Open Letter To - Ireland President Catherine Connolly
And To: Judicial Council
CC: Taoiseach Micheal Martin, Dail, www.cdadd.com & general
From: Chris Addington Pr.Eng.
WedsNov11,2025
Constitutional Repugnancies – violations of UDHR - Nazi Ideologies – Judicial Hitler – Submissions to Judicial Council and International & EU Courts of Justice for Directions/Remedies – call for Donal O'Donnell's immediate resignation from Chief Justice & Judiciary
Ireland is a gorgeous, warm & welcoming Country, but a Country that is severely oppressed, as can be seen with the increasing Socio-Economic chaos which stems from a century of oppressions since Independence, culminating in the development of the Constitution based on Nazi ideology
-----------------
Appended:
Links at www.cdadd.com
References to 'Repugnant' within Ireland Constitution
Relevant Articles of the Constitution
---------------
I draw attention in general to papers on my Professional Engineering website www.cdadd.com, and specifically (links below) to those concerning GROSS JUSTICE VIOLATIONS pertaining to Ireland Constitution, which was developed up to & promulgated in 1937 and was based upon Nazi Ideology, that was rampant at that time.
Those specific papers set out a broad background to the present circumstances whereby seemingly covert passive Nazi Ideology has now shifted to active overt Nazi Ideology, in that the present Chief Justice, Donal O'Donnell has effectively criminally, treasonously elevated himself to a position that can only be described as a 'Judicial Hitler', and this so as to suppress a MASS of Human Rights/Criminal violations (as per SC 158/17), which matter was rejected for Leave To Appeal, as it addressed systemic & systematic Justice Abuses/Treasons throughout Ireland's Judiciary, covers-up of Child Groomings, Adolescent Groomings, Adult Groomings ALL for the furtherance of Frauds, Subornations, Perjuries, Thefts, Frauds, Fabrications of Evidence, …... etc., etc.,
The purpose herein is NOT to address the underlying issues within SC158/17 other than to highlight the numerous & significant HR violations, but to address the now century-old Nazi Ideology that has been further entrenched by O'Donnell's Treasons Against Humanity – wherein he treasonously conspired with Supreme Court Registrar John Mahon to interfere in a Lawful Justice Service Process of Int&EU Court papers (Lawful Papers) on Donal O'Donnell in his personal capacity & in his official capacity as Chief Justice, in the Supreme Court on December 2, 2025.
Wherein Mahon further contrived & coerced a Garda Sergeant & Garda Constable to unlawfully, criminally interfere with that Lawful Justice Service Process – and contrived with that Sergeant to falsely bring a criminal charge & later to perjure himself; and later for a Judge, John Hughes, to complicity engage with this TREASON AGAINST HUMANITY, and the more so since he & ALL Judges had been prior informed (as was President Higgins & Government & Dail) through the newly formed Judicial Council via their @judiciary.ie email addresses.
The purpose herein is to address the TREASONOUS actions by O'Donnell & Mahon, in unlawfully, criminally, treasonously interfering with a Lawful Justice Service Process of International & EU Court Papers on O'Donnell in both his private & official capacities, and to implement immediate measures to remedy & defeat any further such HR violations.
This treasonous act by O'Donnell → TREASON AGAINST HUMANITY – is the 'silent pen' action by O'Donnell through which he sought to raise himself to the position of a Judicial Hitler, which situation is now in FULL FORCE&EFFECT throughout Ireland => a Nazi State!!!.
To understand how such TREASONOUS ACTS could occur it is first necessary that you, Madam President, and Judicial Council Members, read the papers as linked below - which, as prior stated, sets out how Ireland Constitution became aligned (deviously so) to Nazi Ideology.
The purpose herein is to address remedies so as to rectify the treasonous acts by O'Donnell and to provide measures to prevent future occurrences, thereby to justify O'Donnell's removal from Office, and to ensure Appeal Hearing of SC 158/17.
It would be appropriate if O'Donnell immediately resigned from his Office & Judiciary
The OVER-RIDING clause of the Constitution is Art34.1 'Justice shall be administered …'
All Laws, including the remainder of the Constitution is SUBORDINATE to that Clause 34.1 – thus there is NO EXCUSE for any Judge to abuse and/or corrupt the Justice System – BUT, abuse & corruption is SYSTEMIC & SYSTEMATIC throughout the entire of Ireland's Judiciary.
The Constitution refers to 'Repugnancies', the function of the Attorney general & 'other body' & 'court of summary jurisdiction' – see appended extracts below.
