforced exile from South Africa due to ANC government’s oppressive XDR-nazi system and oppressive economic isolation by corporate & academic world’s.)
XDR = Extreme Democracy Resistant.
#### END OF UPDATE 3 ####
__________________________________________________
#### UPDATE 4 ####
Beyond Osama 2 – Obama Talking to the Taliban? – and the Irish
On Sunday May 22, 2011, BBC presented a tame interview of Barack Obama with a nodding interviewer (Andrew Marr) – in which Obama broached the issue of talking to the Taliban – and setting some basic pre-conditions for same, amongst which was renouncement of & turning away from violence, and breaking links with Al-Qaeda.
The following day (Monday May 23, 2011) Barack Obama visited Ireland and made a truly inspiring speech from Dublin’s College Green – a speech that was full of promise & hope.
But, as with all great speeches of the past that promised future prosperity they always failed to bring it on, Obama’s speech will fail – and that is because we do not properly understand the economy environment that brought about the Global Economy Meltdown, but more importantly we do not know what man-made economy environment we need to make to achieve a future of prosperity & greatly diminished disparities.
Albert Einstein’s thinking was truly great – but it also turns out to be wrong – as CDADD has demonstrated, e does not equal mc squared - because the environment throughout which the universe functions was not properly understood Einstein also misunderstood & reached an incorrect conclusion – we do not properly understand the God-made environment in which we exist.
The reasons for our limited understandings of the universe’s functioning as made by God or for our limited understanding & development of optimal man-made Economy Systems & Controls stems from centuries of dishonesty in academic institutions & societies.
Consequently, Barack Obama has nothing to offer the Taliban even if he were to arrange talks. The Taliban are not fighting for no reason at all – they are fighting because of centuries of oppressions imposed by the West to supplement/advance the West’s voracious lifestyle.
Matters will not change for the better unless & until honesty is forthcoming – Merit needs to be funded/rewarded so as to free up the dishonesty in academia, so that sound engineered Economy Systems & Controls can be developed & implemented so as to achieve real prosperity with greatly diminished & diminishing reliance upon disparities.
Still today the governments of USA, UK, SA, Ireland & Euroland continue to steal CDADD’s Intellectual Property that has disproved Einstein’s theories & other physics theories and numerous Nobel Prize wining Economics models.
Unless & until President Barack Obama, PM David Cameron, President Jacob Zuma, Taoiseach Enda Kenny & other Euroland leaders correctly reward/fund CDADD for past stolen IP then there will be a continual block to constructive development of sound engineered Economy solutions.
And without sound Economy Engineering there can be no hope of determining optimally designed Economy Systems & Controls that will optimally achieve real prosperity for all.
And without sound Economy Engineering President Barack Obama’s truly inspiring Ireland speech will also be a failed event.
Chris Addington Pr.Eng.
www.cdadd.com, (currently unlawfully, criminally & abusively gagged/censored by SA ISP Diamatrix.co.za & USA ISP Softlayer.com)
Ireland ISP UPC.ie are also unlawfully, criminally interfering & blocking communications
(Under enforced exile from South Africa due to ANC government’s oppressive XDR-nazi system and oppressive economic isolation by corporate & academic world’s.)
XDR = Extreme Democracy Resistant.
#### END OF UPDATE 4 ####
__________________________________________________