Briefly- The Constitution (wherein these deceptive clauses, lie the means by which Nazi Ideology is entrenched):
Oireachtas (Parliament) cannot pass any law that is repugnant to the Constitution; any law that is repugnant is only invalid to the extent of that repugnancy; the President shall not sign any Bill containing any repugnancy so determined by the Supreme Court; the President need only sign a Bill 6 days after Supreme Court has declared 'NOT repugnant'
The Courts Art 34.1 Justice shall be administered in courts established by law by judges
The Attorney General Art 30.3 All crimes and offences prosecuted in any court constituted under Article 34 of this Constitution other than a court of summary jurisdiction shall be prosecuted in the name of the People and at the suit of the Attorney General or some other person authorised in accordance with law to act for that purpose.
therein. these deceptive clauses. lie the means by which Nazi Ideology is entrenched
For, anyone who steps out-of-line with the prevailing political/authority ideology can be dragged into a court of 'summary jurisdiction', i.e. a court wherein the 'police' are DIRECTLY CONNECTED to the Judiciary → by DEFINITION a POLICE STATE!
BUT, a Police State that was developed with Nazi ideology at the forefront within the Constitution (1937), thus → a Nazi state with a GESTAPO FORCE.
→ thus a person can be unlawfully removed from Society
BUT, the formation of the United Nations and the inception of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) (1948) rendered the Constitution INVALID from that very point of inception of the UDHR - but the UDHR was effectively ignored by ALL Western Nations – a cute document, but too troublesome to deal with.
As a consequence, Ireland continued as a Nazi State and with the Church acting as a spy-network through the confessional box & other abusive measures, much sexual due to inappropriate persons being forced, through economic circumstances, into the Church, thus into a sexual-vacuum, and the cause of later & increasing sex-crimes.
Whilst the past 2 decades has largely curbed the evils of the spy-network, the point remains that the underlying Nazi Ideology is still in full-force; and this is further entrenched with the inception of the Judicial Council, and more so with O'Donnell's actions to elevate himself to 'Judicial Hitler'.
The Judicial Council should NOT be seen as a protective body but a body that entrenches Nazi Tyranny & through the ABSOLUTE POWER of the Judiciary – and this is clearly seen with O'Donnell's TREASONOUS actions in: (a) redacting the Bangalore Principles which was the very Foundation for the Judicial Council; (b) interfering with Lawful Justice Service Process in Higher (Int&EU) Courts (notice of this treasonous action was circulated to ALL Judges (@judiciary.ie) and to Dail & other Parliaments, and to Pres Higgins on Feb19,2025)
The Judicial Council is structured on Corporate Governance (CG) – but CG was developed by Mervyn King, (KingReports I, II, III) an SA ex-HighCourt Judge who developed CG as a first-line of defence for corporate criminals. And King was instrumental in globalising Pension Frauds & defrauding the Automobile Association in SA out of the Kyalami F1 Racetrack – in short: Corporate Governance is DESIGNED to entrench corporate Organised Crime (corpOrgCrime)
The Judiciary, and now the Judicial Council, use these abusive CG measures to entrench their ABSOLUTE POWERS that render Ireland a Nazi State.
Measures to Rectify & Prevent
Clearly the Constitution is designed to PREVENT the Office of the President from interfering with Government and, more importantly, the Judiciary in regard to any abuses, regardless of whether intentional or not. This in itself is why O'Donnell felt confident in his TREASONOUS ACTS.
BUT, the over-riding Article in the Constitution is that of Art 34 'Justice shall be administered ...' – and it is on this point that anyone&everyone, including the President, is empowered - No, COMPELLED!!! - to raise objection to O'Donnell's TREASONOUS ACTS, not only through the Judicial Council, even though it is simply a council controlled by O'Donnell, the abuser himself, but also to raise objection through Int&EU Courts – to remedy & prevent, and to address the numerous underlying Judicial Abuses & Crimes in SC158/17.
For, anything that unlawfully, unreasonable diminishes 'Justice; is, by DEFINITION → REPUGNANT.
Also, O'Donnell has purposefully redacted the Bangalore Principles, the Foundation of the JC, so as to maintain Nazi Power within the Judiciary (one only has to sit in any Court, observe & understand)
In addition to submitting objections to the JC, it is necessary to file applications to ALL the International & EU Courts
It is also important to recognise that the Nuremberg & Tokyo War Crimes Trials made clear that 'following orders', howsoever constructed, is no defence, for unlawful acts by subordinates, against prosecutions for Crimes/Treasons Against Humanity
Conclusion:
Ireland's Constitution is NOT fit-for-purpose, it never was – Separation-of-Powers, especially removal of Police from DIRECT connection to Judiciary, is critical.
The 'other body' i.e. Director of Public Prosecutions MUST intervene in ALL Court Processes, between Judiciary & Police, thus separating Powers; and measures must be immediately introduced to allow for challenges to the Director on any Prosecution matter prior to Trial (see SA & DRC Constitutions)
The Judicial Council must have INDEPENDENT oversight and the COURAGE to challenge Judicial abuses, and the Bangalore Principles FULLY INSTATED..
In addition, the President needs take immediate steps for O'Donnell's removal from Office via the Dail, and, ideally, to call for O'Donnell to resign immediately; and to initiate actions in the Int&EU Courts against O'Donnell.
It should also be noted that the Constitution cannot in any way obstruct the President from any of these actions as the War Crimes Trial Judgments make clear that 'following orders' (or any Constitutional restraints) cannot prevent Lawful Actions.
To reiterate:
The purpose is to address remedies so as to rectify the Treasonous Acts by O'Donnell and to provide measures to prevent future occurrences, thereby to justify O'Donnell's removal from Office, and to ensure Appeal Hearing.
To achieve this Ireland President Catherine Connolly must engage the International & EU Courts – immediately
AND
the Judicial Council & Judiciary must take immediate steps to remedy
Sincerely
Chris Addington Pr.Eng.
+353 (0)86 168 4318, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.,
Appended:
Links at www.cdadd.com
https://cdadd.com/legal/200-ireland-s-role-in-global-chaos
https://cdadd.com/legal/190-icj-climate-change-hearings-set-for-dec-2-2024-submission-of-opinion & 5 addendums)
https://cdadd.com/legal/204-treasons-against-humanity-by-international-eu-national-courts-united-nations
https://cdadd.com/legal/202-echr-court-new-evidence-r39-interim-application
(note – boldings, enlargements by writer)
References to 'Repugnant' within Ireland Constitution
(CONSTITUTION AND POWERS) ARTICLE 15
4 1 The Oireachtas shall not enact any law which is in any respect repugnant to this Constitution or any provision thereof.
4.2 Every law enacted by the Oireachtas which is in any respect repugnant to this Constitution or to any provision thereof, shall, but to the extent only of such repugnancy, be invalid.
(Reference of Bills to the Supreme Court) ARTICLE 26
1 1° The President may, after consultation with the Council of State, refer any Bill to which this Article applies to the Supreme Court for a decision on the question as to whether such Bill or any specified provision or provisions of such Bill is or are repugnant to this Constitution or to any provision thereof.
3 1° In every case in which the Supreme Court decides that any provision of a Bill the subject of a reference to the Supreme Court under this Article is repugnant to this Constitution or to any provision thereof, the President shall decline to sign such Bill.
(Reference of Bills to the People) ARTICLE 27
4.2 If the Bill or any provision thereof is or has been referred to the Supreme Court under Article 26 of this Constitution, it shall not be obligatory on the President to consider the petition unless or until the Supreme Court has pronounced a decision on such reference to the effect that the said Bill or the said provision thereof is not repugnant to this Constitution or to any provision thereof, and, if a decision to that effect is pronounced by the Supreme Court, it shall not be obligatory on the President to pronounce his decision on the petition before the expiration of six days after the day on which the decision of the Supreme Court to the effect aforesaid is pronounced.
Relevant Articles of the Constitution
(THE COURTS) ARTICLE 34
1 Justice shall be administered in courts established by law by judges appointed in the manner provided by this Constitution, and, save in such special and limited cases as may be prescribed by law, shall be administered in public.
ARTICLE 34.6.1 Every person appointed a judge under this Constitution shall make and subscribe the following declaration:
"In the presence of Almighty God I do solemnly and sincerely promise and declare that I will duly and faithfully and to the best of my knowledge and power execute the office of Chief Justice (or as the case may be) without fear or favour, affection or ill-will towards any man, and that I will uphold the Constitution and the laws. May God direct and sustain me."
(THE ATTORNEY GENERAL) ARTICLE 30
3 All crimes and offences prosecuted in any court constituted under Article 34 of this Constitution other than a court of summary jurisdiction shall be prosecuted in the name of the People and at the suit of the Attorney General or some other person authorised in accordance with law to act for that purpose.